Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [v3,1/2] Revert "drm/i915/ehl: Update MOCS table for EHL"

2019-11-13 Thread Matt Roper
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:49:53AM +, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: series starting with [v3,1/2] Revert "drm/i915/ehl: Update MOCS table 
> for EHL"
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/69383/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7323_full -> Patchwork_15245_full
> 
> 
> Summary
> ---
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_15245_full absolutely need to 
> be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_15245_full, please notify your bug team to allow 
> them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   
> 
> Possible new issues
> ---
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
> Patchwork_15245_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
>  Possible regressions 
> 
>   * igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-rc6-ctx-render:
> - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1] +1 similar issue
>[1]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-tglb4/igt@gem_mocs_setti...@mocs-rc6-ctx-render.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-settings-ctx-render:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][2] -> [FAIL][3] +10 similar issues
>[2]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_mocs_setti...@mocs-settings-ctx-render.html
>[3]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_mocs_setti...@mocs-settings-ctx-render.html

These are expected failures from this change --- this IGT test hardcodes
the expected MOCS table into the test, so corrections to the bspec like
this also need to be reflected in IGT.  I'll send along an IGT patch to
address this shortly.

Since the rest of the results are correct, added a Cc:stable to the
first patch and pushed to dinq.


Matt

> 
>   
> Known issues
> 
> 
>   Here are the changes found in Patchwork_15245_full that come from known 
> issues:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
>  Issues hit 
> 
>   * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@vcs1-cleanup:
> - shard-iclb: [PASS][4] -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109276] / [fdo#112080])
>[4]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@vcs1-cleanup.html
>[5]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@vcs1-cleanup.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress:
> - shard-snb:  [PASS][6] -> [FAIL][7] ([fdo#109661])
>[6]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-snb2/igt@gem_...@unwedge-stress.html
>[7]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@unwedge-stress.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke:
> - shard-iclb: [PASS][8] -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#110854])
>[8]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_balan...@smoke.html
>[9]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_balan...@smoke.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_create@basic:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][10] -> [INCOMPLETE][11] ([fdo#111736])
>[10]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-tglb9/igt@gem_exec_cre...@basic.html
>[11]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_cre...@basic.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs1-fds:
> - shard-iclb: [PASS][12] -> [SKIP][13] ([fdo#112080]) +7 similar 
> issues
>[12]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs1-fds.html
>[13]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs1-fds.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_schedule@fifo-bsd:
> - shard-iclb: [PASS][14] -> [SKIP][15] ([fdo#112146]) +1 similar 
> issue
>[14]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_sched...@fifo-bsd.html
>[15]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_sched...@fifo-bsd.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked:
> - shard-hsw:  [PASS][16] -> [INCOMPLETE][17] ([fdo#103540])
>[16]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-hsw1/igt@gem_persistent_rel...@forked.html
>[17]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-hsw8/igt@gem_persistent_rel...@forked.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_sync@basic-store-each:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][18] -> [INCOMPLETE][19] ([fdo#111647] / 
> [fdo#111747])
>[18]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-tglb4/igt@gem_s...@basic-store-each.html
>[19]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_s...@basic-store-each.html
> 
>   * 

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [v3,1/2] Revert "drm/i915/ehl: Update MOCS table for EHL"

2019-11-13 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [v3,1/2] Revert "drm/i915/ehl: Update MOCS table 
for EHL"
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/69383/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7323_full -> Patchwork_15245_full


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_15245_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_15245_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
Patchwork_15245_full:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-rc6-ctx-render:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1] +1 similar issue
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-tglb4/igt@gem_mocs_setti...@mocs-rc6-ctx-render.html

  * igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-settings-ctx-render:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][2] -> [FAIL][3] +10 similar issues
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_mocs_setti...@mocs-settings-ctx-render.html
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_mocs_setti...@mocs-settings-ctx-render.html

  
Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_15245_full that come from known 
issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@vcs1-cleanup:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][4] -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109276] / [fdo#112080])
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@vcs1-cleanup.html
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@vcs1-cleanup.html

  * igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress:
- shard-snb:  [PASS][6] -> [FAIL][7] ([fdo#109661])
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-snb2/igt@gem_...@unwedge-stress.html
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@unwedge-stress.html

  * igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][8] -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#110854])
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_balan...@smoke.html
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_balan...@smoke.html

  * igt@gem_exec_create@basic:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][10] -> [INCOMPLETE][11] ([fdo#111736])
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-tglb9/igt@gem_exec_cre...@basic.html
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_cre...@basic.html

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs1-fds:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][12] -> [SKIP][13] ([fdo#112080]) +7 similar 
issues
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs1-fds.html
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs1-fds.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@fifo-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][14] -> [SKIP][15] ([fdo#112146]) +1 similar 
issue
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_sched...@fifo-bsd.html
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_sched...@fifo-bsd.html

  * igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked:
- shard-hsw:  [PASS][16] -> [INCOMPLETE][17] ([fdo#103540])
   [16]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-hsw1/igt@gem_persistent_rel...@forked.html
   [17]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-hsw8/igt@gem_persistent_rel...@forked.html

  * igt@gem_sync@basic-store-each:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][18] -> [INCOMPLETE][19] ([fdo#111647] / 
[fdo#111747])
   [18]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-tglb4/igt@gem_s...@basic-store-each.html
   [19]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_s...@basic-store-each.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-busy:
- shard-hsw:  [PASS][20] -> [DMESG-WARN][21] ([fdo#110789] / 
[fdo#111870])
   [20]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7323/shard-hsw4/igt@gem_userptr_bl...@map-fixed-invalidate-busy.html
   [21]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15245/shard-hsw1/igt@gem_userptr_bl...@map-fixed-invalidate-busy.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-busy-gup:
- shard-hsw:  [PASS][22] -> [DMESG-WARN][23] ([fdo#111870]) +1 
similar issue
   [22]: