On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:25:46 +0000,
Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> The irq descriptor is already there, no need to look it up again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <m...@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ int arch_show_interrupts(struct seq_file
>               seq_printf(p, "%*s%u:%s", prec - 1, "IPI", i,
>                          prec >= 4 ? " " : "");
>               for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> -                     seq_printf(p, "%10u ", kstat_irqs_cpu(irq, cpu));
> +                     seq_printf(p, "%10u ", irq_desc_kstat_cpu(ipi_desc[i], 
> cpu));
>               seq_printf(p, "      %s\n", ipi_types[i]);
>       }
>  
> 
> 

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <m...@kernel.org>

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to