[IRCA] TP 30 Apr Victoria version
This morning was a little more interesting, almost all Asian, though not too many signals, and lots of domestic splash. pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker, at least briefly): 1566 HLAZ man in Japanese 1240 and 1246UT. After this, in and out with poor to fair levels until about 1310UT this morning, Reasonable audio at times during the period (much of it understandable by a native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise): 774 JOUB man and woman in Japanese 1213UT 1053 Korean jammer 1208UT 1566 HLAZ man in English, presumably a sermon, "verses 22-23", then man in Chinese (presumably) translating 1210UT not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or noise could be understood by a native speaker: 972 HLCA man and woman in Korean 1218UT 1287 JOHR man and woman in Japanese 1207UT Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed at by cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or music) 738 pop music 1238UT 747 JOIB man and woman talking //774 1207UT 1386 NHK2 synchros, a couple of words crept through the splash //774 1213UT Strongish het, no or "near imaginary" audio (either undermodulated or ravaged by splatter) 594 702 873 1098 1134 1242 1269 1323 best wishes, Nick ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up. Registration info: http://www.nrcdxas.org Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
[IRCA] WWV Solar Report
:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt :Issued: 2016 May 01 0005 UTC # Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center # # Geophysical Alert Message # Solar-terrestrial indices for 30 April follow. Solar flux 94 and estimated planetary A-index 7. The estimated planetary K-index at UTC on 01 May was 3. No space weather storms were observed for the past 24 hours. No space weather storms are predicted for the next 24 hours. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Trends -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Date 28 29 29 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 01 UTC 1500 1200 1500 1800 2100 0300 0600 0900 1200 1500 1800 2100 SFlx 93 95 95 95 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 94 94 A-in 10 5555444444410 7 K-in 11101111222223 Current Solar information available at http://www.am-dx.com/wwv.htm ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up. Registration info: http://www.nrcdxas.org Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
[IRCA] WWV Solar Report
:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt :Issued: 2016 Apr 30 1805 UTC # Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center # # Geophysical Alert Message # Solar-terrestrial indices for 29 April follow. Solar flux 92 and estimated planetary A-index 4. The estimated planetary K-index at 1800 UTC on 30 April was 2. No space weather storms were observed for the past 24 hours. Space weather for the next 24 hours is predicted to be minor. Geomagnetic storms reaching the G1 level are likely. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Trends -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Date 28 28 28 29 29 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 UTC 0900 1200 1500 1200 1500 1800 2100 0300 0600 0900 1200 1500 1800 SFlx 93 93 93 95 95 95 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 A-in 10 10 10 55554444444 K-in 22111011112222 Current Solar information available at http://www.am-dx.com/wwv.htm ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up. Registration info: http://www.nrcdxas.org Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
[IRCA] 1210 UNID Spanish
I've heard Spanish on 1210 lately and this morning at 7 AM I tuned in just after ToH and heard a slogan that sounded like Radio Maricial 12-10 AM. It's light out at this time but reception can be over 500 miles. It's not KPRZ. Anyone know what the current formats for Fowler and Rocklin CA are? I'll try to get to the radio tomorrow a little earlier. Martin Foltz Mission Viejo CA ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up. Registration info: http://www.nrcdxas.org Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
Re: [IRCA] Layer Announces All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test Results
Artifacts or Harmonics, whatever their reasoning, they are two very gifted CEs and it is their ears, not mine. One referred to them as digital harmonics and they bother his ears, where analog doesn't. Apparently he has quite a high range that most do not have. Patrick Martin Seaside OR KGED QSL Manager > From: charle...@msn.com > To: irca@hard-core-dx.com > Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 05:29:19 + > Subject: Re: [IRCA] Layer Announces All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test > Results > > I'll put their opinions in the trash can where they belong, as there is no > such thing as a "digital harmonic" and - assuming they mean simply > "harmonic", harmonics are not the issue with digital codecs. It's rather the > artifacts of the compression that cause the odd swirls, muffling and > artificial sound. None of that has anything to do with harmonics. > > Chuck > > > From: IRCAon behalf of Patrick Martin > > Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 4:53 AM > To: IRCA > Subject: Re: [IRCA] Layer Announces All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test Results > > Chuck, > > Two broadcasting engineers I know, both in CA state that they have acute > hearing and to them, the digital harmonics drive them nuts, if they have to > monitor IBOC audio too long. It is quite personal to them. Some people like > vinyl as the audio has the "warmth" that digital audio lacks. I kind of agree > with that, as I have compared both many times. An album sounds better to me, > if played through a good sound system. My hearing is not that acute that > affects me listening to digital. IBOC audio sounds fine to me as well as the > streaming audio, but to some digital audio is not to their liking. > > Patrick > > Patrick Martin > Seaside OR > KGED QSL Manager > > > From: charle...@msn.com > > To: irca@hard-core-dx.com > > Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 00:38:55 + > > Subject: Re: [IRCA] Layer Announces All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test > > Results > > > > Patrick: > > > > Audio quality testers have been aware of that for a hundred years. That's > > why professional audio testing always uses many listeners, male and female, > > old and youg, etc. That's exactly what the consultant did that wrote the > > IBOC audio quality report. > > > > And as for the engineers that hate it, you have to tell me why. There are a > > lot of emotions surrounding IBOC, and with just your words I can't tell if > > they have an agenda. > > > > As for why I dislike (it seems wrong to say "hate") IBOC audio quality: the > > hybrid mode was the lowest quality of FM, analog AM, digital FM, or most > > streaming channels. The all digital quality only gets it up to just below > > analog FM. Still in last place.but possibly equal to many streaming > > channels. > > > > Chuck > > > > > > From: IRCA on behalf of Patrick Martin > > > > Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 12:08 AM > > To: IRCA > > Subject: Re: [IRCA] Layer Announces All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test > > Results > > > > Chuck, > > > > I think with IBOC, if is up to the person's ears. I know several CE's that > > hates digital audio, especially IBOC. > > > > Patrick Martin > > Seaside OR > > KGED QSL Manager > > > > > From: charle...@msn.com > > > To: irca@hard-core-dx.com > > > Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:33:58 + > > > Subject: Re: [IRCA] Layer Announces All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab > > > TestResults > > > > > > It should be mentioned that all digital IBOC sounds better than hybrid > > > IBOC and is more robust. The question is whether it is good enough to > > > spark more interest and then more interest sparks more receivers. Or: the > > > FCC does something to force the issue, an unlikely possibility given > > > their lack of desire so far. > > > > > > Chuck > > > > > > > > > From: IRCA on behalf of Russ Edmunds > > > > > > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 10:45 AM > > > To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America > > > Subject: Re: [IRCA] Layer Announces All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test > > > Results > > > > > > Going to all digital might or might not solve interference issues but the > > > cost for stations to do so > > > coupled with the lack of interest already and the lack of receivers would > > > indeed likely be the final > > > nail in the coffin. > > > > > > Russ Edmunds > > > 15 mi NW Phila > > > Grid FN20id > > > > > > > > > AM: Modified Sony ICF2010's (2) barefoot w/whip > > > FM: Yamaha T-80 & T-85, each w/ Conrad RDS Decoder; > > > Onkyo T-450RDS; Tecsun PL-310 ( 2); > > > modified Sony ICF2010 w/APS9B @ 15'; > > > Grundig G8 w/whip; modified Sony ICF2010 w/whip > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Patrick Martin wrote: