Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Use intel_plane_data_rate for min_cdclk calculation (rev6)

2020-03-01 Thread Vudum, Lakshminarayana 
Stan, I have addressed and reported the issue.

From: Lisovskiy, Stanislav 
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2020 6:12 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Peres, Martin ; 
Vudum, Lakshminarayana 
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Use intel_plane_data_rate for 
min_cdclk calculation (rev6)


Hi,



The IGT issue here is unrelated to intel_plane_data_rate change. Looks pretty 
weird though :)


Best Regards,

Lisovskiy Stanislav

Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

From: Patchwork 
mailto:patchw...@emeril.freedesktop.org>>
Sent: Saturday, February 29, 2020 1:54:04 AM
To: Lisovskiy, Stanislav
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Use intel_plane_data_rate for 
min_cdclk calculation (rev6)

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Use intel_plane_data_rate for min_cdclk calculation (rev6)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/73718/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8020_full -> Patchwork_16737_full


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_16737_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.

  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_16737_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.



Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
Patchwork_16737_full:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-b-planes:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [TIMEOUT][2] +1 similar issue
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_pl...@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-b-planes.html
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_pl...@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-b-planes.html


New tests
-

  New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_8020_full and 
Patchwork_16737_full:

### New IGT tests (4) ###

  * igt@drm_mm@all:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s

  * igt@i915_selftest@mock:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s

  * igt@i915_selftest@perf:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s

  * igt@kms_selftest@all:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s



Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16737_full that come from known 
issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#110841])
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_ctx_sha...@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_ctx_sha...@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs1-fds:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] ([fdo#112080]) +10 similar 
issues
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs1-fds.html
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs1-fds.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-both-bsd1:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109276] / [i915#677])
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_sched...@implicit-both-bsd1.html
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_sched...@implicit-both-bsd1.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][9] -> [SKIP][10] ([fdo#112146]) +4 similar 
issues
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_sched...@preempt-queue-bsd.html
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_sched...@preempt-queue-bsd.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@cursor-dpms:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][11] -> [INCOMPLETE][12] ([i915#189])
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_...@cursor-dpms.html
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_pm_...@cursor-dpms.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible:
- shard-apl:  [PASS][13] -> [DMESG-WARN][14] ([i915#180]) +2 
similar issues
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-apl2/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-apl2/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
- shard-kbl:  [PASS][15] -> [DMESG-WARN][16] ([i915#180]) +1 
similar issue
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Use intel_plane_data_rate for min_cdclk calculation (rev6)

2020-03-01 Thread Patchwork 
== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Use intel_plane_data_rate for min_cdclk calculation (rev6)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/73718/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8020_full -> Patchwork_16737_full


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_16737_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_16737_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
Patchwork_16737_full:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [TIMEOUT][2]
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html

  
Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16737_full that come from known 
issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#110841])
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_ctx_sha...@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_ctx_sha...@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs1-fds:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] ([fdo#112080]) +10 similar 
issues
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs1-fds.html
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs1-fds.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-both-bsd1:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109276] / [i915#677])
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_sched...@implicit-both-bsd1.html
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_sched...@implicit-both-bsd1.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][9] -> [SKIP][10] ([fdo#112146]) +4 similar 
issues
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_sched...@preempt-queue-bsd.html
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_sched...@preempt-queue-bsd.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@cursor-dpms:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][11] -> [INCOMPLETE][12] ([i915#189])
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_...@cursor-dpms.html
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_pm_...@cursor-dpms.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible:
- shard-apl:  [PASS][13] -> [DMESG-WARN][14] ([i915#180]) +2 
similar issues
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-apl2/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-apl2/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
- shard-kbl:  [PASS][15] -> [DMESG-WARN][16] ([i915#180]) +1 
similar issue
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
   [16]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html

  * igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-b-planes:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][17] -> [TIMEOUT][18] ([i915#1346])
   [17]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_pl...@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-b-planes.html
   [18]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_pl...@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-b-planes.html

  * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-x:
- shard-glk:  [PASS][19] -> [FAIL][20] ([i915#899]) +1 similar issue
   [19]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-glk8/igt@kms_plane_low...@pipe-a-tiling-x.html
   [20]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-glk3/igt@kms_plane_low...@pipe-a-tiling-x.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_page_flip:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][21] -> [SKIP][22] ([fdo#109441]) +1 similar 
issue
   [21]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_page_flip.html
   [22]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_page_

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Use intel_plane_data_rate for min_cdclk calculation (rev6)

2020-03-01 Thread Lisovskiy, Stanislav 
Hi,


The IGT issue here is unrelated to intel_plane_data_rate change. Looks pretty 
weird though :)


Best Regards,

Lisovskiy Stanislav

Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

From: Patchwork 
Sent: Saturday, February 29, 2020 1:54:04 AM
To: Lisovskiy, Stanislav
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Use intel_plane_data_rate for 
min_cdclk calculation (rev6)

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Use intel_plane_data_rate for min_cdclk calculation (rev6)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/73718/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8020_full -> Patchwork_16737_full


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_16737_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.

  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_16737_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.



Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
Patchwork_16737_full:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-b-planes:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [TIMEOUT][2] +1 similar issue
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_pl...@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-b-planes.html
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_pl...@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-b-planes.html


New tests
-

  New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_8020_full and 
Patchwork_16737_full:

### New IGT tests (4) ###

  * igt@drm_mm@all:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s

  * igt@i915_selftest@mock:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s

  * igt@i915_selftest@perf:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s

  * igt@kms_selftest@all:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s



Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16737_full that come from known 
issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#110841])
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_ctx_sha...@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_ctx_sha...@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs1-fds:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] ([fdo#112080]) +10 similar 
issues
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs1-fds.html
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs1-fds.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-both-bsd1:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109276] / [i915#677])
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_sched...@implicit-both-bsd1.html
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_sched...@implicit-both-bsd1.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][9] -> [SKIP][10] ([fdo#112146]) +4 similar 
issues
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_sched...@preempt-queue-bsd.html
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_sched...@preempt-queue-bsd.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@cursor-dpms:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][11] -> [INCOMPLETE][12] ([i915#189])
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_...@cursor-dpms.html
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_pm_...@cursor-dpms.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible:
- shard-apl:  [PASS][13] -> [DMESG-WARN][14] ([i915#180]) +2 
similar issues
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-apl2/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-apl2/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
- shard-kbl:  [PASS][15] -> [DMESG-WARN][16] ([i915#180]) +1 
similar issue
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
   [16]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html

  * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-x:
- shard-glk:  [PASS][17] -> [FAIL][18] ([i915#899]) +1 similar issue
   [17]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-ti

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Use intel_plane_data_rate for min_cdclk calculation (rev6)

2020-02-28 Thread Patchwork 
== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Use intel_plane_data_rate for min_cdclk calculation (rev6)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/73718/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8020_full -> Patchwork_16737_full


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_16737_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_16737_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
Patchwork_16737_full:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-b-planes:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [TIMEOUT][2] +1 similar issue
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_pl...@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-b-planes.html
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_pl...@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-b-planes.html

  
New tests
-

  New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_8020_full and 
Patchwork_16737_full:

### New IGT tests (4) ###

  * igt@drm_mm@all:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s

  * igt@i915_selftest@mock:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s

  * igt@i915_selftest@perf:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s

  * igt@kms_selftest@all:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s

  

Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16737_full that come from known 
issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#110841])
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_ctx_sha...@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_ctx_sha...@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs1-fds:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] ([fdo#112080]) +10 similar 
issues
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs1-fds.html
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs1-fds.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-both-bsd1:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109276] / [i915#677])
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_sched...@implicit-both-bsd1.html
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_sched...@implicit-both-bsd1.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][9] -> [SKIP][10] ([fdo#112146]) +4 similar 
issues
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_sched...@preempt-queue-bsd.html
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_sched...@preempt-queue-bsd.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@cursor-dpms:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][11] -> [INCOMPLETE][12] ([i915#189])
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_...@cursor-dpms.html
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_pm_...@cursor-dpms.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible:
- shard-apl:  [PASS][13] -> [DMESG-WARN][14] ([i915#180]) +2 
similar issues
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-apl2/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-apl2/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
- shard-kbl:  [PASS][15] -> [DMESG-WARN][16] ([i915#180]) +1 
similar issue
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
   [16]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_f...@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html

  * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-x:
- shard-glk:  [PASS][17] -> [FAIL][18] ([i915#899]) +1 similar issue
   [17]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-glk8/igt@kms_plane_low...@pipe-a-tiling-x.html
   [18]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16737/shard-glk3/igt@kms_plane_low...@pipe-a-tiling-x.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_page_flip:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][19] -> [SKIP][20] ([fdo#109441]) +1 similar 
issue
   [19]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8020/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_page_flip.html
   [20]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/