[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reenable LTTPR non-transparent LT mode for DPCD_REV<1.4

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork 
== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Reenable LTTPR non-transparent LT mode for DPCD_REV<1.4
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90102/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10074 -> Patchwork_20115


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20115 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_20115, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/index.html

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20115:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@runner@aborted:
- fi-ilk-650: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1]
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-ilk-650/igt@run...@aborted.html

  
 Warnings 

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
- fi-bsw-nick:[INCOMPLETE][2] ([i915#2782] / [i915#2940]) -> 
[DMESG-FAIL][3]
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html

  
 Suppressed 

  The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
  They do not affect the overall result.

  * igt@runner@aborted:
- {fi-rkl-11500t}:NOTRUN -> [FAIL][4]
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-rkl-11500t/igt@run...@aborted.html

  
Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20115 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await@vcs0:
- fi-bsw-n3050:   [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#3457])
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-aw...@vcs0.html
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-aw...@vcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await@vecs0:
- fi-glk-dsi: [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#3457])
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-aw...@vecs0.html
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-aw...@vecs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy@bcs0:
- fi-kbl-soraka:  NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#109271]) +6 similar issues
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-b...@bcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-await@vcs0:
- fi-bsw-kefka:   [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#3457]) +2 similar 
issues
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-aw...@vcs0.html
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-aw...@vcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3:
- fi-tgl-u2:  [PASS][12] -> [FAIL][13] ([i915#1888])
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-tgl-u2/igt@gem_exec_susp...@basic-s3.html
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-tgl-u2/igt@gem_exec_susp...@basic-s3.html

  * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
- fi-kbl-soraka:  NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190])
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_huc_c...@huc-copy.html

  * igt@gem_wait@busy@all:
- fi-bsw-nick:[PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#3177] / [i915#3457])
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_wait@b...@all.html
   [16]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_wait@b...@all.html

  * igt@gem_wait@wait@all:
- fi-bsw-nick:[PASS][17] -> [FAIL][18] ([i915#3457]) +2 similar 
issues
   [17]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_wait@w...@all.html
   [18]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_wait@w...@all.html

  * igt@i915_module_load@reload:
- fi-kbl-soraka:  NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][19] ([i915#1982] / [i915#3457])
   [19]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_module_l...@reload.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
- fi-kbl-soraka:  NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][20] ([i915#2782] / [i915#3462] 
/ [i915#794])
   [20]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm:
- fi-kbl-soraka:  NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][21] ([i915#1886] / [i915#2291])
   [21]:

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reenable LTTPR non-transparent LT mode for DPCD_REV<1.4

2021-05-12 Thread Imre Deak 
Hi Lakshmi,

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:23:59PM +, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: drm/i915: Reenable LTTPR non-transparent LT mode for DPCD_REV<1.4
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90102/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10074 -> Patchwork_20115
> 
> 
> Summary
> ---
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20115 absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_20115, please notify your bug team to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/index.html
> 
> Possible new issues
> ---
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
> Patchwork_20115:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
>  Possible regressions 
> 
>   * igt@runner@aborted:
> - fi-ilk-650: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1]
>[1]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-ilk-650/igt@run...@aborted.html

x86/PAT: kms_busy:4365 map pfn RAM range req write-combining for [mem 
0x109055000-0x109055fff], got write-back
...
i915 :00:02.0: [drm] kms_busy[4365] context reset due to GPU hang

Looks like the same issue as
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3457

> 
>   
>  Warnings 
> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
> - fi-bsw-nick:[INCOMPLETE][2] ([i915#2782] / [i915#2940]) -> 
> [DMESG-FAIL][3]
>[2]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html
>[3]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html
> 
>   
>  Suppressed 
> 
>   The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
>   They do not affect the overall result.
> 
>   * igt@runner@aborted:
> - {fi-rkl-11500t}:NOTRUN -> [FAIL][4]
>[4]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-rkl-11500t/igt@run...@aborted.html
> 
>   
> Known issues
> 
> 
>   Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20115 that come from known issues:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
>  Issues hit 
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await@vcs0:
> - fi-bsw-n3050:   [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#3457])
>[5]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-aw...@vcs0.html
>[6]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-aw...@vcs0.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await@vecs0:
> - fi-glk-dsi: [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#3457])
>[7]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-aw...@vecs0.html
>[8]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-aw...@vecs0.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy@bcs0:
> - fi-kbl-soraka:  NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#109271]) +6 similar issues
>[9]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-b...@bcs0.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-await@vcs0:
> - fi-bsw-kefka:   [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#3457]) +2 similar 
> issues
>[10]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-aw...@vcs0.html
>[11]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-aw...@vcs0.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3:
> - fi-tgl-u2:  [PASS][12] -> [FAIL][13] ([i915#1888])
>[12]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-tgl-u2/igt@gem_exec_susp...@basic-s3.html
>[13]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-tgl-u2/igt@gem_exec_susp...@basic-s3.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
> - fi-kbl-soraka:  NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190])
>[14]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_huc_c...@huc-copy.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_wait@busy@all:
> - fi-bsw-nick:[PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#3177] / [i915#3457])
>[15]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_wait@b...@all.html
>[16]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_wait@b...@all.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_wait@wait@all:
> - fi-bsw-nick:[PASS][17] -> [FAIL][18] ([i915#3457]) +2 similar 
> issues
>[17]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_wait@w...@all.html
>[18]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_wait@w...@all.html
> 
>   *

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reenable LTTPR non-transparent LT mode for DPCD_REV<1.4

2021-05-13 Thread Vudum, Lakshminarayana 
Re-reported.

-Original Message-
From: Deak, Imre  
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 3:46 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Vudum, Lakshminarayana 

Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reenable LTTPR non-transparent 
LT mode for DPCD_REV<1.4

Hi Lakshmi,

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:23:59PM +, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: drm/i915: Reenable LTTPR non-transparent LT mode for DPCD_REV<1.4
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90102/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10074 -> Patchwork_20115 
> 
> 
> Summary
> ---
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20115 absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_20115, please notify your bug team to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/index.html
> 
> Possible new issues
> ---
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
> Patchwork_20115:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
>  Possible regressions 
> 
>   * igt@runner@aborted:
> - fi-ilk-650: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1]
>[1]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-ilk-650/ig
> t@run...@aborted.html

x86/PAT: kms_busy:4365 map pfn RAM range req write-combining for [mem 
0x109055000-0x109055fff], got write-back ...
i915 :00:02.0: [drm] kms_busy[4365] context reset due to GPU hang

Looks like the same issue as
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3457

> 
>   
>  Warnings 
> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
> - fi-bsw-nick:[INCOMPLETE][2] ([i915#2782] / [i915#2940]) -> 
> [DMESG-FAIL][3]
>[2]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html
>[3]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-nick/i
> gt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html
> 
>   
>  Suppressed 
> 
>   The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
>   They do not affect the overall result.
> 
>   * igt@runner@aborted:
> - {fi-rkl-11500t}:NOTRUN -> [FAIL][4]
>[4]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-rkl-11500t
> /igt@run...@aborted.html
> 
>   
> Known issues
> 
> 
>   Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20115 that come from known issues:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
>  Issues hit 
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await@vcs0:
> - fi-bsw-n3050:   [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#3457])
>[5]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-aw...@vcs0.html
>[6]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-n3050/
> igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-aw...@vcs0.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await@vecs0:
> - fi-glk-dsi: [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#3457])
>[7]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-aw...@vecs0.html
>[8]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-glk-dsi/ig
> t@gem_exec_fence@basic-aw...@vecs0.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy@bcs0:
> - fi-kbl-soraka:  NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#109271]) +6 similar issues
>[9]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-kbl-soraka
> /igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-b...@bcs0.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-await@vcs0:
> - fi-bsw-kefka:   [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#3457]) +2 similar 
> issues
>[10]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-aw...@vcs0.html
>[11]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-kefka/
> igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-aw...@vcs0.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3:
> - fi-tgl-u2:  [PASS][12] -> [FAIL][13] ([i915#1888])
>[12]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-tgl-u2/igt@gem_exec_susp...@basic-s3.html
>[13]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-tgl-u2/igt
> @gem_exec_susp...@basic-s3.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
> - fi-kbl-soraka:  NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190])
>[14]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-kbl-soraka
> /igt@gem_huc_c...@huc-copy.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_wait@busy@all:
> - fi-bsw-nick:[PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#3177] / [i915#3457])
>[15]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10074/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_wait@b...@all.html
>[16]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20115/fi-bsw-nick/i
> gt@gem_wait@b...@all.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_wait@wait@all:
> - fi-bsw-n