Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: SAGV fixes (rev2)
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 08:03:41PM -, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: SAGV fixes (rev2) > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/100091/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11239_full -> Patchwork_22302_full > > > Summary > --- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22302_full absolutely need to > be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_22302_full, please notify your bug team to allow > them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > Participating hosts (11 -> 11) > -- > > No changes in participating hosts > > Possible new issues > --- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_22302_full: > > ### IGT changes ### > > Possible regressions > > * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@all-pipes-forked-bo: > - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] +10 similar issues Argh. These are due to the extra debug spam from intel_bw_atomic_check() since that now goes throug the full function a lot more. So either we just nuke a bunch of those debugs, or I guess we do it a bit more like what Stan suggested and try to check more carefully if the inputs to to the QGV calculation actually changed. I guess I'll try the latter approach, in case those debugs are actually useful. The challenge will be doing that and keeping the patch looking reasonable for stable... -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: SAGV fixes (rev2)
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: SAGV fixes (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/100091/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11239_full -> Patchwork_22302_full
Summary
---
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22302_full absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_22302_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
Participating hosts (11 -> 11)
--
No changes in participating hosts
Possible new issues
---
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
Patchwork_22302_full:
### IGT changes ###
Possible regressions
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@all-pipes-forked-bo:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] +10 similar issues
[1]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11239/shard-iclb4/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@all-pipes-forked-bo.html
[2]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22302/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@all-pipes-forked-bo.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@all-pipes-single-bo:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4] +9 similar issues
[3]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11239/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@all-pipes-single-bo.html
[4]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22302/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@all-pipes-single-bo.html
* igt@kms_fbcon_fbt@psr-suspend:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][5]
[5]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22302/shard-skl3/igt@kms_fbcon_...@psr-suspend.html
Suppressed
The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
They do not affect the overall result.
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-c-single-move:
- {shard-tglu}: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][6]
[6]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22302/shard-tglu-4/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@pipe-c-single-move.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-forked-move:
- {shard-tglu}: [PASS][7] -> [INCOMPLETE][8] +8 similar issues
[7]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11239/shard-tglu-4/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@pipe-d-forked-move.html
[8]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22302/shard-tglu-4/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@pipe-d-forked-move.html
Known issues
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_22302_full that come from known
issues:
### IGT changes ###
Issues hit
* igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@bcs0:
- shard-apl: [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-WARN][10] ([i915#180])
[9]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11239/shard-apl7/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation...@bcs0.html
[10]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22302/shard-apl3/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation...@bcs0.html
* igt@gem_eio@in-flight-immediate:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][11] -> [TIMEOUT][12] ([i915#3063])
[11]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11239/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_...@in-flight-immediate.html
[12]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22302/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_...@in-flight-immediate.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-vip@rcs0:
- shard-glk: [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#2842])
[13]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11239/shard-glk5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-...@rcs0.html
[14]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22302/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-...@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#2842])
[15]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11239/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-sh...@rcs0.html
[16]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22302/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-sh...@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][17] ([i915#2842])
[17]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22302/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-s...@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-normal-all:
- shard-glk: [PASS][18] -> [DMESG-WARN][19] ([i915#118])
[18]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11239/shard-glk5/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-normal-all.html
[19]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22302/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-normal-all.html
* igt@gem_lmem_swapping@heavy-verify-multi:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][20] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +2
similar issues
[20]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22302/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@heavy-verify-multi.html
