Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tools/null_state/gen9: Send atleast one valid component in VF state
Ben Widawsky writes: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:27:07PM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote: >> A programming restriction exists for this instruction, atleast one component >> of one valid vertex element must be enabled. >> >> Cc: Ben Widawsky >> Cc: Chris Wilson >> Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery >> --- >> tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c | 7 ++- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c >> b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c >> index 6f808f8..b3766ea 100644 >> --- a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c >> +++ b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c >> @@ -440,7 +440,12 @@ int gen9_setup_null_render_state(struct >> intel_batchbuffer *batch) >> /* Vertex buffers */ >> gen8_emit_vertex_buffers(batch); >> gen8_emit_vertex_elements(batch); >> -OUT_CMD(GEN9_3DSTATE_COMPONENT_PACKING, 5); >> + >> +OUT_BATCH(GEN9_3DSTATE_COMPONENT_PACKING | 3); >> +OUT_BATCH(1); >> +OUT_BATCH(0); >> +OUT_BATCH(0); >> +OUT_BATCH(0); >> >> OUT_BATCH(GEN6_3DSTATE_VF_STATISTICS | 1 /* Enable */); >> > > Like I said on IRC, I don't think this does anything unless you set bit 9 of > 3DSTATE_VF.0. Also, I believe you should be setting 0xf, not 1 since you'd > want > to use all 4 components. > > So I'm not really sure what we're aiming to do. If you make it 0xf, and add a > comment about how this command doesn't do anything because we're not setting > up > 3DSTATE_VF packing, it's: > Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky > I messed with this one. The version with 0x1 went with your r-b. The generator side change only so we can amend the version that gets committed to kernel side still. Sorry about this. -Mika > I'm still more in favor of dropping the command altogether, that too would be: > Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky > > -- > Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center > ___ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tools/null_state/gen9: Send atleast one valid component in VF state
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 11:13:46AM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Ben Widawsky writes: > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:27:07PM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote: > >> A programming restriction exists for this instruction, atleast one > >> component > >> of one valid vertex element must be enabled. > >> > >> Cc: Ben Widawsky > >> Cc: Chris Wilson > >> Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery > >> --- > >> tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c | 7 ++- > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c > >> b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c > >> index 6f808f8..b3766ea 100644 > >> --- a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c > >> +++ b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c > >> @@ -440,7 +440,12 @@ int gen9_setup_null_render_state(struct > >> intel_batchbuffer *batch) > >>/* Vertex buffers */ > >>gen8_emit_vertex_buffers(batch); > >>gen8_emit_vertex_elements(batch); > >> - OUT_CMD(GEN9_3DSTATE_COMPONENT_PACKING, 5); > >> + > >> + OUT_BATCH(GEN9_3DSTATE_COMPONENT_PACKING | 3); > >> + OUT_BATCH(1); > >> + OUT_BATCH(0); > >> + OUT_BATCH(0); > >> + OUT_BATCH(0); > >> > >>OUT_BATCH(GEN6_3DSTATE_VF_STATISTICS | 1 /* Enable */); > >> > > > > Like I said on IRC, I don't think this does anything unless you set bit 9 of > > 3DSTATE_VF.0. Also, I believe you should be setting 0xf, not 1 since you'd > > want > > to use all 4 components. > > > > So I'm not really sure what we're aiming to do. If you make it 0xf, and add > > a > > comment about how this command doesn't do anything because we're not > > setting up > > 3DSTATE_VF packing, it's: > > Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky > > > > I'm still more in favor of dropping the command altogether, that too would > > be: > > Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky > > We are trying here just to satisfy the minimum requirements the bspec > states. > Right, except I am saying at least set minimal state which makes sense. Packing 1 component of the vertex element makes little sense (though doing this at all makes even less sense). > The bspec also states that with gen9+, the 3d pipeline state > doesn't need to be initialized. We should seek confirmation > about this and if it is so, remove the null state for gen9+. > That would be super terrific. > -Mika > > > > > -- > > Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center > > ___ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tools/null_state/gen9: Send atleast one valid component in VF state
Ben Widawsky writes: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:27:07PM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote: >> A programming restriction exists for this instruction, atleast one component >> of one valid vertex element must be enabled. >> >> Cc: Ben Widawsky >> Cc: Chris Wilson >> Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery >> --- >> tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c | 7 ++- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c >> b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c >> index 6f808f8..b3766ea 100644 >> --- a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c >> +++ b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c >> @@ -440,7 +440,12 @@ int gen9_setup_null_render_state(struct >> intel_batchbuffer *batch) >> /* Vertex buffers */ >> gen8_emit_vertex_buffers(batch); >> gen8_emit_vertex_elements(batch); >> -OUT_CMD(GEN9_3DSTATE_COMPONENT_PACKING, 5); >> + >> +OUT_BATCH(GEN9_3DSTATE_COMPONENT_PACKING | 3); >> +OUT_BATCH(1); >> +OUT_BATCH(0); >> +OUT_BATCH(0); >> +OUT_BATCH(0); >> >> OUT_BATCH(GEN6_3DSTATE_VF_STATISTICS | 1 /* Enable */); >> > > Like I said on IRC, I don't think this does anything unless you set bit 9 of > 3DSTATE_VF.0. Also, I believe you should be setting 0xf, not 1 since you'd > want > to use all 4 components. > > So I'm not really sure what we're aiming to do. If you make it 0xf, and add a > comment about how this command doesn't do anything because we're not setting > up > 3DSTATE_VF packing, it's: > Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky > > I'm still more in favor of dropping the command altogether, that too would be: > Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky We are trying here just to satisfy the minimum requirements the bspec states. The bspec also states that with gen9+, the 3d pipeline state doesn't need to be initialized. We should seek confirmation about this and if it is so, remove the null state for gen9+. -Mika > > -- > Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center > ___ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tools/null_state/gen9: Send atleast one valid component in VF state
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:27:07PM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote: > A programming restriction exists for this instruction, atleast one component > of one valid vertex element must be enabled. > > Cc: Ben Widawsky > Cc: Chris Wilson > Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery > --- > tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c | 7 ++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c > b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c > index 6f808f8..b3766ea 100644 > --- a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c > +++ b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c > @@ -440,7 +440,12 @@ int gen9_setup_null_render_state(struct > intel_batchbuffer *batch) > /* Vertex buffers */ > gen8_emit_vertex_buffers(batch); > gen8_emit_vertex_elements(batch); > - OUT_CMD(GEN9_3DSTATE_COMPONENT_PACKING, 5); > + > + OUT_BATCH(GEN9_3DSTATE_COMPONENT_PACKING | 3); > + OUT_BATCH(1); > + OUT_BATCH(0); > + OUT_BATCH(0); > + OUT_BATCH(0); > > OUT_BATCH(GEN6_3DSTATE_VF_STATISTICS | 1 /* Enable */); > Like I said on IRC, I don't think this does anything unless you set bit 9 of 3DSTATE_VF.0. Also, I believe you should be setting 0xf, not 1 since you'd want to use all 4 components. So I'm not really sure what we're aiming to do. If you make it 0xf, and add a comment about how this command doesn't do anything because we're not setting up 3DSTATE_VF packing, it's: Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky I'm still more in favor of dropping the command altogether, that too would be: Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tools/null_state/gen9: Send atleast one valid component in VF state
Arun Siluvery writes: > A programming restriction exists for this instruction, atleast one component > of one valid vertex element must be enabled. > > Cc: Ben Widawsky > Cc: Chris Wilson > Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala > --- > tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c | 7 ++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c > b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c > index 6f808f8..b3766ea 100644 > --- a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c > +++ b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_renderstate_gen9.c > @@ -440,7 +440,12 @@ int gen9_setup_null_render_state(struct > intel_batchbuffer *batch) > /* Vertex buffers */ > gen8_emit_vertex_buffers(batch); > gen8_emit_vertex_elements(batch); > - OUT_CMD(GEN9_3DSTATE_COMPONENT_PACKING, 5); > + > + OUT_BATCH(GEN9_3DSTATE_COMPONENT_PACKING | 3); > + OUT_BATCH(1); > + OUT_BATCH(0); > + OUT_BATCH(0); > + OUT_BATCH(0); > > OUT_BATCH(GEN6_3DSTATE_VF_STATISTICS | 1 /* Enable */); > > -- > 1.9.1 > > ___ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
