Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS according to HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT()
Comments below -Original Message- From: Roper, Matthew D Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 2:17 PM To: Vudum, Lakshminarayana Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS according to HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT() Looks like the logs links finally work (there was probably a big backlog to upload them after the gitlab downtime). The module_reload log shows and ext4 filesystem panic (not graphics-related). The syncobj_basic failure is an unexpected incomplete; no graphics errors in the log that I can see, although logs of periodic non-graphics warnings from xhci_hcd. Matt On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 01:21:49PM -0700, Vudum, Lakshminarayana wrote: > I am unable to load both the failures? Is there any other way to get these > failures? > > -Original Message- > From: Roper, Matthew D > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 1:07 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Vudum, Lakshminarayana > Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS > according to HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT() > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 07:20:48PM +, Patchwork wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS according to > > HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT() > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/105010/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11753_full -> Patchwork_105010v1_full > > > > > > Summary > > --- > > > > **FAILURE** > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_105010v1_full absolutely > > need to be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in Patchwork_105010v1_full, please notify your bug team to > > allow them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in > > CI. > > > > > > > > Participating hosts (13 -> 13) > > -- > > > > No changes in participating hosts > > > > Possible new issues > > --- > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > > Patchwork_105010v1_full: > > > > ### IGT changes ### > > > > Possible regressions > > > > * igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection: > > - shard-snb: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] > >[1]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-snb5/igt@i915_module_l...@reload-with-fault-injection.html > >[2]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-snb5/igt@i915_module_l...@reload-with-fault-injection.html > > Lakshmi: This failure is same as https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6201 > > * igt@syncobj_basic@bad-create-flags: > > - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][3] > >[3]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-skl3/igt@syncobj_ba...@bad-create-flags.html > Lakshmi: We have a bug for similar signature https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2295 ' This test didn't produce any output. The machine probably rebooted ungracefully.' > The failure logs for the two hits above don't seem to have been uploaded > to the server so I can't see exactly what went wrong. However this > patch is modifying xehp_sseu_info_init() which only gets executed on > Xe_HP-based platforms, so it would not change the behavior of SNB or > SKL. > > > Matt > > > > > > > Known issues > > > > > > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_105010v1_full that come from > > known issues: > > > > ### CI changes ### > > > > Issues hit > > > > * boot: > > - shard-apl: ([PASS][4], [PASS][5], [PASS][6], [PASS][7], > > [PASS][8], [PASS][9], [PASS][10], [PASS][11], [PASS][12], [PASS][13], > > [PASS][14], [PASS][15], [PASS][16], [PASS][17], [PASS][18], [PASS][19], > > [PASS][20], [PASS][21], [PASS][22], [PASS][23], [PASS][24], [PASS][25], > > [PASS][26], [PASS][27], [PASS][28]) -> ([PASS][29], [PASS][30], [FAIL][31], > > [PASS][32], [PASS][33], [PASS][34], [PASS][35], [PASS][36], [PASS][37], > > [PASS][38], [PASS][39], [PASS][40], [PASS][41], [PASS][42], [PASS][43], > > [PASS][44], [PASS][45], [PASS][46], [PASS][47], [PASS][48], [PASS][49], > > [PASS][50], [PASS][51], [PASS][52], [PASS][53]) ([i915#4386]) > >[4]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html > >[5]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html > >[6]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html > >[7]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html > >[8]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html > >[9]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html > >[10]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS according to HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT()
Looks like the logs links finally work (there was probably a big backlog to upload them after the gitlab downtime). The module_reload log shows and ext4 filesystem panic (not graphics-related). The syncobj_basic failure is an unexpected incomplete; no graphics errors in the log that I can see, although logs of periodic non-graphics warnings from xhci_hcd. Matt On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 01:21:49PM -0700, Vudum, Lakshminarayana wrote: > I am unable to load both the failures? Is there any other way to get these > failures? > > -Original Message- > From: Roper, Matthew D > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 1:07 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Vudum, Lakshminarayana > Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS > according to HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT() > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 07:20:48PM +, Patchwork wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS according to > > HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT() > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/105010/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11753_full -> Patchwork_105010v1_full > > > > > > Summary > > --- > > > > **FAILURE** > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_105010v1_full absolutely > > need to be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in Patchwork_105010v1_full, please notify your bug team to > > allow them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in > > CI. > > > > > > > > Participating hosts (13 -> 13) > > -- > > > > No changes in participating hosts > > > > Possible new issues > > --- > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > > Patchwork_105010v1_full: > > > > ### IGT changes ### > > > > Possible regressions > > > > * igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection: > > - shard-snb: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] > >[1]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-snb5/igt@i915_module_l...@reload-with-fault-injection.html > >[2]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-snb5/igt@i915_module_l...@reload-with-fault-injection.html > > > > * igt@syncobj_basic@bad-create-flags: > > - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][3] > >[3]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-skl3/igt@syncobj_ba...@bad-create-flags.html > > The failure logs for the two hits above don't seem to have been uploaded > to the server so I can't see exactly what went wrong. However this > patch is modifying xehp_sseu_info_init() which only gets executed on > Xe_HP-based platforms, so it would not change the behavior of SNB or > SKL. > > > Matt > > > > > > > Known issues > > > > > > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_105010v1_full that come from > > known issues: > > > > ### CI changes ### > > > > Issues hit > > > > * boot: > > - shard-apl: ([PASS][4], [PASS][5], [PASS][6], [PASS][7], > > [PASS][8], [PASS][9], [PASS][10], [PASS][11], [PASS][12], [PASS][13], > > [PASS][14], [PASS][15], [PASS][16], [PASS][17], [PASS][18], [PASS][19], > > [PASS][20], [PASS][21], [PASS][22], [PASS][23], [PASS][24], [PASS][25], > > [PASS][26], [PASS][27], [PASS][28]) -> ([PASS][29], [PASS][30], [FAIL][31], > > [PASS][32], [PASS][33], [PASS][34], [PASS][35], [PASS][36], [PASS][37], > > [PASS][38], [PASS][39], [PASS][40], [PASS][41], [PASS][42], [PASS][43], > > [PASS][44], [PASS][45], [PASS][46], [PASS][47], [PASS][48], [PASS][49], > > [PASS][50], [PASS][51], [PASS][52], [PASS][53]) ([i915#4386]) > >[4]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html > >[5]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html > >[6]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html > >[7]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html > >[8]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html > >[9]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html > >[10]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html > >[11]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html > >[12]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl3/boot.html > >[13]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl3/boot.html > >[14]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl3/boot.html > >[15]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl4/boot.html > >[16]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.o
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS according to HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT()
I am unable to load both the failures? Is there any other way to get these failures? -Original Message- From: Roper, Matthew D Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 1:07 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Vudum, Lakshminarayana Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS according to HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT() On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 07:20:48PM +, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS according to HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT() > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/105010/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11753_full -> Patchwork_105010v1_full > > > Summary > --- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_105010v1_full absolutely need > to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_105010v1_full, please notify your bug team to allow > them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > Participating hosts (13 -> 13) > -- > > No changes in participating hosts > > Possible new issues > --- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_105010v1_full: > > ### IGT changes ### > > Possible regressions > > * igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection: > - shard-snb: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] >[1]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-snb5/igt@i915_module_l...@reload-with-fault-injection.html >[2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-snb5/igt@i915_module_l...@reload-with-fault-injection.html > > * igt@syncobj_basic@bad-create-flags: > - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][3] >[3]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-skl3/igt@syncobj_ba...@bad-create-flags.html The failure logs for the two hits above don't seem to have been uploaded to the server so I can't see exactly what went wrong. However this patch is modifying xehp_sseu_info_init() which only gets executed on Xe_HP-based platforms, so it would not change the behavior of SNB or SKL. Matt > > > Known issues > > > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_105010v1_full that come from known > issues: > > ### CI changes ### > > Issues hit > > * boot: > - shard-apl: ([PASS][4], [PASS][5], [PASS][6], [PASS][7], > [PASS][8], [PASS][9], [PASS][10], [PASS][11], [PASS][12], [PASS][13], > [PASS][14], [PASS][15], [PASS][16], [PASS][17], [PASS][18], [PASS][19], > [PASS][20], [PASS][21], [PASS][22], [PASS][23], [PASS][24], [PASS][25], > [PASS][26], [PASS][27], [PASS][28]) -> ([PASS][29], [PASS][30], [FAIL][31], > [PASS][32], [PASS][33], [PASS][34], [PASS][35], [PASS][36], [PASS][37], > [PASS][38], [PASS][39], [PASS][40], [PASS][41], [PASS][42], [PASS][43], > [PASS][44], [PASS][45], [PASS][46], [PASS][47], [PASS][48], [PASS][49], > [PASS][50], [PASS][51], [PASS][52], [PASS][53]) ([i915#4386]) >[4]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html >[5]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html >[6]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html >[7]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html >[8]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html >[9]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html >[10]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html >[11]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html >[12]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl3/boot.html >[13]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl3/boot.html >[14]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl3/boot.html >[15]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl4/boot.html >[16]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl4/boot.html >[17]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl4/boot.html >[18]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl6/boot.html >[19]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl6/boot.html >[20]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl6/boot.html >[21]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl6/boot.html >[22]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl7/boot.html >[23]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl7/boo
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS according to HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT()
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 07:20:48PM +, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS according to HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT() > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/105010/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11753_full -> Patchwork_105010v1_full > > > Summary > --- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_105010v1_full absolutely need > to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_105010v1_full, please notify your bug team to allow > them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > Participating hosts (13 -> 13) > -- > > No changes in participating hosts > > Possible new issues > --- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_105010v1_full: > > ### IGT changes ### > > Possible regressions > > * igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection: > - shard-snb: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] >[1]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-snb5/igt@i915_module_l...@reload-with-fault-injection.html >[2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-snb5/igt@i915_module_l...@reload-with-fault-injection.html > > * igt@syncobj_basic@bad-create-flags: > - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][3] >[3]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-skl3/igt@syncobj_ba...@bad-create-flags.html The failure logs for the two hits above don't seem to have been uploaded to the server so I can't see exactly what went wrong. However this patch is modifying xehp_sseu_info_init() which only gets executed on Xe_HP-based platforms, so it would not change the behavior of SNB or SKL. Matt > > > Known issues > > > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_105010v1_full that come from known > issues: > > ### CI changes ### > > Issues hit > > * boot: > - shard-apl: ([PASS][4], [PASS][5], [PASS][6], [PASS][7], > [PASS][8], [PASS][9], [PASS][10], [PASS][11], [PASS][12], [PASS][13], > [PASS][14], [PASS][15], [PASS][16], [PASS][17], [PASS][18], [PASS][19], > [PASS][20], [PASS][21], [PASS][22], [PASS][23], [PASS][24], [PASS][25], > [PASS][26], [PASS][27], [PASS][28]) -> ([PASS][29], [PASS][30], [FAIL][31], > [PASS][32], [PASS][33], [PASS][34], [PASS][35], [PASS][36], [PASS][37], > [PASS][38], [PASS][39], [PASS][40], [PASS][41], [PASS][42], [PASS][43], > [PASS][44], [PASS][45], [PASS][46], [PASS][47], [PASS][48], [PASS][49], > [PASS][50], [PASS][51], [PASS][52], [PASS][53]) ([i915#4386]) >[4]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html >[5]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html >[6]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html >[7]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html >[8]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html >[9]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html >[10]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html >[11]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html >[12]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl3/boot.html >[13]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl3/boot.html >[14]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl3/boot.html >[15]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl4/boot.html >[16]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl4/boot.html >[17]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl4/boot.html >[18]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl6/boot.html >[19]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl6/boot.html >[20]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl6/boot.html >[21]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl6/boot.html >[22]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl7/boot.html >[23]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl7/boot.html >[24]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl7/boot.html >[25]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl7/boot.html >[26]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl8/boot.html >[27]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-ap
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS according to HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT()
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/pvc: Adjust EU per SS according to HAS_ONE_EU_PER_FUSE_BIT() URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/105010/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11753_full -> Patchwork_105010v1_full Summary --- **FAILURE** Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_105010v1_full absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_105010v1_full, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. Participating hosts (13 -> 13) -- No changes in participating hosts Possible new issues --- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_105010v1_full: ### IGT changes ### Possible regressions * igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection: - shard-snb: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-snb5/igt@i915_module_l...@reload-with-fault-injection.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-snb5/igt@i915_module_l...@reload-with-fault-injection.html * igt@syncobj_basic@bad-create-flags: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][3] [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-skl3/igt@syncobj_ba...@bad-create-flags.html Known issues Here are the changes found in Patchwork_105010v1_full that come from known issues: ### CI changes ### Issues hit * boot: - shard-apl: ([PASS][4], [PASS][5], [PASS][6], [PASS][7], [PASS][8], [PASS][9], [PASS][10], [PASS][11], [PASS][12], [PASS][13], [PASS][14], [PASS][15], [PASS][16], [PASS][17], [PASS][18], [PASS][19], [PASS][20], [PASS][21], [PASS][22], [PASS][23], [PASS][24], [PASS][25], [PASS][26], [PASS][27], [PASS][28]) -> ([PASS][29], [PASS][30], [FAIL][31], [PASS][32], [PASS][33], [PASS][34], [PASS][35], [PASS][36], [PASS][37], [PASS][38], [PASS][39], [PASS][40], [PASS][41], [PASS][42], [PASS][43], [PASS][44], [PASS][45], [PASS][46], [PASS][47], [PASS][48], [PASS][49], [PASS][50], [PASS][51], [PASS][52], [PASS][53]) ([i915#4386]) [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl1/boot.html [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl2/boot.html [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl3/boot.html [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl3/boot.html [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl3/boot.html [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl4/boot.html [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl4/boot.html [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl4/boot.html [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl6/boot.html [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl6/boot.html [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl6/boot.html [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl6/boot.html [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl7/boot.html [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl7/boot.html [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl7/boot.html [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl7/boot.html [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl8/boot.html [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl8/boot.html [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11753/shard-apl8/boot.html [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-apl1/boot.html [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-apl1/boot.html [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-apl1/boot.html [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-apl1/boot.html [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_105010v1/shard-apl1/boot.html [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/dr
