[PATCH 3/7] openrisc: remove the partial DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT support

2019-06-14 Thread Christoph Hellwig
The openrisc DMA code supports DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT allocations, but
does not provide a cache_sync operation.  This means any user of it
will never be able to actually transfer cache ownership and thus cause
coherency bugs.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig 
---
 arch/openrisc/kernel/dma.c | 22 +-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/dma.c b/arch/openrisc/kernel/dma.c
index f79457cb3741..9f25fd0fbb5d 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/dma.c
+++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/dma.c
@@ -98,15 +98,13 @@ arch_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t 
*dma_handle,
 
va = (unsigned long)page;
 
-   if ((attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT) == 0) {
-   /*
-* We need to iterate through the pages, clearing the dcache for
-* them and setting the cache-inhibit bit.
-*/
-   if (walk_page_range(va, va + size, &walk)) {
-   free_pages_exact(page, size);
-   return NULL;
-   }
+   /*
+* We need to iterate through the pages, clearing the dcache for
+* them and setting the cache-inhibit bit.
+*/
+   if (walk_page_range(va, va + size, &walk)) {
+   free_pages_exact(page, size);
+   return NULL;
}
 
return (void *)va;
@@ -122,10 +120,8 @@ arch_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *vaddr,
.mm = &init_mm
};
 
-   if ((attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT) == 0) {
-   /* walk_page_range shouldn't be able to fail here */
-   WARN_ON(walk_page_range(va, va + size, &walk));
-   }
+   /* walk_page_range shouldn't be able to fail here */
+   WARN_ON(walk_page_range(va, va + size, &walk));
 
free_pages_exact(vaddr, size);
 }
-- 
2.20.1



Re: [PATCH 3/7] openrisc: remove the partial DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT support

2019-06-16 Thread Stafford Horne
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:44:27PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The openrisc DMA code supports DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT allocations, but
> does not provide a cache_sync operation.  This means any user of it
> will never be able to actually transfer cache ownership and thus cause
> coherency bugs.

The below looks good.  I am always happy to what looks like legacy copy & paste
cruft.

Acked-by: Stafford Horne 

> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig 
> ---
>  arch/openrisc/kernel/dma.c | 22 +-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/dma.c b/arch/openrisc/kernel/dma.c
> index f79457cb3741..9f25fd0fbb5d 100644
> --- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/dma.c
> +++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/dma.c
> @@ -98,15 +98,13 @@ arch_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, 
> dma_addr_t *dma_handle,
>  
>   va = (unsigned long)page;
>  
> - if ((attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT) == 0) {
> - /*
> -  * We need to iterate through the pages, clearing the dcache for
> -  * them and setting the cache-inhibit bit.
> -  */
> - if (walk_page_range(va, va + size, &walk)) {
> - free_pages_exact(page, size);
> - return NULL;
> - }
> + /*
> +  * We need to iterate through the pages, clearing the dcache for
> +  * them and setting the cache-inhibit bit.
> +  */
> + if (walk_page_range(va, va + size, &walk)) {
> + free_pages_exact(page, size);
> + return NULL;
>   }
>  
>   return (void *)va;
> @@ -122,10 +120,8 @@ arch_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void 
> *vaddr,
>   .mm = &init_mm
>   };
>  
> - if ((attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT) == 0) {
> - /* walk_page_range shouldn't be able to fail here */
> - WARN_ON(walk_page_range(va, va + size, &walk));
> - }
> + /* walk_page_range shouldn't be able to fail here */
> + WARN_ON(walk_page_range(va, va + size, &walk));
>  
>   free_pages_exact(vaddr, size);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>