Re: [Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS

[Tuukka Turunen]

Hi Kim,

Even partial Posix will help you get going. It is possible to do without, but 
then more work will be needed.

When looking into QPA, perhaps the one for INTEGRITY is the one that you want 
to start with.

What kind of hardware and applications you are thinking about?

Yours,

Tuukka

On 27/09/2018, 6.34, "Interest on behalf of Jason H" 
 wrote:

I think POSIX will make it very l vastly easier. But a graphical raster 
framebuffer should be doable. Look at QPA, the platform plugin architecture and 
see what you can adapt. 

Warning: I've never tried to do it. 

> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 2:09 AM
> From: "Kim Hartman" 
> To: "interest@qt-project.org" 
> Subject: [Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS
>
> I am investigating how to bring Qt to our INtime RTOS. The INtime 
Distributed RTOS runs on standard PC hardware as a multicore AMP OS (no SMP and 
not POSIX compliant). Currently the RTOS has only a text console output based 
on INT10 services. The RTOS is fully preemptive, with strict priority based 
scheduling, managed process services with rich IPC services. The development 
environment is tightly coupled with MS VC (2008 and on) with ANSI C and C++11 
language support. The RTOS is very stable and been commercially deployed for 
decades. It lacks a means for graphical programming, mostly for industrial 
controls application. What is the means to port Qt to this RTOS? We're not 
intending on building out OpenGL ES 2.0 unless absolutely necessary. I've read 
some marketing materials about Qt on MCU, however the details seem very thin. 
It's not Windows, Linux, OSX, Android, QNX, Integrity, or VxWorks... how to go 
about getting this done?
> ___
> Interest mailing list
> Interest@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest


___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS

[Jason H]

I think POSIX will make it very l vastly easier. But a graphical raster 
framebuffer should be doable. Look at QPA, the platform plugin architecture and 
see what you can adapt. 

Warning: I've never tried to do it. 

> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 2:09 AM
> From: "Kim Hartman" 
> To: "interest@qt-project.org" 
> Subject: [Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS
>
> I am investigating how to bring Qt to our INtime RTOS. The INtime Distributed 
> RTOS runs on standard PC hardware as a multicore AMP OS (no SMP and not POSIX 
> compliant). Currently the RTOS has only a text console output based on INT10 
> services. The RTOS is fully preemptive, with strict priority based 
> scheduling, managed process services with rich IPC services. The development 
> environment is tightly coupled with MS VC (2008 and on) with ANSI C and C++11 
> language support. The RTOS is very stable and been commercially deployed for 
> decades. It lacks a means for graphical programming, mostly for industrial 
> controls application. What is the means to port Qt to this RTOS? We're not 
> intending on building out OpenGL ES 2.0 unless absolutely necessary. I've 
> read some marketing materials about Qt on MCU, however the details seem very 
> thin. It's not Windows, Linux, OSX, Android, QNX, Integrity, or VxWorks... 
> how to go about getting this done?
> ___
> Interest mailing list
> Interest@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] When Microsoft comes to purchase Qt what will, be the outcome?

[Jason H]

You're preaching to the choir. Rest in peace Nokia Meego, and it's replacement, 
Windows Phone. It never even ran on a zune!

I bet you Qt could run on a zune. 


> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 4:03 PM
> From: "Roland Hughes" 
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] When Microsoft comes to purchase Qt what will, be the 
> outcome?
>
> 
> On 9/26/18 4:41 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > The "poison pill" of the KDE Free Qt Foundation kicks in if there are
> > commercial releases with no equivalent open source within 12 months of that
> > release. It does not kick in if the maintainer community decides to drop 
> > some
> > platforms.
> >
> > For the latter, there's always the ability to fork. If anyone disagrees with
> > the direction Qt (or any other Open Source project, for that matter) is 
> > going,
> > fork it and maintain it the way you want it to go (after, of course, trying 
> > to
> > engage the community to argue your case).
> 
> 
> Microsoft has a phenomenal track record of running both companies and 
> products into the ground. They also have an incredibly long history of 
> failures people rather conveniently forget about. Here is my all time 
> favorite Malcolm Berko quote:
> 
> =
> 
> Microsoft (MSFT-$58) may be making a dreadful boo-boo with its 
> $196-per-share purchase of LinkedIn (LNKD-$192), which since 2011 has 
> dumbly traded between $56 and $275 and never earned a dime. MSFT's new 
> CEO, Satya Nadella, will be the old CEO if this LNKD acquisition fails 
> as I and some important insiders think it will. Nadella believes that 
> adding a professional social network to its business-focused software 
> line will allow MSFT to wean itself from its legacy of personal 
> computers. LNKD, with zero earnings prospects in sight, isn't a bargain 
> at $26 billion; rather, it's an expensive and seemingly frantic gamble. 
> And MSFT has a really stinky record with takeovers and buyouts. Its 
> purchase of Nokia's handsets quickly morphed into a $7.5 billion 
> write-off. Microsoft bought Yammer for $1.2 billion, which turned into a 
> black hole, and then put $605 million into Barnes & Noble's Nook 
> e-reader, which flopped, and its Skype purchase is an embarrassing 
> failure. MSFT paid $6.3 billion for aQuantive, an online advertising 
> company that's worthless. MSFT bought Visio for $1.4 billion, Navision 
> for $1.5 billion and Tellme Networks for $800 million, and they're all 
> worthless. During Steve Ballmer's tenure, MSFT bought 149 companies, and 
> 121 of them have vaporized into the ether. No wonder Ballmer is bald.
> 
> =
> 
> I come from the DEC (Digital Equipment Corporation) world. I have 
> watched Microsoft try to kill other, far superior, products off before. 
> I've lived through the history where Compaq, fronted/funded/financially 
> backed by Microsoft bought DEC then announced they were killing OpenVMS 
> so Compaq servers with NT on them could get into the data center. I was 
> also around to hear the stories about the day various DoD/NSA personnel 
> paid an unexpected visit informing upper management that killing off the 
> OS which ran a huge portion of the defense industry, not to mention most 
> nuclear power plants, was an act of treason and that they would be 
> spending the rest of their lives in solitary per the terms of the contract.
> 
> Most of you will be too young to remember when Microsoft offered to 
> "give" Novell "Microsoft Money" so they could buy Quicken. The courts 
> struck it down. At the time Quicken was rumored to be written with ZAF 
> (Zinc Application Framework) and a non-Microsoft compiler. It worked 
> better and ran faster than "Money." You will have to learn about "Money" 
> on Wikipedia as it doesn't exist anymore.
> 
> I won't even bother going into Janet Reno (at the behest of the 
> Clintons) committing treason against the human species not putting Bill 
> Gates in Prison
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp.
> 
> Windows, all the way up to and including 98, was NOT an operating 
> system. It was a task switching GUI ran on top of DOS. Advertising it as 
> an operating system was both wire and mail fraud.
> 
> Microsoft doesn't like "other successful software." Qt hasn't been 
> successful enough for Microsoft to divert as much attention. They only 
> tried to shove Qt out of the phone market by purchasing Nokia and making 
> them use only Microsoft products.
> 
> No, Microsoft will not need to buy Qt. The current owners of Qt will 
> force it from the market with their current (and probably future) 
> licensing policies.
> 
> 
> As to forking, there are already hundreds of forks of Qt. Basically at 
> every medical device manufacturer which used 3.x or 4.x to build one or 
> more devices. They have had no choice but to fork and maintain because 
> developers would rather add something broken than fix the last broken 
> thing to get added.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Roland Hughes, P

[Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS

[Kim Hartman]

I am investigating how to bring Qt to our INtime RTOS. The INtime Distributed 
RTOS runs on standard PC hardware as a multicore AMP OS (no SMP and not POSIX 
compliant). Currently the RTOS has only a text console output based on INT10 
services. The RTOS is fully preemptive, with strict priority based scheduling, 
managed process services with rich IPC services. The development environment is 
tightly coupled with MS VC (2008 and on) with ANSI C and C++11 language 
support. The RTOS is very stable and been commercially deployed for decades. It 
lacks a means for graphical programming, mostly for industrial controls 
application. What is the means to port Qt to this RTOS? We're not intending on 
building out OpenGL ES 2.0 unless absolutely necessary. I've read some 
marketing materials about Qt on MCU, however the details seem very thin. It's 
not Windows, Linux, OSX, Android, QNX, Integrity, or VxWorks... how to go about 
getting this done?
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] When Microsoft comes to purchase Qt what will, be the outcome?

[Roland Hughes]

On 9/26/18 4:41 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:

The "poison pill" of the KDE Free Qt Foundation kicks in if there are
commercial releases with no equivalent open source within 12 months of that
release. It does not kick in if the maintainer community decides to drop some
platforms.

For the latter, there's always the ability to fork. If anyone disagrees with
the direction Qt (or any other Open Source project, for that matter) is going,
fork it and maintain it the way you want it to go (after, of course, trying to
engage the community to argue your case).



Microsoft has a phenomenal track record of running both companies and 
products into the ground. They also have an incredibly long history of 
failures people rather conveniently forget about. Here is my all time 
favorite Malcolm Berko quote:


=

Microsoft (MSFT-$58) may be making a dreadful boo-boo with its 
$196-per-share purchase of LinkedIn (LNKD-$192), which since 2011 has 
dumbly traded between $56 and $275 and never earned a dime. MSFT's new 
CEO, Satya Nadella, will be the old CEO if this LNKD acquisition fails 
as I and some important insiders think it will. Nadella believes that 
adding a professional social network to its business-focused software 
line will allow MSFT to wean itself from its legacy of personal 
computers. LNKD, with zero earnings prospects in sight, isn't a bargain 
at $26 billion; rather, it's an expensive and seemingly frantic gamble. 
And MSFT has a really stinky record with takeovers and buyouts. Its 
purchase of Nokia's handsets quickly morphed into a $7.5 billion 
write-off. Microsoft bought Yammer for $1.2 billion, which turned into a 
black hole, and then put $605 million into Barnes & Noble's Nook 
e-reader, which flopped, and its Skype purchase is an embarrassing 
failure. MSFT paid $6.3 billion for aQuantive, an online advertising 
company that's worthless. MSFT bought Visio for $1.4 billion, Navision 
for $1.5 billion and Tellme Networks for $800 million, and they're all 
worthless. During Steve Ballmer's tenure, MSFT bought 149 companies, and 
121 of them have vaporized into the ether. No wonder Ballmer is bald.


=

I come from the DEC (Digital Equipment Corporation) world. I have 
watched Microsoft try to kill other, far superior, products off before. 
I've lived through the history where Compaq, fronted/funded/financially 
backed by Microsoft bought DEC then announced they were killing OpenVMS 
so Compaq servers with NT on them could get into the data center. I was 
also around to hear the stories about the day various DoD/NSA personnel 
paid an unexpected visit informing upper management that killing off the 
OS which ran a huge portion of the defense industry, not to mention most 
nuclear power plants, was an act of treason and that they would be 
spending the rest of their lives in solitary per the terms of the contract.


Most of you will be too young to remember when Microsoft offered to 
"give" Novell "Microsoft Money" so they could buy Quicken. The courts 
struck it down. At the time Quicken was rumored to be written with ZAF 
(Zinc Application Framework) and a non-Microsoft compiler. It worked 
better and ran faster than "Money." You will have to learn about "Money" 
on Wikipedia as it doesn't exist anymore.


I won't even bother going into Janet Reno (at the behest of the 
Clintons) committing treason against the human species not putting Bill 
Gates in Prison


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp.

Windows, all the way up to and including 98, was NOT an operating 
system. It was a task switching GUI ran on top of DOS. Advertising it as 
an operating system was both wire and mail fraud.


Microsoft doesn't like "other successful software." Qt hasn't been 
successful enough for Microsoft to divert as much attention. They only 
tried to shove Qt out of the phone market by purchasing Nokia and making 
them use only Microsoft products.


No, Microsoft will not need to buy Qt. The current owners of Qt will 
force it from the market with their current (and probably future) 
licensing policies.



As to forking, there are already hundreds of forks of Qt. Basically at 
every medical device manufacturer which used 3.x or 4.x to build one or 
more devices. They have had no choice but to fork and maintain because 
developers would rather add something broken than fix the last broken 
thing to get added.




--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630) 205-1593

http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
http://lesedi.us

___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

[Interest] HTML and IMAGES to list

[Roland Hughes]

Just an FYI

When you post to the list using an HTML email client, __especially when 
you include images__ the content gets scrubbed.


It is best to upload the images somewhere and provide a link.

The scrubbing wouldn't be so bad, but, big images seem to kick the 
DIGEST part of this to the curb. Just this morning there were 4 DIGEST 
releases consisting of one message each and they were roughly 4 minutes 
apart.



On 9/26/18 4:49 AM, Stanislas RENAN wrote:

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:<http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20180926/824fb10a/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot_20180926_123910.png
Type: image/png
Size: 123431 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:<http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20180926/824fb10a/attachment.png>


--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630) 205-1593

http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
http://lesedi.us

___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] Qt with latest Android SDK

[Igor Mironchik]

Big thanks guys, Java 8 from Oracle, NDK r17. And all is fine.


On 26.09.2018 13:24, Ivan Donchevskii wrote:


> Use r10e unless you know why you don't.

You don't need to do that. r17 works quite fine with Qt Creator. But 
you may have issues with r18 since it has gcc removed.


Ivan


*From:* Interest 
 on behalf of 
Stanislas RENAN 

*Sent:* Wednesday, September 26, 2018 12:22:30 PM
*To:* interest@qt-project.org
*Subject:* Re: [Interest] Qt with latest Android SDK

Le 26/09/2018 à 12:17, Igor Mironchik a écrit :


Hi,


On 26.09.2018 13:12, Stanislas RENAN wrote:


Hi,

Have you followed these steps ?



Sure.

Good.



In particular, what is the version of your NDK ?



18.0.5002713

Not good.
https://developer.android.com/ndk/downloads/revision_history
Check the procedure again for missed steps.
Use r10e unless you know why you don't.




http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/androidgs.html

Regards,

Stanislas RENAN


Le 26/09/2018 à 11:20, Igor Mironchik a écrit :


Hello,

I'm on Linux, installed latest Android SDK and NDK, trying to build 
project for Android...


12:17:30: Running steps for project Pro...

12:17:30: Starting: "/home/igor/Qt/5.11.2/android_armv7/bin/qmake" 
/home/igor/Work/Projects/pro/Pro.pro -spec android-g++ 
CONFIG+=debug CONFIG+=qml_debug


clang++: error: unknown argument: '-mthumb-interwork'

Project ERROR: failed to parse default search paths from compiler 
output


12:17:30: The process 
"/home/igor/Qt/5.11.2/android_armv7/bin/qmake" exited with code 3.


Error while building/deploying project Pro (kit: Android for 
armeabi-v7a (GCC 4.9, Qt 5.11.2 for Android ARMv7))


When executing step "qmake"

12:17:30: Elapsed time: 00:00.

What is it? Why clang++? Thank you.



___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org 
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest




___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org 
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest




___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org 
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest




___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest


___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] What platform SDK are needed?

[Artem Sidyakin]

Here’s what I have:
- SDK platforms: https://i.imgur.com/hZJBv5v.png
- SDK tools: https://i.imgur.com/6vbt9hZ.png
- Qt Creator Android settings: https://i.imgur.com/kixtWbw.png

Qt 5.11.1, Qt Creator 4.7.1.

And a couple of general advices: use JDK 8, not 9; use NDK 17, not 18 (but 18 
will be supported later, as I heard), set path to JRE in PATH.

---
Artem Sidyakin

> On 26 Sep 2018, at 12:19, Ivan Donchevskii  wrote:
> 
> As far as I see Qt Creator sets JAVA_HOME, calls {sdk}/tools/android list 
> targets and then checks the {sdk}/platforms folder for android-{platform 
> version} from the list.
> You can try to look if you can follow these steps manually.
> 
> Ivan
> From: Igor Mironchik 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 12:03:36 PM
> To: Ivan Donchevskii; interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] What platform SDK are needed?
>  
> Sure.
> 
> 
> On 26.09.2018 12:59, Ivan Donchevskii wrote:
>> Do you have anything selected in SDK Platforms?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Ivan
>> 
>> From: Interest  on 
>> behalf of Igor Mironchik 
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 11:53:46 AM
>> To: interest@qt-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [Interest] What platform SDK are needed?
>>  
>> Sorry, not that SDK tab... No there are nothing
>> 
>> On 26.09.2018 12:48, Stanislas RENAN wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> In the SDK Manager tab, do you see a Tool item with installed sub-items ?
>>> Regards,
>>> Stanislas RENAN
>>> 
>>> Le 26/09/2018 à 11:41, Igor Mironchik a écrit :
 Hi,
 What platform Android SDK are needed by QtCreator?
 Look at the picture...
 
 
 ___
 Interest mailing list
 
 Interest@qt-project.org
 http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Interest mailing list
>>> 
>>> Interest@qt-project.org
>>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>> 
> 
> ___
> Interest mailing list
> Interest@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] Qt win/wip Branch of qtconnectivity

[Alex Blasche]

Hi Kuncheria,

Your statement tells me that it is not ready yet ;)

In all honesty, the port is mostly working for Low Energy features. The branch 
is not feature complete with regards to classic Bluetooth.

The fact that you have problems in the semi ready BLE section concerns me. I 
would appreciate it if you could provide details of your failure (logging 
output, stack trace, etc) via bugreports.qt.io (don't forgot the mentioned the 
wip/win branch).

Thank you.

--
Alex



From: Interest  on 
behalf of KUNCHERIA KURUVILLA 
Sent: Tuesday, 25 September 2018 2:43:06 PM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: [Interest] Qt win/wip Branch of qtconnectivity

Hi,

I need to use a Qt Bluetooth module on a windows 10 platform (Not WinRT) and 
using mingw32 compiler. I understand that the work in progress branch win/wip 
is suitable for this requirement. It would be helpful if someone could tell me 
if it is safe to use this branch. I have checked out the branch and build it. 
But I was unable to connect to a BLE device or query characteristics.

Awaiting your response,
Kuncheria Kuruvilla
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] Qt with latest Android SDK

[Ivan Donchevskii]

> Use r10e unless you know why you don't.


You don't need to do that. r17 works quite fine with Qt Creator. But you may 
have issues with r18 since it has gcc removed.


Ivan


From: Interest  on 
behalf of Stanislas RENAN 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 12:22:30 PM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt with latest Android SDK


Le 26/09/2018 à 12:17, Igor Mironchik a écrit :

Hi,

On 26.09.2018 13:12, Stanislas RENAN wrote:

Hi,

Have you followed these steps ?

Sure.
Good.


In particular, what is the version of your NDK ?

18.0.5002713
Not good.
https://developer.android.com/ndk/downloads/revision_history
Check the procedure again for missed steps.
Use r10e unless you know why you don't.



http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/androidgs.html

Regards,

Stanislas RENAN

Le 26/09/2018 à 11:20, Igor Mironchik a écrit :

Hello,

I'm on Linux, installed latest Android SDK and NDK, trying to build project for 
Android...

12:17:30: Running steps for project Pro...

12:17:30: Starting: "/home/igor/Qt/5.11.2/android_armv7/bin/qmake" 
/home/igor/Work/Projects/pro/Pro.pro -spec android-g++ CONFIG+=debug 
CONFIG+=qml_debug

clang++: error: unknown argument: '-mthumb-interwork'

Project ERROR: failed to parse default search paths from compiler output

12:17:30: The process "/home/igor/Qt/5.11.2/android_armv7/bin/qmake" exited 
with code 3.

Error while building/deploying project Pro (kit: Android for armeabi-v7a (GCC 
4.9, Qt 5.11.2 for Android ARMv7))

When executing step "qmake"

12:17:30: Elapsed time: 00:00.

What is it? Why clang++? Thank you.



___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest





___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest





___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest


___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] Qt with latest Android SDK

[Stanislas RENAN]

Le 26/09/2018 à 12:17, Igor Mironchik a écrit :


Hi,


On 26.09.2018 13:12, Stanislas RENAN wrote:


Hi,

Have you followed these steps ?



Sure.

Good.



In particular, what is the version of your NDK ?



18.0.5002713

Not good.
https://developer.android.com/ndk/downloads/revision_history
Check the procedure again for missed steps.
Use r10e unless you know why you don't.




http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/androidgs.html

Regards,

Stanislas RENAN


Le 26/09/2018 à 11:20, Igor Mironchik a écrit :


Hello,

I'm on Linux, installed latest Android SDK and NDK, trying to build 
project for Android...


12:17:30: Running steps for project Pro...

12:17:30: Starting: "/home/igor/Qt/5.11.2/android_armv7/bin/qmake" 
/home/igor/Work/Projects/pro/Pro.pro -spec android-g++ CONFIG+=debug 
CONFIG+=qml_debug


clang++: error: unknown argument: '-mthumb-interwork'

Project ERROR: failed to parse default search paths from compiler output

12:17:30: The process "/home/igor/Qt/5.11.2/android_armv7/bin/qmake" 
exited with code 3.


Error while building/deploying project Pro (kit: Android for 
armeabi-v7a (GCC 4.9, Qt 5.11.2 for Android ARMv7))


When executing step "qmake"

12:17:30: Elapsed time: 00:00.

What is it? Why clang++? Thank you.



___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest




___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest




___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest


___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] Qt with latest Android SDK

[Igor Mironchik]

Hi,


On 26.09.2018 13:12, Stanislas RENAN wrote:


Hi,

Have you followed these steps ?



Sure.


In particular, what is the version of your NDK ?



18.0.5002713


http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/androidgs.html

Regards,

Stanislas RENAN


Le 26/09/2018 à 11:20, Igor Mironchik a écrit :


Hello,

I'm on Linux, installed latest Android SDK and NDK, trying to build 
project for Android...


12:17:30: Running steps for project Pro...

12:17:30: Starting: "/home/igor/Qt/5.11.2/android_armv7/bin/qmake" 
/home/igor/Work/Projects/pro/Pro.pro -spec android-g++ CONFIG+=debug 
CONFIG+=qml_debug


clang++: error: unknown argument: '-mthumb-interwork'

Project ERROR: failed to parse default search paths from compiler output

12:17:30: The process "/home/igor/Qt/5.11.2/android_armv7/bin/qmake" 
exited with code 3.


Error while building/deploying project Pro (kit: Android for 
armeabi-v7a (GCC 4.9, Qt 5.11.2 for Android ARMv7))


When executing step "qmake"

12:17:30: Elapsed time: 00:00.

What is it? Why clang++? Thank you.



___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest




___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest


___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] Qt with latest Android SDK

[Stanislas RENAN]

Hi,

Have you followed these steps ? In particular, what is the version of 
your NDK ?


http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/androidgs.html

Regards,

Stanislas RENAN


Le 26/09/2018 à 11:20, Igor Mironchik a écrit :


Hello,

I'm on Linux, installed latest Android SDK and NDK, trying to build 
project for Android...


12:17:30: Running steps for project Pro...

12:17:30: Starting: "/home/igor/Qt/5.11.2/android_armv7/bin/qmake" 
/home/igor/Work/Projects/pro/Pro.pro -spec android-g++ CONFIG+=debug 
CONFIG+=qml_debug


clang++: error: unknown argument: '-mthumb-interwork'

Project ERROR: failed to parse default search paths from compiler output

12:17:30: The process "/home/igor/Qt/5.11.2/android_armv7/bin/qmake" 
exited with code 3.


Error while building/deploying project Pro (kit: Android for 
armeabi-v7a (GCC 4.9, Qt 5.11.2 for Android ARMv7))


When executing step "qmake"

12:17:30: Elapsed time: 00:00.

What is it? Why clang++? Thank you.



___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest


___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

[Interest] Qt with latest Android SDK

[Igor Mironchik]

Hello,

I'm on Linux, installed latest Android SDK and NDK, trying to build 
project for Android...


12:17:30: Running steps for project Pro...

12:17:30: Starting: "/home/igor/Qt/5.11.2/android_armv7/bin/qmake" 
/home/igor/Work/Projects/pro/Pro.pro -spec android-g++ CONFIG+=debug 
CONFIG+=qml_debug


clang++: error: unknown argument: '-mthumb-interwork'

Project ERROR: failed to parse default search paths from compiler output

12:17:30: The process "/home/igor/Qt/5.11.2/android_armv7/bin/qmake" 
exited with code 3.


Error while building/deploying project Pro (kit: Android for armeabi-v7a 
(GCC 4.9, Qt 5.11.2 for Android ARMv7))


When executing step "qmake"

12:17:30: Elapsed time: 00:00.

What is it? Why clang++? Thank you.

___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest