Re: Comment on RFC 1981-Path MTU Discovery for IPV6

2002-09-09 Thread Jack McCann


Referring to item 5.3, we think that the timestamp value need not be set
to Reserved.

The text in question is a suggestion, not a requirement.
The use of a Reserved timestamp value is just one possible
implementation of PMTU aging.  Other implementations are
also possible, as you have seen.  FYI this text was taken
from RFC 1191.

- Jack


IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:  http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:  ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Comment on RFC 1981-Path MTU Discovery for IPV6

2002-09-08 Thread ASantiago


Hi,

  Your suggestion is very much appreciated where you proposed to
not to initialize timestamp to 'reserved'. But the problem here is that
the timestamp should be initialize to a certain value. Otherwise the timestamp
value is set to null. How would you propose to set the timestamp value?
Is there any default value to the timestamp to indicate that the PMTU is
equal to the MTU of the 1st hop link?

Santiago,
System Engineer

-- Original Message --
From: Liu xiao lian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
'vasuki ponnusamy' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Comment on RFC 1981-Path MTU Discovery for IPV6
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 23:26:37 +0800


Referring to item 5.3, we think that the timestamp value need not be set
to Reserved.

This is because we can just use the timestamp and the current time to
determine that the PMTU has expired.  For example, before sending out a
packet, the timer-based procedure should check whether the PMTU to be
used has expired based on the cached timestamp and current time.  If it
has expired indeed, then there are no packets should be sent out using
this PMTU.  The PMTU value should be reset to the MTU value of the first
hop and the PMTU discovery should be restarted.

We think the Reserved value can be removed to make the process of
detemining the stale PMTUs less complicated.

We welcome suggestions and comments. 



XiaoLian LIU
Computer Science School
USM 11800
Pulau Penang
Malaysia







Dreaming of a Swiss Account? Get it here: http://freemail.swissinfo.org



IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:  http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:  ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Comment on RFC 1981-Path MTU Discovery for IPV6

2002-09-07 Thread Liu xiao lian
Title: Comment on RFC 1981-Path MTU Discovery for IPV6






Referring to item 5.3, we think that the timestamp value need not be set to Reserved.

This is because we can just use the timestamp and the current time to determine that the PMTU has expired. For example, before sending out a packet, the timer-based procedure should check whether the PMTU to be used has expired based on the cached timestamp and current time. If it has expired indeed, then there are no packets should be sent out using this PMTU. The PMTU value should be reset to the MTU value of the first hop and the PMTU discovery should be restarted.

We think the Reserved value can be removed to make the process of detemining the stale PMTUs less complicated.

We welcome suggestions and comments. 



XiaoLian LIU

Computer Science School

USM 11800

Pulau Penang

Malaysia






Comment on RFC 1981 - Path MTU Discovery for IPv6

2002-08-31 Thread Lim Min Min

Referring to item 5.3,  we think that the timestamp value need not be set to
Reserved.

This is because we can just use the timestamp and the current time to
determine that the PMTU has expired.  For example, before sending out a
packet, the timer-based procedure should check if the PMTU to be used has
expired based on the cached timestamp and the current time.  If it has
indeed expired, then no packets should be sent out using this PMTU.  The
PMTU value should be reset to the MTU value of the first hop and the PMTU
discovery should be restarted.

We think the Reserved value can be removed to make the process of
detemining the stale PMTUs less complicated.

We welcome suggestions and comments. 


Lim Min Min
Universiti Sains Malaysia

IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:  http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:  ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]