Re: [PATCH 1/3] dts: arm64/sdm845: Add node for arm,mmu-500

2018-08-12 Thread Vivek Gautam

Hi Doug,


On 8/11/2018 4:00 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Doug Anderson  wrote:

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Vivek Gautam
 wrote:

Add device node for arm,mmu-500 available on sdm845.
This MMU-500 with single TCU and multiple TBU architecture
is shared among all the peripherals except gpu on sdm845.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam 
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts |  4 ++
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi| 73 +
  2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts 
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
index 6d651f314193..13b50dff440f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
@@ -58,3 +58,7 @@
 bias-pull-up;
 };
  };
+
+_smmu {
+   status = "okay";
+};

When you spin this patch please put the above in the correct place.
Since "a" sorts alphabetically before "i" then this should be just
before the line:

 {

Sorry--one more thing I thought of after I sent this out...

Possibly you can drop this part of the patch completely and get rid of
the 'status = "disabled";' in sdm845.dtsi.  As I understand it you
really only want to mark things as disabled in the SoC dtsi file if
some boards might use this device and other boards wouldn't.  For
instance not all boards will have the SD card controller hooked up /
enabled so having that set to "disabled" in the SoC device tree file
makes sense.  ...but it's not a board-level question about whether the
SMMU is present--it's always there.  You don't gain anything by
forcing all boards to set status to "okay".


Thanks for reviewing the patches.
Will sort the node as per alphabetical order.
Also as you pointed, it makes sense to not have the 'status' property
in SMMU. Will remove that. Thanks.

Best regards
Vivek



-Doug


___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu


Re: [PATCH 1/3] dts: arm64/sdm845: Add node for arm,mmu-500

2018-08-10 Thread Doug Anderson via iommu
Hi,

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Vivek Gautam
 wrote:
> Add device node for arm,mmu-500 available on sdm845.
> This MMU-500 with single TCU and multiple TBU architecture
> is shared among all the peripherals except gpu on sdm845.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam 
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts |  4 ++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi| 73 
> +
>  2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
> index 6d651f314193..13b50dff440f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
> @@ -58,3 +58,7 @@
> bias-pull-up;
> };
>  };
> +
> +_smmu {
> +   status = "okay";
> +};

When you spin this patch please put the above in the correct place.
Since "a" sorts alphabetically before "i" then this should be just
before the line:

 {

Thanks!

-Doug
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu


Re: [PATCH 1/3] dts: arm64/sdm845: Add node for arm,mmu-500

2018-07-20 Thread Vivek Gautam
Hi Rob,

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Rob Herring  wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:54 AM Vivek Gautam
>  wrote:
>>
>> Add device node for arm,mmu-500 available on sdm845.
>> This MMU-500 with single TCU and multiple TBU architecture
>> is shared among all the peripherals except gpu on sdm845.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam 
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts |  4 ++
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi| 73 
>> +
>>  2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
>> index 6d651f314193..13b50dff440f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
>> @@ -58,3 +58,7 @@
>> bias-pull-up;
>> };
>>  };
>> +
>> +_smmu {
>> +   status = "okay";
>> +};
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> index 00722b533a92..70ca18ae6cb3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> @@ -980,6 +980,79 @@
>> cell-index = <0>;
>> };
>>
>> +   apps_smmu: arm,smmu@1500 {
>
> iommu@...

Thanks for the review.
Sure, will modify this.

>
>> +   compatible = "arm,mmu-500";
>
> Really unmodified by QCom? Would be better to have SoC specific compatible.

Yes, at this point we are able to use the driver as is on 845.
But, will add a SoC specific compatible as suggested to make bindings
future proof.

Best regards
Vivek

>
> Rob
> ___
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu



-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu


Re: [PATCH 1/3] dts: arm64/sdm845: Add node for arm,mmu-500

2018-07-19 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:54 AM Vivek Gautam
 wrote:
>
> Add device node for arm,mmu-500 available on sdm845.
> This MMU-500 with single TCU and multiple TBU architecture
> is shared among all the peripherals except gpu on sdm845.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam 
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts |  4 ++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi| 73 
> +
>  2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
> index 6d651f314193..13b50dff440f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
> @@ -58,3 +58,7 @@
> bias-pull-up;
> };
>  };
> +
> +_smmu {
> +   status = "okay";
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> index 00722b533a92..70ca18ae6cb3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> @@ -980,6 +980,79 @@
> cell-index = <0>;
> };
>
> +   apps_smmu: arm,smmu@1500 {

iommu@...

> +   compatible = "arm,mmu-500";

Really unmodified by QCom? Would be better to have SoC specific compatible.

Rob
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu


[PATCH 1/3] dts: arm64/sdm845: Add node for arm,mmu-500

2018-07-19 Thread Vivek Gautam
Add device node for arm,mmu-500 available on sdm845.
This MMU-500 with single TCU and multiple TBU architecture
is shared among all the peripherals except gpu on sdm845.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam 
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts |  4 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi| 73 +
 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts 
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
index 6d651f314193..13b50dff440f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
@@ -58,3 +58,7 @@
bias-pull-up;
};
 };
+
+_smmu {
+   status = "okay";
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi 
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
index 00722b533a92..70ca18ae6cb3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
@@ -980,6 +980,79 @@
cell-index = <0>;
};
 
+   apps_smmu: arm,smmu@1500 {
+   compatible = "arm,mmu-500";
+   reg = <0x1500 0x8>;
+   #iommu-cells = <2>;
+   #global-interrupts = <1>;
+   interrupts = ,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+,
+;
+   status = "disabled";
+   };
+
apss_shared: mailbox@1799 {
compatible = "qcom,sdm845-apss-shared";
reg = <0x1799 0x1000>;
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu