Re: [PHP-DEV] About PHP NG document lacking argument
On 25 July 2014 14:14, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote: I do think that some people simply doesn't like phpng (for reasons mostly not on technical grounds), and they are bringing up any issue which can hinder the acceptance of phpng. I think you hit the nail on the head, Ferenc. That's why I'm reluctant to participate in this game. Do you realize that I think that some people are doing bad things is a vague character assassination? The other side of that argument is I feel like some companies *wink* *wink* develop things in secret then pressure the list into accepting them blindly. You cannot use that *and* claim the high road. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Move phpng to master
On 21/07/2014, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote: Regarding Dmitry saying that phpng is an experimental branch - that was a couple of months ago. It evolved, it runs apps in parity with 5.6, and it's fine to move it to master right now. Perhaps you could write a summary of what's changed since phpng was uncovered a couple of months ago? (besides better performance and greater compatibility with existing PHP) And also update the existing RFC with the benefits of merging this branch to master, as opposed to describing the inconvenience of not merging it. I'm sure that would help keep the discussion on topic and grounded in fact. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
