Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/i915: misc fixes in headers (RESEND)
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:22:55PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 13:58:48 +0100, Petri Latvala> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > On Thu, 08 Mar 2018, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-03-08 09:50:33) > > > >> This is a resend, to make patchwork happy. > > > >> All patches already been reviewed. > > > > > > > > It's still being ignored. :( > > > > > > At least patchwork detected this as a series [1], often that's the > > > problem. > > > > > > Patchwork is not seeing patch 4/4, and due to its weird logic, it's > > still waiting for it instead of considering the series "incomplete". > > > > Looking at the series page, it doesn't even have a revision number. > > > > This causes the pw REST api to show the series as one with 0 patches > > when listing series, there's no series-new-revision event (CI is > > watching that), and it also causes the below: > > > > > I tried to start testing manually from patchwork, it gives me "failed!". > > > > > > Arek checked the logs and patch 4/4 hasn't been received by pw at > > all. Maybe it's still on the way, who knows. > > > > I'm not sure if this is related, but list archive decided to assign > patch 1/4 [1] to old series [2] instead new one [3] > > [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/158080.html > [2] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/thread.html#157974 > [3] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/thread.html#158081 > > ps. patch 4/4 is already in archive [4] > > [4] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/158082.html The patch got lost in time and space and has never reached patchwork's mail server. I feed the patchwork with a copy of the mail manually. Expect results soon. -- Cheers, Arek ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/i915: misc fixes in headers (RESEND)
On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 13:58:48 +0100, Petri Latvalawrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: On Thu, 08 Mar 2018, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-03-08 09:50:33) >> This is a resend, to make patchwork happy. >> All patches already been reviewed. > > It's still being ignored. :( At least patchwork detected this as a series [1], often that's the problem. Patchwork is not seeing patch 4/4, and due to its weird logic, it's still waiting for it instead of considering the series "incomplete". Looking at the series page, it doesn't even have a revision number. This causes the pw REST api to show the series as one with 0 patches when listing series, there's no series-new-revision event (CI is watching that), and it also causes the below: I tried to start testing manually from patchwork, it gives me "failed!". Arek checked the logs and patch 4/4 hasn't been received by pw at all. Maybe it's still on the way, who knows. I'm not sure if this is related, but list archive decided to assign patch 1/4 [1] to old series [2] instead new one [3] [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/158080.html [2] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/thread.html#157974 [3] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/thread.html#158081 ps. patch 4/4 is already in archive [4] [4] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/158082.html ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/i915: misc fixes in headers (RESEND)
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 08 Mar 2018, Chris Wilsonwrote: > > Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-03-08 09:50:33) > >> This is a resend, to make patchwork happy. > >> All patches already been reviewed. > > > > It's still being ignored. :( > > At least patchwork detected this as a series [1], often that's the > problem. Patchwork is not seeing patch 4/4, and due to its weird logic, it's still waiting for it instead of considering the series "incomplete". Looking at the series page, it doesn't even have a revision number. This causes the pw REST api to show the series as one with 0 patches when listing series, there's no series-new-revision event (CI is watching that), and it also causes the below: > I tried to start testing manually from patchwork, it gives me "failed!". Arek checked the logs and patch 4/4 hasn't been received by pw at all. Maybe it's still on the way, who knows. -- Petri Latvala ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/i915: misc fixes in headers (RESEND)
On Thu, 08 Mar 2018, Chris Wilsonwrote: > Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-03-08 09:50:33) >> This is a resend, to make patchwork happy. >> All patches already been reviewed. > > It's still being ignored. :( At least patchwork detected this as a series [1], often that's the problem. I tried to start testing manually from patchwork, it gives me "failed!". BR, Jani. [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/39589/ -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/i915: misc fixes in headers (RESEND)
Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-03-08 09:50:33) > This is a resend, to make patchwork happy. > All patches already been reviewed. It's still being ignored. :( -Chris ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx