Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV plane alignment handling
I have addressed that now. -Original Message- From: Deak, Imre Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 8:48 AM To: Vudum, Lakshminarayana Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Heikkila, Juha-pekka ; Ville Syrjälä Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV plane alignment handling Lakshmi, ah that's true, so no need to re-report the result. In any case the failure of rev 1 on igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each was still unrelated to those changes, so if you still see that occuring again it's good to track it as a known issue. On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 06:40:56PM +0300, Vudum, Lakshminarayana wrote: > I don't see any regression on rev 2. > > Lakshmi. > > -Original Message- > From: Deak, Imre > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 8:00 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Heikkila, Juha-pekka > ; Ville Syrjälä > ; Vudum, Lakshminarayana > > Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV > plane alignment handling > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:20:44PM +, Patchwork wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV plane alignment handling > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/89299/ > > State : failure > > Thanks for the reviews, pushed to -din with a TODO: update about using a 4k > linear UV plane alignment everywhere. > > Lakshmi, please see the unrelated failure below. > > > > > == Summary == > > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9993_full -> Patchwork_19963_full > > > > > > Summary > > --- > > > > **FAILURE** > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19963_full absolutely need > > to be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in Patchwork_19963_full, please notify your bug team to allow > > them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in > > CI. > > > > > > > > Possible new issues > > --- > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > > Patchwork_19963_full: > > > > ### IGT changes ### > > > > Possible regressions > > > > * igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each: > > - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] > >[1]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_s...@basic-many-each.html > >[2]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-iclb2 > > /i > > gt@gem_s...@basic-many-each.html > > Starting subtest: basic-many-each > runner: This test was killed due to a kernel taint (0x280). > runner: This test was killed due to exceeding disk usage limit. (Used > 23707386 bytes, limit 10485760) > > Looks like a test or CI config issue, do we have ticket for this? > > > > Known issues > > > > > > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19963_full that come from known > > issues: > > > > ### IGT changes ### > > > > Issues hit > > > > * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@file: > > - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) > >[3]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-snb5/ > > ig > > t@gem_ctx_persiste...@file.html > > > > * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend: > > - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#180]) +1 similar > > issue > >[4]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-apl8/ > > ig > > t@gem_...@in-flight-suspend.html > > > > * igt@gem_eio@kms: > > - shard-glk: [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#3115]) > >[5]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-glk4/igt@gem_...@kms.html > >[6]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-glk8/ > > ig > > t@gem_...@kms.html > > > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0: > > - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#109271]) +84 similar > > issues > >[7]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-skl10 > > /i gt@gem_exec_fair@basic-f...@rcs0.html > > > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0: > > - shard-tglb: [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar > > issue > >[8]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-sh...@rcs0.html > >[9]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-tglb5 > > /i gt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-sh...@rcs0.html > > > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0: > > - shard-kbl: [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar > > issue > >[10]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html > >[11]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-kbl6/ > > ig t@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html > > > > *
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV plane alignment handling
Lakshmi, ah that's true, so no need to re-report the result. In any case the failure of rev 1 on igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each was still unrelated to those changes, so if you still see that occuring again it's good to track it as a known issue. On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 06:40:56PM +0300, Vudum, Lakshminarayana wrote: > I don't see any regression on rev 2. > > Lakshmi. > > -Original Message- > From: Deak, Imre > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 8:00 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Heikkila, Juha-pekka > ; Ville Syrjälä > ; Vudum, Lakshminarayana > > Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV plane > alignment handling > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:20:44PM +, Patchwork wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV plane alignment handling > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/89299/ > > State : failure > > Thanks for the reviews, pushed to -din with a TODO: update about using a 4k > linear UV plane alignment everywhere. > > Lakshmi, please see the unrelated failure below. > > > > > == Summary == > > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9993_full -> Patchwork_19963_full > > > > > > Summary > > --- > > > > **FAILURE** > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19963_full absolutely need > > to be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in Patchwork_19963_full, please notify your bug team to allow > > them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in > > CI. > > > > > > > > Possible new issues > > --- > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > > Patchwork_19963_full: > > > > ### IGT changes ### > > > > Possible regressions > > > > * igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each: > > - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] > >[1]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_s...@basic-many-each.html > >[2]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-iclb2/i > > gt@gem_s...@basic-many-each.html > > Starting subtest: basic-many-each > runner: This test was killed due to a kernel taint (0x280). > runner: This test was killed due to exceeding disk usage limit. (Used > 23707386 bytes, limit 10485760) > > Looks like a test or CI config issue, do we have ticket for this? > > > > Known issues > > > > > > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19963_full that come from known > > issues: > > > > ### IGT changes ### > > > > Issues hit > > > > * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@file: > > - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) > >[3]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-snb5/ig > > t@gem_ctx_persiste...@file.html > > > > * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend: > > - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#180]) +1 similar > > issue > >[4]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-apl8/ig > > t@gem_...@in-flight-suspend.html > > > > * igt@gem_eio@kms: > > - shard-glk: [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#3115]) > >[5]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-glk4/igt@gem_...@kms.html > >[6]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-glk8/ig > > t@gem_...@kms.html > > > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0: > > - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#109271]) +84 similar > > issues > >[7]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-skl10/i > > gt@gem_exec_fair@basic-f...@rcs0.html > > > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0: > > - shard-tglb: [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar > > issue > >[8]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-sh...@rcs0.html > >[9]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-tglb5/i > > gt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-sh...@rcs0.html > > > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0: > > - shard-kbl: [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar > > issue > >[10]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html > >[11]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-kbl6/ig > > t@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html > > > > * igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-queues-priority-all: > > - shard-iclb: [PASS][12] -> [INCOMPLETE][13] ([i915#1895]) > >[12]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-queues-priority-all.html > >[13]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-iclb7/i > >
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV plane alignment handling
I don't see any regression on rev 2. Lakshmi. -Original Message- From: Deak, Imre Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 8:00 AM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Heikkila, Juha-pekka ; Ville Syrjälä ; Vudum, Lakshminarayana Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV plane alignment handling On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:20:44PM +, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV plane alignment handling > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/89299/ > State : failure Thanks for the reviews, pushed to -din with a TODO: update about using a 4k linear UV plane alignment everywhere. Lakshmi, please see the unrelated failure below. > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9993_full -> Patchwork_19963_full > > > Summary > --- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19963_full absolutely need to > be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_19963_full, please notify your bug team to allow > them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > Possible new issues > --- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_19963_full: > > ### IGT changes ### > > Possible regressions > > * igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each: > - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] >[1]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_s...@basic-many-each.html >[2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-iclb2/i > gt@gem_s...@basic-many-each.html Starting subtest: basic-many-each runner: This test was killed due to a kernel taint (0x280). runner: This test was killed due to exceeding disk usage limit. (Used 23707386 bytes, limit 10485760) Looks like a test or CI config issue, do we have ticket for this? > Known issues > > > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19963_full that come from known > issues: > > ### IGT changes ### > > Issues hit > > * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@file: > - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) >[3]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-snb5/ig > t@gem_ctx_persiste...@file.html > > * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend: > - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#180]) +1 similar > issue >[4]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-apl8/ig > t@gem_...@in-flight-suspend.html > > * igt@gem_eio@kms: > - shard-glk: [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#3115]) >[5]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-glk4/igt@gem_...@kms.html >[6]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-glk8/ig > t@gem_...@kms.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0: > - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#109271]) +84 similar > issues >[7]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-skl10/i > gt@gem_exec_fair@basic-f...@rcs0.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0: > - shard-tglb: [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar > issue >[8]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-sh...@rcs0.html >[9]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-tglb5/i > gt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-sh...@rcs0.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0: > - shard-kbl: [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar > issue >[10]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html >[11]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-kbl6/ig > t@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html > > * igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-queues-priority-all: > - shard-iclb: [PASS][12] -> [INCOMPLETE][13] ([i915#1895]) >[12]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-queues-priority-all.html >[13]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-iclb7/i > gt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-queues-priority-all.html > > * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy: > - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190]) >[14]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-skl2/ig > t@gem_huc_c...@huc-copy.html > > * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@big-copy-xy: > - shard-glk: [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#307]) >[15]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-glk8/igt@gem_mmap_...@big-copy-xy.html >[16]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-glk8/ig > t@gem_mmap_...@big-copy-xy.html > >
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV plane alignment handling
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:20:44PM +, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV plane alignment handling > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/89299/ > State : failure Thanks for the reviews, pushed to -din with a TODO: update about using a 4k linear UV plane alignment everywhere. Lakshmi, please see the unrelated failure below. > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9993_full -> Patchwork_19963_full > > > Summary > --- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19963_full absolutely need to > be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_19963_full, please notify your bug team to allow > them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > Possible new issues > --- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_19963_full: > > ### IGT changes ### > > Possible regressions > > * igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each: > - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] >[1]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_s...@basic-many-each.html >[2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_s...@basic-many-each.html Starting subtest: basic-many-each runner: This test was killed due to a kernel taint (0x280). runner: This test was killed due to exceeding disk usage limit. (Used 23707386 bytes, limit 10485760) Looks like a test or CI config issue, do we have ticket for this? > Known issues > > > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19963_full that come from known > issues: > > ### IGT changes ### > > Issues hit > > * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@file: > - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) >[3]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-snb5/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@file.html > > * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend: > - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#180]) +1 similar > issue >[4]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-apl8/igt@gem_...@in-flight-suspend.html > > * igt@gem_eio@kms: > - shard-glk: [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#3115]) >[5]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-glk4/igt@gem_...@kms.html >[6]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-glk8/igt@gem_...@kms.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0: > - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#109271]) +84 similar > issues >[7]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-skl10/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-f...@rcs0.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0: > - shard-tglb: [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar > issue >[8]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-sh...@rcs0.html >[9]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-sh...@rcs0.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0: > - shard-kbl: [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar > issue >[10]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html >[11]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html > > * igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-queues-priority-all: > - shard-iclb: [PASS][12] -> [INCOMPLETE][13] ([i915#1895]) >[12]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-queues-priority-all.html >[13]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-queues-priority-all.html > > * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy: > - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190]) >[14]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-skl2/igt@gem_huc_c...@huc-copy.html > > * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@big-copy-xy: > - shard-glk: [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#307]) >[15]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-glk8/igt@gem_mmap_...@big-copy-xy.html >[16]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-glk8/igt@gem_mmap_...@big-copy-xy.html > > * igt@gem_userptr_blits@set-cache-level: > - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][17] ([i915#3324]) >[17]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-skl7/igt@gem_userptr_bl...@set-cache-level.html > > * igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge: > - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][18] ([i915#2724]) >[18]: >
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV plane alignment handling
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Simplify CCS and UV plane alignment handling URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/89299/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9993_full -> Patchwork_19963_full Summary --- **FAILURE** Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19963_full absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_19963_full, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. Possible new issues --- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_19963_full: ### IGT changes ### Possible regressions * igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each: - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_s...@basic-many-each.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_s...@basic-many-each.html Known issues Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19963_full that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### Issues hit * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@file: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-snb5/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@file.html * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#180]) +1 similar issue [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-apl8/igt@gem_...@in-flight-suspend.html * igt@gem_eio@kms: - shard-glk: [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#3115]) [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-glk4/igt@gem_...@kms.html [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-glk8/igt@gem_...@kms.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#109271]) +84 similar issues [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-skl10/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-f...@rcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0: - shard-tglb: [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-sh...@rcs0.html [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-sh...@rcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0: - shard-kbl: [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-queues-priority-all: - shard-iclb: [PASS][12] -> [INCOMPLETE][13] ([i915#1895]) [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-queues-priority-all.html [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-queues-priority-all.html * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190]) [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-skl2/igt@gem_huc_c...@huc-copy.html * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@big-copy-xy: - shard-glk: [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#307]) [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-glk8/igt@gem_mmap_...@big-copy-xy.html [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-glk8/igt@gem_mmap_...@big-copy-xy.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@set-cache-level: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][17] ([i915#3324]) [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-skl7/igt@gem_userptr_bl...@set-cache-level.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][18] ([i915#2724]) [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-snb5/igt@gem_userptr_bl...@vma-merge.html - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][19] ([i915#3318]) [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-apl8/igt@gem_userptr_bl...@vma-merge.html * igt@gem_vm_create@destroy-race: - shard-tglb: [PASS][20] -> [FAIL][21] ([i915#2822]) [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9993/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_vm_cre...@destroy-race.html [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19963/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_vm_cre...@destroy-race.html * igt@gen9_exec_parse@bb-large: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][22] ([i915#3296]) [22]:
