Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 16/21] gem_wsim: Some more example workloads
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-08 13:10:53) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > A few additional workloads useful for experimenting with scheduling. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Acked-by: Chris Wilson -Chris ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 16/21] gem_wsim: Some more example workloads
On 08/05/2019 14:56, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-08 14:50:41) On 08/05/2019 13:27, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-08 13:10:53) From: Tvrtko Ursulin A few additional workloads useful for experimenting with scheduling. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Are the extra modes & .wsim supported by scripts/media-bench.pl? i.e. can I just run media-bench.pl and have it exercise all the new features? Not sure what you mean by extra modes? If all new wsim commands then no. They are not in the default media-bench.pl set. The workloads from this patch are not in that set so are just for reference. That's what I meant, are the new example.wsim with explicit engine maps and so I presume inter-mixing of load-balanced workloads with other work included in the default set run by ./scripts/media-bench.pl It's not in the default set but manual workloads can be given to media-bench.pl using the -w switch. String passed there is passed onto gem_wsim directly so one or more workloads can be manually specified. What's the minimum amount of effort I need to exercise all the new features of gem_wsim? :) frame-split-60fps.wsim uses almost all new features: preemption control, engine map, load balance, bond, submit fence and the "endless" batch. Only missing is SSEU control for which I did not add an example workload (there is a snippet in README though) since the access to uapi is blocked outside the gen11 special case. To use that the i915 IS_GEN11 check in set_sseu needs to be lifted as well. Virtual engine (gem_wsim -b i915) is supported by media-bench.pl even with the old/default set of workloads. The catch is old wsim workloads use VCS to mean any VCS and in those cases -b i915 will set up the virtual engine automatically/transparently. So those old workloads can be ran both with userspace or i915 balancing. And seems to still be working. I'd hope so, I mostly do test things! :) Regards, Tvrtko ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 16/21] gem_wsim: Some more example workloads
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-08 14:50:41) > > On 08/05/2019 13:27, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-08 13:10:53) > >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin > >> > >> A few additional workloads useful for experimenting with scheduling. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin > > > > Are the extra modes & .wsim supported by scripts/media-bench.pl? > > i.e. can I just run media-bench.pl and have it exercise all the new > > features? > > Not sure what you mean by extra modes? If all new wsim commands then no. > They are not in the default media-bench.pl set. The workloads from this > patch are not in that set so are just for reference. That's what I meant, are the new example.wsim with explicit engine maps and so I presume inter-mixing of load-balanced workloads with other work included in the default set run by ./scripts/media-bench.pl What's the minimum amount of effort I need to exercise all the new features of gem_wsim? :) > Virtual engine (gem_wsim -b i915) is supported by media-bench.pl even > with the old/default set of workloads. > > The catch is old wsim workloads use VCS to mean any VCS and in those > cases -b i915 will set up the virtual engine > automatically/transparently. So those old workloads can be ran both with > userspace or i915 balancing. And seems to still be working. -Chris ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 16/21] gem_wsim: Some more example workloads
On 08/05/2019 13:27, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-08 13:10:53) From: Tvrtko Ursulin A few additional workloads useful for experimenting with scheduling. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Are the extra modes & .wsim supported by scripts/media-bench.pl? i.e. can I just run media-bench.pl and have it exercise all the new features? Not sure what you mean by extra modes? If all new wsim commands then no. They are not in the default media-bench.pl set. The workloads from this patch are not in that set so are just for reference. Virtual engine (gem_wsim -b i915) is supported by media-bench.pl even with the old/default set of workloads. The catch is old wsim workloads use VCS to mean any VCS and in those cases -b i915 will set up the virtual engine automatically/transparently. So those old workloads can be ran both with userspace or i915 balancing. Regards, Tvrtko ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 16/21] gem_wsim: Some more example workloads
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-08 13:10:53) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > A few additional workloads useful for experimenting with scheduling. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Are the extra modes & .wsim supported by scripts/media-bench.pl? i.e. can I just run media-bench.pl and have it exercise all the new features? -Chris ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
