[IRCA] WBT's Digital Test - "Is There Hope For A Digital > AM
The descriptions I read below of AM IBOC describe exactly how WBZ IBOC sounds to me: horrible. AM radio sounded great years ago before the current NRSC audio mask was implemented. Bob Young Millbury, ma KB1OKL > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:01:50 -0500 > From: "Stewart, Joseph R" > To: "irca@hard-core-dx.com" > Subject: Re: [IRCA] WBT's Digital Test - "Is There Hope For A Digital > AM > Message-ID: > <96662f42b7fac9489c72164de62ed9881180bfe...@evh2-ms1.edubear.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Re Steve Ponder's post about the Radio Insight article > (http://radioinsight.com/blog/headlines/84743/is-there-hope-for-a-digital-am-band/)... > Has anybody listened to the audio clip of the test? The WBT signal goes to > digital near the end of the clip, starting with the CBS top-of-hour "bong" > and into the newscast. Yes, the sudden drop to near-zero noise is > impressive... but the actual SOUND quality is gawd-awful, like an especially > bad webstream. Sure, it's got more "high end" than the analog signal--but > it's gargly, hashy, artifact-ridden, and nearly unlistenable. The analog, > while bandwidth-limited, is MUCH more pleasant to listen to! "FM-quality" my > foot (and various other extremities)! > > Randy Stewart > Arts Producer > KSMU > 901 S. National > Springfield MO 65897 > > > > > > > > > ---------- > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:28:05 -0700 > From: "Rick Lewis" > To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" > > Subject: Re: [IRCA] WBT's Digital Test - "Is There Hope For A Digital > AM > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Randy, > That's what I thought, too. > Swishy, very artificial-sounding. You know what I do with a web stream that > sounds like that? I ignore it and go somewhere else. > And if that's what IBOC-only AM sounds like, that's exactly what I'd do. > Although I've heard very few, so far I haven't heard, live or recorded, any > AM IBOC that's pleasing to my ears. > I don't like the audio artifacts. I like hearing more high frequencies, but > if they come with artifacts, I'd rather not have the highs. > -- > Rick > > ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
[IRCA] WBT's Digital Test - "Is There Hope For A Digital AM Band?"
Article from Radio Insight ... http://radioinsight.com/blog/headlines/84743/is-there-hope-for-a-digital-am-band/ 73 & Good DX, Steve Ponder, N5WBI Houston, TX _ Sent from my Kindle Fire HD 8.9 ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
Re: [IRCA] WBT's Digital Test - "Is There Hope For A Digital AM
Re Steve Ponder's post about the Radio Insight article (http://radioinsight.com/blog/headlines/84743/is-there-hope-for-a-digital-am-band/)... Has anybody listened to the audio clip of the test? The WBT signal goes to digital near the end of the clip, starting with the CBS top-of-hour "bong" and into the newscast. Yes, the sudden drop to near-zero noise is impressive... but the actual SOUND quality is gawd-awful, like an especially bad webstream. Sure, it's got more "high end" than the analog signal--but it's gargly, hashy, artifact-ridden, and nearly unlistenable. The analog, while bandwidth-limited, is MUCH more pleasant to listen to! "FM-quality" my foot (and various other extremities)! Randy Stewart Arts Producer KSMU 901 S. National Springfield MO 65897 ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
Re: [IRCA] WBT's Digital Test - "Is There Hope For A Digital AM
Randy, That's what I thought, too. Swishy, very artificial-sounding. You know what I do with a web stream that sounds like that? I ignore it and go somewhere else. And if that's what IBOC-only AM sounds like, that's exactly what I'd do. Although I've heard very few, so far I haven't heard, live or recorded, any AM IBOC that's pleasing to my ears. I don't like the audio artifacts. I like hearing more high frequencies, but if they come with artifacts, I'd rather not have the highs. -- Rick ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
Re: [IRCA] WBT's Digital Test - "Is There Hope For A Digital AM
Perhaps somebody should pass this information along to the folks at WBT. --Mike Sanburn > From: randystew...@missouristate.edu > To: irca@hard-core-dx.com > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:01:50 -0500 > Subject: Re: [IRCA] WBT's Digital Test - "Is There Hope For A Digital AM > > Re Steve Ponder's post about the Radio Insight article > (http://radioinsight.com/blog/headlines/84743/is-there-hope-for-a-digital-am-band/)... > Has anybody listened to the audio clip of the test? The WBT signal goes to > digital near the end of the clip, starting with the CBS top-of-hour "bong" > and into the newscast. Yes, the sudden drop to near-zero noise is > impressive... but the actual SOUND quality is gawd-awful, like an especially > bad webstream. Sure, it's got more "high end" than the analog signal--but > it's gargly, hashy, artifact-ridden, and nearly unlistenable. The analog, > while bandwidth-limited, is MUCH more pleasant to listen to! "FM-quality" my > foot (and various other extremities)! > > Randy Stewart > Arts Producer > KSMU > 901 S. National > Springfield MO 65897 > > > > > > > ___ > IRCA mailing list > IRCA@hard-core-dx.com > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original > contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its > editors, publishing staff, or officers > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com > ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
Re: [IRCA] WBT's Digital Test - "Is There Hope For A Digital AM Band?"
This particular test only hits one aspect. It doesn't give any indication as to what would occur with co-channel digital stations or adjacent channels. When I look at the number of AM stations vs TV, and the number of small stations of AM; when I look at the number of FM stations vs the number which have implemented the IBOC hybrid; and when I look at the much smaller proportion of AM's which have gone that route, I just can't see full digital on AM. Russ Edmunds 15 mi NNW of Philadelphia Grid FN20id From: Stephen H. Ponder To: ABDX ; "ultralightdx@yahoogroups com" ; "irca@hard-core-dx com" Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:08 PM Subject: [IRCA] WBT's Digital Test - "Is There Hope For A Digital AM Band?" Article from Radio Insight ... http://radioinsight.com/blog/headlines/84743/is-there-hope-for-a-digital-am-band/ 73 & Good DX, Steve Ponder, N5WBI Houston, TX _ Sent from my Kindle Fire HD 8.9 ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
