[jira] [Comment Edited] (AMQ-9469) Removing JRMS dependency from assembly POM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17831951#comment-17831951
]
Kartik Ganesh edited comment on AMQ-9469 at 3/29/24 3:27 AM:
-
I've opened a -draft- PR for removal of the dependency here -
[https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1191]
was (Author: JIRAUSER287644):
I've opened a draft PR for removal of the dependency here -
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1191
> Removing JRMS dependency from assembly POM
> --
>
> Key: AMQ-9469
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9469
> Project: ActiveMQ Classic
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Environment: Tested using the libraries from the ActiveMQ 5.18.3
> tarball downloaded from
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/
>Reporter: Kartik Ganesh
>Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Hello!
> I noticed that the ActiveMQ [assembly
> pom.xml|https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/main/assembly/pom.xml#L484-L486]
> has a dependency on a very old library - "jrms-1.1" - and I'm wondering if I
> can submit a PR to remove this. This library has not seen any
> releases/updates since 2005 and
> [Maven|https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/jrms/jrms/usages] lists only
> ActiveMQ and Apache Camel as upstream usages.
> After digging through ActiveMQ's mailing lists and commit history, I found
> that it [used to be
> listed|https://github.com/apache/activemq-web/blob/7a7d976c/2004/06/23/jgroups-and-jrms-support.xml]
> on ActiveMQ's [URI
> Protocols|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/uri-protocols]
> page, but was removed at some point. JRMS seems to be listed as a
> peer-to-peer option on the
> [topologies|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/topologies]
> page but is not discussed in either the
> [peer|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/peer-transport-reference]
> or
> [multicast|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/multicast-transport-reference]
> transport reference pages.
> If I try to specify "jrms://" as a protocol for my ActiveMQConnectionFactory,
> I see the following stack-trace:
> {{javax.jms.JMSException: Could not create Transport. Reason:
> java.io.IOException: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jrms]}}{{ at
> org.apache.activemq.util.JMSExceptionSupport.create(JMSExceptionSupport.java:49)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createTransport(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:378)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createActiveMQConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:391)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createActiveMQConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:349)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:245)}}{{
> at App$HelloWorldProducer.run(App.java:66)}}{{ at
> java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)}}
> {{Caused by: java.io.IOException: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jrms]}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.util.IOExceptionSupport.create(IOExceptionSupport.java:30)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFactory.findTransportFactory(TransportFactory.java:185)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFactory.connect(TransportFactory.java:64)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createTransport(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:376)}}{{
> ... 5 more}}
> {{Caused by: java.io.IOException: Could not find factory class for resource:
> META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport/jrms}}{{ at
> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.loadProperties(FactoryFinder.java:104)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.create(FactoryFinder.java:61)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:154)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFactory.findTransportFactory(TransportFactory.java:182)}}{{
> ... 7 more}}
>
> An [email from 2011 on the users
> mailing-list|https://lists.apache.org/thread/wbwdj8011tmcqtdlbbfmzsthjdrh0gn0]
> came to the same conclusion, but I don't see any further discussion on it.
> I've confirmed that the
> [META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport|https://github.com/apache/activemq/tree/main/activemq-client/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport]
> folder under activemq-client does not have a "jrms" file.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Work logged] (ARTEMIS-4703) Add additional Queue federation example for AMQP federation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4703?focusedWorklogId=912117=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-912117 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-4703: --- Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 28/Mar/24 21:13 Start Date: 28/Mar/24 21:13 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: tabish121 opened a new pull request, #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-examples/pull/8 Adds an example that demonstrates moving messages through an intermediary broker which has no consumer demand. Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 912117) Remaining Estimate: 0h Time Spent: 10m > Add additional Queue federation example for AMQP federation > --- > > Key: ARTEMIS-4703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4703 > Project: ActiveMQ Artemis > Issue Type: Task > Components: AMQP >Affects Versions: 2.33.0 >Reporter: Timothy A. Bish >Assignee: Timothy A. Bish >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 2.34.0 > > Time Spent: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Add an additional Queue federation example showing how to federate queue > messages through an intermediary broker. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Resolved] (ARTEMIS-3262) Cannot get max-hops >= 2 federation to work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy A. Bish resolved ARTEMIS-3262.
--
Resolution: Information Provided
> Cannot get max-hops >= 2 federation to work
> ---
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-3262
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3262
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Federation
>Affects Versions: 2.17.0, 2.20.0
> Environment: Artemis 2.17.0 on 3 Linux machines
> Dragonwell OpenJDK 11.0.10
>Reporter: Zhang Xiang
>Priority: Major
> Labels: ActiveMQ, federation
>
> I want to construct a 3-level MQTT message forwarding system:
> A → B → C
> Once a message publish under the topic "from-A" to A, all clients subscribing
> "from-A" on B and C should receive that message.
> Here is the config of B:
>
> {code:xml}
>
> tcp://192.168.1.200:61616
>
>
>
>
> true
>
> connector-A
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> {code}
> And here is the config of C:
>
>
> {code:xml}
>
> tcp://192.168.1.100:61616
>
>
>
>
>
> connector-C
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> {code}
> The problem is that even I've set max-hops to 2, the message cannot be
> forwarded for more than 1 time.
>
> * If I published a "from-A" message to B, all clients subscribing "from-A"
> on C could receive the message.
> * If I published a "from-A" message to A, all clients subscribing "from-A"
> on B could receive the message, but clients on C wouldn't!
> The example config files provided by the software packages do not cover this
> kind of situations, nor do the documentation.
> Please tell me if it is a bug and if not, what should I do.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (ARTEMIS-3262) Cannot get max-hops >= 2 federation to work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17831977#comment-17831977
]
Timothy A. Bish commented on ARTEMIS-3262:
--
This is a configuration issue, the max-hops value isn't actually needed in this
scenario as there is no loop of federated brokers that could cause cycling. If
you wanted to add max hops to this setup you should set the value to two on
both brokers or set as the message is getting stopped right now from moving to
C from B when published on A is because the configuration on C says only one
hop is allowed and the message already hopped once from A to B.
> Cannot get max-hops >= 2 federation to work
> ---
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-3262
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3262
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Federation
>Affects Versions: 2.17.0, 2.20.0
> Environment: Artemis 2.17.0 on 3 Linux machines
> Dragonwell OpenJDK 11.0.10
>Reporter: Zhang Xiang
>Priority: Major
> Labels: ActiveMQ, federation
>
> I want to construct a 3-level MQTT message forwarding system:
> A → B → C
> Once a message publish under the topic "from-A" to A, all clients subscribing
> "from-A" on B and C should receive that message.
> Here is the config of B:
>
> {code:xml}
>
> tcp://192.168.1.200:61616
>
>
>
>
> true
>
> connector-A
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> {code}
> And here is the config of C:
>
>
> {code:xml}
>
> tcp://192.168.1.100:61616
>
>
>
>
>
> connector-C
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> {code}
> The problem is that even I've set max-hops to 2, the message cannot be
> forwarded for more than 1 time.
>
> * If I published a "from-A" message to B, all clients subscribing "from-A"
> on C could receive the message.
> * If I published a "from-A" message to A, all clients subscribing "from-A"
> on B could receive the message, but clients on C wouldn't!
> The example config files provided by the software packages do not cover this
> kind of situations, nor do the documentation.
> Please tell me if it is a bug and if not, what should I do.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (ARTEMIS-4703) Add additional Queue federation example for AMQP federation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Timothy A. Bish updated ARTEMIS-4703: - Affects Version/s: 2.33.0 (was: 2.34.0) > Add additional Queue federation example for AMQP federation > --- > > Key: ARTEMIS-4703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4703 > Project: ActiveMQ Artemis > Issue Type: Task > Components: AMQP >Affects Versions: 2.33.0 >Reporter: Timothy A. Bish >Assignee: Timothy A. Bish >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 2.33.0 > > > Add an additional Queue federation example showing how to federate queue > messages through an intermediary broker. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (ARTEMIS-4703) Add additional Queue federation example for AMQP federation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Timothy A. Bish updated ARTEMIS-4703: - Fix Version/s: 2.34.0 (was: 2.33.0) > Add additional Queue federation example for AMQP federation > --- > > Key: ARTEMIS-4703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4703 > Project: ActiveMQ Artemis > Issue Type: Task > Components: AMQP >Affects Versions: 2.33.0 >Reporter: Timothy A. Bish >Assignee: Timothy A. Bish >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 2.34.0 > > > Add an additional Queue federation example showing how to federate queue > messages through an intermediary broker. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (ARTEMIS-4703) Add additional Queue federation example for AMQP federation
Timothy A. Bish created ARTEMIS-4703: Summary: Add additional Queue federation example for AMQP federation Key: ARTEMIS-4703 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4703 Project: ActiveMQ Artemis Issue Type: Task Components: AMQP Affects Versions: 2.34.0 Reporter: Timothy A. Bish Assignee: Timothy A. Bish Fix For: 2.33.0 Add an additional Queue federation example showing how to federate queue messages through an intermediary broker. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-9469) Removing JRMS dependency from assembly POM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kartik Ganesh updated AMQ-9469:
---
Description:
Hello!
I noticed that the ActiveMQ [assembly
pom.xml|https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/main/assembly/pom.xml#L484-L486]
has a dependency on a very old library - "jrms-1.1" - and I'm wondering if I
can submit a PR to remove this. This library has not seen any releases/updates
since 2005 and [Maven|https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/jrms/jrms/usages]
lists only ActiveMQ and Apache Camel as upstream usages.
After digging through ActiveMQ's mailing lists and commit history, I found that
it [used to be
listed|https://github.com/apache/activemq-web/blob/7a7d976c/2004/06/23/jgroups-and-jrms-support.xml]
on ActiveMQ's [URI
Protocols|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/uri-protocols]
page, but was removed at some point. JRMS seems to be listed as a peer-to-peer
option on the
[topologies|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/topologies]
page but is not discussed in either the
[peer|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/peer-transport-reference]
or
[multicast|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/multicast-transport-reference]
transport reference pages.
If I try to specify "jrms://" as a protocol for my ActiveMQConnectionFactory, I
see the following stack-trace:
{{javax.jms.JMSException: Could not create Transport. Reason:
java.io.IOException: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jrms]}}{{ at
org.apache.activemq.util.JMSExceptionSupport.create(JMSExceptionSupport.java:49)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createTransport(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:378)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createActiveMQConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:391)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createActiveMQConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:349)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:245)}}{{
at App$HelloWorldProducer.run(App.java:66)}}{{ at
java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)}}
{{Caused by: java.io.IOException: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jrms]}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.util.IOExceptionSupport.create(IOExceptionSupport.java:30)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFactory.findTransportFactory(TransportFactory.java:185)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFactory.connect(TransportFactory.java:64)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createTransport(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:376)}}{{
... 5 more}}
{{Caused by: java.io.IOException: Could not find factory class for resource:
META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport/jrms}}{{ at
org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.loadProperties(FactoryFinder.java:104)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.create(FactoryFinder.java:61)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:154)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFactory.findTransportFactory(TransportFactory.java:182)}}{{
... 7 more}}
An [email from 2011 on the users
mailing-list|https://lists.apache.org/thread/wbwdj8011tmcqtdlbbfmzsthjdrh0gn0]
came to the same conclusion, but I don't see any further discussion on it. I've
confirmed that the
[META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport|https://github.com/apache/activemq/tree/main/activemq-client/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport]
folder under activemq-client does not have a "jrms" file.
was:
Hello!
I noticed that the ActiveMQ [assembly
pom.xml|https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/main/assembly/pom.xml#L484-L486]
has a dependency on a very old library - "jrms-1.1" - and I'm wondering if I
can submit a PR to remove this. This library has not seen any releases/updates
since 2005 and [Maven|https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/jrms/jrms/usages]
lists only ActiveMQ and Apache Camel as upstream usages.
After digging through ActiveMQ's mailing lists and commit history, I found that
it [used to be
listed|https://github.com/apache/activemq-web/blob/7a7d976c/2004/06/23/jgroups-and-jrms-support.xml]
on ActiveMQ's [URI
Protocols|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/uri-protocols]
page, but was removed at some point. JRMS seems to be listed as a peer-to-peer
option on the
[topologies|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/topologies]
page but is not discussed in either the
[peer|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/peer-transport-reference]
or
[multicast|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/multicast-transport-reference]
transport reference pages.
If I try to specify "jrms://" as a protocol for my
[jira] [Work logged] (AMQ-9469) Removing JRMS dependency from assembly POM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9469?focusedWorklogId=912111=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-912111
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on AMQ-9469:
---
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 28/Mar/24 19:52
Start Date: 28/Mar/24 19:52
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: kartg opened a new pull request, #1191:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1191
The jrms-1.1 library has not seen any releases/updates since 2005 and
[Maven](https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/jrms/jrms/usages) lists only
ActiveMQ and Apache Camel as upstream usages.
After digging through ActiveMQ's mailing lists and commit history, I found
that it [used to be
listed](https://github.com/apache/activemq-web/blob/7a7d976c/2004/06/23/jgroups-and-jrms-support.xml)
on ActiveMQ's [URI
Protocols](https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/uri-protocols)
page, but was removed at some point. JRMS seems to be listed as a peer-to-peer
option on the
[topologies](https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/topologies)
page but is not discussed in either the
[peer](https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/peer-transport-reference)
or
[multicast](https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/multicast-transport-reference)
transport reference pages.
The
[META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport](https://github.com/apache/activemq/tree/main/activemq-client/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport)
folder under `activemq-client` (tested using v5.18.3) does not have a "jrms"
file, so "jrms://" does not resolve to a supported ActiveMQ protocol.
More details in the JIRA issue -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9469
Issue Time Tracking
---
Worklog Id: (was: 912111)
Remaining Estimate: 0h
Time Spent: 10m
> Removing JRMS dependency from assembly POM
> --
>
> Key: AMQ-9469
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9469
> Project: ActiveMQ Classic
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Environment: Tested using the libraries from the ActiveMQ 5.18.3
> tarball downloaded from
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/
>Reporter: Kartik Ganesh
>Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Hello!
> I noticed that the ActiveMQ [assembly
> pom.xml|https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/main/assembly/pom.xml#L484-L486]
> has a dependency on a very old library - "jrms-1.1" - and I'm wondering if I
> can submit a PR to remove this. This library has not seen any
> releases/updates since 2005 and
> [Maven|https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/jrms/jrms/usages] lists only
> ActiveMQ and Apache Camel as upstream usages.
> After digging through ActiveMQ's mailing lists and commit history, I found
> that it [used to be
> listed|https://github.com/apache/activemq-web/blob/7a7d976c/2004/06/23/jgroups-and-jrms-support.xml]
> on ActiveMQ's [URI
> Protocols|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/uri-protocols]
> page, but was removed at some point. JRMS seems to be listed as a
> peer-to-peer option on the
> [topologies|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/topologies]
> page but is not discussed in either the
> [peer|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/peer-transport-reference]
> or
> [multicast|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/multicast-transport-reference]
> transport reference pages.
> If I try to specify "jrms://" as a protocol for my ActiveMQConnectionFactory,
> I see the following stack-trace:
> {{javax.jms.JMSException: Could not create Transport. Reason:
> java.io.IOException: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jrms]}}{{ at
> org.apache.activemq.util.JMSExceptionSupport.create(JMSExceptionSupport.java:49)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createTransport(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:378)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createActiveMQConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:391)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createActiveMQConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:349)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:245)}}{{
> at App$HelloWorldProducer.run(App.java:66)}}{{{} at
> java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829){}}}{{{}Caused by:
> java.io.IOException: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jrms]{}}}{{ at
> org.apache.activemq.util.IOExceptionSupport.create(IOExceptionSupport.java:30)}}{{
> at
>
[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-9469) Removing JRMS dependency from assembly POM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17831951#comment-17831951
]
Kartik Ganesh commented on AMQ-9469:
I've opened a draft PR for removal of the dependency here -
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1191
> Removing JRMS dependency from assembly POM
> --
>
> Key: AMQ-9469
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9469
> Project: ActiveMQ Classic
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Environment: Tested using the libraries from the ActiveMQ 5.18.3
> tarball downloaded from
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/
>Reporter: Kartik Ganesh
>Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Hello!
> I noticed that the ActiveMQ [assembly
> pom.xml|https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/main/assembly/pom.xml#L484-L486]
> has a dependency on a very old library - "jrms-1.1" - and I'm wondering if I
> can submit a PR to remove this. This library has not seen any
> releases/updates since 2005 and
> [Maven|https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/jrms/jrms/usages] lists only
> ActiveMQ and Apache Camel as upstream usages.
> After digging through ActiveMQ's mailing lists and commit history, I found
> that it [used to be
> listed|https://github.com/apache/activemq-web/blob/7a7d976c/2004/06/23/jgroups-and-jrms-support.xml]
> on ActiveMQ's [URI
> Protocols|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/uri-protocols]
> page, but was removed at some point. JRMS seems to be listed as a
> peer-to-peer option on the
> [topologies|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/topologies]
> page but is not discussed in either the
> [peer|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/peer-transport-reference]
> or
> [multicast|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/multicast-transport-reference]
> transport reference pages.
> If I try to specify "jrms://" as a protocol for my ActiveMQConnectionFactory,
> I see the following stack-trace:
> {{javax.jms.JMSException: Could not create Transport. Reason:
> java.io.IOException: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jrms]}}{{ at
> org.apache.activemq.util.JMSExceptionSupport.create(JMSExceptionSupport.java:49)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createTransport(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:378)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createActiveMQConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:391)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createActiveMQConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:349)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:245)}}{{
> at App$HelloWorldProducer.run(App.java:66)}}{{{} at
> java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829){}}}{{{}Caused by:
> java.io.IOException: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jrms]{}}}{{ at
> org.apache.activemq.util.IOExceptionSupport.create(IOExceptionSupport.java:30)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFactory.findTransportFactory(TransportFactory.java:185)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFactory.connect(TransportFactory.java:64)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createTransport(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:376)}}{{{}
> ... 5 more{}}}{{{}Caused by: java.io.IOException: Could not find factory
> class for resource:
> META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport/jrms{}}}{{ at
> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.loadProperties(FactoryFinder.java:104)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.create(FactoryFinder.java:61)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:154)}}{{
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFactory.findTransportFactory(TransportFactory.java:182)}}{{{}
> ... 7 more{}}}{{{}{}}}
>
> An [email from 2011 on the users
> mailing-list|https://lists.apache.org/thread/wbwdj8011tmcqtdlbbfmzsthjdrh0gn0]
> came to the same conclusion, but I don't see any further discussion on it.
> I've confirmed that the
> [META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport|https://github.com/apache/activemq/tree/main/activemq-client/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport]
> folder under activemq-client does not have a "jrms" file.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (AMQ-9469) Removing JRMS dependency from assembly POM
Kartik Ganesh created AMQ-9469:
--
Summary: Removing JRMS dependency from assembly POM
Key: AMQ-9469
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9469
Project: ActiveMQ Classic
Issue Type: Improvement
Environment: Tested using the libraries from the ActiveMQ 5.18.3
tarball downloaded from https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/
Reporter: Kartik Ganesh
Hello!
I noticed that the ActiveMQ [assembly
pom.xml|https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/main/assembly/pom.xml#L484-L486]
has a dependency on a very old library - "jrms-1.1" - and I'm wondering if I
can submit a PR to remove this. This library has not seen any releases/updates
since 2005 and [Maven|https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/jrms/jrms/usages]
lists only ActiveMQ and Apache Camel as upstream usages.
After digging through ActiveMQ's mailing lists and commit history, I found that
it [used to be
listed|https://github.com/apache/activemq-web/blob/7a7d976c/2004/06/23/jgroups-and-jrms-support.xml]
on ActiveMQ's [URI
Protocols|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/uri-protocols]
page, but was removed at some point. JRMS seems to be listed as a peer-to-peer
option on the
[topologies|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/topologies]
page but is not discussed in either the
[peer|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/peer-transport-reference]
or
[multicast|https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/multicast-transport-reference]
transport reference pages.
If I try to specify "jrms://" as a protocol for my ActiveMQConnectionFactory, I
see the following stack-trace:
{{javax.jms.JMSException: Could not create Transport. Reason:
java.io.IOException: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jrms]}}{{ at
org.apache.activemq.util.JMSExceptionSupport.create(JMSExceptionSupport.java:49)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createTransport(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:378)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createActiveMQConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:391)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createActiveMQConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:349)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:245)}}{{
at App$HelloWorldProducer.run(App.java:66)}}{{{} at
java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829){}}}{{{}Caused by:
java.io.IOException: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jrms]{}}}{{ at
org.apache.activemq.util.IOExceptionSupport.create(IOExceptionSupport.java:30)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFactory.findTransportFactory(TransportFactory.java:185)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFactory.connect(TransportFactory.java:64)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createTransport(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:376)}}{{{}
... 5 more{}}}{{{}Caused by: java.io.IOException: Could not find factory class
for resource: META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport/jrms{}}}{{ at
org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.loadProperties(FactoryFinder.java:104)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.create(FactoryFinder.java:61)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:154)}}{{
at
org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFactory.findTransportFactory(TransportFactory.java:182)}}{{{}
... 7 more{}}}{{{}{}}}
An [email from 2011 on the users
mailing-list|https://lists.apache.org/thread/wbwdj8011tmcqtdlbbfmzsthjdrh0gn0]
came to the same conclusion, but I don't see any further discussion on it. I've
confirmed that the
[META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport|https://github.com/apache/activemq/tree/main/activemq-client/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport]
folder under activemq-client does not have a "jrms" file.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Work logged] (ARTEMIS-4510) Add auto-create-destination logic to diverts
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4510?focusedWorklogId=912072=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-912072 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-4510: --- Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 28/Mar/24 14:43 Start Date: 28/Mar/24 14:43 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: AntonRoskvist opened a new pull request, #4867: URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4867 This is the second try of #4681 after a round of feedback on the dev mailing list. @jbertram @brusdev @clebertsuconic Please let me know if you agree to these changes or if I should change anything else. An additional thing of note in this PR is added handling for a fringe issue I found while working on this PR pertaining to redistributed messages arriving on the divert. There is an added test for this as well. I can break this part out into a separate PR if preferred. Issue Time Tracking --- Worklog Id: (was: 912072) Time Spent: 3h 50m (was: 3h 40m) > Add auto-create-destination logic to diverts > > > Key: ARTEMIS-4510 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4510 > Project: ActiveMQ Artemis > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Anton Roskvist >Priority: Major > Time Spent: 3h 50m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > This enables the use of dynamic routing decisions within the transformer by > setting the message address. It also covers for a rare problem where if any > of the forwarding addresses are removed during runtime, such as from > auto-delete, the message would get silently dropped. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
