[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev10)

2021-09-03 Thread Patchwork 
== Series Details ==

Series: Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev10)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93704/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10550 -> Patchwork_20959


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20959 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_20959, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20959/index.html

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20959:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms:
- fi-rkl-11600:   NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] +1 similar issue
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20959/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_f...@basic-flip-vs-dpms.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-c:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][2] -> [SKIP][3]
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-c.html
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20959/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-c.html

  
New tests
-

  New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_10550 and Patchwork_20959:

### New IGT tests (1) ###

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@guc:
- Statuses : 37 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.40, 5.01] s

  

Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20959 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@sync-fork-compute0:
- fi-snb-2600:NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#109271]) +17 similar issues
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20959/fi-snb-2600/igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_...@sync-fork-compute0.html

  * igt@fbdev@write:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] ([i915#2582]) +4 similar issues
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@fb...@write.html
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20959/fi-rkl-11600/igt@fb...@write.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109308]) +1 similar issue
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-rte.html
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20959/fi-rkl-11600/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-rte.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat:
- fi-tgl-y:   [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-FAIL][10] ([i915#541])
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-tgl-y/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20959/fi-tgl-y/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][11] -> [SKIP][12] ([fdo#111825]) +7 similar 
issues
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic.html
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20959/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic.html

  * igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset:
- fi-rkl-11600:   NOTRUN -> [SKIP][13] ([i915#3669]) +2 similar issues
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20959/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_f...@basic-flip-vs-modeset.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][14] -> [SKIP][15] ([i915#3180])
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_frontbuffer_track...@basic.html
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20959/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_frontbuffer_track...@basic.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-a:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][16] -> [SKIP][17] ([i915#3919]) +9 similar 
issues
   [16]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-a.html
   [17]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20959/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-a.html

  * igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][18] -> [SKIP][19] ([i915#1845])
   [18]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@prime_v...@basic-fence-flip.html
   [19]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20959/fi-rkl-11600/igt@prime_v...@basic-fence-flip.html

  
 Possible fixes 

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
- fi-icl-y:   [DMESG-FAIL][20]

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev9)

2021-09-03 Thread Patchwork 
== Series Details ==

Series: Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev9)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93704/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10550 -> Patchwork_20956


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20956 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_20956, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20956/index.html

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20956:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms:
- fi-rkl-11600:   NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] +1 similar issue
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20956/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_f...@basic-flip-vs-dpms.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-c:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][2] -> [SKIP][3]
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-c.html
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20956/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-c.html

  
New tests
-

  New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_10550 and Patchwork_20956:

### New IGT tests (1) ###

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@guc:
- Statuses : 36 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.40, 5.05] s

  

Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20956 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@sync-fork-compute0:
- fi-snb-2600:NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#109271]) +17 similar issues
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20956/fi-snb-2600/igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_...@sync-fork-compute0.html

  * igt@fbdev@write:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] ([i915#2582]) +4 similar issues
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@fb...@write.html
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20956/fi-rkl-11600/igt@fb...@write.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109308]) +1 similar issue
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-rte.html
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20956/fi-rkl-11600/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-rte.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm:
- fi-bsw-nick:[PASS][9] -> [DMESG-FAIL][10] ([i915#2927] / 
[i915#3428])
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm.html
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20956/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][11] -> [SKIP][12] ([fdo#111825]) +7 similar 
issues
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic.html
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20956/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic.html

  * igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset:
- fi-rkl-11600:   NOTRUN -> [SKIP][13] ([i915#3669]) +2 similar issues
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20956/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_f...@basic-flip-vs-modeset.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][14] -> [SKIP][15] ([i915#3180])
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_frontbuffer_track...@basic.html
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20956/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_frontbuffer_track...@basic.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-a:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][16] -> [SKIP][17] ([i915#3919]) +9 similar 
issues
   [16]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-a.html
   [17]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20956/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-a.html

  * igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip:
- fi-rkl-11600:   [PASS][18] -> [SKIP][19] ([i915#1845])
   [18]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10550/fi-rkl-11600/igt@prime_v...@basic-fence-flip.html
   [19]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20956/fi-rkl-11600/igt@prime_v...@basic-fence-flip.html

  * igt@runner@aborted:
- fi-bsw-nick:NOTRUN -> [FAIL][20] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1436] /

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev6)

2021-08-26 Thread Matthew Brost 
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 04:17:07PM +, Patchwork wrote:
> Patch Details
> 
> Series:  Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev6)
> URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93704/
> State:   failure
> Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20904/index.html
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10525 -> Patchwork_20904
> 
> Summary
> 
> FAILURE
> 
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20904 absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
> 
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_20904, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
> External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20904/
> index.html
> 
> Possible new issues
> 
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20904:
> 
> IGT changes
> 
> Possible regressions
> 
>   • igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
>   □ fi-rkl-guc: PASS -> INCOMPLETE

I've seen this locally before and after this series. I wouldn't hold of
the merge of this series because of this as I don't believe it is a
regression, just an existing instability in the stack. I haven't been
able to root cause this yet, but my initial analysis points to the GuC
losing a submission after the GuC has reset a context. Will dig into
this and hopefully get a fix after I'm back from vacation on 9/7.

Matt 

> 
> New tests
> 
> New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_10525 and Patchwork_20904:
> 
> New IGT tests (1)
> 
>   • igt@i915_selftest@live@guc:
>   □ Statuses : 30 pass(s)
>   □ Exec time: [0.41, 5.26] s
> 
> Known issues
> 
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20904 that come from known issues:
> 
> IGT changes
> 
> Issues hit
> 
>   • igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@sync-compute0:
> 
>   □ fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> SKIP (fdo#109271) +5 similar issues
>   • igt@runner@aborted:
> 
>   □ fi-rkl-guc: NOTRUN -> FAIL (i915#3928)
> 
> {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
> the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
> 
> Participating hosts (40 -> 33)
> 
> Missing (7): fi-ilk-m540 bat-adls-5 fi-hsw-4200u fi-tgl-1115g4 fi-bsw-cyan
> fi-bdw-samus bat-jsl-1
> 
> Build changes
> 
>   • Linux: CI_DRM_10525 -> Patchwork_20904
> 
> CI-20190529: 20190529
> CI_DRM_10525: 059309d37ac2de5d93cf6d71fd7fe33c9c2c66ea @ git://
> anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
> IGT_6186: 250081b306c6fa8f95405fab6a7604f1968dd4ec @ https://
> gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
> Patchwork_20904: 0c1d27ac9fce7e231e7dddebcf56905e05302cae @ git://
> anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
> 
> == Linux commits ==
> 
> 0c1d27ac9fce drm/i915/guc: Drop static inline functions intel_guc_submission.c
> 50ada01b3d95 drm/i915/guc: Add GuC kernel doc
> 883eccfa8221 drm/i915/guc: Drop guc_active move everything into guc_state
> fa075902c938 drm/i915/guc: Move fields protected by guc->contexts_lock into 
> sub
> structure
> a1c73c8c481a drm/i915/guc: Move GuC priority fields in context under 
> guc_active
> f16c0554ae08 drm/i915/guc: Drop pin count check trick between sched_disable 
> and
> re-pin
> 42ac1b77a019 drm/i915/guc: Proper xarray usage for contexts_lookup
> 9b9222998c83 drm/i915/guc: Rework and simplify locking
> 244934484f63 drm/i915/guc: Move guc_blocked fence to struct guc_state
> ba695a58136a drm/i915/guc: Release submit fence from an irq_work
> 3bd5803d5e25 drm/i915/guc: Flush G2H work queue during reset
> b87ba9121748 drm/i915: Allocate error capture in nowait context
> adb35ad83c76 drm/i915/guc: Reset LRC descriptor if register returns -ENODEV
> 97e616063006 drm/i915/guc: Don't touch guc_state.sched_state without a lock
> 1ff99308ef88 drm/i915/guc: Take context ref when cancelling request
> ff84f14ddceb drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost
> G2H
> abd6a8884cf4 drm/i915/guc: Copy whole golden context, set engine state size of
> subset
> a19ba1f51009 drm/i915/guc: Don't enable scheduling on a banned context, guc_id
> invalid, not registered
> f29b2b338002 drm/i915/guc: Kick tasklet after queuing a request
> f577a4fdeeab drm/i915/selftests: Add a cancel request selftest that triggers a
> reset
> da3d87dfe8c5 Revert "drm/i915/gt: Propagate change in error status to children
> on unhold"
> 25273a034c8d drm/i915/guc: Workaround reset G2H is received after schedule 
> done
> G2H
> c00d543957c2 drm/i915/guc: Process all G2H message at once in work queue
> 5b7ff1fa9e43 drm/i915/guc: Don't drop ce->guc_active.lock when unwinding
> context
> 54cd904fa232 drm/i915/guc: Unwind context requests in reverse order
> 593f21493fda drm/i915/guc: Fix outstanding G2H accounting
> 6b511953d015 drm/i915/guc: Fix blocked context accounting
> 
> SECURITY NOTE: file ~/.netrc must not be accessible by others

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev6)

2021-08-26 Thread Patchwork 
== Series Details ==

Series: Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev6)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93704/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10525 -> Patchwork_20904


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20904 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_20904, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20904/index.html

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20904:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
- fi-rkl-guc: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10525/fi-rkl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@l...@hangcheck.html
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20904/fi-rkl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@l...@hangcheck.html

  
New tests
-

  New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_10525 and Patchwork_20904:

### New IGT tests (1) ###

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@guc:
- Statuses : 30 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.41, 5.26] s

  

Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20904 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@sync-compute0:
- fi-kbl-soraka:  NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271]) +5 similar issues
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20904/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_...@sync-compute0.html

  * igt@runner@aborted:
- fi-rkl-guc: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][4] ([i915#3928])
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20904/fi-rkl-guc/igt@run...@aborted.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
  the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [i915#1982]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1982
  [i915#2411]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2411
  [i915#3928]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3928


Participating hosts (40 -> 33)
--

  Missing(7): fi-ilk-m540 bat-adls-5 fi-hsw-4200u fi-tgl-1115g4 fi-bsw-cyan 
fi-bdw-samus bat-jsl-1 


Build changes
-

  * Linux: CI_DRM_10525 -> Patchwork_20904

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_10525: 059309d37ac2de5d93cf6d71fd7fe33c9c2c66ea @ 
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_6186: 250081b306c6fa8f95405fab6a7604f1968dd4ec @ 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_20904: 0c1d27ac9fce7e231e7dddebcf56905e05302cae @ 
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

0c1d27ac9fce drm/i915/guc: Drop static inline functions intel_guc_submission.c
50ada01b3d95 drm/i915/guc: Add GuC kernel doc
883eccfa8221 drm/i915/guc: Drop guc_active move everything into guc_state
fa075902c938 drm/i915/guc: Move fields protected by guc->contexts_lock into sub 
structure
a1c73c8c481a drm/i915/guc: Move GuC priority fields in context under guc_active
f16c0554ae08 drm/i915/guc: Drop pin count check trick between sched_disable and 
re-pin
42ac1b77a019 drm/i915/guc: Proper xarray usage for contexts_lookup
9b9222998c83 drm/i915/guc: Rework and simplify locking
244934484f63 drm/i915/guc: Move guc_blocked fence to struct guc_state
ba695a58136a drm/i915/guc: Release submit fence from an irq_work
3bd5803d5e25 drm/i915/guc: Flush G2H work queue during reset
b87ba9121748 drm/i915: Allocate error capture in nowait context
adb35ad83c76 drm/i915/guc: Reset LRC descriptor if register returns -ENODEV
97e616063006 drm/i915/guc: Don't touch guc_state.sched_state without a lock
1ff99308ef88 drm/i915/guc: Take context ref when cancelling request
ff84f14ddceb drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost G2H
abd6a8884cf4 drm/i915/guc: Copy whole golden context, set engine state size of 
subset
a19ba1f51009 drm/i915/guc: Don't enable scheduling on a banned context, guc_id 
invalid, not registered
f29b2b338002 drm/i915/guc: Kick tasklet after queuing a request
f577a4fdeeab drm/i915/selftests: Add a cancel request selftest that triggers a 
reset
da3d87dfe8c5 Revert "drm/i915/gt: Propagate change in error status to children 
on unhold"
25273a034c8d drm/i915/guc: Workaround reset G2H is received after schedule done 
G2H
c00d543957c2 drm/i915/guc: Process all G2H message at once in work queue
5b7ff1fa9e43 drm/i915/guc: Don't drop ce->guc_active.lock when unwinding context
54cd904fa232 drm/i915/guc: Unwind context requests in reverse order
593f21493fda drm/i915/guc: Fix outstanding G2H

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC

2021-08-15 Thread Matthew Brost 
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 09:15:31PM +, Patchwork wrote:
> Patch Details
> 
> Series:  Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC
> URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93704/
> State:   failure
> Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/index.html
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10484 -> Patchwork_20826
> 
> Summary
> 
> FAILURE
> 
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20826 absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
> 
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_20826, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
> External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/
> index.html
> 
> Possible new issues
> 
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20826:
> 
> IGT changes
> 
> Possible regressions
> 
>   • igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
> 
>   □ fi-cfl-guc: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 

New selftext, __cancel_reset, is exposing a bug (or at minimum different
behavior) in the execlists implementation for canceling requests. Will
fix in new rev.

Matt

>   □ fi-kbl-soraka: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-bxt-dsi: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-tgl-1115g4: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-cml-u2: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-kbl-8809g: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-cfl-8700k: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-cfl-8109u: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-icl-u2: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-kbl-7500u: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-bsw-nick: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-icl-y: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-kbl-guc: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-kbl-7567u: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-skl-guc: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-bdw-5557u: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-glk-dsi: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-bsw-kefka: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ fi-skl-6700k2: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
> Warnings
> 
>   • igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds:
>   □ fi-rkl-guc: DMESG-FAIL (i915#3928) -> INCOMPLETE
> 
> Suppressed
> 
> The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
> They do not affect the overall result.
> 
>   • igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
> 
>   □ {fi-tgl-dsi}: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ {fi-jsl-1}: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
>   □ {fi-ehl-2}: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> 
> New tests
> 
> New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_10484 and Patchwork_20826:
> 
> New IGT tests (1)
> 
>   • igt@i915_selftest@live@guc:
>   □ Statuses : 30 pass(s)
>   □ Exec time: [0.42, 5.06] s
> 
> Known issues
> 
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20826 that come from known issues:
> 
> IGT changes
> 
> Issues hit
> 
>   • igt@i915_module_load@reload:
> 
>   □ fi-kbl-soraka: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (i915#1982)
>   • igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
> 
>   □ fi-icl-y: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL (i915#1993)
> 
> Possible fixes
> 
>   • igt@i915_module_load@reload:
>   □ {fi-tgl-dsi}: DMESG-WARN (i915#1982 / k.org#205379) -> PASS
> 
> {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
> the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
> 
> Participating hosts (37 -> 34)
> 
> Missing (3): fi-bdw-samus fi-bsw-cyan bat-jsl-1
> 
> Build changes
> 
>   • Linux: CI_DRM_10484 -> Patchwork_20826
> 
> CI-20190529: 20190529
> CI_DRM_10484: 7de02d5cb1f35bd3f068237444063844dea47ddc @ git://
> anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
> IGT_6175: c91f99c74b966f635d7e2eb898bf0f78383d281b @ https://
> gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
> Patchwork_20826: f7ff315bfe3a76713c1f0a16cd92b0908d28e4c6 @ git://
> anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
> 
> == Linux commits ==
> 
> f7ff315bfe3a drm/i915/guc: Add GuC kernel doc
> af14e3698d19 drm/i915/guc: Move GuC priority fields in context under 
> guc_active
> eb8a352e7c1f drm/i915/guc: Drop pin count check trick between sched_disable 
> and
> re-pin
> 7057a0daff8c drm/i915/guc: Proper xarray usage for contexts_lookup
> d97ab34c8bac drm/i915/guc: Rework and simplify locking
> 4c980575f7af drm/i915/guc: Move guc_blocked fence to struct guc_state
> 1c2b4c0ac62a drm/i915/guc: Release submit fence from an IRQ
> 14dc302536e1 drm/i915/guc: Flush G2H work queue during reset
> c0ad63d810e6 drm/i915: Allocate error capture in atomic context
> 6c1c488a3654 drm/i915/guc: Reset LRC descriptor if register returns -ENODEV
> 025e88fa74d3 drm/i915/guc: Don't touch guc_state.sched_state without a lock
> b929abcf3b59 drm/i915/guc: Take context ref when cancelling request
> b5e8c08dff35 drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost
> G2H
> cddf94c9bda0 drm/i915/selftests: Fix memory corruption in live_lrc_isolation
> c18da32e671c drm/i915/guc: Don't enable scheduling on a banned context, guc_id
> invalid, not registered
> 0c0928ba1ba8 drm/i915/selftests: Add a cancel request selftest that

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC

2021-08-15 Thread Patchwork 
== Series Details ==

Series: Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93704/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10484 -> Patchwork_20826


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20826 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_20826, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/index.html

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20826:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
- fi-cfl-guc: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-kbl-soraka:  [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-FAIL][4]
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-bxt-dsi: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6]
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-tgl-1115g4:  [PASS][7] -> [DMESG-FAIL][8]
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-cml-u2:  [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-FAIL][10]
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-cml-u2/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-cml-u2/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-kbl-8809g:   [PASS][11] -> [DMESG-FAIL][12]
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-cfl-8700k:   [PASS][13] -> [DMESG-FAIL][14]
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-cfl-8109u:   [PASS][15] -> [DMESG-FAIL][16]
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [16]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-icl-u2:  [PASS][17] -> [DMESG-FAIL][18]
   [17]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [18]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-kbl-7500u:   [PASS][19] -> [DMESG-FAIL][20]
   [19]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [20]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-bsw-nick:[PASS][21] -> [DMESG-FAIL][22]
   [21]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [22]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-icl-y:   [PASS][23] -> [DMESG-FAIL][24]
   [23]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-icl-y/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [24]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-icl-y/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-kbl-guc: [PASS][25] -> [DMESG-FAIL][26]
   [25]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [26]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-kbl-7567u:   [PASS][27] -> [DMESG-FAIL][28]
   [27]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10484/fi-kbl-7567u/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [28]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20826/fi-kbl-7567u/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
- fi-skl-guc: [PASS][29] -> [DMESG-FAIL][30]
   [29]: