[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (CALCITE-2302) Implicit type cast support

2019-08-27 Thread Danny Chan (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Danny Chan updated CALCITE-2302:

Comment: was deleted

(was: [~julianhyde] Does the latest commit solve your review objections ? I'm 
planning to merge this PR if there are no more comments in 24 hours.)

> Implicit type cast support
> --
>
> Key: CALCITE-2302
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: core
>Affects Versions: 1.17.0
>Reporter: Danny Chan
>Assignee: Danny Chan
>Priority: Critical
>  Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.21.0
>
>  Time Spent: 7.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Now many DBs have support implicit type cast, eg: SqlServer, Oracle, Hive.
> Implicit type cast is an useful function for many cases, So we should support 
> this.
> I checkout Calcite code and found that:
>  # Now we use a validator to validate our operands types[ through kinds of 
> namespaces and scopes ]
>  # Most of the validations will finally goes to
> {code:java}
> SqlOperator.validateOperands
> {code}
>  # which will use validation logic defined in corresponding 
> SqlOperandTypeChecker
> What i'm confused about is where should i put the implicit type cast logic 
> in? I figured out 2 ways:
>  # Supply a tool class/rules to add casts into a parsed SqlNode tree which 
> will then go through the validation logic later on.
>  # Unleash the validation logic in kinds of SqlOperandTypeChecker, then 
> modify the RelNode/RexNodes tree converted from a validated SqlNode tree to 
> add in casts through custom RelOptRules.
> So guys, which of the 2 ways should i go, or if there are better way to do 
> this?
> I need your help.
>  
> Updated 18-05-30:
> Hi guys, i have made a PR in 
> [CALCITE-2302|https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706]
> This is design doc: [Calcite Implicit Type Cast 
> Design|https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g2RUnLXyp_LjUlO-wbblKuP5hqEu3a_2Mt2k4dh6RwU/edit?usp=sharing].
> This is the conversion types mapping: [Conversion Types 
> Mapping|https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhleX5h5W8-kJKh7NMJ4vtoE78pwfaZRJl88ULX_MgU/edit?usp=sharing].
> I really appreciate your suggestions, thx.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (CALCITE-2302) Implicit type cast support

2018-05-30 Thread Yuzhao Chen (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Yuzhao Chen updated CALCITE-2302:
-
Comment: was deleted

(was: hi, [~julianhyde]

I have made a PR here 
[CALCITE-2302|https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706], really appreciate 
that you can give me some suggestions.)

> Implicit type cast support
> --
>
> Key: CALCITE-2302
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: core
>Affects Versions: 1.17.0
>Reporter: Yuzhao Chen
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.17.0
>
>
> Now many DBs have support implicit type cast, eg: SqlServer, Oracle, Hive.
> Implicit type cast is an useful function for many cases, So we should support 
> this.
> I checkout Calcite code and found that:
>  # Now we use a validator to validate our operands types[ through kinds of 
> namespaces and scopes ]
>  # Most of the validations will finally goes to
> {code:java}
> SqlOperator.validateOperands
> {code}
>  # which will use validation logic defined in corresponding 
> SqlOperandTypeChecker
> What i'm confused about is where should i put the implicit type cast logic 
> in? I figured out 2 ways:
>  # Supply a tool class/rules to add casts into a parsed SqlNode tree which 
> will then go through the validation logic later on.
>  # Unleash the validation logic in kinds of SqlOperandTypeChecker, then 
> modify the RelNode/RexNodes tree converted from a validated SqlNode tree to 
> add in casts through custom RelOptRules.
> So guys, which of the 2 ways should i go, or if there are better way to do 
> this?
> I need your help.
>  
> Updated 18-05-30:
> Hi guys, i have made a PR in [https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706,] 
> This is design doc: [Calcite Implicit Type Cast 
> Design|https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g2RUnLXyp_LjUlO-wbblKuP5hqEu3a_2Mt2k4dh6RwU/edit?usp=sharing].
> This is the conversion types mapping: [Conversion Types 
> Mapping|https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhleX5h5W8-kJKh7NMJ4vtoE78pwfaZRJl88ULX_MgU/edit?usp=sharing].
> I really appreciate your suggestions, thx.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)