Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/adlp: Add support for remapping CCS FBs (rev3)
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 05:25:30AM +, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915/adlp: Add support for remapping CCS FBs (rev3) > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/94108/ > State : failure Patches 1-5 pushed to drm-intel-next, thanks for the review. The failure is unrelated, commented on it earlier in this thread. > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10553_full -> Patchwork_20971_full > > > Summary > --- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20971_full absolutely need to > be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_20971_full, please notify your bug team to allow > them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > Possible new issues > --- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_20971_full: > > ### IGT changes ### > > Possible regressions > > * igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader: > - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] >[1]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_susp...@sysfs-reader.html >[2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-iclb3/igt@i915_susp...@sysfs-reader.html > > > Known issues > > > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20971_full that come from known > issues: > > ### IGT changes ### > > Issues hit > > * igt@feature_discovery@chamelium: > - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#111827]) >[3]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-tglb8/igt@feature_discov...@chamelium.html > > * igt@feature_discovery@display-2x: > - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([i915#1839]) >[4]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-tglb3/igt@feature_discov...@display-2x.html > > * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@smoketest: > - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) +6 > similar issues >[5]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-snb5/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@smoketest.html > > * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-1us: > - shard-iclb: [PASS][6] -> [TIMEOUT][7] ([i915#3070]) >[6]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_...@in-flight-contexts-1us.html >[7]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_...@in-flight-contexts-1us.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline: > - shard-kbl: [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2846]) >[8]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html >[9]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html > - shard-glk: [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2846]) >[10]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-glk5/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html >[11]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-glk2/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-rrul@rcs0: > - shard-glk: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue >[12]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-r...@rcs0.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0: > - shard-kbl: [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar > issue >[13]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vcs0.html >[14]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vcs0.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0: > - shard-glk: [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#2842]) >[15]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-glk4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-sh...@rcs0.html >[16]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-glk4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-sh...@rcs0.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0: > - shard-tglb: [PASS][17] -> [FAIL][18] ([i915#2842]) >[17]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html >[18]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1: > - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][19] ([i915#2842]) >[19]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@vcs1.html > > * igt@gem_exec_parallel@engines@basic: > - shard-glk: [PASS][20] ->
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/adlp: Add support for remapping CCS FBs (rev3)
This looks very much like SATA drive issue. I'll replace the drive for shard-iclb3 and we'll see if this happens again. Tomi > -Original Message- > From: Deak, Imre > Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/adlp: Add support for > remapping CCS FBs (rev3) > > Hi Lakshmi, Tomi, > > could you check the failure below, looks like a storage device issue. > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 05:25:30AM +, Patchwork wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: drm/i915/adlp: Add support for remapping CCS FBs (rev3) > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/94108/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10553_full -> Patchwork_20971_full > > > > > > Summary > > --- > > > > **FAILURE** > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20971_full absolutely > need to be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in Patchwork_20971_full, please notify your bug team to allow > them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in > > CI. > > > > > > > > Possible new issues > > --- > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_20971_full: > > > > ### IGT changes ### > > > > Possible regressions > > > > * igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader: > > - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] > >[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard- > iclb2/igt@i915_susp...@sysfs-reader.html > >[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard- > iclb3/igt@i915_susp...@sysfs-reader.html > > In > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard- > iclb3/pstore6-1630987738_Panic_1.txt > > <4>[ 186.690964] ata3.00: qc timeout (cmd 0x27) > > followed by ata3/sda2 device errors. > > This happened on the same machine already at: > https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20201003134854.GA1278041@ideak- > desk.fi.intel.com/ > > and recently on the same machine also in: > > Trybot_7967/shard-iclb3 > Patchwork_20943/shard-iclb3 > IGTPW_6178/shard-iclb3 > Patchwork_20963/shard-iclb3 > Patchwork_20962/shard-iclb3 > > as well as on: > shard-iclb4 > shard-iclb7 > shard-kbl6 > shard-tglb1 > shard-tglb7 > > I can't see this related to the changes, as no CCS tests were run. > > > Known issues > > > > > > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20971_full that come from > known issues: > > > > ### IGT changes ### > > > > Issues hit > > > > * igt@feature_discovery@chamelium: > > - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#111827]) > >[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard- > tglb8/igt@feature_discov...@chamelium.html > > > > * igt@feature_discovery@display-2x: > > - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([i915#1839]) > >[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard- > tglb3/igt@feature_discov...@display-2x.html > > > > * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@smoketest: > > - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) > > +6 > similar issues > >[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard- > snb5/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@smoketest.html > > > > * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-1us: > > - shard-iclb: [PASS][6] -> [TIMEOUT][7] ([i915#3070]) > >[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard- > iclb3/igt@gem_...@in-flight-contexts-1us.html > >[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard- > iclb3/igt@gem_...@in-flight-contexts-1us.html > > > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline: > > - shard-kbl: [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2846]) > >[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard- > kbl1/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html > >[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard- > kbl1/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html > > - shard-glk: [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2846]) > >[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard- > glk5/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html > >[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard- > glk2/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html > > > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-rrul@rcs0: > > - shard-glk: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar > > issue > >[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard- > glk6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-r...@rcs0.html > > > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0: > > - shard-kbl: [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar > > issue > >[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard- > kbl3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vcs0.html > >[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/adlp: Add support for remapping CCS FBs (rev3)
Hi Lakshmi, Tomi, could you check the failure below, looks like a storage device issue. On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 05:25:30AM +, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915/adlp: Add support for remapping CCS FBs (rev3) > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/94108/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10553_full -> Patchwork_20971_full > > > Summary > --- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20971_full absolutely need to > be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_20971_full, please notify your bug team to allow > them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > Possible new issues > --- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_20971_full: > > ### IGT changes ### > > Possible regressions > > * igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader: > - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] >[1]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_susp...@sysfs-reader.html >[2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-iclb3/igt@i915_susp...@sysfs-reader.html In https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-iclb3/pstore6-1630987738_Panic_1.txt <4>[ 186.690964] ata3.00: qc timeout (cmd 0x27) followed by ata3/sda2 device errors. This happened on the same machine already at: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20201003134854.ga1278...@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com/ and recently on the same machine also in: Trybot_7967/shard-iclb3 Patchwork_20943/shard-iclb3 IGTPW_6178/shard-iclb3 Patchwork_20963/shard-iclb3 Patchwork_20962/shard-iclb3 as well as on: shard-iclb4 shard-iclb7 shard-kbl6 shard-tglb1 shard-tglb7 I can't see this related to the changes, as no CCS tests were run. > Known issues > > > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20971_full that come from known > issues: > > ### IGT changes ### > > Issues hit > > * igt@feature_discovery@chamelium: > - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#111827]) >[3]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-tglb8/igt@feature_discov...@chamelium.html > > * igt@feature_discovery@display-2x: > - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([i915#1839]) >[4]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-tglb3/igt@feature_discov...@display-2x.html > > * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@smoketest: > - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) +6 > similar issues >[5]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-snb5/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@smoketest.html > > * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-1us: > - shard-iclb: [PASS][6] -> [TIMEOUT][7] ([i915#3070]) >[6]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_...@in-flight-contexts-1us.html >[7]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_...@in-flight-contexts-1us.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline: > - shard-kbl: [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2846]) >[8]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html >[9]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html > - shard-glk: [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2846]) >[10]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-glk5/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html >[11]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-glk2/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-rrul@rcs0: > - shard-glk: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue >[12]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-r...@rcs0.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0: > - shard-kbl: [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar > issue >[13]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vcs0.html >[14]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vcs0.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0: > - shard-glk: [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#2842]) >[15]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-glk4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-sh...@rcs0.html >[16]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-glk4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-sh...@rcs0.html > > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0: > - shard-tglb:
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/adlp: Add support for remapping CCS FBs (rev3)
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/adlp: Add support for remapping CCS FBs (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/94108/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10553_full -> Patchwork_20971_full Summary --- **FAILURE** Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20971_full absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_20971_full, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. Possible new issues --- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20971_full: ### IGT changes ### Possible regressions * igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader: - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_susp...@sysfs-reader.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-iclb3/igt@i915_susp...@sysfs-reader.html Known issues Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20971_full that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### Issues hit * igt@feature_discovery@chamelium: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#111827]) [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-tglb8/igt@feature_discov...@chamelium.html * igt@feature_discovery@display-2x: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([i915#1839]) [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-tglb3/igt@feature_discov...@display-2x.html * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@smoketest: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) +6 similar issues [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-snb5/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@smoketest.html * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-1us: - shard-iclb: [PASS][6] -> [TIMEOUT][7] ([i915#3070]) [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_...@in-flight-contexts-1us.html [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_...@in-flight-contexts-1us.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline: - shard-kbl: [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2846]) [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html - shard-glk: [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2846]) [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-glk5/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-glk2/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-rrul@rcs0: - shard-glk: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-r...@rcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0: - shard-kbl: [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vcs0.html [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0: - shard-glk: [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#2842]) [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-glk4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-sh...@rcs0.html [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-glk4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-sh...@rcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0: - shard-tglb: [PASS][17] -> [FAIL][18] ([i915#2842]) [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][19] ([i915#2842]) [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@vcs1.html * igt@gem_exec_parallel@engines@basic: - shard-glk: [PASS][20] -> [DMESG-WARN][21] ([i915#118] / [i915#95]) +1 similar issue [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10553/shard-glk9/igt@gem_exec_parallel@engi...@basic.html [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20971/shard-glk7/igt@gem_exec_parallel@engi...@basic.html * igt@gem_exec_params@secure-non-master: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][22] ([fdo#112283]) [22]:
