Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/debugfs: add noreclaim annotations (rev2)

2021-12-14 Thread Vudum, Lakshminarayana 
All are known issues. Re-reported the results.

-Original Message-
From: Auld, Matthew  
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 1:26 AM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Vudum, Lakshminarayana 

Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/debugfs: add noreclaim 
annotations (rev2)

On 14/12/2021 04:55, Patchwork wrote:
> *Patch Details*
> *Series:* drm/i915/debugfs: add noreclaim annotations (rev2)
> *URL:*https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/97966/ 
> 
> *State:*  failure
> *Details:*
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/index.html
> 
> 
> 
>   CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10996_full -> Patchwork_21842_full
> 
> 
> Summary
> 
> *FAILURE*
> 
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_21842_full absolutely 
> need to be verified manually.
> 
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes 
> introduced in Patchwork_21842_full, please notify your bug team to 
> allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false 
> positives in CI.
> 
> 
> Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
> 
> No changes in participating hosts
> 
> 
> Possible new issues
> 
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_21842_full:
> 
> 
>   IGT changes
> 
> 
> Possible regressions
> 
>   *
> 
> igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area:
> 
>   o
> 
> shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> SKIP
> 
>  igt@kms_psr2...@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area.html>
> 
>   o
> 
> shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> SKIP
> 
>  igt@kms_psr2...@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area.html>
> 
>   *
> 
> igt@perf@enable-disable:
> 
>   o shard-glk: PASS
> 
> 
> -> FAIL
> 
>  gt@p...@enable-disable.html>
> 
> 
> Suppressed
> 
> The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
> They do not affect the overall result.
> 
>   * igt@kms_psr2_sf@primary-plane-update-sf-dmg-area:
>   o {shard-rkl}: NOTRUN -> SKIP
> 
>  igt@kms_psr2...@primary-plane-update-sf-dmg-area.html>
> 

These all look to be unrelated.

> 
> Known issues
> 
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_21842_full that come from 
> known
> issues:
> 
> 
>   IGT changes
> 
> 
> Issues hit
> 
>   *
> 
> igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@rcs0:
> 
>   o shard-apl: PASS
> 
> 
> -> DMESG-WARN
> 
> 
> ([i915#180]) +2 similar issues
>   *
> 
> igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vcs0:
> 
>   o shard-kbl: PASS
> 
> 
> -> DMESG-WARN
> 
> 
> ([i915#180]) +5 similar issues
>   *
> 
> igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
> 
>   o shard-kbl: PASS
> 
> 
> -> FAIL
> 
> 
> ([i915#2846])
>   *
> 
> igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0:
> 
>   o shard-glk: PASS
> 
> 
> -> FAIL
> 
> 
> ([i915#2842])
>   *
> 
> igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0:
> 
>   o shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> FAIL
> 
> 
> ([i915#2842])
>   *
> 
> igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1:
> 
>   o shard-kbl: PASS
> 
> 
> -> FAIL
> 
> 
> ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue
>   *
> 
>

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/debugfs: add noreclaim annotations (rev2)

2021-12-14 Thread Matthew Auld 

On 14/12/2021 04:55, Patchwork wrote:

*Patch Details*
*Series:*   drm/i915/debugfs: add noreclaim annotations (rev2)
*URL:*	https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/97966/ 


*State:*failure
*Details:* 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/index.html 




  CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10996_full -> Patchwork_21842_full


Summary

*FAILURE*

Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_21842_full absolutely need 
to be

verified manually.

If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_21842_full, please notify your bug team to allow 
them

to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.


Participating hosts (10 -> 10)

No changes in participating hosts


Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
Patchwork_21842_full:



  IGT changes


Possible regressions

  *

igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area:

  o

shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> SKIP



  o

shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> SKIP



  *

igt@perf@enable-disable:

  o shard-glk: PASS


-> FAIL




Suppressed

The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
They do not affect the overall result.

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@primary-plane-update-sf-dmg-area:
  o {shard-rkl}: NOTRUN -> SKIP





These all look to be unrelated.



Known issues

Here are the changes found in Patchwork_21842_full that come from known 
issues:



  IGT changes


Issues hit

  *

igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@rcs0:

  o shard-apl: PASS


-> DMESG-WARN


([i915#180]) +2 similar issues
  *

igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vcs0:

  o shard-kbl: PASS


-> DMESG-WARN


([i915#180]) +5 similar issues
  *

igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:

  o shard-kbl: PASS


-> FAIL


([i915#2846])
  *

igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0:

  o shard-glk: PASS


-> FAIL


([i915#2842])
  *

igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0:

  o shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> FAIL


([i915#2842])
  *

igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1:

  o shard-kbl: PASS


-> FAIL


([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue
  *

igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-multi:

  o shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> SKIP


([i915#4613]) +2 similar issues
  *

igt@gem_lmem_swapping@random:

  o

shard-apl: NOTRUN -> SKIP


([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613])

  o

shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> SKIP

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/debugfs: add noreclaim annotations (rev2)

2021-12-13 Thread Patchwork 
== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/debugfs: add noreclaim annotations (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/97966/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10996_full -> Patchwork_21842_full


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_21842_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_21842_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
--

  No changes in participating hosts

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
Patchwork_21842_full:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1]
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_psr2...@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area.html
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][2]
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_psr2...@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area.html

  * igt@perf@enable-disable:
- shard-glk:  [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4]
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10996/shard-glk1/igt@p...@enable-disable.html
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/shard-glk1/igt@p...@enable-disable.html

  
 Suppressed 

  The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
  They do not affect the overall result.

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@primary-plane-update-sf-dmg-area:
- {shard-rkl}:NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5]
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/shard-rkl-1/igt@kms_psr2...@primary-plane-update-sf-dmg-area.html

  
Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_21842_full that come from known 
issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@rcs0:
- shard-apl:  [PASS][6] -> [DMESG-WARN][7] ([i915#180]) +2 similar 
issues
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10996/shard-apl4/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation...@rcs0.html
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/shard-apl2/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation...@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vcs0:
- shard-kbl:  [PASS][8] -> [DMESG-WARN][9] ([i915#180]) +5 similar 
issues
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10996/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation...@vcs0.html
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation...@vcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
- shard-kbl:  [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2846])
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10996/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0:
- shard-glk:  [PASS][12] -> [FAIL][13] ([i915#2842])
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10996/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-sh...@rcs0.html
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/shard-glk3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-sh...@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0:
- shard-kbl:  NOTRUN -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#2842])
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-s...@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1:
- shard-kbl:  [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar 
issue
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10996/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@vcs1.html
   [16]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@vcs1.html

  * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-multi:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][17] ([i915#4613]) +2 similar issues
   [17]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@parallel-multi.html

  * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@random:
- shard-apl:  NOTRUN -> [SKIP][18] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613])
   [18]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/shard-apl6/igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@random.html
- shard-kbl:  NOTRUN -> [SKIP][19] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +1 
similar issue
   [19]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21842/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@random.html
- shard-skl:  NOTRUN -> [SKIP][20] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +1 
similar issue
   [20]: 
https://