Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fixup forcewake spinlock fallout in drpc debugfs function
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:52:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > My forcewake spinlock patches have a functional conflict with Ben > Widawsky's gen6 drpc support for debugfs. Result was a benign warning > about trying to read an non-atomic variabla with atomic_read. I've merged this to drm-intel-fixes -- keith.pack...@intel.com pgp7WCOBT7Rmo.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fixup forcewake spinlock fallout in drpc debugfs function
On 01/25/12 04:52, Daniel Vetter wrote: My forcewake spinlock patches have a functional conflict with Ben Widawsky's gen6 drpc support for debugfs. Result was a benign warning about trying to read an non-atomic variabla with atomic_read. Note that the entire check is racy anyway and purely informational. Also update it to reflect the forcewake voodoo changes, the kernel can now also hold onto a forcewake reference for longer times. Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
