[IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers

2008-01-03 Thread Tim Kridel
From: SkyREPORT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 2:01 AM

Subject: SkyREPORT 01/03/2008 - iBiquity Takes On Satellite Radio Merger

 

iBiquity Takes On Satellite Radio Merger

 

Should a combined satellite radio entity be required to include technology
from a competing service in its receivers?

 

Last month, iBiquity Digital, known for its HD Radio platform that allows FM
and AM stations to deliver digital-quality audio to listeners, asked the
Federal Communications Commission to consider a condition for the XM/Sirius
merger that would require HD Radio technology to be included in all
satellite radio receivers. It was the latest proposed condition aimed at the
XM/Sirius transaction, which continues to wait for regulatory approval from
the FCC and Justice Department antitrust staff.

 

In a filing sent to the FCC, iBiquity stressed that it has no formal
position on the merger. But the company suggested the condition would ensure
a level competitive playing field between satellite radio and HD Radio
technology.

 

iBiquity also said a combined satellite radio company should be required to
terminate all exclusive arrangements with current partners and be prohibited
from entering into exclusive deals with suppliers, retailers and automobile
manufacturers in the future.

 

In its FCC filing, iBiquity alleged that the satellite radio companies may
have used subsidies and incentives paid to automobile manufacturers and
their suppliers to discourage proliferation of HD Radio products.

 

The company also said, A merged entity will have a stronger economic
position and more cash to fund subsidies and incentives. As the sole
provider of satellite services, the merged entity will have greater leverage
over retailers, car manufacturers and suppliers.

 

iBiquity added, This combined satellite monopoly would be in a better
position to act anti-competitively to exclude HD Radio products.

 

The XM/Sirius merger has been at the FCC for more than 180 days. The
companies first announced plans to combine operations in February.

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers

2008-01-03 Thread Saul Chernos
Is this a signof desperation on iBiquity's part. Hopefully the court will 
learn something other than the wild success IBOC has enjoyed...


- Original Message - 
From: Tim Kridel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America' 
irca@hard-core-dx.com
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 9:04 AM
Subject: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers


 From: SkyREPORT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 2:01 AM

 Subject: SkyREPORT 01/03/2008 - iBiquity Takes On Satellite Radio Merger



 iBiquity Takes On Satellite Radio Merger



 Should a combined satellite radio entity be required to include technology
 from a competing service in its receivers?



 Last month, iBiquity Digital, known for its HD Radio platform that allows 
 FM
 and AM stations to deliver digital-quality audio to listeners, asked the
 Federal Communications Commission to consider a condition for the 
 XM/Sirius
 merger that would require HD Radio technology to be included in all
 satellite radio receivers. It was the latest proposed condition aimed at 
 the
 XM/Sirius transaction, which continues to wait for regulatory approval 
 from
 the FCC and Justice Department antitrust staff.



 In a filing sent to the FCC, iBiquity stressed that it has no formal
 position on the merger. But the company suggested the condition would 
 ensure
 a level competitive playing field between satellite radio and HD Radio
 technology.



 iBiquity also said a combined satellite radio company should be required 
 to
 terminate all exclusive arrangements with current partners and be 
 prohibited
 from entering into exclusive deals with suppliers, retailers and 
 automobile
 manufacturers in the future.



 In its FCC filing, iBiquity alleged that the satellite radio companies may
 have used subsidies and incentives paid to automobile manufacturers and
 their suppliers to discourage proliferation of HD Radio products.



 The company also said, A merged entity will have a stronger economic
 position and more cash to fund subsidies and incentives. As the sole
 provider of satellite services, the merged entity will have greater 
 leverage
 over retailers, car manufacturers and suppliers.



 iBiquity added, This combined satellite monopoly would be in a better
 position to act anti-competitively to exclude HD Radio products.



 The XM/Sirius merger has been at the FCC for more than 180 days. The
 companies first announced plans to combine operations in February.

 ___
 IRCA mailing list
 IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

 Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
 original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
 IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

 For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

 To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com 

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers

2008-01-03 Thread LAWRENCE STOLER
If this isn't pure desperation, nothing is.
Larry Stoler

- Original Message - 
From: Saul Chernos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
irca@hard-core-dx.com
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers


 Is this a signof desperation on iBiquity's part. Hopefully the court will
 learn something other than the wild success IBOC has enjoyed...


 - Original Message - 
 From: Tim Kridel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America'
 irca@hard-core-dx.com
 Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 9:04 AM
 Subject: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers


  From: SkyREPORT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 2:01 AM
 
  Subject: SkyREPORT 01/03/2008 - iBiquity Takes On Satellite Radio Merger
 
 
 
  iBiquity Takes On Satellite Radio Merger
 
 
 
  Should a combined satellite radio entity be required to include
technology
  from a competing service in its receivers?
 
 
 
  Last month, iBiquity Digital, known for its HD Radio platform that
allows
  FM
  and AM stations to deliver digital-quality audio to listeners, asked the
  Federal Communications Commission to consider a condition for the
  XM/Sirius
  merger that would require HD Radio technology to be included in all
  satellite radio receivers. It was the latest proposed condition aimed at
  the
  XM/Sirius transaction, which continues to wait for regulatory approval
  from
  the FCC and Justice Department antitrust staff.
 
 
 
  In a filing sent to the FCC, iBiquity stressed that it has no formal
  position on the merger. But the company suggested the condition would
  ensure
  a level competitive playing field between satellite radio and HD Radio
  technology.
 
 
 
  iBiquity also said a combined satellite radio company should be required
  to
  terminate all exclusive arrangements with current partners and be
  prohibited
  from entering into exclusive deals with suppliers, retailers and
  automobile
  manufacturers in the future.
 
 
 
  In its FCC filing, iBiquity alleged that the satellite radio companies
may
  have used subsidies and incentives paid to automobile manufacturers and
  their suppliers to discourage proliferation of HD Radio products.
 
 
 
  The company also said, A merged entity will have a stronger economic
  position and more cash to fund subsidies and incentives. As the sole
  provider of satellite services, the merged entity will have greater
  leverage
  over retailers, car manufacturers and suppliers.
 
 
 
  iBiquity added, This combined satellite monopoly would be in a better
  position to act anti-competitively to exclude HD Radio products.
 
 
 
  The XM/Sirius merger has been at the FCC for more than 180 days. The
  companies first announced plans to combine operations in February.
 
  ___
  IRCA mailing list
  IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
  http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
 
  Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
  original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
  IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
 
  For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
 
  To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

 ___
 IRCA mailing list
 IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

 Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

 For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

 To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1207 - Release Date: 1/2/2008
11:29 AM



___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers

2008-01-03 Thread Saul Chernos
Imagine the impact a really knowledgeable DXer could make as an expert 
witness should this ever go before a court...

- Original Message - 
From: Russ Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America 
irca@hard-core-dx.com
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers



 --- Tim Kridel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: SkyREPORT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 2:01 AM

 Subject: SkyREPORT 01/03/2008 - iBiquity Takes On Satellite Radio
 Merger



 iBiquity Takes On Satellite Radio Merger



 This is sooo transparent !

 Satellite has niche content. Satellite has pre-empted many possible FM
 HD-2 format deployments. HD isn't penetrating the market.

 So now they want to mandate HD on satellite - the only levelling of the
 playing field here is in iBiquity's favor because they have seriously
 misjudged just about everything in this misadventure of theirs.

 It also shows they've learned nothing at all from their dubious
 experience about propagation. Satellite already has some challenges
 there, and overlaying HD would only make them worse.

 What's also laughable is that they've obviously also learned nothing
 about the market economics at play. We have to overlapping and
 underperforming satellite services trying to merge, so now we'll toss
 in some difficult and very expensive platform changes, and at the same
 time render all existing satellite receivers obsolete.

 It's about time for iBiquity to stand or fail on its own - if they hang
 by their own petard, then so be it.

 Russ Edmunds
 Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
 [15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
 40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 FM: Yamaha T-80  Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
 AM: Hammarlund HQ-150  4' FET air core loop


 
 
 Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
 http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
 ___
 IRCA mailing list
 IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

 Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
 original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
 IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

 For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

 To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com 

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers

2008-01-03 Thread LAWRENCE STOLER
Isn't it amazing how much time and money Ibiquity has wasted on this whole
thing.  Now they can't compete! that's their latest claim.  What next?  It's
not over yet.  They will keep going until the whole HD thing goes down in
flames which may not take long.
Larry Stoler

- Original Message - 
From: Russ Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
irca@hard-core-dx.com
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers



 --- Tim Kridel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  From: SkyREPORT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 2:01 AM
 
  Subject: SkyREPORT 01/03/2008 - iBiquity Takes On Satellite Radio
  Merger
 
 
 
  iBiquity Takes On Satellite Radio Merger
 


 This is sooo transparent !

 Satellite has niche content. Satellite has pre-empted many possible FM
 HD-2 format deployments. HD isn't penetrating the market.

 So now they want to mandate HD on satellite - the only levelling of the
 playing field here is in iBiquity's favor because they have seriously
 misjudged just about everything in this misadventure of theirs.

 It also shows they've learned nothing at all from their dubious
 experience about propagation. Satellite already has some challenges
 there, and overlaying HD would only make them worse.

 What's also laughable is that they've obviously also learned nothing
 about the market economics at play. We have to overlapping and
 underperforming satellite services trying to merge, so now we'll toss
 in some difficult and very expensive platform changes, and at the same
 time render all existing satellite receivers obsolete.

 It's about time for iBiquity to stand or fail on its own - if they hang
 by their own petard, then so be it.

 Russ Edmunds
 Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
 [15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
 40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 FM: Yamaha T-80  Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
 AM: Hammarlund HQ-150  4' FET air core loop





 Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
 http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
 ___
 IRCA mailing list
 IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

 Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

 For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

 To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1207 - Release Date: 1/2/2008
11:29 AM



___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers

2008-01-03 Thread Paul B. Walker, Jr.
 I doubt a DX'er: would EVER be considered an expert witness.

Paul



On Jan 3, 2008 12:07 PM, Saul Chernos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Imagine the impact a really knowledgeable DXer could make as an expert
 witness should this ever go before a court...

 - Original Message -
 From: Russ Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
 irca@hard-core-dx.com
 Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:02 PM
 Subject: Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers

2008-01-03 Thread Patrick Martin
Russ,

They are not going give up without a fight and there is going to be a
lot of fallout from this. Lots of money will be lost before it is over.
I think with the poor sales around Christmas, they are trying something
else. 

73,

Patrick 

Patrick Martin
KAVT Reception Manager

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers

2008-01-03 Thread Patrick Martin
You've got to at least give them credit for not giving up. I hope the
whole HD issue does go out the window in time.

Patrick

Patrick Martin
KAVT Reception Manager

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers

2008-01-03 Thread Saul Chernos
Maybe you aren't, nor am I, but look around the list a bit and you might 
identify one or two who are...

- Original Message - 
From: Paul B. Walker, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America 
irca@hard-core-dx.com
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers


 I doubt a DX'er: would EVER be considered an expert witness.

 Paul



 On Jan 3, 2008 12:07 PM, Saul Chernos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Imagine the impact a really knowledgeable DXer could make as an expert
 witness should this ever go before a court...

 - Original Message -
 From: Russ Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
 irca@hard-core-dx.com
 Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:02 PM
 Subject: Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers


 ___
 IRCA mailing list
 IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

 Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
 original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
 IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

 For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

 To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com 

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers

2008-01-03 Thread Russ Edmunds

--- Patrick Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Russ,
 
 They are not going give up without a fight and there is going to be a
 lot of fallout from this. Lots of money will be lost before it is
 over.
 I think with the poor sales around Christmas, they are trying
 something
 else. 
 


While that may be true, I also doubt the FCC will be able to get away
with some of the things they have in the past as Congress - members of
both parties - is about fed up with Kevin Martin.There will also be
fallout from the handling of the TV conversion by the FCC, and that
will factor in.




Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FM: Yamaha T-80  Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Hammarlund HQ-150  4' FET air core loop


  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers

2008-01-03 Thread Russ Edmunds

--- Tim Kridel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Although the FCC might end up taking the heat for the DTV transition,
 ultimately it's Congress' lust for the auction revenue driving the
 timetable. 
 
 


I disagree, at least partially. The timetable is largely driven by
agreements made a few years ago to re-allocate the spectrum. Many
portions of it are already allocated and the new users impatient.
Congress didn't negotiate those. Further, there was more than ample
time for the FCC to have done what needed to be done and still comply
with the timetable.

The current FCC simply doesn't really care about the public/audience.
They're more interested in benefitting the industry. 

There was probably never a sufficient timetable to allow for any
serious phased deployment, however there was time for some phased tests
as discussed earlier. There was also time to have done some
shortened-up phase-ins. 




Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FM: Yamaha T-80  Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Hammarlund HQ-150  4' FET air core loop


  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers

2008-01-03 Thread Tim Kridel
It was Congress, not the FCC, that started this whole process back in '96 by
giving stations their DTV spectrum. Congress also set the original December
2006 analog phase-out deadline, and some members wanted an earlier cut-off.

Congress knows that the sooner the auctions are held, the sooner they get
not only the proceeds, but also the tax revenue from the services using the
new spectrum.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Russ Edmunds
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 3:59 PM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Requiring HD in Sat Receivers


--- Tim Kridel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Although the FCC might end up taking the heat for the DTV transition,
 ultimately it's Congress' lust for the auction revenue driving the
 timetable. 
 
 


I disagree, at least partially. The timetable is largely driven by
agreements made a few years ago to re-allocate the spectrum. Many
portions of it are already allocated and the new users impatient.
Congress didn't negotiate those. Further, there was more than ample
time for the FCC to have done what needed to be done and still comply
with the timetable.

The current FCC simply doesn't really care about the public/audience.
They're more interested in benefitting the industry. 

There was probably never a sufficient timetable to allow for any
serious phased deployment, however there was time for some phased tests
as discussed earlier. There was also time to have done some
shortened-up phase-ins. 




Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FM: Yamaha T-80  Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Hammarlund HQ-150  4' FET air core loop


 


Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com