Re: Best practice - dual stack DNS?

2013-10-22 Thread Gert Doering
Hi,

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:45:02AM +, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
 I can confirm the lack of support on IOS (see my email address). Moreover, 
 AFAIK there is no support in Windows, Android and Mac OS/X

There is support in iOS, though :-)

Gert
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AGVorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14  Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444   USt-IdNr.: DE813185279


RE: Best practice - dual stack DNS?

2013-10-22 Thread Trevor Warwick (twarwick)
FWIW, the RFC6106 support that's in IOS (big I) allows one to specify  DNS 
Server Addresses but not, currently, the DNS Search List.  As Lorenzo 
mentioned, this is in the latest ASR1000 release, and will appear on other 
platforms over time as their releases pick up the latest version of ND. E.g. 
for the T release on ISRs, this is intended to ship in Q1CY14 - but as ever, 
contact your account team for committed dates.

Trevor


From: ipv6-ops-bounces+twarwick=cisco@lists.cluenet.de 
[mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+twarwick=cisco@lists.cluenet.de] On Behalf Of Eric 
Vyncke (evyncke)
Sent: 22 October 2013 06:15
To: Lorenzo Colitti
Cc: Roger Wiklund; ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de
Subject: RE: Best practice - dual stack DNS?

I stand corrected and thanks for the good pieces of news

-éric

From: Lorenzo Colitti [mailto:lore...@google.com]
Sent: mardi 22 octobre 2013 10:42
To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Cc: Roger Wiklund; ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.demailto:ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de; 
Brian E Carpenter
Subject: RE: Best practice - dual stack DNS?


AIUI Cisco supports RFC 6106 on the ASR1K.
Mac OS X and iOS do support it, I think (tested recently).
Android does not yet support it.
Windows does not support it.
On 22 Oct 2013 13:45, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) 
evyn...@cisco.commailto:evyn...@cisco.com wrote:
I can confirm the lack of support on IOS (see my email address). Moreover, 
AFAIK there is no support in Windows, Android and Mac OS/X

-éric

From: 
ipv6-ops-bounces+evyncke=cisco@lists.cluenet.demailto:cisco@lists.cluenet.de
 
[mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+evynckemailto:ipv6-ops-bounces%2Bevyncke=cisco@lists.cluenet.demailto:cisco@lists.cluenet.de]
 On Behalf Of Roger Wiklund
Sent: mardi 22 octobre 2013 01:54
To: Brian E Carpenter
Cc: ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.demailto:ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de
Subject: Re: Best practice - dual stack DNS?

Not supported on either IOS or JUNOS afaik.

/Roger

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Brian E Carpenter 
brian.e.carpen...@gmail.commailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote:
What about http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6106 ?

   Brian

On 22/10/2013 01:24, Roger Wiklund wrote:
 Hi.

 I'm setting up a wireless guest network with dual stack.
 Private IPv4 via DHCP and public IPv6 via SLAAC.

 At first had the client first hop IPv6 routing on the WAN CPE using SLAAC
 and DHCPv6 just for DNS.

 I decided to move the client first hop IPv6 routing to the ASA firewall
 instead, but it does not support DHCPv6.

 So currently I only have IPv4 DNS and what works just fine. What's the best
 practice for dual stack DNS? Should I bother with setting up DHCPv6 relay
 etc?

 Thanks!

 /Roger




Re: Best practice - dual stack DNS?

2013-10-21 Thread Gert Doering
Hi,

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:24:27PM +0200, Roger Wiklund wrote:
 So currently I only have IPv4 DNS and what works just fine. What's the best
 practice for dual stack DNS? Should I bother with setting up DHCPv6 relay
 etc?

Well, how do you handle clients that do not want to use IPv4?  So yes,
DHCPv6 and RDNSS is it :-)

Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AGVorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14  Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444   USt-IdNr.: DE813185279


Re: Best practice - dual stack DNS?

2013-10-21 Thread Gert Doering
Hi,

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:46:08PM +0200, Enno Rey wrote:
  Well, how do you handle clients that do not want to use IPv4?  So yes,
  DHCPv6 and RDNSS is it :-)
 
 which both are (still) not supported by Android, to the best of my knowledge.

Yeah, Android seems to be a bit lacking in the IPv6 department... :-(

 Not sure about the environment of the OP but at least for Android
 clients his exact setup is probably the way to go [besides manually
 configuring DNS resolvers in some Android-based phones GUI].

This worked nicely on the IPv6-only + NAT64/DNS64 wifi at RIPE67 - 
configuring a bogus IPv4 address, no IPv4 default gateway, and manually
entering the IPv6 DNS64 server.  But of course that was just a stopgap 
to enable testing the NAT64 environment, not something I consider 
production ready.

Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AGVorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14  Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444   USt-IdNr.: DE813185279


Re: Best practice - dual stack DNS?

2013-10-21 Thread Roger Wiklund
Yeah I know, I'm already running ISC DHCP server for IPv4. I know the ASA
supports DHCPv6 relay but there is a limitation for shared interfaces which
im running into.

Enables DHCPv6 relay service on an interface. When the service is enabled,
the incoming DHCPv6 message from a client on the interface that may have
been relayed by another relay agent will be forwarded to all configured
relay destinations through all configured outgoing links. For multiple
context mode, you cannot enable DHCP relay on an interface that is used by
more than one context (that is, a shared interface).




On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Max Tulyev max...@netassist.ua wrote:

 In IPv4 DHCP server is not nessecary to be a router. You can have DHCP
 server as x.x.x.2 and tell the clients use next-hop x.x.x.1. Is thera
 any problem with DHCPv6?

 On 21.10.13 15:24, Roger Wiklund wrote:
  I decided to move the client first hop IPv6 routing to the ASA firewall
  instead, but it does not support DHCPv6.




Re: Best practice - dual stack DNS?

2013-10-21 Thread Brian E Carpenter
What about http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6106 ?

   Brian

On 22/10/2013 01:24, Roger Wiklund wrote:
 Hi.
 
 I'm setting up a wireless guest network with dual stack.
 Private IPv4 via DHCP and public IPv6 via SLAAC.
 
 At first had the client first hop IPv6 routing on the WAN CPE using SLAAC
 and DHCPv6 just for DNS.
 
 I decided to move the client first hop IPv6 routing to the ASA firewall
 instead, but it does not support DHCPv6.
 
 So currently I only have IPv4 DNS and what works just fine. What's the best
 practice for dual stack DNS? Should I bother with setting up DHCPv6 relay
 etc?
 
 Thanks!
 
 /Roger