[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [CI,1/2] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [CI,1/2] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/84433/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9411_full -> Patchwork_19021_full Summary --- **FAILURE** Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19021_full absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_19021_full, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. Possible new issues --- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_19021_full: ### IGT changes ### Possible regressions * igt@gem_exec_balancer@full: - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2] +1 similar issue [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9411/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_balan...@full.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19021/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_balan...@full.html * igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late: - shard-tglb: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4] +3 similar issues [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9411/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_exec_balan...@full-late.html [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19021/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_exec_balan...@full-late.html * igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late-pulse: - shard-tglb: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6] +1 similar issue [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9411/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_exec_balan...@full-late-pulse.html [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19021/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_exec_balan...@full-late-pulse.html * igt@gem_exec_balancer@hog: - shard-kbl: [PASS][7] -> [INCOMPLETE][8] +4 similar issues [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9411/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_balan...@hog.html [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19021/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_balan...@hog.html * igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds@bcs0: - shard-iclb: [PASS][9] -> [INCOMPLETE][10] +1 similar issue [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9411/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_parallel@f...@bcs0.html [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19021/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_parallel@f...@bcs0.html New tests - New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_9411_full and Patchwork_19021_full: ### New CI tests (1) ### * boot: - Statuses : 175 pass(s) - Exec time: [0.0] s Known issues Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19021_full that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### Issues hit * igt@gem_exec_balancer@full: - shard-kbl: [PASS][11] -> [INCOMPLETE][12] ([i915#794]) [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9411/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_balan...@full.html [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19021/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_balan...@full.html * igt@gem_exec_gttfill@basic: - shard-glk: [PASS][13] -> [DMESG-WARN][14] ([i915#118] / [i915#95]) +1 similar issue [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9411/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_gttf...@basic.html [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19021/shard-glk5/igt@gem_exec_gttf...@basic.html * igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-pci-d3-state: - shard-apl: [PASS][15] -> [DMESG-WARN][16] ([i915#1982]) +1 similar issue [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9411/shard-apl1/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-pci-d3-state.html [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19021/shard-apl7/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-pci-d3-state.html * igt@i915_selftest@live@active: - shard-glk: [PASS][17] -> [DMESG-FAIL][18] ([i915#2291] / [i915#666]) [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9411/shard-glk5/igt@i915_selftest@l...@active.html [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19021/shard-glk8/igt@i915_selftest@l...@active.html * igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists: - shard-tglb: [PASS][19] -> [INCOMPLETE][20] ([i915#1037] / [i915#2268]) [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9411/shard-tglb3/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19021/shard-tglb5/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html - shard-kbl: [PASS][21] -> [INCOMPLETE][22] ([i915#1037] / [i915#794]) [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9411/shard-kbl6/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19021/shard-kbl4/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html * igt@kms_big_fb@linear-8bpp-rotate-180:
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [CI,1/2] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [CI,1/2] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/84345/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9398_full -> Patchwork_19000_full Summary --- **FAILURE** Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19000_full absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_19000_full, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. Possible new issues --- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_19000_full: ### IGT changes ### Possible regressions * igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late-pulse: - shard-tglb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] +4 similar issues [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9398/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_exec_balan...@full-late-pulse.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19000/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_exec_balan...@full-late-pulse.html * igt@gem_exec_balancer@sliced: - shard-tglb: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-FAIL][4] [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9398/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_exec_balan...@sliced.html [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19000/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_exec_balan...@sliced.html - shard-iclb: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6] [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9398/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_balan...@sliced.html [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19000/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_balan...@sliced.html * igt@i915_selftest@mock@shmem: - shard-iclb: [PASS][7] -> [INCOMPLETE][8] +1 similar issue [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9398/shard-iclb4/igt@i915_selftest@m...@shmem.html [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19000/shard-iclb4/igt@i915_selftest@m...@shmem.html - shard-kbl: [PASS][9] -> [INCOMPLETE][10] +4 similar issues [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9398/shard-kbl2/igt@i915_selftest@m...@shmem.html [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19000/shard-kbl3/igt@i915_selftest@m...@shmem.html ### Piglit changes ### Possible regressions * spec@arb_texture_buffer_object@render-no-bo (NEW): - pig-skl-6260u: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][11] +3 similar issues [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19000/pig-skl-6260u/spec@arb_texture_buffer_obj...@render-no-bo.html New tests - New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_9398_full and Patchwork_19000_full: ### New CI tests (1) ### * boot: - Statuses : 200 pass(s) - Exec time: [0.0] s ### New Piglit tests (4) ### * spec@arb_point_parameters@arb_point_parameters-point-attenuation: - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s) - Exec time: [0.0] s * spec@arb_texture_buffer_object@max-size: - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s) - Exec time: [0.0] s * spec@arb_texture_buffer_object@render-no-bo: - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s) - Exec time: [0.0] s * spec@arb_texture_buffer_object@unused-name: - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s) - Exec time: [0.0] s Known issues Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19000_full that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### Issues hit * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend: - shard-skl: [PASS][12] -> [DMESG-WARN][13] ([i915#1037] / [i915#1982]) [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9398/shard-skl2/igt@gem_...@in-flight-suspend.html [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19000/shard-skl1/igt@gem_...@in-flight-suspend.html * igt@gem_exec_balancer@full: - shard-kbl: [PASS][14] -> [INCOMPLETE][15] ([i915#794]) [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9398/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_balan...@full.html [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19000/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_exec_balan...@full.html * igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked: - shard-glk: [PASS][16] -> [DMESG-WARN][17] ([i915#118] / [i915#95]) [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9398/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-fds-forked.html [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19000/shard-glk2/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-fds-forked.html * igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all: - shard-kbl: [PASS][18] -> [DMESG-WARN][19] ([i915#1436] / [i915#716]) [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9398/shard-kbl7/igt@gen9_exec_pa...@allowed-all.html [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19000/shard-kbl3/igt@gen9_exec_pa...@allowed-all.html * igt@i915_mod
