Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v16 02/13] drm/i915: add syncobj timeline support
On 10/09/2019 00:06, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-09-09 10:31:05) v9: After explanations on https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2019-August/229287.html drop the ordering check from v8 (Lionel) Designing an interface to be antirobust. Userspace shooting itself in the foot is fine; userspace breaking the kernel in the process, no. -Chris How is that breaking the kernel? Adding points out of order to the timeline just leads to more waiting. -Lionel ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v16 02/13] drm/i915: add syncobj timeline support
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-09-09 10:31:05) > v9: After explanations on > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2019-August/229287.html > drop the ordering check from v8 (Lionel) Designing an interface to be antirobust. Userspace shooting itself in the foot is fine; userspace breaking the kernel in the process, no. -Chris ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx