On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Jack McCann wrote:
> > minor nit:
> > NI_NUMERICSCOPE appears in the text (page 24) but not in section 7.
>
> Thanks for catching that. The reference to NI_NUMERICSCOPE
> on page 24 should be removed, it was part of the stuff
> that moved to draft-ietf-ipv6-scope-api-00.txt.
>
> It may be too late to fix this...
Another minor nit: the Introduction says:
IPv6 also introduces new features (e.g., traffic class
and flowlabel), some of which must be made visible to applications via
the API.
.. but tclass/flowlabel specification was mostly moved off. I wonder if
some rewording would be in order?
I believe these kind of editorial nits can be fixed when RFC editor is
done and while at AUTH48 state.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
