Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/display: Add smem fallback allocation for dpt (rev5)

2022-06-17 Thread Vudum, Lakshminarayana 
Issue is related to #5726. Updated the filters.

-Original Message-
From: Juha-Pekka Heikkila  
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2022 4:36 AM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Vudum, Lakshminarayana 

Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/3] 
drm/i915/display: Add smem fallback allocation for dpt (rev5)

Hi Lakshmi,

here would be another false positive from ci. My changes are not affecting this 
error with busyness on skl with igt@kms_flip@busy-flip@a-edp1

/Juha-Pekka

On 17.6.2022 13.19, Patchwork wrote:
> *Patch Details*
> *Series:* series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/display: Add smem fallback 
> allocation for dpt (rev5)
> *URL:*https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/104983/ 
> 
> *State:*  failure
> *Details:*
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104983v5/index.html
>  l>
> 
> 
>   CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11772_full -> 
> Patchwork_104983v5_full
> 
> 
> Summary
> 
> *FAILURE*
> 
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_104983v5_full absolutely 
> need to be verified manually.
> 
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes 
> introduced in Patchwork_104983v5_full, please notify your bug team to 
> allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false 
> positives in CI.
> 
> 
> Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
> 
> No changes in participating hosts
> 
> 
> Possible new issues
> 
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_104983v5_full:
> 
> 
>   IGT changes
> 
> 
> Possible regressions
> 
>   * igt@kms_flip@busy-flip@a-edp1:
>   o shard-skl: PASS
> 
> 
> -> FAIL
> 
>  4/igt@kms_flip@busy-f...@a-edp1.html>
> 
> 
> Known issues
> 
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_104983v5_full that come from 
> known issues:
> 
> 
>   CI changes
> 
> 
> Issues hit
> 
>   * boot:
>   o shard-glk: (PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> ,
> PASS
> 
> )
> -> (PASS
> 
> ,
>

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/display: Add smem fallback allocation for dpt (rev5)

2022-06-17 Thread Juha-Pekka Heikkila 

Hi Lakshmi,

here would be another false positive from ci. My changes are not 
affecting this error with busyness on skl with igt@kms_flip@busy-flip@a-edp1


/Juha-Pekka

On 17.6.2022 13.19, Patchwork wrote:

*Patch Details*
*Series:*	series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/display: Add smem fallback 
allocation for dpt (rev5)
*URL:*	https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/104983/ 


*State:*failure
*Details:* 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104983v5/index.html 




  CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11772_full -> Patchwork_104983v5_full


Summary

*FAILURE*

Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_104983v5_full absolutely 
need to be

verified manually.

If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_104983v5_full, please notify your bug team to 
allow them

to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.


Participating hosts (10 -> 10)

No changes in participating hosts


Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
Patchwork_104983v5_full:



  IGT changes


Possible regressions

  * igt@kms_flip@busy-flip@a-edp1:
  o shard-skl: PASS


-> FAIL




Known issues

Here are the changes found in Patchwork_104983v5_full that come from 
known issues:



  CI changes


Issues hit

  * boot:
  o shard-glk: (PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

)
-> (PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS

,
PASS