[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3544) Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sailaja Mada updated CLOUDSTACK-3544: - Attachment: Xen61hosttags.png Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1 -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3544 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3544 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: XenServer Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Sailaja Mada Priority: Critical Attachments: Xen61hosttags.png Steps: 1. Add Xenserver 6.2 to Cloudstack Observation: Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1 . In a way it is added as 6.1 host and not 6.2 host. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3544) Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1
Sailaja Mada created CLOUDSTACK-3544: Summary: Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1 Key: CLOUDSTACK-3544 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3544 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: XenServer Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Sailaja Mada Priority: Critical Attachments: Xen61hosttags.png Steps: 1. Add Xenserver 6.2 to Cloudstack Observation: Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1 . In a way it is added as 6.1 host and not 6.2 host. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3544) Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sailaja Mada updated CLOUDSTACK-3544: - Fix Version/s: 4.2.0 Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1 -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3544 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3544 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: XenServer Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Sailaja Mada Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: Xen61hosttags.png Steps: 1. Add Xenserver 6.2 to Cloudstack Observation: Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1 . In a way it is added as 6.1 host and not 6.2 host. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3544) Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devdeep Singh reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3544: - Assignee: Devdeep Singh Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1 -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3544 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3544 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: XenServer Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Sailaja Mada Assignee: Devdeep Singh Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: Xen61hosttags.png Steps: 1. Add Xenserver 6.2 to Cloudstack Observation: Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1 . In a way it is added as 6.1 host and not 6.2 host. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2119) Doc : Adding NICs to guest VMs on VMWare get IPs to the new nics if vm-tools are installed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709507#comment-13709507 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-2119: - Commit a67cce3d26c5d6e6de0f8c58f2772ff93b666404 in branch refs/heads/master from [~radhikap] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=a67cce3 ] CLOUDSTACK-2119 Doc : Adding NICs to guest VMs on VMWare get IPs to the new nics if vm-tools are installed --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-2119 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2119 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: API, VMware Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: VMWare Reporter: Saksham Srivastava Assignee: Radhika Nair Fix For: 4.2.0 Add NIC API creates new NICs on the guest VM. If vm-tools are not present running dhclient does not result in IPs assigned to the NICs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-2119) Doc : Adding NICs to guest VMs on VMWare get IPs to the new nics if vm-tools are installed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Radhika Nair resolved CLOUDSTACK-2119. -- Resolution: Fixed Doc : Adding NICs to guest VMs on VMWare get IPs to the new nics if vm-tools are installed --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-2119 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2119 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: API, VMware Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: VMWare Reporter: Saksham Srivastava Assignee: Radhika Nair Fix For: 4.2.0 Add NIC API creates new NICs on the guest VM. If vm-tools are not present running dhclient does not result in IPs assigned to the NICs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2119) Doc : Adding NICs to guest VMs on VMWare get IPs to the new nics if vm-tools are installed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709508#comment-13709508 ] Radhika Nair commented on CLOUDSTACK-2119: -- For adding or removing a NIC to work, ensure that vm-tools are running on the guest VMs on VMware host. Doc : Adding NICs to guest VMs on VMWare get IPs to the new nics if vm-tools are installed --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-2119 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2119 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: API, VMware Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: VMWare Reporter: Saksham Srivastava Assignee: Radhika Nair Fix For: 4.2.0 Add NIC API creates new NICs on the guest VM. If vm-tools are not present running dhclient does not result in IPs assigned to the NICs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3545) NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709511#comment-13709511 ] Devdeep Singh commented on CLOUDSTACK-3545: --- Marking it blocker. It prevents a storage motion feature to be used/verified. It is also a regression. NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3545 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3545 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Devdeep Singh Assignee: Devdeep Singh Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 1. Do a cloudstack setup with either XenServer 6.1 or 6.2 hosts. 2. Add multiple storage pools to the cluster. 3. Execute a findStoragePoolsForMigration api to list the storage pools available for migrating a volume. A NPE is generated. Stack trace looks as follows ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-16:null) unhandled exception executing api command: findStoragePoolsForMigration java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl.listStoragePoolsForMigrationOfVolume(ManagementServerImpl.java:1336) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.storage.FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.execute(FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.java:72) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:528) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:371) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3545) NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume
Devdeep Singh created CLOUDSTACK-3545: - Summary: NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume Key: CLOUDSTACK-3545 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3545 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Devdeep Singh Assignee: Devdeep Singh Fix For: 4.2.0 1. Do a cloudstack setup with either XenServer 6.1 or 6.2 hosts. 2. Add multiple storage pools to the cluster. 3. Execute a findStoragePoolsForMigration api to list the storage pools available for migrating a volume. A NPE is generated. Stack trace looks as follows ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-16:null) unhandled exception executing api command: findStoragePoolsForMigration java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl.listStoragePoolsForMigrationOfVolume(ManagementServerImpl.java:1336) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.storage.FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.execute(FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.java:72) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:528) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:371) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3545) NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devdeep Singh updated CLOUDSTACK-3545: -- Priority: Blocker (was: Major) NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3545 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3545 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Devdeep Singh Assignee: Devdeep Singh Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 1. Do a cloudstack setup with either XenServer 6.1 or 6.2 hosts. 2. Add multiple storage pools to the cluster. 3. Execute a findStoragePoolsForMigration api to list the storage pools available for migrating a volume. A NPE is generated. Stack trace looks as follows ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-16:null) unhandled exception executing api command: findStoragePoolsForMigration java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl.listStoragePoolsForMigrationOfVolume(ManagementServerImpl.java:1336) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.storage.FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.execute(FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.java:72) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:528) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:371) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3545) NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709513#comment-13709513 ] Devdeep Singh commented on CLOUDSTACK-3545: --- The bug is similar to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3264 which was filed for ZWPS. The fix was also made for ZWFS. NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3545 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3545 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Devdeep Singh Assignee: Devdeep Singh Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 1. Do a cloudstack setup with either XenServer 6.1 or 6.2 hosts. 2. Add multiple storage pools to the cluster. 3. Execute a findStoragePoolsForMigration api to list the storage pools available for migrating a volume. A NPE is generated. Stack trace looks as follows ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-16:null) unhandled exception executing api command: findStoragePoolsForMigration java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl.listStoragePoolsForMigrationOfVolume(ManagementServerImpl.java:1336) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.storage.FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.execute(FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.java:72) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:528) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:371) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3545) NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709516#comment-13709516 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-3545: - Commit 04a868231311477dde8e60d4f87a0360ef681dd1 in branch refs/heads/master from [~devdeep] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=04a8682 ] CLOUDSTACK-3545: NPE in listStoragePoolsForMigration api. The volume table no longer holds the pod id, the column is null now. Made a change to get the pod id from the storage pool on which the volume resides. NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3545 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3545 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Devdeep Singh Assignee: Devdeep Singh Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 1. Do a cloudstack setup with either XenServer 6.1 or 6.2 hosts. 2. Add multiple storage pools to the cluster. 3. Execute a findStoragePoolsForMigration api to list the storage pools available for migrating a volume. A NPE is generated. Stack trace looks as follows ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-16:null) unhandled exception executing api command: findStoragePoolsForMigration java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl.listStoragePoolsForMigrationOfVolume(ManagementServerImpl.java:1336) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.storage.FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.execute(FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.java:72) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:528) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:371) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2725) [Automation] Re-attaching volume on VM failing in KVM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709518#comment-13709518 ] Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-2725: - I'm so far unable to recreate the issue, RHEL 6.3, libvirt 0.10.2 (stock), with cloudstack 4.1. I created a VM on NFS storage, with a datadisk, attached two other data disks, and detached/reattached each one. I tried with 4.1 to try to verify whether or not it was libvirt, or how we are using libvirt in 4.2. I will now try 4.2 and see if I can reproduce. [Automation] Re-attaching volume on VM failing in KVM - Key: CLOUDSTACK-2725 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2725 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Volumes Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Automation environment KVM Found in master also (8d1189c2ae87216bc1c4a1443f75e9a8629abdc2) Reporter: Rayees Namathponnan Assignee: Fang Wang Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: CLOUDSTACK-2725.rar Below two test case failing from BVT integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes.test_08_resize_volume integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes.test_09_delete_detached_volume Steps to reproduce Step 1 : Create an account, service offering, create volume, create VM Step 2 : Attach volume to VM , Step 3 : Detach volume Step 4 : Attach volume to VM again Actual result Attachment failed with below error 2013-05-28 13:45:39,101 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-98:job-1246) Seq 5-258539658: Rec eived: { Ans: , MgmtId: 29066118877352, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { AttachAnswer } } 2013-05-28 13:45:39,106 ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-98:job-1246) Unexpected e xception while executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.volume.AttachVolumeCmd com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to attach volume: TestDiskServ to VM: ce79edb6- a306-4ac4-95e4-6202800f691e; org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unable to execute QEMU comman d '__com.redhat_drive_add': Duplicate ID 'drive-virtio-disk1' for drive at com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.sendAttachVolumeCommand(VolumeManagerImpl.java:1583) at com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.attachVolumeToVM(VolumeManagerImpl.java:1788) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercep t(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.volume.AttachVolumeCmd.execute(AttachVolumeCmd.java:1 22) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:437) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) 2013-05-28 13:45:39,107 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-98:job-1246) Complete asy nc job-1246, jobStatus: 2, resultCode: 530, result: Error Code: 530 Error text: Failed to attach volume : TestDiskServ to VM: ce79edb6-a306-4ac4-95e4-6202800f691e; org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal erro -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2119) Doc : Adding NICs to guest VMs on VMWare get IPs to the new nics if vm-tools are installed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709521#comment-13709521 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-2119: - Commit 1c43c95767fc6937961c17aa849e09277b772a98 in branch refs/heads/master from [~radhikap] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=1c43c95 ] CLOUDSTACK-2119 Doc : Adding NICs to guest VMs on VMWare get IPs to the new nics if vm-tools are installed --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-2119 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2119 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: API, VMware Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: VMWare Reporter: Saksham Srivastava Assignee: Radhika Nair Fix For: 4.2.0 Add NIC API creates new NICs on the guest VM. If vm-tools are not present running dhclient does not result in IPs assigned to the NICs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3545) NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devdeep Singh resolved CLOUDSTACK-3545. --- Resolution: Fixed NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3545 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3545 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Devdeep Singh Assignee: Devdeep Singh Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 1. Do a cloudstack setup with either XenServer 6.1 or 6.2 hosts. 2. Add multiple storage pools to the cluster. 3. Execute a findStoragePoolsForMigration api to list the storage pools available for migrating a volume. A NPE is generated. Stack trace looks as follows ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-16:null) unhandled exception executing api command: findStoragePoolsForMigration java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl.listStoragePoolsForMigrationOfVolume(ManagementServerImpl.java:1336) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.storage.FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.execute(FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.java:72) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:528) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:371) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3545) NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709527#comment-13709527 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-3545: - Commit c59c736f985762d5d5fb991731c19ce1e69e0098 in branch refs/heads/4.2 from [~devdeep] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=c59c736 ] CLOUDSTACK-3545: NPE in listStoragePoolsForMigration api. The volume table no longer holds the pod id, the column is null now. Made a change to get the pod id from the storage pool on which the volume resides. NPE while listing the storage pools for migrating a volume -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3545 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3545 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Devdeep Singh Assignee: Devdeep Singh Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 1. Do a cloudstack setup with either XenServer 6.1 or 6.2 hosts. 2. Add multiple storage pools to the cluster. 3. Execute a findStoragePoolsForMigration api to list the storage pools available for migrating a volume. A NPE is generated. Stack trace looks as follows ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-16:null) unhandled exception executing api command: findStoragePoolsForMigration java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl.listStoragePoolsForMigrationOfVolume(ManagementServerImpl.java:1336) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.storage.FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.execute(FindStoragePoolsForMigrationCmd.java:72) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:528) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:371) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3193) Remove SecondaryStorageDiscoverer
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-3193: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue Remove SecondaryStorageDiscoverer - Key: CLOUDSTACK-3193 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3193 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Earlier the way secondary storage was discovered was through the SecondaryStorageDiscoverer calling on the DummySecondaryStorageResource. Right now, with the object storage merge discovery process is delegated to the corresponding ImageStoreDriver. Deprecate the unused discoverer to reduce confusion. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3285) UCS: Need support for HTTP redirects and HTTPS Certificate handling
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-3285: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue UCS: Need support for HTTP redirects and HTTPS Certificate handling --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3285 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3285 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: UCS Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Master; Basic Bare-metal and UCS Reporter: Parth Jagirdar Priority: Critical By default UCS has HTTP to HTTPs redirect enabled. At which point, addUcsManager fails with following error. 2013-06-28 14:19:57,020 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-20:null) ===START=== 10.217.252.127 -- GET command=addUcsManagerzoneid=d92cc843-8c50-4f57-9c07-1041bf859f8dname=ucsmanagerurl=10.223.184.2username=adminresponse=jsonsessionkey=NiAtOI4sZHTkTJ37Y4jz0ntaeYg%3D_=1372454390205 2013-06-28 14:19:57,256 WARN [cloudstack.api.AddUcsManagerCmd] (catalina-exec-20:null) Exception: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Cannot get cookie at com.cloud.ucs.manager.UcsManagerImpl.getCookie(UcsManagerImpl.java:174) at com.cloud.ucs.manager.UcsManagerImpl.listBlades(UcsManagerImpl.java:179) at com.cloud.ucs.manager.UcsManagerImpl.discoverBlades(UcsManagerImpl.java:123) at com.cloud.ucs.manager.UcsManagerImpl.addUcsManager(UcsManagerImpl.java:154) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.AddUcsManagerCmd.execute(AddUcsManagerCmd.java:68) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:528) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:371) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequest(ApiServlet.java:304) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doGet(ApiServlet.java:66) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:617) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:555) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:298) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProcessor.process(Http11NioProcessor.java:889) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11NioProtocol.java:721) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(NioEndpoint.java:2268) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) Caused by: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Call failed: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN htmlhead title302 Found/title /headbody h1Found/h1 pThe document has moved a href=https://10.223.184.2/nuova;here/a./p /body/html at com.cloud.ucs.manager.UcsHttpClient.call(UcsHttpClient.java:50) at com.cloud.ucs.manager.UcsManagerImpl.getCookie(UcsManagerImpl.java:166) ... 26 more Caused by: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Call failed: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN htmlhead title302 Found/title /headbody h1Found/h1 pThe document has moved a href=https://10.223.184.2/nuova;here/a./p /body/html at com.cloud.ucs.manager.UcsHttpClient.call(UcsHttpClient.java:41) ... 27 more 2013-06-28 14:19:57,257 INFO [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-20:null) Cannot get cookie 2013-06-28 14:19:57,258 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-20:null) ===END=== 10.217.252.127 -- GET
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2793) Ubuntu 13.04 - Unable to start Stopped VM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-2793: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue Ubuntu 13.04 - Unable to start Stopped VM - Key: CLOUDSTACK-2793 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2793 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: MS ubuntu 13.04 KVM ACS 4.2 PVLAN host ubuntu 13.04 KVM ACS 4.2 PVLAN Reporter: angeline shen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: management-server.log.gz, management-server.log.gz, Screenshot-CloudStack - Mozilla Firefox-5.png 1. advance zone. Add 2 hosts. create PVLAN shared network with VLAN ID, private VLAN ID, IPV4 gateway, netmask, start IP, end IP gatewayprimary vlan secondary vlan IP network1: 10.223.161.65 1611998 10.223.161.110- 10.223.161.113 network2: 10.223.161.1291612997 10.223.161.150-10.223.161.153 2. Deploy VMs in both PVLAN shared network 3. stop VMs in both PVLAN shared networks 4. Start stopped VMs in network2 failed . Start stopped VMs in network1 succeeded. 2013-05-31 20:01:36,070 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-57:job-55) Successfully released network resources for the vm VM[User|z1admin1612-153V86] 2013-05-31 20:01:36,070 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-57:job-55) Successfully cleanued up resources for the vm VM[User|z1admin1612-153V86] in Starting state 2013-05-31 20:01:36,077 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-57:job-55) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: 4 new host id: null host id before s tate transition: 4 2013-05-31 20:01:36,084 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-57:job-55) Hosts's actual total CPU: 9040 and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 9040 2013-05-31 20:01:36,084 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-57:job-55) Hosts's actual total RAM: 16816881664 and RAM after applying overprovisioning: 16816881664 2013-05-31 20:01:36,084 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-57:job-55) release cpu from host: 4, old used: 1200,reserved: 0, actual total: 9040, total with overprovisioning: 9040; new used: 1100,reserved :0; movedfromreserved: false,moveToReserveredfalse 2013-05-31 20:01:36,084 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-57:job-55) release mem from host: 4, old used: 2281701376,reserved: 0, total: 16816881664; new used: 1744830464,reserved:0; movedfromreserved: false,moveToReserveredfalse 2013-05-31 20:01:36,101 ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-57:job-55) Unexpected exception while executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.StartVMCmd com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:4] is unreachable: Host 4: Unable to start instance due to Unable to get answer that is of class com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:937) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:550) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VMEntityManagerImpl.deployVirtualMachine(VMEntityManagerImpl.java:243) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VirtualMachineEntityImpl.deploy(VirtualMachineEntityImpl.java:209) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:3243) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:1786) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.StartVMCmd.execute(StartVMCmd.java:120) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:437) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2450) SRX:F5:guestvm deployement with userdata failed with exception
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-2450: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue SRX:F5:guestvm deployement with userdata failed with exception -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-2450 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2450 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: sadhu suresh Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: management-server.rar guest vm deployment with user-data failed where as guestvm deployment without user-data successful. Steps: 1.create a network offering with following service capabilities Firewall: JuniperSRX, UserData: VirtualRouter, SourceNat: JuniperSRX, Lb: F5BigIp, Dns: VirtualRouter, Dhcp: VirtualRouter, PortForwarding: JuniperSRX, StaticNat: JuniperSRXr, 2.create shared guest network with scope as account 3. deploy a VM without user data 4. deploy a vm with user-data http://10.147.59.83:8080/client/api?command=deployVirtualMachinezoneId=80b8c228-7244-40d9-b567-e0c60591a57etemplateId=66b3548a-b702-11e2-bb08-068a723bhypervisor=XenServerserviceOfferingId=e2fdf625-532b-43c8-80a2-4d232dbdf5danetworkIds=09607cd1-71ff-4d87-90f2-e5d54528ec3cdisplayname=guestvm3name=guestvm3response=jsonuserdata=Y3VzdG9tZXJWTQ==sessionkey=uyRu4Dei1T3VlQOmDFPmI%2BJDWF0%3D_=1368420957885 actual result : step3: uservm deployment was successful step4: uservm deployment failed with below exception: 2013-05-13 06:27:37,010 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-4:job-135) Seq 1-1546190956: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 7191687856187, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{routing.SavePasswordCommand:{password:fnirq_cnffjbeq,vmIpAddress:192.168.40.35,vmName:guestvm3,accessDetails:{router.guest.ip:192.168.40.30,zone.network.type:Advanced,router.ip:169.254.2.156,router.name:r-13-VM},wait:0}},{routing.VmDataCommand:{vmIpAddress:192.168.40.35,vmName:guestvm3,accessDetails:{router.guest.ip:192.168.40.30,zone.network.type:Advanced,router.ip:169.254.2.156,router.name:r-13-VM},wait:0}}] } 2013-05-13 06:27:37,011 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-4:job-135) Seq 1-1546190956: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 7191687856187, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{routing.SavePasswordCommand:{password:fnirq_cnffjbeq,vmIpAddress:192.168.40.35,vmName:guestvm3,accessDetails:{router.guest.ip:192.168.40.30,zone.network.type:Advanced,router.ip:169.254.2.156,router.name:r-13-VM},wait:0}},{routing.VmDataCommand:{vmIpAddress:192.168.40.35,vmName:guestvm3,accessDetails:{router.guest.ip:192.168.40.30,zone.network.type:Advanced,router.ip:169.254.2.156,router.name:r-13-VM},wait:0}}] } 2013-05-13 06:27:37,012 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-76:null) Seq 1-1546190956: Executing request 2013-05-13 06:27:47,326 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-76:null) Seq 1-1546190956: Response Received: 2013-05-13 06:27:47,327 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (DirectAgent-76:null) Seq 1-1546190956: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 7191687856187, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, [{Answer:{result:true,wait:0}},{Answer:{result:false,details:vm_data failed,wait:0}}] } 2013-05-13 06:27:47,327 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-4:job-135) Seq 1-1546190956: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 7191687856187, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, { Answer, Answer } } 2013-05-13 06:27:47,328 INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-4:job-135) Unable to contact resource. com.cloud.exception.ResourceUnavailableException: Resource [DataCenter:1] is unreachable: Unable to apply userdata and password entry on router at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyRules(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3458) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyUserData(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:2752) at com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement.addPasswordAndUserdata(VirtualRouterElement.java:860) at com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.prepareElement(NetworkManagerImpl.java:1616) at com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.prepareNic(NetworkManagerImpl.java:1721) at com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.prepare(NetworkManagerImpl.java:1662) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:810) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:529) at
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3274) Object_store_refactor: secretkey and accesskey of the backing store is found in plaintext in the logs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-3274: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue Object_store_refactor: secretkey and accesskey of the backing store is found in plaintext in the logs - Key: CLOUDSTACK-3274 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3274 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Should we be printing the s3 store credentials in the logs in plaintext? Can it be sanitized? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2776) UI Implicit dedication planner: createServiceOffering UI should be changed to take in key-value details
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-2776: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue UI Implicit dedication planner: createServiceOffering UI should be changed to take in key-value details Key: CLOUDSTACK-2776 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2776 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: UI Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prachi Damle Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 The UI changes done to the createServiceOffering page as part of the Implicit dedication planner are not correct and very specific to this feature. Instead we need a generic design. We should make following changes: 1) Create Service Offering Page should show option ‘Add Details’ and then take in 2 text boxes titled ‘key’ and ‘value’ - This is same as the UI for adding Tags to a resource like network 2) After adding one pair, UI can show the option to add another key-value detail 3) UI can then send all the key-value pairs in a Map while calling CreateServiceOffering API -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3294) CLONE - System VMs not coming up due to “InsufficientServerCapacityException”.(not consistently reproducible)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-3294: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue CLONE - System VMs not coming up due to “InsufficientServerCapacityException”.(not consistently reproducible) - Key: CLOUDSTACK-3294 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3294 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Nitin Mehta Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: management-server.zip Seps:t 1.Have a CS with advanced zone . 2.Created some user VMs. 3.Created VPCs and VMs under VPCs. 4.Shutdown the Host(Xen) and MS. 5.Start the Host and MS. Observation: The SSVM and CPVM were not coming up with “InsufficientServerCapacityException” exception. The Dashboard was showing exhausted management IPs . Deleted all the VMS ,still the IPs were not released. Below is the table which shows that all the management ips are reserved. mysql select * from op_dc_ip_address_alloc; ++---++++--+-+-+ | id | ip_address| data_center_id | pod_id | nic_id | reservation_id | taken | mac_address | ++---++++--+-+-+ | 1 | 10.147.40.181 | 1 | 1 | 34 | 48d95839-6fb1-4bc4-b23a-c9f1891bf1fa | 2013-05-31 17:10:06 | 1 | | 2 | 10.147.40.182 | 1 | 1 | 3 | a7b9610c-9319-478c-84e4-e70be099cd9d | 2013-05-31 17:07:29 | 2 | | 3 | 10.147.40.183 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 238830cd-8cbe-411e-8016-352129885df6 | 2013-05-31 17:07:30 | 3 | | 4 | 10.147.40.184 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 70f091d4-acb4-435b-bfde-9bdb35bcfa6b | 2013-05-31 17:09:15 | 4 | | 5 | 10.147.40.185 | 1 | 1 | 29 | 14690352-e9a0-4695-a834-0552175f7684 | 2013-05-31 17:08:45 | 5 | | 6 | 10.147.40.186 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 14690352-e9a0-4695-a834-0552175f7684 | 2013-05-31 17:08:45 | 6 | | 7 | 10.147.40.187 | 1 | 1 | 4 | a7b9610c-9319-478c-84e4-e70be099cd9d | 2013-05-31 17:07:29 | 7 | | 8 | 10.147.40.188 | 1 | 1 | 7 | ea8644d1-7801-4dbb-aa0c-204f31e922a1 | 2013-05-31 17:08:25 | 8 | | 9 | 10.147.40.189 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 245e0082-d697-454d-9689-b36cc3b6e113 | 2013-05-31 17:11:16 | 9 | | 10 | 10.147.40.190 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 094e371a-da69-44e0-80fd-14c2d090e935 | 2013-05-31 17:10:15 | 10 | ++---++++--+-+-+ As all the IPs were in reserved state ,SSVM and CPVM were not coming up. Was not able to reproduce this issue again . Attached is the server log. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3250) PVLAN - When host is put in maintenance mode , the rules for the router and the user Vms that get migrated out of this host are not getting cleared from this host.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-3250: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue PVLAN - When host is put in maintenance mode , the rules for the router and the user Vms that get migrated out of this host are not getting cleared from this host. Key: CLOUDSTACK-3250 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3250 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Build from master Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: management-server.log 1. Advance zone cluster with 2 hosts. 2. Create Shared NW1 scope zone pVLAN1, sVLAN1. 3. Deploy few Vms in this network. 4. In my case: host1 - had SSVM,CPVM and 1 user vm host2 - had 1 router and 2 user Vms. Put host2 in maintenance mode. All the vms running in host2 got migrated to host1. As part of this migration , we see all the rules relating to the router and user Vms that got migrated being reprogrammed in host1. But the rules that existed for these Vms in host2 continue to be present in the host. Expected Behavior: The rules relating to the Vms that migrated out of this host needs to be cleared from this host. root@xenserver-sangee2 ~]# ovs-ofctl dump-flows xenbr0 NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4): cookie=0x0, duration=352.296s, table=0, n_packets=2, n_bytes=96, priority=60,dl_vlan=997,dl_src=06:a5:26:00:00:11 actions=output:1 cookie=0x0, duration=361.825s, table=0, n_packets=76, n_bytes=9304, priority=60,dl_vlan=997,dl_src=06:3d:cc:00:00:10 actions=output:1 cookie=0x0, duration=6082.819s, table=0, n_packets=2635, n_bytes=199830, priority=60,dl_vlan=997,dl_src=06:64:5e:00:00:0e actions=output:1 cookie=0x0, duration=352.302s, table=0, n_packets=2, n_bytes=96, priority=50,vlan_tci=0x,dl_src=06:a5:26:00:00:11 actions=mod_vlan_vid:997,resubmit:1 cookie=0x0, duration=6082.824s, table=0, n_packets=2717, n_bytes=207263, priority=50,vlan_tci=0x,dl_src=06:64:5e:00:00:0e actions=mod_vlan_vid:997,resubmit:1 cookie=0x0, duration=361.829s, table=0, n_packets=83, n_bytes=9838, priority=50,vlan_tci=0x,dl_src=06:3d:cc:00:00:10 actions=mod_vlan_vid:997,resubmit:1 cookie=0x0, duration=343.987s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=100,udp,dl_vlan=997,nw_dst=255.255.255.255,tp_dst=67 actions=strip_vlan,output:24 cookie=0x0, duration=343.995s, table=0, n_packets=4, n_bytes=168, priority=200,arp,dl_vlan=997,nw_dst=10.223.161.141 actions=strip_vlan,output:24 cookie=0x0, duration=8241.736s, table=0, n_packets=19016430, n_bytes=24109319550, priority=0 actions=NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=343.991s, table=0, n_packets=7, n_bytes=646, priority=150,dl_vlan=997,dl_dst=06:ba:9c:00:00:0f actions=strip_vlan,output:24 [root@xenserver-sangee1 ~]# ovs-ofctl dump-flows xenbr0 NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4): cookie=0x0, duration=734.85s, table=0, n_packets=54, n_bytes=6732, priority=60,dl_vlan=997,dl_src=06:3d:cc:00:00:10 actions=output:1 cookie=0x0, duration=597.648s, table=0, n_packets=158, n_bytes=19572, priority=60,dl_vlan=997,dl_src=06:a5:26:00:00:11 actions=output:1 cookie=0x0, duration=597.653s, table=0, n_packets=182, n_bytes=22797, priority=50,vlan_tci=0x,dl_src=06:a5:26:00:00:11 actions=mod_vlan_vid:997,resubmit:1 cookie=0x0, duration=734.854s, table=0, n_packets=64, n_bytes=7884, priority=50,vlan_tci=0x,dl_src=06:3d:cc:00:00:10 actions=mod_vlan_vid:997,resubmit:1 cookie=0x0, duration=1032.129s, table=0, n_packets=6, n_bytes=2052, priority=100,udp,dl_vlan=997,nw_dst=255.255.255.255,tp_dst=67 actions=strip_vlan,output:4 cookie=0x0, duration=1032.137s, table=0, n_packets=13, n_bytes=656, priority=200,arp,dl_vlan=997,nw_dst=10.223.161.141 actions=strip_vlan,output:4 cookie=0x0, duration=8231.759s, table=0, n_packets=2165619, n_bytes=2671820347, priority=0 actions=NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=1032.133s, table=0, n_packets=42, n_bytes=3685, priority=150,dl_vlan=997,dl_dst=06:ba:9c:00:00:0f actions=strip_vlan,output:4 root@r-4-VM:~# cat /etc/dhcphosts.txt 06:64:5e:00:00:0e,set:10_223_161_140,10.223.161.140,test-123,infinite 06:3d:cc:00:00:10,set:10_223_161_142,10.223.161.142,test345,infinite 06:a5:26:00:00:11,set:10_223_161_143,10.223.161.143,yuyu,infinite root@r-4-VM:~# -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2005) Condition mapping entries / rules are not working as expected
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-2005: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue Condition mapping entries / rules are not working as expected - Key: CLOUDSTACK-2005 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2005 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: VNC Proxy Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Build No.#133 (CloudStack-non-OSS-MASTER-133-rhel6.3.tar.gz) XenServer6.1 for Host Server, CentOS6.3 for NFS server and CloudStack-Mgr Server, Win7Entx64SP1 for Client machine. Reporter: Minying Bao Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: v3Extensive Test of the Conditional mapping entry.docx Steps Setup the CloudStack environments with build 4.2#133. Add template and then create as an instance. Manually modify the condition mapping entries in the ajaxkeys.js file, synchronize the script to v-2-VM. Launch the VM via ConsoleProxy in client machine, to check if the condition mapping entries are working as expected. Note The requirements link have the following list of rules/conditional mapping entries: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Non-US+Keyboard+Support+for+Console+Proxy Conditional mapping entry { type: event type, code: mapped key code, modifiers: modifiers, shift : shift state match condition,-- match on shift state guestos : guest os match condition, -- match on guestos type browser: browser type match condition, -- match on browser browserVersion: brower version match condition -- match on browser version } Expected Result All the condition mapping entries / rules should be working as expected. Actual Result Condition mapping entries / rules are not working as expected. Please refer to attached for details. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2909) EN, SC, KO: Key translation fails for the US keyboard and KO keyboard keys ' , ; :, Tab
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-2909: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue EN, SC, KO: Key translation fails for the US keyboard and KO keyboard keys ' , ; :, Tab Key: CLOUDSTACK-2909 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2909 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: VNC Proxy Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Build No.#426 (CloudStack-non-OSS-MASTER-426-rhel6.3.tar.gz) XenServer6.1 for Host Server, CentOS6.3 for NFS server and CloudStack-Mgr Server, Win7-x86 for Client machine. Reporter: Minying Bao Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: US,SC,KO Keyboard_issues.xlsx Steps 1. Setup the CloudStack environments with build 4.2#426. 2. Bring US,SC,KO Win-7 x86 VMs. 3. Access the VM via Console Proxy from the US,SC,KO client machines, choose the Stardtand (US) Keyboard for Keyboard Option. 4. Hit all the keys with US/KO keyboard. Expected Result All the keys should work fine. Actual Result The US/KO keyboard keys ' , ; :, Tab are not working well. Please refer to the details as attached Excel. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3256) UI - AWS Regions - When switching between regions after logging out and logging in as a different user , we are authenticated as the previous user probably due to br
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-3256: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue UI - AWS Regions - When switching between regions after logging out and logging in as a different user , we are authenticated as the previous user probably due to browser cache. -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3256 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3256 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Build from master Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 UI - AWS Regions - When switching between regions after logging out and logging in as a different user , we are authenticated as the previous user. Steps to reproduce the problem: Set up - 2 Regions - Region1 and Region2. Scenario1: Log in as user1 to Region1. Switch to Region2. User is prompted for password . Enter username and password for user1. User is logged in to Region2 successfully. From Region2 , now switch to Region1. User is not prompted for password and is directed to Region1 UI. Expected Bhevaior: User should be prompted for password. Scenario2: Log in as user1 to Region1. Switch to Region2. User is prompted for password . Enter username and password for user1. User is logged in to Region2 successfully. Log out. Log in as user2. From Region2 (where we are logged in as user2) , now switch to Region1. User is not prompted for password. He is redirected to Region1 and is authenticated as user1. Expected Bhevaior: User should be prompted for password. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3229) Object_Store_Refactor - Snapshot fails due to an internal error
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-3229: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue Object_Store_Refactor - Snapshot fails due to an internal error --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3229 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3229 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: chrome on linux devcloud Cloudian or Amazon S3 Object store Reporter: Thomas O'Dowd Priority: Critical Assuming initial devcloud state... I added a cache for the S3 storage like this. on devcloud machine as root: # mkdir /opt/storage/cache # vi /etc/exports (and append this line) /opt/storage/cache *(rw,no_subtree_check,no_root_squash,fsid=) # exportfs -a On Mgmt server GUI: 1. navigate to infrastructure - secondary storage 2. delete the NFS SS. 3. add S3 storage for Cloudian (I used 6 as the timeouts - assuming millis). I used the /opt/storage/cache thing as the s3 cache. 4. nav to templates 5. register a new template (I uploaded tinyLinux again as mytiny (5.3 64bit)). 6. confirm with s3cmd that 2 objects are now on S3. - s3 objects --- template/tmpl/1/1/routing-1/acton-systemvm-02062012.vhd.bz2 2013-06-27T03:01:46.203Z None 140616708 b533e7b65219439ee7fca0146ddd7ffa-27 template/tmpl/2/201/201-2-ae9e9409-4c8e-3ad8-a62f-abec7a35fe26/tinylinux.vhd 2013-06-27T03:04:06.730Z None 50430464 4afac316e865adf74ca1a8039fae7399-10 - s3 objects --- 7. I restarted the management server at this point which actually resulted in another object on S3. - the new s3 object --- template/tmpl/1/5/tiny Linux/ttylinux_pv.vhd 2013-06-27T03:43:26.494Z None 50430464 4afac316e865adf74ca1a8039fae7399-10 - the new s3 object --- 8. Go to instance and create a new choosing the mytiny template which we registered. 9. launch it after selecting all defaults. 10. wait until it starts. 11. nav to storage. I see ROOT-8. Click on this to open. 12. click the camera to take the snapshot. after a pause I get a popup Failed to create snapshot due to an internal error creating snapshot for volume 8 Also on the mgmt terminal I get the following log entry (only 1): INFO [user.snapshot.CreateSnapshotCmd] (Job-Executor-8:job-16) VOLSS: createSnapshotCmd starts:1372321251009 If I check the view snapshots button under storage, I can however see the snapshot. It says its on primary. I'm expecting it to go to secondary storage though. Nothing is in the S3 logs and no snapshots. If I try to delete that snapshot from here I get this error in the logs: ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-12:job-20) Unexpected exception while executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.snapshot.DeleteSnapshotCmd com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to delete snapshot:com.cloud.exception.InvalidParameterValueException: Can't delete snapshotshot 4 due to it is not in BackedUp Status at com.cloud.storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshot(SnapshotManagerImpl.java:513) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.snapshot.DeleteSnapshotCmd.execute(DeleteSnapshotCmd.java:96) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:437) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722) If I navigate to instance, my instance, and try to take a vm snapshot from here, I get a different pop-up which says: There is other active volume snapshot tasks on the instance to which the volume is attached, please try again later And I get an exception: ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (352129314@qtp-2110413789-32:) unhandled exception executing api command: createVMSnapshot com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: There is other active volume snapshot tasks on the instance to which the volume is attached, please try
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3254) Anti-Affinity - UI - Admin should be able to view the affinity groups that belong to all other users. He should be allowed to delete affinity group that belongs to o
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-3254: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue Anti-Affinity - UI - Admin should be able to view the affinity groups that belong to all other users. He should be allowed to delete affinity group that belongs to other users. - Key: CLOUDSTACK-3254 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3254 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Build from master Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Anti-Affinity - UI - Admin should be able to view the affinity groups that belong to all other users. He should be allowed to delete affinity group that belongs to other users. As regular users , create few affinity groups. When logged in as Admin , we are not able to list all the affinity group that is owned by other users. Expected Behavior: UI should allow for admins to list all affinity groups. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2911) KO: Key translation fails for KO keyboard Right Alt, Han/Eng, Hanja keys
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-2911: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue KO: Key translation fails for KO keyboard Right Alt, Han/Eng, Hanja keys Key: CLOUDSTACK-2911 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2911 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: VNC Proxy Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Build No.#426 (CloudStack-non-OSS-MASTER-426-rhel6.3.tar.gz) XenServer6.1 for Host Server, CentOS6.3 for NFS server and CloudStack-Mgr Server, Win7-x86 for Client machine. Reporter: Minying Bao Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: Korean Keyboard_issues.xlsx Steps 1. Setup the CloudStack environments with build 4.2#426. 2. Bring KO Win-7 x86 VMs. 3. Access the VM via Console Proxy from the KO client machines, choose the Stardtand (US) Keyboard for Keyboard Option. 4. Hit all the keys with KO keyboard. Expected Result All the keys should work fine. Actual Result The KO keyboard Right Alt, Han/Eng, Hanja keys are not working well. Please refer to the details as attached Excel. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3037) [UI] [Snapshot] deletion of Allocated snapshot is showing successful in UI, but server is failing to delete it
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-3037: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue [UI] [Snapshot] deletion of Allocated snapshot is showing successful in UI, but server is failing to delete it -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3037 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3037 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Snapshot Affects Versions: 4.1.1, 4.2.0 Reporter: Rajesh Battala Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.1.1, 4.2.0 In UI, Try to delete the Allocated snapshot. UI show snapshot is deleted, But server throws the exception properly. ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-3:job-40) Unexpected exception while executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.snapshot.DeleteSnapshotCmd com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to delete snapshot:com.cloud.exception.InvalidParameterValueException: Can't delete snapshotshot 4 due to it is not in BackedUp Status at com.cloud.storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshot(SnapshotManagerImpl.java:543) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.snapshot.DeleteSnapshotCmd.execute(DeleteSnapshotCmd.java:96) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:437) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722) After refreshing the page, listsnapshot is getting called and then showing the snapshot. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3289) StorageSubsystem: cannot add image store of a different provider in a different zone
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-3289: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue StorageSubsystem: cannot add image store of a different provider in a different zone Key: CLOUDSTACK-3289 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3289 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 The storage code right now restricts usage of multiple image store providers in the same zone. But it restricts this even when the image store may be in a different zone/region. From StorageManagerImpl.java: // check if we have already image stores from other different providers, // we currently are not supporting image stores from different // providers co-existing ListImageStoreVO imageStores = _imageStoreDao.listImageStores(); for (ImageStoreVO store : imageStores) { if (!store.getProviderName().equalsIgnoreCase(providerName)) { throw new InvalidParameterValueException(You can only add new image stores from the same provider + store.getProviderName() + already added); } } search criteria lists all add images stores: @Override public ListImageStoreVO listImageStores() { SearchCriteriaImageStoreVO sc = createSearchCriteria(); sc.addAnd(role, SearchCriteria.Op.EQ, DataStoreRole.Image); return listBy(sc); } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2910) SC: Ctrl combinated with . is not working of SC IME
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-2910: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue SC: Ctrl combinated with . is not working of SC IME Key: CLOUDSTACK-2910 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2910 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: VNC Proxy Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Build No.#426 (CloudStack-non-OSS-MASTER-426-rhel6.3.tar.gz) XenServer6.1 for Host Server, CentOS6.3 for NFS server and CloudStack-Mgr Server, Win7-x86 for Client machine. Reporter: Minying Bao Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Steps 1. Setup the CloudStack environments with build 4.2#426. 2. Bring SC Win-7 x86 VMs. 3. Access the VM via Console Proxy from the SC client machine, choose the Standtard (US) Keyboard for Keyboard Option. 4. Test with the Ctrl combinations. Expected Result All the Ctrl combinations should work fine. Ctrl + . should switch the punctuation between full-width and half-width of SC IME. Actual Result Ctrl + . did not work. Note The SC IME contained Sougou Input Method, Microsoft Pinyin New Experience Input -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3108) Disk related statistics of a VM always show 0 values
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-3108: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue Disk related statistics of a VM always show 0 values - Key: CLOUDSTACK-3108 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3108 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: build: CloudPlatform-4.2-117-rhel6.3.tar.gz Reporter: shweta agarwal Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Repro steps: 1. Set global configuration value for storage.stas to 600 milliseconds or other small value and restart Management server 2. Create a VM 4. Create Some data on a VM (create a data heavy file) 5. Wait for storage collector thread to run Bug: Even after storage stats collector thread runs Disk Read, Disk write shows values a zero. Expectations: Disk read , disk write stats for VM should show correct value. I waited for several Stats collector thread to collect data but still value in VM shows Zero For example: VM stats shows API : http://10.147.38.141:8080/client/api?command=listVirtualMachinesdetails=statsid=c448201a-9fc5-4cc1-ab28-c8cd2a53594dresponse=jsonsessionkey=4xWeT9Rw4XpRnWMGa1yIqr2vYSA%3D_=1371794494563 Response: { listvirtualmachinesresponse : { count:1 ,virtualmachine : [ {id:c448201a-9fc5-4cc1-ab28-c8cd2a53594d,name:c448201a-9fc5-4cc1-ab28-c8cd2a53594d,account:admin,domainid:9df32920-d98f-11e2-95e7-0682fe17,domain:ROOT,created:2013-06-20T18:16:16+0530,state:Running,haenable:false,zoneid:0d3e68a9-4f66-4077-a934-6a07b7bde4d1,zonename:xen,hostid:897004e4-4eab-471a-88c6-0f9ad84386c0,hostname:Rack1Pod1Host27,cpuused:0%,networkkbsread:39873,networkkbswrite:1336,diskkbsread:0,diskkbswrite:0,diskioread:0,diskiowrite:0,guestosid:9ea5e3d0-d98f-11e2-95e7-0682fe17,securitygroup:[],nic:[{id:832205d4-b9ed-4e35-93fe-25dfa51afe43,networkid:4bda1bc0-8c1b-4368-8ee9-e7d32f842ca9,networkname:vv,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.0.4.1,ipaddress:10.0.4.237,isolationuri:vlan://1041,broadcasturi:vlan://1041,traffictype:Guest,type:Isolated,isdefault:false,macaddress:02:00:7a:18:00:03},{id:6613398e-b652-41e7-8ca3-77f0d913acc0,networkid:867ab04e-fae0-4e0d-aea0-c3e135273b1a,networkname:tier1,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.0.3.1,ipaddress:10.0.3.121,isolationuri:vlan://1046,broadcasturi:vlan://1046,traffictype:Guest,type:Isolated,isdefault:false,macaddress:02:00:40:00:00:01}],hypervisor:XenServer,instancename:i-2-8-VM,tags:[],affinitygroup:[],displayvm:true} ] } } Where as VM shows following file sizes ls -ltr -rw-r--r-- 1 root root3965 Jun 20 18:30 ter -rw-r--r-- 1 root root3965 Jun 20 18:30 ter1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 206180 Jun 20 18:31 ter4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 206180 Jun 20 18:31 ter5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9071920 Jun 20 18:31 ter3 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2979) [Object_Store_Refactor] UI: No provision for the user to add additional NFS Cache Storage if S3 is being used as secondary storage provider
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-2979: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue [Object_Store_Refactor] UI: No provision for the user to add additional NFS Cache Storage if S3 is being used as secondary storage provider --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-2979 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2979 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Latest build from object store branch Reporter: Sanjeev N Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 [Object_Store_Refactor] No provision for the user to add additional NFS Cache Storage if S3 is being used as secondary storage provider Steps to Reproduce: = 1.Bring up CS in advanced zone with s3 as the secondary storage provider. During zone creation we provide S3 image store and optional NFS cache storage details. After zone creation if the admin wants to add another NFS cache storage into the zone, there is no way to do it through UI or dint find any API to do it -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3262) [ZWPS][VMWARE] exception while creating template from snapshot
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-3262: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue [ZWPS][VMWARE] exception while creating template from snapshot -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3262 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3262 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Template Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: VMWARE deployment, ESXI 5.1 Reporter: Srikanteswararao Talluri Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Steps to reproduce: == create a VM with its root volume on zone wide primary storage create a snapshot of the root volume create a template from snaphot. ===START=== 10.252.192.7 -- GET command=createTemplateresponse=jsonsessionkey=ywi4cWnDQTL903lMXK6spFaF6U4%3Dsnapshotid=8b9f5778-4788-4455-8e8a-db754e6634bbname=tdisplayText=tosTypeId=f9a1c012-de74-11e2-b754-06e1a630isPublic=truepasswordEnabled=false_=1372403272346 2013-06-28 18:03:13,209 DEBUG [cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-16:null) This template is getting created from other template, setting source template Id to: 7 2013-06-28 18:03:13,299 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-16:null) submit async job-91, details: AsyncJobVO {id:91, userId: 2, accountId: 2, sessionKey: null, instanceType: Template, instanceId: 209, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.template.CreateTemplateCmd, cmdOriginator: null, cmdInfo: {sessionkey:ywi4cWnDQTL903lMXK6spFaF6U4\u003d,ctxUserId:2,httpmethod:GET,osTypeId:f9a1c012-de74-11e2-b754-06e1a630,isPublic:true,response:json,id:209,displayText:t,snapshotid:8b9f5778-4788-4455-8e8a-db754e6634bb,passwordEnabled:false,name:t,_:1372403272346,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:324}, cmdVersion: 0, callbackType: 0, callbackAddress: null, status: 0, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 7566222426160, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null} 2013-06-28 18:03:13,306 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-16:null) ===END=== 10.252.192.7 -- GET command=createTemplateresponse=jsonsessionkey=ywi4cWnDQTL903lMXK6spFaF6U4%3Dsnapshotid=8b9f5778-4788-4455-8e8a-db754e6634bbname=tdisplayText=tosTypeId=f9a1c012-de74-11e2-b754-06e1a630isPublic=truepasswordEnabled=false_=1372403272346 2013-06-28 18:03:13,308 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-41:job-91) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.template.CreateTemplateCmd for job-91 2013-06-28 18:03:13,344 DEBUG [storage.image.ImageDataFactoryImpl] (Job-Executor-41:job-91) template 209 is not in store:1, type:Image 2013-06-28 18:03:13,446 DEBUG [storage.motion.AncientDataMotionStrategy] (Job-Executor-41:job-91) copy failed com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to find storage pools in zone 1 at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.motion.AncientDataMotionStrategy.createTemplateFromSnashot(AncientDataMotionStrategy.java:559) at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.motion.AncientDataMotionStrategy.copyAsync(AncientDataMotionStrategy.java:486) at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.motion.DataMotionServiceImpl.copyAsync(DataMotionServiceImpl.java:59) at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.ImageServiceImpl.createTemplateFromSnapshotAsync(ImageServiceImpl.java:174) at com.cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl.createPrivateTemplate(TemplateManagerImpl.java:1755) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.template.CreateTemplateCmd.execute(CreateTemplateCmd.java:256) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:437) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) 2013-06-28 18:03:13,460 DEBUG [cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-41:job-91) Failed to create templatecom.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to find storage pools in zone 1 2013-06-28 18:03:13,488
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1964) Simplified Chinese -- Some combination keys used to switch IME cannot work well
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-1964: --- This issue has not been picked up, please review and see if you can help fix the issue Simplified Chinese -- Some combination keys used to switch IME cannot work well --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-1964 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1964 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: VNC Proxy Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Build No.#133 (CloudStack-non-OSS-MASTER-133-rhel6.3.tar.gz) XenServer6.1 for Host Server, CentOS6.3 for NFS server and CloudStack-Mgr Server, Win7Entx64SP1 for Client machine. Reporter: Minying Bao Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Steps Setup the CloudStack environments with build 4.2#133. Add SC-Win7 template and then create as an instance. Open Firefox, launch the SC-Win7 via ConsoleProxy in client machine. Hit all the keys with Simplified Chinese Keyboard (the same as US-101 standard keyboard). Expected Result All the keys should remap as same as the Simplified Chinese Keyboard layout behavior. Actual Result Simplified Chinese follows US-101 keyboard style, so most of the keys are working fine for Simplified Chinese apart from few combination keys used to switch IME. 1. Ctrl+Shift Repro frequency is 30%. As the key combinations are accepted correctly, we may not able to fix using keytranslation. Ctrl+Shift is used to switch of Microsoft Pinyin New Experience Input Style, Microsoft Pinyin ABC Input Style and SouGou Pingyin input Style 2. Ctrl+Space Not working. Ctrl + Space to switch keyboard layout between SC-US keyboard and SC-IME are not working at all. 3. Ctrl+Dot Not working in IE browser, but works fine in Firefox. Ctrl + Dot to switch Half/Full shape punctuation are not working at all. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2725) [Automation] Re-attaching volume on VM failing in KVM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709559#comment-13709559 ] Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-2725: - Scratch that, centos 6.4 with stock libvirt. I'm not sure it makes a difference. I don't imagine we'd launch 4.2 targeting CentOS 6.3, though, so if the older libvirt of CentOS 6.3 is the issue then that may conveniently make the problem disappear. On the other hand, Ubuntu 12.04's libvirt is older than CentOS 6.4's so it may crop up again. Just more pains with targeting the moving targets of built-in distribution libvirt. [Automation] Re-attaching volume on VM failing in KVM - Key: CLOUDSTACK-2725 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2725 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Volumes Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Automation environment KVM Found in master also (8d1189c2ae87216bc1c4a1443f75e9a8629abdc2) Reporter: Rayees Namathponnan Assignee: Fang Wang Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: CLOUDSTACK-2725.rar Below two test case failing from BVT integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes.test_08_resize_volume integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes.test_09_delete_detached_volume Steps to reproduce Step 1 : Create an account, service offering, create volume, create VM Step 2 : Attach volume to VM , Step 3 : Detach volume Step 4 : Attach volume to VM again Actual result Attachment failed with below error 2013-05-28 13:45:39,101 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-98:job-1246) Seq 5-258539658: Rec eived: { Ans: , MgmtId: 29066118877352, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { AttachAnswer } } 2013-05-28 13:45:39,106 ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-98:job-1246) Unexpected e xception while executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.volume.AttachVolumeCmd com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to attach volume: TestDiskServ to VM: ce79edb6- a306-4ac4-95e4-6202800f691e; org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unable to execute QEMU comman d '__com.redhat_drive_add': Duplicate ID 'drive-virtio-disk1' for drive at com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.sendAttachVolumeCommand(VolumeManagerImpl.java:1583) at com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.attachVolumeToVM(VolumeManagerImpl.java:1788) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercep t(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.volume.AttachVolumeCmd.execute(AttachVolumeCmd.java:1 22) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:437) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) 2013-05-28 13:45:39,107 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-98:job-1246) Complete asy nc job-1246, jobStatus: 2, resultCode: 530, result: Error Code: 530 Error text: Failed to attach volume : TestDiskServ to VM: ce79edb6-a306-4ac4-95e4-6202800f691e; org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal erro -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3108) Disk related statistics of a VM always show 0 values
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wei Zhou reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3108: Assignee: Wei Zhou Disk related statistics of a VM always show 0 values - Key: CLOUDSTACK-3108 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3108 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: build: CloudPlatform-4.2-117-rhel6.3.tar.gz Reporter: shweta agarwal Assignee: Wei Zhou Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Repro steps: 1. Set global configuration value for storage.stas to 600 milliseconds or other small value and restart Management server 2. Create a VM 4. Create Some data on a VM (create a data heavy file) 5. Wait for storage collector thread to run Bug: Even after storage stats collector thread runs Disk Read, Disk write shows values a zero. Expectations: Disk read , disk write stats for VM should show correct value. I waited for several Stats collector thread to collect data but still value in VM shows Zero For example: VM stats shows API : http://10.147.38.141:8080/client/api?command=listVirtualMachinesdetails=statsid=c448201a-9fc5-4cc1-ab28-c8cd2a53594dresponse=jsonsessionkey=4xWeT9Rw4XpRnWMGa1yIqr2vYSA%3D_=1371794494563 Response: { listvirtualmachinesresponse : { count:1 ,virtualmachine : [ {id:c448201a-9fc5-4cc1-ab28-c8cd2a53594d,name:c448201a-9fc5-4cc1-ab28-c8cd2a53594d,account:admin,domainid:9df32920-d98f-11e2-95e7-0682fe17,domain:ROOT,created:2013-06-20T18:16:16+0530,state:Running,haenable:false,zoneid:0d3e68a9-4f66-4077-a934-6a07b7bde4d1,zonename:xen,hostid:897004e4-4eab-471a-88c6-0f9ad84386c0,hostname:Rack1Pod1Host27,cpuused:0%,networkkbsread:39873,networkkbswrite:1336,diskkbsread:0,diskkbswrite:0,diskioread:0,diskiowrite:0,guestosid:9ea5e3d0-d98f-11e2-95e7-0682fe17,securitygroup:[],nic:[{id:832205d4-b9ed-4e35-93fe-25dfa51afe43,networkid:4bda1bc0-8c1b-4368-8ee9-e7d32f842ca9,networkname:vv,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.0.4.1,ipaddress:10.0.4.237,isolationuri:vlan://1041,broadcasturi:vlan://1041,traffictype:Guest,type:Isolated,isdefault:false,macaddress:02:00:7a:18:00:03},{id:6613398e-b652-41e7-8ca3-77f0d913acc0,networkid:867ab04e-fae0-4e0d-aea0-c3e135273b1a,networkname:tier1,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.0.3.1,ipaddress:10.0.3.121,isolationuri:vlan://1046,broadcasturi:vlan://1046,traffictype:Guest,type:Isolated,isdefault:false,macaddress:02:00:40:00:00:01}],hypervisor:XenServer,instancename:i-2-8-VM,tags:[],affinitygroup:[],displayvm:true} ] } } Where as VM shows following file sizes ls -ltr -rw-r--r-- 1 root root3965 Jun 20 18:30 ter -rw-r--r-- 1 root root3965 Jun 20 18:30 ter1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 206180 Jun 20 18:31 ter4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 206180 Jun 20 18:31 ter5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9071920 Jun 20 18:31 ter3 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3108) Disk related statistics of a VM always show 0 values
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709565#comment-13709565 ] Wei Zhou commented on CLOUDSTACK-3108: -- Animesh, I picked it up. The data collection mechanisms in hypervisors are different. KVM provides traffic data aggregation value , and Vmware/Xen provide traffic rate value. Hence, we can collect aggregation value for KVM only, and disk I/O statistics (CLOUDSTACK-1192) supports KVM only. Stats Collector is ok for KVM (it collects aggregation value). I will change the codes to show polling traffic rate value for Vmware/Xen. -Wei Disk related statistics of a VM always show 0 values - Key: CLOUDSTACK-3108 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3108 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: build: CloudPlatform-4.2-117-rhel6.3.tar.gz Reporter: shweta agarwal Assignee: Wei Zhou Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Repro steps: 1. Set global configuration value for storage.stas to 600 milliseconds or other small value and restart Management server 2. Create a VM 4. Create Some data on a VM (create a data heavy file) 5. Wait for storage collector thread to run Bug: Even after storage stats collector thread runs Disk Read, Disk write shows values a zero. Expectations: Disk read , disk write stats for VM should show correct value. I waited for several Stats collector thread to collect data but still value in VM shows Zero For example: VM stats shows API : http://10.147.38.141:8080/client/api?command=listVirtualMachinesdetails=statsid=c448201a-9fc5-4cc1-ab28-c8cd2a53594dresponse=jsonsessionkey=4xWeT9Rw4XpRnWMGa1yIqr2vYSA%3D_=1371794494563 Response: { listvirtualmachinesresponse : { count:1 ,virtualmachine : [ {id:c448201a-9fc5-4cc1-ab28-c8cd2a53594d,name:c448201a-9fc5-4cc1-ab28-c8cd2a53594d,account:admin,domainid:9df32920-d98f-11e2-95e7-0682fe17,domain:ROOT,created:2013-06-20T18:16:16+0530,state:Running,haenable:false,zoneid:0d3e68a9-4f66-4077-a934-6a07b7bde4d1,zonename:xen,hostid:897004e4-4eab-471a-88c6-0f9ad84386c0,hostname:Rack1Pod1Host27,cpuused:0%,networkkbsread:39873,networkkbswrite:1336,diskkbsread:0,diskkbswrite:0,diskioread:0,diskiowrite:0,guestosid:9ea5e3d0-d98f-11e2-95e7-0682fe17,securitygroup:[],nic:[{id:832205d4-b9ed-4e35-93fe-25dfa51afe43,networkid:4bda1bc0-8c1b-4368-8ee9-e7d32f842ca9,networkname:vv,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.0.4.1,ipaddress:10.0.4.237,isolationuri:vlan://1041,broadcasturi:vlan://1041,traffictype:Guest,type:Isolated,isdefault:false,macaddress:02:00:7a:18:00:03},{id:6613398e-b652-41e7-8ca3-77f0d913acc0,networkid:867ab04e-fae0-4e0d-aea0-c3e135273b1a,networkname:tier1,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.0.3.1,ipaddress:10.0.3.121,isolationuri:vlan://1046,broadcasturi:vlan://1046,traffictype:Guest,type:Isolated,isdefault:false,macaddress:02:00:40:00:00:01}],hypervisor:XenServer,instancename:i-2-8-VM,tags:[],affinitygroup:[],displayvm:true} ] } } Where as VM shows following file sizes ls -ltr -rw-r--r-- 1 root root3965 Jun 20 18:30 ter -rw-r--r-- 1 root root3965 Jun 20 18:30 ter1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 206180 Jun 20 18:31 ter4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 206180 Jun 20 18:31 ter5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9071920 Jun 20 18:31 ter3 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2776) UI Implicit dedication planner: createServiceOffering UI should be changed to take in key-value details
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709567#comment-13709567 ] Prachi Damle commented on CLOUDSTACK-2776: -- Yes the key-value pair UI can be added after creating the compute offering. Will that be edit service offering action? This enhancement can be done for the next release. Atleast for now, for the implicit dedication planner, we should make sure that the option to choose the planner mode is shown to the user only when the implicit planner is chosen from the planner list. UI Implicit dedication planner: createServiceOffering UI should be changed to take in key-value details Key: CLOUDSTACK-2776 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2776 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: UI Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prachi Damle Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 The UI changes done to the createServiceOffering page as part of the Implicit dedication planner are not correct and very specific to this feature. Instead we need a generic design. We should make following changes: 1) Create Service Offering Page should show option ‘Add Details’ and then take in 2 text boxes titled ‘key’ and ‘value’ - This is same as the UI for adding Tags to a resource like network 2) After adding one pair, UI can show the option to add another key-value detail 3) UI can then send all the key-value pairs in a Map while calling CreateServiceOffering API -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-2777) AWSAPI: build and packaging issue causing EC2 SOAP test failures
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prachi Damle closed CLOUDSTACK-2777. This issue has been fixed and EC2 SOAP calls were verified. AWSAPI: build and packaging issue causing EC2 SOAP test failures Key: CLOUDSTACK-2777 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2777 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Packaging Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prachi Damle Assignee: Rayees Namathponnan Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 awsapi webapp is not getting deployed on axis2 when management server is started. Following file is missing and causing this issue: webapps7080/awsapi/WEB-INF/services/cloud-ec2.aar I don’t see this file on a setup using rpm packages under: /usr/share/cloudstack-bridge/webapps/awsapi/WEB-INF/services. So looks like the .aar file is not being generated by the apache build. Apache build should create this jar file [cloud-ec2.aar] too and package it under webapps7080/awsapi/WEB-INF/services -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-2927) [AWSAPI] EC2 SOAP calls fail with 'Uninitalized user context' error
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sailaja Mada closed CLOUDSTACK-2927. Regressed with latest 4.2 master . Reported issue is fixed now. [root@ec2 bin]# ./ec2-describe-instances RESERVATION 1ea6fdbd-1c26-428e-a2e5-bb7991282542 fd3eb4f3-f117-40fd-8bd6-6cbd728a481d:dcuser1 INSTANCE1ea6fdbd-1c26-428e-a2e5-bb7991282542 109c7564-f730-453f-9667-80e3abb8df43stopped Small Instance 2013-07-15T20:06:37+0530AdvZone1 monitoring- 10.1.1.70 TAG instance1ea6fdbd-1c26-428e-a2e5-bb7991282542 [root@ec2 bin]# Hence closing the bug. [AWSAPI] EC2 SOAP calls fail with 'Uninitalized user context' error --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-2927 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2927 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: AWSAPI, Packaging Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Likitha Shetty Assignee: Rayees Namathponnan Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: awsapi.log Set enable.ec2.api to true. Register user using cloudstack-aws-api-register. Make any SOAP API call e.g. ec2-describe-images using ec2 tools. Output - Server.InternalError: An unexpected error occurred Attached awsapi.log for log details -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3293) [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709594#comment-13709594 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-3293: - Commit d0955663cf0324afda52765801033f92b94bf52f in branch refs/heads/4.2 from [~likithas] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=d095566 ] CLOUDSTACK-3293. DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref. [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3293 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam Assignee: Likitha Shetty Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 The following issue was encountered when deleting accounts: 2013-06-30 13:38:49,034 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd for job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ] 2013-06-30 13:38:49,036 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (706873057@qtp-20348362-3:null) ===END=== 127.0.0.1 -- GET signature=oO%2FgP9Ffx%2FlE%2FYIC7tXPcFfb8Pg%3DapiKey=oN8VZaaSyTapdOEJPP29padHk23dgCof3zxoaH9rMm4V4XUpNv2EAkSTixufmjQLr-kbdwLphVC8UQnkcfdUNwcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b 2013-06-30 13:38:49,043 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Removed account 28 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 WARN [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to delete all snapshot for volume 47 on secondary storage nfs://10.147.28.6:/export/home/sandbox/secondary 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 ERROR [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) unsupported command:com.cloud.agent.api.DeleteSnapshotsDirCommand 2013-06-30 13:38:49,055 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 1 Name = -AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run:418-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:439-FutureTask$Sync.innerRun:303-FutureTask.run:138-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask:895-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:918-Thread.run:680; called by -Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:133-SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount:682-AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount:581-AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount:544-AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:1255-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:177-RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount:118 2013-06-30 13:38:49,056 WARN [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to cleanup account Acct[28-test-5E4I97] due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@3632317c: DELETE FROM snapshots WHERE snapshots.id= 3 at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.expunge(GenericDaoBase.java:1137) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount(SnapshotManagerImpl.java:682) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:581) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:544) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:1255) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionManagerImpl.java:177) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionServiceImpl.java:118) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd.execute(DeleteAccountCmd.java:100) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at
[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-1355) Exception when DB upgrade from 4.0.0 to 4.2.0-SNAPSHOT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] gavin lee closed CLOUDSTACK-1355. - Thanks Rohit. Sorry for the late response. It's ok now. Exception when DB upgrade from 4.0.0 to 4.2.0-SNAPSHOT --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-1355 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1355 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Install and Setup Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: osx 10.8.2 apache-maven-3.0.4 Reporter: gavin lee Assignee: Rohit Yadav Labels: db, upgrade Fix For: 4.2.0 Original Estimate: 48h Remaining Estimate: 48h Build for DevCloud on master, after pull latest code, run jetty will raise below Exception: bash$ mvn -pl client jetty:run INFO [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:) Grabbing lock to check for database upgrade. INFO [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:) DB version = 4.0.0 Code Version = 4.2.0-SNAPSHOT INFO [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:) Database upgrade must be performed from 4.0.0 to 4.2.0-SNAPSHOT ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (main:) Error executing: alter table storage_pool modify id bigint unsigned AUTO_INCREMENT UNIQUE NOT NULL ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (main:) java.sql.SQLException: Cannot change column 'id': used in a foreign key constraint 'fk_storage_pool_details__pool_id' of table 'cloud.storage_pool_details' ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:) Unable to execute upgrade script: /Users/gavin_lee/projects/cs-apache/incubator-cloudstack/client/target/utilities/scripts/db/db/schema-40to410.sql java.sql.SQLException: Cannot change column 'id': used in a foreign key constraint 'fk_storage_pool_details__pool_id' of table 'cloud.storage_pool_details' at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:193) at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:87) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.runScript(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:172) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:232) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:357) at net.sf.cglib.proxy.MethodProxy.invoke(MethodProxy.java:204) at org.springframework.aop.framework.Cglib2AopProxy$CglibMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(Cglib2AopProxy.java:689) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150) at org.springframework.aop.aspectj.MethodInvocationProceedingJoinPoint.proceed(MethodInvocationProceedingJoinPoint.java:80) at com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionContextBuilder.AroundAnyMethod(TransactionContextBuilder.java:43) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor36.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AbstractAspectJAdvice.invokeAdviceMethodWithGivenArgs(AbstractAspectJAdvice.java:621) at org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AbstractAspectJAdvice.invokeAdviceMethod(AbstractAspectJAdvice.java:610) at org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AspectJAroundAdvice.invoke(AspectJAroundAdvice.java:65) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172) at org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:90) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172) at org.springframework.aop.framework.Cglib2AopProxy$DynamicAdvisedInterceptor.intercept(Cglib2AopProxy.java:622) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentContext.initComponentsLifeCycle(ComponentContext.java:72) When apply following work around: SET foreign_key_checks = 0; on top of setup/db/db/schema-40to410.sql and SET foreign_key_checks = 1; at bottom of setup/db/db/schema-40to410.sql Another exception will raise: INFO [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:) Grabbing lock to check for database upgrade. INFO [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:) DB version = 4.0.0 Code Version = 4.2.0-SNAPSHOT INFO [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:) Database upgrade must be performed from 4.0.0 to 4.2.0-SNAPSHOT ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (main:) Error executing: alter table vm_template add image_data_store_id bigint unsigned ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (main:)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3293) [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709598#comment-13709598 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-3293: - Commit 22ddc3fa0644b9dae6bbbc6e87d425d11f574f30 in branch refs/heads/master from [~likithas] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=22ddc3f ] CLOUDSTACK-3293. DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref. [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3293 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam Assignee: Likitha Shetty Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 The following issue was encountered when deleting accounts: 2013-06-30 13:38:49,034 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd for job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ] 2013-06-30 13:38:49,036 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (706873057@qtp-20348362-3:null) ===END=== 127.0.0.1 -- GET signature=oO%2FgP9Ffx%2FlE%2FYIC7tXPcFfb8Pg%3DapiKey=oN8VZaaSyTapdOEJPP29padHk23dgCof3zxoaH9rMm4V4XUpNv2EAkSTixufmjQLr-kbdwLphVC8UQnkcfdUNwcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b 2013-06-30 13:38:49,043 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Removed account 28 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 WARN [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to delete all snapshot for volume 47 on secondary storage nfs://10.147.28.6:/export/home/sandbox/secondary 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 ERROR [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) unsupported command:com.cloud.agent.api.DeleteSnapshotsDirCommand 2013-06-30 13:38:49,055 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 1 Name = -AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run:418-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:439-FutureTask$Sync.innerRun:303-FutureTask.run:138-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask:895-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:918-Thread.run:680; called by -Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:133-SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount:682-AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount:581-AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount:544-AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:1255-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:177-RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount:118 2013-06-30 13:38:49,056 WARN [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to cleanup account Acct[28-test-5E4I97] due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@3632317c: DELETE FROM snapshots WHERE snapshots.id= 3 at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.expunge(GenericDaoBase.java:1137) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount(SnapshotManagerImpl.java:682) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:581) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:544) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:1255) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionManagerImpl.java:177) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionServiceImpl.java:118) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd.execute(DeleteAccountCmd.java:100) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at
[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3388) No error message shows when a dedicate operation failed during the creation of a pod/cluster
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Isaac Chiang reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3388: Assignee: Isaac Chiang No error message shows when a dedicate operation failed during the creation of a pod/cluster Key: CLOUDSTACK-3388 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3388 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: UI Environment: Master Reporter: Isaac Chiang Assignee: Isaac Chiang Labels: ui Attachments: Screenshot-1.png, Screenshot-2.png, Screenshot-3.png There should be a error message when trying to make an explicit dedication to a nonexistent account during the creation of a pod/cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3293) [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Likitha Shetty resolved CLOUDSTACK-3293. Resolution: Fixed [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3293 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam Assignee: Likitha Shetty Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 The following issue was encountered when deleting accounts: 2013-06-30 13:38:49,034 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd for job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ] 2013-06-30 13:38:49,036 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (706873057@qtp-20348362-3:null) ===END=== 127.0.0.1 -- GET signature=oO%2FgP9Ffx%2FlE%2FYIC7tXPcFfb8Pg%3DapiKey=oN8VZaaSyTapdOEJPP29padHk23dgCof3zxoaH9rMm4V4XUpNv2EAkSTixufmjQLr-kbdwLphVC8UQnkcfdUNwcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b 2013-06-30 13:38:49,043 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Removed account 28 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 WARN [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to delete all snapshot for volume 47 on secondary storage nfs://10.147.28.6:/export/home/sandbox/secondary 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 ERROR [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) unsupported command:com.cloud.agent.api.DeleteSnapshotsDirCommand 2013-06-30 13:38:49,055 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 1 Name = -AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run:418-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:439-FutureTask$Sync.innerRun:303-FutureTask.run:138-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask:895-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:918-Thread.run:680; called by -Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:133-SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount:682-AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount:581-AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount:544-AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:1255-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:177-RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount:118 2013-06-30 13:38:49,056 WARN [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to cleanup account Acct[28-test-5E4I97] due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@3632317c: DELETE FROM snapshots WHERE snapshots.id= 3 at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.expunge(GenericDaoBase.java:1137) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount(SnapshotManagerImpl.java:682) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:581) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:544) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:1255) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionManagerImpl.java:177) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionServiceImpl.java:118) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd.execute(DeleteAccountCmd.java:100) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:455) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:439) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138) at
[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3533) [IPv6][dnsmasq] VM not able get ip from dhcp which is previously assigned to vm
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jayapal Reddy resolved CLOUDSTACK-3533. --- Resolution: Fixed [IPv6][dnsmasq] VM not able get ip from dhcp which is previously assigned to vm --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3533 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3533 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Network Devices Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Jayapal Reddy Assignee: Jayapal Reddy Fix For: 4.2.0 1. Create a guest network with small ip range (ex: max ips 3) 2. Deploy VMs utill ip address exhaust. 3. Now delete the one vm ex: V3 . Here one IP got freed. 4. deploy new vm Ex: name V4. Now the V4 supposed to get ip address which is release by V3. Issue 1: V4 is not getting ip address. Issue 2: 1.destroy vm ex: v1 with ipv1. 2. create a vm ex:v2. v2 got ip address of v1. 3. Now observe the dhcphosts.txt. It contains the two entries for with same IP. edithosts.sh failed to delete entry with ip already in dhcphosts.txt -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3388) No error message shows when a dedicate operation failed during the creation of a pod/cluster
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709604#comment-13709604 ] Isaac Chiang commented on CLOUDSTACK-3388: -- Create a branch: original/ui-dedicatedresources-refactoring for solving the issue. No error message shows when a dedicate operation failed during the creation of a pod/cluster Key: CLOUDSTACK-3388 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3388 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: UI Environment: Master Reporter: Isaac Chiang Assignee: Isaac Chiang Labels: ui Attachments: Screenshot-1.png, Screenshot-2.png, Screenshot-3.png There should be a error message when trying to make an explicit dedication to a nonexistent account during the creation of a pod/cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3293) [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709610#comment-13709610 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-3293: - Commit 4c924bb83ddfe01512351b202cfa021319148b1e in branch refs/heads/4.2 from [~likithas] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=4c924bb ] Revert CLOUDSTACK-3293. DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref. This reverts commit d0955663cf0324afda52765801033f92b94bf52f. [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3293 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam Assignee: Likitha Shetty Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 The following issue was encountered when deleting accounts: 2013-06-30 13:38:49,034 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd for job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ] 2013-06-30 13:38:49,036 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (706873057@qtp-20348362-3:null) ===END=== 127.0.0.1 -- GET signature=oO%2FgP9Ffx%2FlE%2FYIC7tXPcFfb8Pg%3DapiKey=oN8VZaaSyTapdOEJPP29padHk23dgCof3zxoaH9rMm4V4XUpNv2EAkSTixufmjQLr-kbdwLphVC8UQnkcfdUNwcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b 2013-06-30 13:38:49,043 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Removed account 28 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 WARN [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to delete all snapshot for volume 47 on secondary storage nfs://10.147.28.6:/export/home/sandbox/secondary 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 ERROR [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) unsupported command:com.cloud.agent.api.DeleteSnapshotsDirCommand 2013-06-30 13:38:49,055 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 1 Name = -AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run:418-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:439-FutureTask$Sync.innerRun:303-FutureTask.run:138-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask:895-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:918-Thread.run:680; called by -Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:133-SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount:682-AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount:581-AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount:544-AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:1255-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:177-RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount:118 2013-06-30 13:38:49,056 WARN [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to cleanup account Acct[28-test-5E4I97] due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@3632317c: DELETE FROM snapshots WHERE snapshots.id= 3 at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.expunge(GenericDaoBase.java:1137) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount(SnapshotManagerImpl.java:682) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:581) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:544) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:1255) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionManagerImpl.java:177) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionServiceImpl.java:118) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd.execute(DeleteAccountCmd.java:100) at
[jira] [Reopened] (CLOUDSTACK-3293) [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Likitha Shetty reopened CLOUDSTACK-3293: [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3293 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam Assignee: Likitha Shetty Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 The following issue was encountered when deleting accounts: 2013-06-30 13:38:49,034 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd for job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ] 2013-06-30 13:38:49,036 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (706873057@qtp-20348362-3:null) ===END=== 127.0.0.1 -- GET signature=oO%2FgP9Ffx%2FlE%2FYIC7tXPcFfb8Pg%3DapiKey=oN8VZaaSyTapdOEJPP29padHk23dgCof3zxoaH9rMm4V4XUpNv2EAkSTixufmjQLr-kbdwLphVC8UQnkcfdUNwcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b 2013-06-30 13:38:49,043 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Removed account 28 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 WARN [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to delete all snapshot for volume 47 on secondary storage nfs://10.147.28.6:/export/home/sandbox/secondary 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 ERROR [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) unsupported command:com.cloud.agent.api.DeleteSnapshotsDirCommand 2013-06-30 13:38:49,055 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 1 Name = -AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run:418-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:439-FutureTask$Sync.innerRun:303-FutureTask.run:138-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask:895-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:918-Thread.run:680; called by -Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:133-SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount:682-AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount:581-AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount:544-AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:1255-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:177-RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount:118 2013-06-30 13:38:49,056 WARN [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to cleanup account Acct[28-test-5E4I97] due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@3632317c: DELETE FROM snapshots WHERE snapshots.id= 3 at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.expunge(GenericDaoBase.java:1137) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount(SnapshotManagerImpl.java:682) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:581) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:544) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:1255) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionManagerImpl.java:177) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionServiceImpl.java:118) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd.execute(DeleteAccountCmd.java:100) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:455) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:439) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138) at
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3293) [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709612#comment-13709612 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-3293: - Commit 33d6f7a8c49c2edc7fdacaaf23e54751a9f914be in branch refs/heads/master from [~likithas] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=33d6f7a ] Revert CLOUDSTACK-3293. DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref. This reverts commit 22ddc3fa0644b9dae6bbbc6e87d425d11f574f30. [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3293 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam Assignee: Likitha Shetty Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 The following issue was encountered when deleting accounts: 2013-06-30 13:38:49,034 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd for job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ] 2013-06-30 13:38:49,036 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (706873057@qtp-20348362-3:null) ===END=== 127.0.0.1 -- GET signature=oO%2FgP9Ffx%2FlE%2FYIC7tXPcFfb8Pg%3DapiKey=oN8VZaaSyTapdOEJPP29padHk23dgCof3zxoaH9rMm4V4XUpNv2EAkSTixufmjQLr-kbdwLphVC8UQnkcfdUNwcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b 2013-06-30 13:38:49,043 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Removed account 28 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 WARN [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to delete all snapshot for volume 47 on secondary storage nfs://10.147.28.6:/export/home/sandbox/secondary 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 ERROR [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) unsupported command:com.cloud.agent.api.DeleteSnapshotsDirCommand 2013-06-30 13:38:49,055 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 1 Name = -AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run:418-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:439-FutureTask$Sync.innerRun:303-FutureTask.run:138-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask:895-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:918-Thread.run:680; called by -Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:133-SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount:682-AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount:581-AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount:544-AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:1255-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:177-RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount:118 2013-06-30 13:38:49,056 WARN [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to cleanup account Acct[28-test-5E4I97] due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@3632317c: DELETE FROM snapshots WHERE snapshots.id= 3 at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.expunge(GenericDaoBase.java:1137) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount(SnapshotManagerImpl.java:682) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:581) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:544) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:1255) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionManagerImpl.java:177) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionServiceImpl.java:118) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd.execute(DeleteAccountCmd.java:100) at
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3546) [DOC] Updated 4.2 Developer Guide
Radhika Nair created CLOUDSTACK-3546: Summary: [DOC] Updated 4.2 Developer Guide Key: CLOUDSTACK-3546 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3546 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Doc Affects Versions: 4.1.0 Reporter: Radhika Nair Fix For: 4.2.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3546) [DOC] Update 4.2 Developer Guide
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Radhika Nair updated CLOUDSTACK-3546: - Summary: [DOC] Update 4.2 Developer Guide (was: [DOC] Updated 4.2 Developer Guide) [DOC] Update 4.2 Developer Guide Key: CLOUDSTACK-3546 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3546 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Doc Affects Versions: 4.1.0 Reporter: Radhika Nair Fix For: 4.2.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3548) Update Removed API Commands
Radhika Nair created CLOUDSTACK-3548: Summary: Update Removed API Commands Key: CLOUDSTACK-3548 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3548 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Sub-task Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Reporter: Radhika Nair Fix For: 4.2.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3547) Update Added API Commands
Radhika Nair created CLOUDSTACK-3547: Summary: Update Added API Commands Key: CLOUDSTACK-3547 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3547 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Sub-task Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Doc Reporter: Radhika Nair Assignee: Radhika Nair Fix For: 4.2.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3549) Update Remove API Commands
Radhika Nair created CLOUDSTACK-3549: Summary: Update Remove API Commands Key: CLOUDSTACK-3549 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3549 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Sub-task Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Reporter: Radhika Nair Fix For: 4.2.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3550) Create What' New in 4.2 Section
Radhika Nair created CLOUDSTACK-3550: Summary: Create What' New in 4.2 Section Key: CLOUDSTACK-3550 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3550 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Sub-task Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Reporter: Radhika Nair Fix For: 4.2.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3547) Update Added API Commands
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709616#comment-13709616 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-3547: - Commit 7da1e8a7f3224400e746844baca72dfed735d390 in branch refs/heads/master from [~radhikap] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=7da1e8a ] CLOUDSTACK-3547 Update Added API Commands - Key: CLOUDSTACK-3547 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3547 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Sub-task Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Doc Reporter: Radhika Nair Assignee: Radhika Nair Fix For: 4.2.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-2862) CS AWSAPI SOAP calls fail with NPE
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sailaja Mada closed CLOUDSTACK-2862. Regressed with 4.2 branch build. Issue is fixed now . [root@ec2 bin]# ./ec2-describe-images IMAGE 109c7564-f730-453f-9667-80e3abb8df43/CentOS5.3 available public machine BLOCKDEVICEMAPPING 0 TAG image 109c7564-f730-453f-9667-80e3abb8df43 IMAGE 8ffd90c2-45d7-4ecd-8cf2-3d5910364d93/Centos6_2 available public machine BLOCKDEVICEMAPPING 0 TAG image 8ffd90c2-45d7-4ecd-8cf2-3d5910364d93 [ root@ec2 bin]# ./ec2-describe-tags [root@ec2 bin]# ./ec2-describe-instances RESERVATION 1ea6fdbd-1c26-428e-a2e5-bb7991282542 fd3eb4f3-f117-40fd-8bd6-6cbd728a481d:dcuser1 INSTANCE1ea6fdbd-1c26-428e-a2e5-bb7991282542 109c7564-f730-453f-9667-80e3abb8df43stopped Small Instance 2013-07-15T20:06:37+0530AdvZone1 monitoring- 10.1.1.70 TAG instance1ea6fdbd-1c26-428e-a2e5-bb7991282542 [root@ec2 bin]# ./ec2-describe-snapshots SNAPSHOTee182500-a52c-4668-8616-22ecdd8e5145 6688fd4c-939c-41e6-9ab2-01351d25d583error 2013-07-15T20:45:12+0530 0% fd3eb4f3-f117-40fd-8bd6-6cbd728a481d:dcuser10 dcuser1i1_ROOT-9_20130715151512 TAG snapshotee182500-a52c-4668-8616-22ecdd8e5145 [root@ec2 bin]# ./ec2-describe-availability-zones AVAILABILITYZONEAdvZone1available Enabled [root@ec2 bin]# Hence closing the bug. CS AWSAPI SOAP calls fail with NPE -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-2862 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2862 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: AWSAPI Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Likitha Shetty Assignee: Likitha Shetty Fix For: 4.2.0 Enable ec2 api flag. Use EC2 API Soap tool to run ec2-describe-availability-zones. Ouput - Server:unknown Contents of awsapi.log - 2013-05-28 15:53:53,127 WARN [controller.s3.ServiceProvider] (catalina-exec-int-6:null) Unhandled exception null java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at com.cloud.bridge.service.controller.s3.ServiceProvider$2.invoke(ServiceProvider.java:356) at $Proxy67.describeAvailabilityZones(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.bridge.service.EC2SoapService.describeAvailabilityZones(EC2SoapService.java:230) at com.amazon.ec2.AmazonEC2MessageReceiverInOut.invokeBusinessLogic(AmazonEC2MessageReceiverInOut.java:874) at org.apache.axis2.receivers.AbstractInOutMessageReceiver.invokeBusinessLogic(AbstractInOutMessageReceiver.java:40) at org.apache.axis2.receivers.AbstractMessageReceiver.receive(AbstractMessageReceiver.java:114) at org.apache.axis2.engine.AxisEngine.receive(AxisEngine.java:173) at org.apache.axis2.transport.http.HTTPTransportUtils.processHTTPPostRequest(HTTPTransportUtils.java:173) at org.apache.axis2.transport.http.AxisServlet.doPost(AxisServlet.java:144) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher.java:646) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.processRequest(ApplicationDispatcher.java:436) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doForward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:374) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.forward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:302) at com.cloud.bridge.service.EC2MainServlet.doGetOrPost(EC2MainServlet.java:114) at com.cloud.bridge.service.EC2MainServlet.doPost(EC2MainServlet.java:89) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3551) scaling up VM from small SO to a SO (with 2 GB RAM) is failing ; Unable to scale vm due to Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM
prashant kumar mishra created CLOUDSTACK-3551: - Summary: scaling up VM from small SO to a SO (with 2 GB RAM) is failing ; Unable to scale vm due to Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM:i-2-10-VM due to MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory Key: CLOUDSTACK-3551 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3551 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: hypervisor :Xen 6.1 Reporter: prashant kumar mishra Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Steps to reproduce - 1-prepare a CS setup with xen server(6.1) 2-Deploy a vm with small service offering (cpu=500,RAM=512) 3-create a SO say mem2 (cpu=500 or 1000 and RAM=2048) 4-scaleup vm from small SO to mem2 Expected - Scale up vm should be successful Actual --- Scaling up failed My observation -- - if i try to scale up to a SO (RAM=1.5 GB) ( successful) i see minRam:1610612736,maxRam:1610612736, -for scale up to a SO (RAM= 2GB) i see minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648, (overflow) Logs: --- h overprovisioning: 9576; new used:2500, reserved:0; requested cpu:1000,alloc_from_last:false 2013-07-16 10:06:31,146 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) RAM STATS after allocation: for host: 1, old used: 1476395008, old reserved: 0, total: 16190156800; new used: 3623878656, reserved: 0; requested mem: 2147483648,alloc_from_last:false 2013-07-16 10:06:31,160 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) Seq 1-1237451203: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{com.cloud.agent.api.ScaleVmCommand:{vm:{id:1,name:i-2-10-VM,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:false,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamicallyScaleVm:true},vmName:i-2-10-VM,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 10:06:31,161 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) Seq 1-1237451203: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{com.cloud.agent.api.ScaleVmCommand:{vm:{id:1,name:i-2-10-VM,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:false,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamicallyScaleVm:true},vmName:i-2-10-VM,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 10:06:31,162 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-350:null) Seq 1-1237451203: Executing request 2013-07-16 10:06:31,202 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-1:null) Ping from 3 2013-07-16 10:06:31,364 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-350:null) Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM:i-2-10-VM due to MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy: static_min ⤠dynamic_min ⤠dynamic_max ⤠static_max 2013-07-16 10:06:31,364 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-350:null) Seq 1-1237451203: Response Received: 2013-07-16 10:06:31,365 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (DirectAgent-350:null) Seq 1-1237451203: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, [{com.cloud.agent.api.ScaleVmAnswer:{result:false,details:Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM:i-2-10-VM due to MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy: static_min ⤠dynamic_min ⤠dynamic_max ⤠static_max,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 10:06:31,366 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) Seq 1-1237451203: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, { ScaleVmAnswer } } 2013-07-16 10:06:31,366 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) Unable to scale vm due to Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM:i-2-10-VM due to MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy: static_min ⤠dynamic_min ⤠dynamic_max ⤠static_max 2013-07-16 10:06:31,371 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentAttache] (DirectAgent-350:null) Seq 1-1237451203: No more commands found 2013-07-16 10:06:31,382 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) Hosts's actual total CPU: 9576 and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 9576 2013-07-16 10:06:31,383 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3551) scaling up VM from small SO to a SO (with 2 GB RAM) is failing ; Unable to scale vm due to Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] prashant kumar mishra updated CLOUDSTACK-3551: -- Attachment: XEN_MS_DB.rar scaling up VM from small SO to a SO (with 2 GB RAM) is failing ; Unable to scale vm due to Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM:i-2-10-VM due to MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory Key: CLOUDSTACK-3551 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3551 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: hypervisor :Xen 6.1 Reporter: prashant kumar mishra Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: XEN_MS_DB.rar Steps to reproduce - 1-prepare a CS setup with xen server(6.1) 2-Deploy a vm with small service offering (cpu=500,RAM=512) 3-create a SO say mem2 (cpu=500 or 1000 and RAM=2048) 4-scaleup vm from small SO to mem2 Expected - Scale up vm should be successful Actual --- Scaling up failed My observation -- - if i try to scale up to a SO (RAM=1.5 GB) ( successful) i see minRam:1610612736,maxRam:1610612736, -for scale up to a SO (RAM= 2GB) i see minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648, (overflow) Logs: --- h overprovisioning: 9576; new used:2500, reserved:0; requested cpu:1000,alloc_from_last:false 2013-07-16 10:06:31,146 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) RAM STATS after allocation: for host: 1, old used: 1476395008, old reserved: 0, total: 16190156800; new used: 3623878656, reserved: 0; requested mem: 2147483648,alloc_from_last:false 2013-07-16 10:06:31,160 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) Seq 1-1237451203: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{com.cloud.agent.api.ScaleVmCommand:{vm:{id:1,name:i-2-10-VM,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:false,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamicallyScaleVm:true},vmName:i-2-10-VM,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 10:06:31,161 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) Seq 1-1237451203: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{com.cloud.agent.api.ScaleVmCommand:{vm:{id:1,name:i-2-10-VM,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:false,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamicallyScaleVm:true},vmName:i-2-10-VM,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 10:06:31,162 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-350:null) Seq 1-1237451203: Executing request 2013-07-16 10:06:31,202 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-1:null) Ping from 3 2013-07-16 10:06:31,364 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-350:null) Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM:i-2-10-VM due to MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy: static_min ⤠dynamic_min ⤠dynamic_max ⤠static_max 2013-07-16 10:06:31,364 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-350:null) Seq 1-1237451203: Response Received: 2013-07-16 10:06:31,365 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (DirectAgent-350:null) Seq 1-1237451203: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, [{com.cloud.agent.api.ScaleVmAnswer:{result:false,details:Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM:i-2-10-VM due to MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy: static_min ⤠dynamic_min ⤠dynamic_max ⤠static_max,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 10:06:31,366 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) Seq 1-1237451203: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, { ScaleVmAnswer } } 2013-07-16 10:06:31,366 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) Unable to scale vm due to Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM:i-2-10-VM due to MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must
[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-2085) VM weight on xen remain same as before vmscaleup ;because Add-To-VCPUs-Params-Live.sh is not getting copied on xs host
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] prashant kumar mishra closed CLOUDSTACK-2085. - passed VM weight on xen remain same as before vmscaleup ;because Add-To-VCPUs-Params-Live.sh is not getting copied on xs host - Key: CLOUDSTACK-2085 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2085 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: prashant kumar mishra Assignee: Harikrishna Patnala Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Hypervisor Xen Commit 2057221f4f1fd5afde422b367fc416d4e44275cb VM weight on xen is not getting changed after scaleup Step to reproduce 1-Deployed a vm with service offering small instance (weight on xen 52) , 2-Scaled up vm to service offering medium instance Expected - after scale up VM should get weight according to new service offering Actual - VM weight remain same as before scale up Work around --- copy script Add-To-VCPUs-Params-Live.sh to /opt/xensource/bin -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3293) [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709628#comment-13709628 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-3293: - Commit e15876944bbcf3badbb4e03395fc1e8fcc8abd00 in branch refs/heads/4.2 from [~likithas] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=e158769 ] CLOUDSTACK-3293. DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref. [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3293 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam Assignee: Likitha Shetty Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 The following issue was encountered when deleting accounts: 2013-06-30 13:38:49,034 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd for job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ] 2013-06-30 13:38:49,036 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (706873057@qtp-20348362-3:null) ===END=== 127.0.0.1 -- GET signature=oO%2FgP9Ffx%2FlE%2FYIC7tXPcFfb8Pg%3DapiKey=oN8VZaaSyTapdOEJPP29padHk23dgCof3zxoaH9rMm4V4XUpNv2EAkSTixufmjQLr-kbdwLphVC8UQnkcfdUNwcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b 2013-06-30 13:38:49,043 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Removed account 28 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 WARN [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to delete all snapshot for volume 47 on secondary storage nfs://10.147.28.6:/export/home/sandbox/secondary 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 ERROR [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) unsupported command:com.cloud.agent.api.DeleteSnapshotsDirCommand 2013-06-30 13:38:49,055 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 1 Name = -AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run:418-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:439-FutureTask$Sync.innerRun:303-FutureTask.run:138-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask:895-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:918-Thread.run:680; called by -Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:133-SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount:682-AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount:581-AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount:544-AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:1255-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:177-RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount:118 2013-06-30 13:38:49,056 WARN [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to cleanup account Acct[28-test-5E4I97] due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@3632317c: DELETE FROM snapshots WHERE snapshots.id= 3 at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.expunge(GenericDaoBase.java:1137) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount(SnapshotManagerImpl.java:682) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:581) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:544) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:1255) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionManagerImpl.java:177) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionServiceImpl.java:118) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd.execute(DeleteAccountCmd.java:100) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3293) [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709635#comment-13709635 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-3293: - Commit d7122bc144b0d03a6fe304198a4a9dd465416265 in branch refs/heads/master from [~likithas] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=d7122bc ] CLOUDSTACK-3293. DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref. [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3293 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam Assignee: Likitha Shetty Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 The following issue was encountered when deleting accounts: 2013-06-30 13:38:49,034 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd for job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ] 2013-06-30 13:38:49,036 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (706873057@qtp-20348362-3:null) ===END=== 127.0.0.1 -- GET signature=oO%2FgP9Ffx%2FlE%2FYIC7tXPcFfb8Pg%3DapiKey=oN8VZaaSyTapdOEJPP29padHk23dgCof3zxoaH9rMm4V4XUpNv2EAkSTixufmjQLr-kbdwLphVC8UQnkcfdUNwcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b 2013-06-30 13:38:49,043 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Removed account 28 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 WARN [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to delete all snapshot for volume 47 on secondary storage nfs://10.147.28.6:/export/home/sandbox/secondary 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 ERROR [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) unsupported command:com.cloud.agent.api.DeleteSnapshotsDirCommand 2013-06-30 13:38:49,055 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 1 Name = -AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run:418-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:439-FutureTask$Sync.innerRun:303-FutureTask.run:138-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask:895-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:918-Thread.run:680; called by -Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:133-SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount:682-AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount:581-AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount:544-AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:1255-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:177-RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount:118 2013-06-30 13:38:49,056 WARN [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to cleanup account Acct[28-test-5E4I97] due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@3632317c: DELETE FROM snapshots WHERE snapshots.id= 3 at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.expunge(GenericDaoBase.java:1137) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount(SnapshotManagerImpl.java:682) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:581) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:544) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:1255) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionManagerImpl.java:177) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionServiceImpl.java:118) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd.execute(DeleteAccountCmd.java:100) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at
[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3293) [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Likitha Shetty resolved CLOUDSTACK-3293. Resolution: Fixed [Automation] DeleteAccount fails with ConstraintViolation on snapshot_store_ref --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3293 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3293 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam Assignee: Likitha Shetty Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 The following issue was encountered when deleting accounts: 2013-06-30 13:38:49,034 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd for job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ] 2013-06-30 13:38:49,036 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (706873057@qtp-20348362-3:null) ===END=== 127.0.0.1 -- GET signature=oO%2FgP9Ffx%2FlE%2FYIC7tXPcFfb8Pg%3DapiKey=oN8VZaaSyTapdOEJPP29padHk23dgCof3zxoaH9rMm4V4XUpNv2EAkSTixufmjQLr-kbdwLphVC8UQnkcfdUNwcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b 2013-06-30 13:38:49,043 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Removed account 28 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 WARN [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to delete all snapshot for volume 47 on secondary storage nfs://10.147.28.6:/export/home/sandbox/secondary 2013-06-30 13:38:49,053 ERROR [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) unsupported command:com.cloud.agent.api.DeleteSnapshotsDirCommand 2013-06-30 13:38:49,055 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 1 Name = -AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run:418-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:439-FutureTask$Sync.innerRun:303-FutureTask.run:138-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask:895-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:918-Thread.run:680; called by -Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:133-SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount:682-AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount:581-AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount:544-AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:1255-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount:177-RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount:118 2013-06-30 13:38:49,056 WARN [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-72:job-142 = [ bb4be72e-a4a1-4d1d-9ecd-f4516807990b ]) Failed to cleanup account Acct[28-test-5E4I97] due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@3632317c: DELETE FROM snapshots WHERE snapshots.id= 3 at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.expunge(GenericDaoBase.java:1137) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl.deleteSnapshotDirsForAccount(SnapshotManagerImpl.java:682) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.cleanupAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:581) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:544) at com.cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(AccountManagerImpl.java:1255) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionManagerImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionManagerImpl.java:177) at org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionServiceImpl.deleteUserAccount(RegionServiceImpl.java:118) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.account.DeleteAccountCmd.execute(DeleteAccountCmd.java:100) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:455) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:439) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138) at
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2875) VM password is not correct after deployment and resetpassword on KVM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709638#comment-13709638 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-2875: - Commit 53f6b2aee3699a56516dd8c7c636f0f2f578df00 in branch refs/heads/master from [~weizhou] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=53f6b2a ] CLOUDSTACK-2875: change runlevel of cloud-passwd-srvr to remove error message at systemvm startup VM password is not correct after deployment and resetpassword on KVM Key: CLOUDSTACK-2875 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2875 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: CentOS 6.4 Reporter: Wei Zhou Assignee: Wei Zhou Labels: integration-test After fixed CLOUDSTACK-2823, the systemvms are running finally. A new issue is that I can not log in the VM (Ubuntu 12.04 64bit) as the password is not correct, even after reset password. The IP and hostname are correct in VM. systemvm from http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-systemvm-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-04-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3552) Domain/Account details are not displayed for the implicitly dedicated hosts neither in UI nor in DB.
Kiran Koneti created CLOUDSTACK-3552: Summary: Domain/Account details are not displayed for the implicitly dedicated hosts neither in UI nor in DB. Key: CLOUDSTACK-3552 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3552 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Kiran Koneti Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 When a host is implicitly dedicated to an domain/account then the dedication details for that particular account is not recorded neither in DB nor in UI. The op_host_planner_reservation; shows the details as of weather a host is dedicated or not but it doesn't make a note of to which account it is dedicated . The op_host_planner_reservation; table details are as below: mysql select * from op_host_planner_reservation; +++++-++ | id | data_center_id | pod_id | cluster_id | host_id | resource_usage | +++++-++ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Shared | +++++-++ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) This will be an issue when the number of accounts and hosts in the setup increases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3551) scaling up VM from small SO to a SO (with 2 GB RAM) is failing ; Unable to scale vm due to Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling V
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harikrishna Patnala reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3551: --- Assignee: Harikrishna Patnala scaling up VM from small SO to a SO (with 2 GB RAM) is failing ; Unable to scale vm due to Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM:i-2-10-VM due to MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory Key: CLOUDSTACK-3551 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3551 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: hypervisor :Xen 6.1 Reporter: prashant kumar mishra Assignee: Harikrishna Patnala Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: XEN_MS_DB.rar Steps to reproduce - 1-prepare a CS setup with xen server(6.1) 2-Deploy a vm with small service offering (cpu=500,RAM=512) 3-create a SO say mem2 (cpu=500 or 1000 and RAM=2048) 4-scaleup vm from small SO to mem2 Expected - Scale up vm should be successful Actual --- Scaling up failed My observation -- - if i try to scale up to a SO (RAM=1.5 GB) ( successful) i see minRam:1610612736,maxRam:1610612736, -for scale up to a SO (RAM= 2GB) i see minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648, (overflow) Logs: --- h overprovisioning: 9576; new used:2500, reserved:0; requested cpu:1000,alloc_from_last:false 2013-07-16 10:06:31,146 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) RAM STATS after allocation: for host: 1, old used: 1476395008, old reserved: 0, total: 16190156800; new used: 3623878656, reserved: 0; requested mem: 2147483648,alloc_from_last:false 2013-07-16 10:06:31,160 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) Seq 1-1237451203: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{com.cloud.agent.api.ScaleVmCommand:{vm:{id:1,name:i-2-10-VM,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:false,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamicallyScaleVm:true},vmName:i-2-10-VM,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 10:06:31,161 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) Seq 1-1237451203: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{com.cloud.agent.api.ScaleVmCommand:{vm:{id:1,name:i-2-10-VM,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:false,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamicallyScaleVm:true},vmName:i-2-10-VM,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:2147483648,maxRam:-2147483648,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 10:06:31,162 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-350:null) Seq 1-1237451203: Executing request 2013-07-16 10:06:31,202 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-1:null) Ping from 3 2013-07-16 10:06:31,364 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-350:null) Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM:i-2-10-VM due to MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy: static_min ⤠dynamic_min ⤠dynamic_max ⤠static_max 2013-07-16 10:06:31,364 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-350:null) Seq 1-1237451203: Response Received: 2013-07-16 10:06:31,365 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (DirectAgent-350:null) Seq 1-1237451203: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, [{com.cloud.agent.api.ScaleVmAnswer:{result:false,details:Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM:i-2-10-VM due to MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy: static_min ⤠dynamic_min ⤠dynamic_max ⤠static_max,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 10:06:31,366 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) Seq 1-1237451203: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, { ScaleVmAnswer } } 2013-07-16 10:06:31,366 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-9:job-47 = [ 1ad7dec8-2fbc-4ef5-a748-928a20d047a7 ]) Unable to scale vm due to Catch exception com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException when scaling VM:i-2-10-VM due to
[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-2297) Delete Account/Domain is not updating the resources usage of the parent domain
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sailaja Mada closed CLOUDSTACK-2297. Reported issue is fixed with 4.2. There are issues with delete account when it has snapshots. That is tracked as a different ticket. Closing this defect. Delete Account/Domain is not updating the resources usage of the parent domain -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-2297 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2297 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Sailaja Mada Assignee: Sanjay Tripathi Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: apilog.log, parentdomainresourcesbeforedelete.png, ROOTDomainusagebeforedelete.png, useraccountbeforedelete.png Setup: Advanced Networking Zone, Xen 6.1 , MS- RHEL 6.3 Steps: 1. Create Child domains under ROOT domain 2. Create user/admin accounts under this child domain 3. Deploy one instance as the child Domain user other instance as one more account. 4. Delete the User Verify the resources usage 5. Delete the Domain Verify the resources usage Observation: Delete Account/Domain is not updating the resources usage of the parent domain -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3500) [Object_Store_Refactor] Deleting snapshots in CS doesn't delete them physically on the secondary storage.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Likitha Shetty reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3500: -- Assignee: Likitha Shetty [Object_Store_Refactor] Deleting snapshots in CS doesn't delete them physically on the secondary storage. -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3500 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3500 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Snapshot Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Primary Storage : iscsii Secondary Storage : NFS Hypervisor : Xen 6.2 Build : CS 4.2 Reporter: Abhinav Roy Assignee: Likitha Shetty Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: CS-3500_apilog, CS-3500_DB.sql, CS-3500_management-server.zip Steps : === 1. Create an Advanced networking setup 2. Deploy a VM. 3. Take a snapshot of the ROOT disk of the VM. 4. Delete the snapshot Expected behaviour : == 1. After step 3 , a snapshot should be created on CS and also a physical disk for that snapshot is created on the secondary storage. 2. After step 4, the physical disk created for the snapshot should be deleted from the secondary storage Observed behaviour : = 1. A snapshot does get created on CS and also a physical disk for that snapshot is created on the secondary storage. 2. But, after deletion of snapshot from CS the physical disk on the secondary storage is not deleted. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-2181) Scale down is allowed when one resource(say cpu) is being scale up and other resource (say ram)is being scale down ;but not allowed when both resources are being sc
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] prashant kumar mishra closed CLOUDSTACK-2181. - passed Scale down is allowed when one resource(say cpu) is being scale up and other resource (say ram)is being scale down ;but not allowed when both resources are being scaledown -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-2181 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2181 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server, XenServer Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: prashant kumar mishra Assignee: Harikrishna Patnala Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: apilog.log, catalina.out, management-server.log, scaleup.png Scale down is not allowed as per FS and condition is valid when you try to scale down both resources (cpu and RAM); but not valid when you try to scale up one resource and scale down other resource Steps to repo -- 1-Deploy a vm with small instance SO 2-create three service offering say a1, a2 ,a3 (a1{cpu=1 GHz,ram=256};a2{cpu=500MGz,ram=512};a3{cpu=300 MGz,ram=256}) 3-try to scaledown to service offering a3 (it will fail with message Only scaling up the vm is supported, new service offering should have both cpu and memory greater than the old values) 4-Try to scaleup to SO a1(successful) 5-Try to scaleup to SO a2 from a1(successful) Expected -- AS per FS scale down should not be allowed in any case Snippet of Log --- --- 1-VM details -- 2013-04-25 08:50:27,150 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-7:job-171) Seq 5-1339424813: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{StartCommand:{vm:{id:29,name:i-2-29-VM,bootloader:PyGrub,type:User,cpus:1,minSpeed:500,maxSpeed:500,minRam:536870912,maxRam:536870912,arch:x86_64,os:CentOS 5.3 (64-bit),bootArgs:,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:false,limitCpuUse:false,vncPassword:f406158baa072feb,params:{},uuid:3355e0f2-d9c7-4fc1-adad-d6337adea271,disks:[{id:39,name:ROOT-29,mountPoint:/export/home/prashant/asfprime,path:d1e10716-38ec-4d02-b785-6d3c9e381779,size:21474836480,type:ROOT,storagePoolType:NetworkFilesystem,storagePoolUuid:59f08402-b4ed-3a26-9d59-eb04cc22886b,deviceId:0},{id:29,name:CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer),size:0,type:ISO,storagePoolType:ISO,deviceId:3}],nics:[{deviceId:0,networkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:true,uuid:e86fb52c-4e3e-4963-99c9-197038404f25,ip:10.1.1.61,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.1.1.1,mac:02:00:73:4c:00:18,dns1:10.103.128.16,broadcastType:Vlan,type:Guest,broadcastUri:vlan://1101,isolationUri:vlan://1101,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false}]},hostIp:10.147.40.8,wait:0}}] } 2013-04-25 08:50:27,153 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-7:job-171) Seq 5-1339424813: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 7635042566263, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{StartCommand:{vm:{id:29,name:i-2-29-VM,bootloader:PyGrub,type:User,cpus:1,minSpeed:500,maxSpeed:500,minRam:536870912,maxRam:536870912,arch:x86_64,os:CentOS 5.3 (64-bit),bootArgs:,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:false,limitCpuUse:false,vncPassword:f406158baa072feb,params:{},uuid:3355e0f2-d9c7-4fc1-adad-d6337adea271,disks:[{id:39,name:ROOT-29,mountPoint:/export/home/prashant/asfprime,path:d1e10716-38ec-4d02-b785-6d3c9e381779,size:21474836480,type:ROOT,storagePoolType:NetworkFilesystem,storagePoolUuid:59f08402-b4ed-3a26-9d59-eb04cc22886b,deviceId:0},{id:29,name:CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer),size:0,type:ISO,storagePoolType:ISO,deviceId:3}],nics:[{deviceId:0,networkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:true,uuid:e86fb52c-4e3e-4963-99c9-197038404f25,ip:10.1.1.61,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.1.1.1,mac:02:00:73:4c:00:18,dns1:10.103.128.16,broadcastType:Vlan,type:Guest,broadcastUri:vlan://1101,isolationUri:vlan://1101,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false}]},hostIp:10.147.40.8,wait:0}}] } 2013-04-25 08:50:27,154 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-29:null) Seq 5-1339424813: Executing request 2013-04-25 08:50:27,236 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-29:null) 1. The VM i-2-29-VM is in Starting state 2-Scale down(cpu and ram) to a3 -- 2013-04-25 08:53:37,706 INFO [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-3:null) Only scaling up the vm is supported, new service offering should have both cpu and memory gre 3-Scale up cpu and scale down ram-SO a1 - 2013-04-25 08:55:33,229 DEBUG
[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-1809) Actual capacity availble for vm deployement in vmware cluster is less than what Dashboard shows (total_capacity in op_host_capacity table)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709654#comment-13709654 ] Nitin Mehta edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-1809 at 7/16/13 10:06 AM: --- This means we are not showing the total capacity for cluster right. I am pasting the text from description for clarification. This will lead to vm deployment failures. This is a severe issue. The vmware expert needs to fix it and ALSO needs to take care of UPGRADE. For vmware cluster(with only one host) vcenter shows total capacity of cluster is (Memory 13431 MB, CPU 7752MHz) which is available for vm deployment and cloud stack shows (Memory 15.99 GB, CPU 9572) . -Due to this calculation difference CS allocator shows capacity is available on host but vm deployment fails with run time error was (Author: nitinme): This means we are not showing the total capacity for cluster right. I am pasting the text from description for clarification. This will lead to vm deployment failures. This is a sever issue. The vmware expert needs to fix it and ALSO needs to take care of UPGRADE. For vmware cluster(with only one host) vcenter shows total capacity of cluster is (Memory 13431 MB, CPU 7752MHz) which is available for vm deployment and cloud stack shows (Memory 15.99 GB, CPU 9572) . -Due to this calculation difference CS allocator shows capacity is available on host but vm deployment fails with run time error Actual capacity availble for vm deployement in vmware cluster is less than what Dashboard shows (total_capacity in op_host_capacity table) --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-1809 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1809 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: VMware Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: vmware Reporter: prashant kumar mishra Assignee: Nitin Mehta Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: DB_Logs.rar, screenshot-1.jpg, screenshot-2.jpg -For vmware cluster(with only one host) vcenter shows total capacity of cluster is (Memory 13431 MB, CPU 7752MHz) which is available for vm deployment and cloud stack shows (Memory 15.99 GB, CPU 9572) . -Due to this calculation difference CS allocator shows capacity is available on host but vm deployment fails with run time error 2013-06-13 12:23:01,945 WARN [vmware.resource.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-141:10.147.40.7) StartCommand failed due to Exception: java.lang.RuntimeException Message: The available CPU resources in the parent resource pool are insufficient for the operation. java.lang.RuntimeException: The available CPU resources in the parent resource pool are insufficient for the operation. DB - mysql select *from op_host_capacity where capacity_type in (0,1)\G; *** 1. row *** id: 1 host_id: 1 data_center_id: 1 pod_id: 1 cluster_id: 1 used_capacity: 6039797760 reserved_capacity: 0 total_capacity: 17169539072 capacity_type: 0 capacity_state: Enabled update_time: 2013-06-13 15:29:33 created: 2013-06-05 16:05:51 *** 2. row *** id: 2 host_id: 1 data_center_id: 1 pod_id: 1 cluster_id: 1 used_capacity: 7700 reserved_capacity: 0 total_capacity: 9572 capacity_type: 1 capacity_state: Enabled update_time: 2013-06-13 15:29:33 created: 2013-06-05 16:05:51 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1809) Actual capacity availble for vm deployement in vmware cluster is less than what Dashboard shows (total_capacity in op_host_capacity table)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709654#comment-13709654 ] Nitin Mehta commented on CLOUDSTACK-1809: - This means we are not showing the total capacity for cluster right. I am pasting the text from description for clarification. This will lead to vm deployment failures. This is a sever issue. The vmware expert needs to fix it and ALSO needs to take care of UPGRADE. For vmware cluster(with only one host) vcenter shows total capacity of cluster is (Memory 13431 MB, CPU 7752MHz) which is available for vm deployment and cloud stack shows (Memory 15.99 GB, CPU 9572) . -Due to this calculation difference CS allocator shows capacity is available on host but vm deployment fails with run time error Actual capacity availble for vm deployement in vmware cluster is less than what Dashboard shows (total_capacity in op_host_capacity table) --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-1809 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1809 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: VMware Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: vmware Reporter: prashant kumar mishra Assignee: Nitin Mehta Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: DB_Logs.rar, screenshot-1.jpg, screenshot-2.jpg -For vmware cluster(with only one host) vcenter shows total capacity of cluster is (Memory 13431 MB, CPU 7752MHz) which is available for vm deployment and cloud stack shows (Memory 15.99 GB, CPU 9572) . -Due to this calculation difference CS allocator shows capacity is available on host but vm deployment fails with run time error 2013-06-13 12:23:01,945 WARN [vmware.resource.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-141:10.147.40.7) StartCommand failed due to Exception: java.lang.RuntimeException Message: The available CPU resources in the parent resource pool are insufficient for the operation. java.lang.RuntimeException: The available CPU resources in the parent resource pool are insufficient for the operation. DB - mysql select *from op_host_capacity where capacity_type in (0,1)\G; *** 1. row *** id: 1 host_id: 1 data_center_id: 1 pod_id: 1 cluster_id: 1 used_capacity: 6039797760 reserved_capacity: 0 total_capacity: 17169539072 capacity_type: 0 capacity_state: Enabled update_time: 2013-06-13 15:29:33 created: 2013-06-05 16:05:51 *** 2. row *** id: 2 host_id: 1 data_center_id: 1 pod_id: 1 cluster_id: 1 used_capacity: 7700 reserved_capacity: 0 total_capacity: 9572 capacity_type: 1 capacity_state: Enabled update_time: 2013-06-13 15:29:33 created: 2013-06-05 16:05:51 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-2184) Failed to scale up number of vcpus;Only scaling up the vm is supported, new service offering should have both cpu and memory greater than the old values
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] prashant kumar mishra closed CLOUDSTACK-2184. - tested on xen 6.1 ; = Tried scaling up from SO(CPU=1000,vcpu=1,RAM=1024) to SO (CPU=1000,vcp=2,RAM=1024) passed. Failed to scale up number of vcpus;Only scaling up the vm is supported, new service offering should have both cpu and memory greater than the old values -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-2184 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2184 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: API, Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: prashant kumar mishra Assignee: Nitin Mehta Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: access_log.2013-04-25.txt, apilog.log, management-server.log, scaleup.png Step to reproduce -- 1-Deploy a vm with service offering small instance(vcpu=1,cpu=500,RAM=512) 2-create a service offering vcpu(vcpu=2,cpu=500,ram=512) 3-Try to scaleup vm to new service offering vcpu Expected - -scaleup should be successful Actual Scaleup failed with message Only scaling up the vm is supported, new service offering should have both cpu and memory greater than the old values Snippet of log 2013-04-25 11:53:50,397 INFO [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-2:null) Only scaling up the vm is supported, new service offering should have both cpu and memory greater than the old values -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3553) [UI]UI remains in the processing state forever when it failed to delete primary storage
Sailaja Mada created CLOUDSTACK-3553: Summary: [UI]UI remains in the processing state forever when it failed to delete primary storage Key: CLOUDSTACK-3553 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3553 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: UI Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Sailaja Mada Priority: Minor Steps: 1. Configure Adv zone with VMWARE 2. Have Primary storage added at the cluster level. 3. Deploy VM's using a new user account 4. Pu the host into maintenance . There are no other storage pools to migrate its volumes 5. Tried to delete primary storage when it has volumes 6. It failed to remove saying 'Cannot delete pool PS1 as there are associated non-destroyed vols for this pool' Observation : But UI remains in the processing state forever when it failed to delete primary storage (Attached the snap) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3553) [UI]UI remains in the processing state forever when it failed to delete primary storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sailaja Mada updated CLOUDSTACK-3553: - Attachment: storageUI.png [UI]UI remains in the processing state forever when it failed to delete primary storage --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3553 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3553 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: UI Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Sailaja Mada Priority: Minor Attachments: storageUI.png Steps: 1. Configure Adv zone with VMWARE 2. Have Primary storage added at the cluster level. 3. Deploy VM's using a new user account 4. Pu the host into maintenance . There are no other storage pools to migrate its volumes 5. Tried to delete primary storage when it has volumes 6. It failed to remove saying 'Cannot delete pool PS1 as there are associated non-destroyed vols for this pool' Observation : But UI remains in the processing state forever when it failed to delete primary storage (Attached the snap) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3369) Autoscaling: Deleting an isolated network of an account deletes also the autoscaling rule for a network associated with another account
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709669#comment-13709669 ] Rajesh Battala commented on CLOUDSTACK-3369: Verified on the lastest 4.2 branch, issue is not reproducible. Will verify on 4.1 and update the findings. Autoscaling: Deleting an isolated network of an account deletes also the autoscaling rule for a network associated with another account --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3369 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3369 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.1.0 Reporter: Francois Gaudreault Assignee: Rajesh Battala Priority: Blocker Hypothesis: - Say you have a Network Offering with NetScaler as external load balancer, and you configure it to be shared. - Say you have two accounts (A and B), and both have a network using that LB offering If you create an autoscaling rule on network associated with account A, and you delete a network associated with account B, it will also delete the autoscaling rule of the network associated with account A. To Reproduce: - Add a NetScaler, and make it shared (not dedicated) - Create a network offering with LB service on the NetScaler - Create a network for Account A using the NS network offering - Create a network for Account B using the same offering - Create an autoscaling rule on network A, and wait until you see VMs spun up by the NS. - Spin a VM on network B, and then destroy that VM - Delete the Network B You should see instances being created with the name VM-Date-NONE. Netscaler Logs: Jul 4 19:48:36 local0.notice 172.30.100.5 Device server_vip_NSSVC_HTTP_x:80(Cloud-VirtualServer-74.121.246.141-80) - State DOWN Jul 4 19:48:36 local0.info 172.30.100.5 User nsroot - Remote_ip 172.30.100.15 - Command rm server autoscale-internal_server_Cloud241781113fa541a8aafb46bb45b8a719 - Status Success Jul 4 19:48:36 local0.info 172.30.100.5 User nsroot - Remote_ip 172.30.100.15 - Command unbind vlan 3654 -ifnum 1/3 -tagged - Status Success Jul 4 19:48:36 local0.info 172.30.100.5 User nsroot - Remote_ip 172.30.100.15 - Command unbind vlan 3654 -IPAddress 10.3.96.69 255.255.240.0 - Status Success Jul 4 19:48:36 local0.info 172.30.100.5 User nsroot - Remote_ip 172.30.100.15 - Command show ns ip 10.3.96.69 - Status Success Jul 4 19:48:36 local0.info 172.30.100.5 Route route(10.3.96.0_255.255.240.0) - State DOWN Jul 4 19:48:36 local0.info 172.30.100.5 User nsroot - Remote_ip 172.30.100.15 - Command rm ns ip 10.3.96.69 - Status Success Jul 4 19:48:36 local0.info 172.30.100.5 User nsroot - Remote_ip 172.30.100.15 - Command show vlan 3654 - Status Success Jul 4 19:48:36 local0.info 172.30.100.5 User nsroot - Remote_ip 172.30.100.15 - Command rm vlan 3654 - Status Success -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2725) [Automation] Re-attaching volume on VM failing in KVM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709684#comment-13709684 ] Wei Zhou commented on CLOUDSTACK-2725: -- Can someone log into the VM , and check if acpiphp module is already loaded? root@NEW:~# lsmod |grep acpiphp acpiphp24231 0 if not, please run modprobe acpiphp, and try again -Wei [Automation] Re-attaching volume on VM failing in KVM - Key: CLOUDSTACK-2725 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2725 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Volumes Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Automation environment KVM Found in master also (8d1189c2ae87216bc1c4a1443f75e9a8629abdc2) Reporter: Rayees Namathponnan Assignee: Fang Wang Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: CLOUDSTACK-2725.rar Below two test case failing from BVT integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes.test_08_resize_volume integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes.test_09_delete_detached_volume Steps to reproduce Step 1 : Create an account, service offering, create volume, create VM Step 2 : Attach volume to VM , Step 3 : Detach volume Step 4 : Attach volume to VM again Actual result Attachment failed with below error 2013-05-28 13:45:39,101 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-98:job-1246) Seq 5-258539658: Rec eived: { Ans: , MgmtId: 29066118877352, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { AttachAnswer } } 2013-05-28 13:45:39,106 ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-98:job-1246) Unexpected e xception while executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.volume.AttachVolumeCmd com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to attach volume: TestDiskServ to VM: ce79edb6- a306-4ac4-95e4-6202800f691e; org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unable to execute QEMU comman d '__com.redhat_drive_add': Duplicate ID 'drive-virtio-disk1' for drive at com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.sendAttachVolumeCommand(VolumeManagerImpl.java:1583) at com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.attachVolumeToVM(VolumeManagerImpl.java:1788) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercep t(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.volume.AttachVolumeCmd.execute(AttachVolumeCmd.java:1 22) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:437) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) 2013-05-28 13:45:39,107 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-98:job-1246) Complete asy nc job-1246, jobStatus: 2, resultCode: 530, result: Error Code: 530 Error text: Failed to attach volume : TestDiskServ to VM: ce79edb6-a306-4ac4-95e4-6202800f691e; org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal erro -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3552) Domain/Account details are not displayed for the implicitly dedicated hosts neither in UI nor in DB.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devdeep Singh reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3552: - Assignee: Devdeep Singh Domain/Account details are not displayed for the implicitly dedicated hosts neither in UI nor in DB. Key: CLOUDSTACK-3552 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3552 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Kiran Koneti Assignee: Devdeep Singh Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 When a host is implicitly dedicated to an domain/account then the dedication details for that particular account is not recorded neither in DB nor in UI. The op_host_planner_reservation; shows the details as of weather a host is dedicated or not but it doesn't make a note of to which account it is dedicated . The op_host_planner_reservation; table details are as below: mysql select * from op_host_planner_reservation; +++++-++ | id | data_center_id | pod_id | cluster_id | host_id | resource_usage | +++++-++ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Shared | +++++-++ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) This will be an issue when the number of accounts and hosts in the setup increases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3552) Domain/Account details are not displayed for the implicitly dedicated hosts neither in UI nor in DB.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devdeep Singh resolved CLOUDSTACK-3552. --- Resolution: Won't Fix op_host_planner_reservation table is meant for internal house keeping and it doesn't hold the information on who the resource is dedicated too. It is used by the deployment planning manager to make sure that when a vm deployment request is placed and a dedicated resource isn't asked for; a resource explicitly/implicitly dedicated to an account isn't picked up. When a host is implicitly dedicated the information isn't persisted in the db. This is done to make sure when the last instance/vm is removed from the host, the host automatically becomes available to the free pool. Right now there isn't any use case that requires for information on an implicitly dedicated host to be persisted. Domain/Account details are not displayed for the implicitly dedicated hosts neither in UI nor in DB. Key: CLOUDSTACK-3552 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3552 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Kiran Koneti Assignee: Devdeep Singh Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.0 When a host is implicitly dedicated to an domain/account then the dedication details for that particular account is not recorded neither in DB nor in UI. The op_host_planner_reservation; shows the details as of weather a host is dedicated or not but it doesn't make a note of to which account it is dedicated . The op_host_planner_reservation; table details are as below: mysql select * from op_host_planner_reservation; +++++-++ | id | data_center_id | pod_id | cluster_id | host_id | resource_usage | +++++-++ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Shared | +++++-++ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) This will be an issue when the number of accounts and hosts in the setup increases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3513) [Automation] Failed to copy iso and template between zones
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jayapal Reddy reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3513: - Assignee: (was: Jayapal Reddy) [Automation] Failed to copy iso and template between zones -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3513 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3513 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Automation, ISO, Template Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: 4.2 Automation Reporter: Rayees Namathponnan Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: CLOUDSTACK-3513.rar bvt test cases failed 1) integration.smoke.test_templates.TestTemplates.test_06_copy_template 2) integration.smoke.test_iso.TestISO.test_06_copy_iso Steps to reproduce 1) Register ISO 2) copy ISO to another zone 3) iso not getting copied to second zone, i didnt observe any error in ms log, please see the attached log. Job 220 i didnt see any response (job 220) even after 5 minute 2013-07-13 02:52:00,982 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-108:job-220 = [ ccea3738-731d-4745-bdd0-5d81bbf126b6 ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.iso.Cop yIsoCmd for job-220 = [ ccea3738-731d-4745-bdd0-5d81bbf126b6 ] 2013-07-13 02:52:00,985 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-9:null) submit async job-220 = [ ccea3738-731d-4745-bdd0-5d81bbf126b6 ], details: AsyncJobVO {id:220, userId: 2 , accountId: 2, sessionKey: null, instanceType: Template, instanceId: 209, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.iso.CopyIsoCmd, cmdOriginator: null, cmdInfo: {id:b1106f0c-d183-4c75 -99ae-02993d3a91c7,response:json,sessionkey:blwF0jxkh/BXBlAaOW4fzjITizc\u003d,destzoneid:cfd13d3f-38dd-4ccf-baea-dc5d859dbdea,cmdEventType:TEMPLATE.COPY,ctxUserId:2,htt pmethod:GET,_:1373698373159,ctxAccountId:2,sourcezoneid:b76325a6-71dc-486d-98cd-346ea1c3a511,ctxStartEventId:915}, cmdVersion: 0, callbackType: 0, callbackAddress: null, s tatus: 0, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 29066118877352, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null} 2013-07-13 02:52:00,988 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-9:null) ===END=== 10.216.51.171 -- GET command=copyIsoid=b1106f0c-d183-4c75-99ae-02993d3a91c7sourcezoneid=b76325a6-71d c-486d-98cd-346ea1c3a511destzoneid=cfd13d3f-38dd-4ccf-baea-dc5d859dbdearesponse=jsonsessionkey=blwF0jxkh%2FBXBlAaOW4fzjITizc%3D_=1373698373159 2013-07-13 02:52:01,010 DEBUG [storage.image.TemplateDataFactoryImpl] (Job-Executor-108:job-220 = [ ccea3738-731d-4745-bdd0-5d81bbf126b6 ]) template 209 is not in store:2, type:Image 2013-07-13 02:52:01,035 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-108:job-220 = [ ccea3738-731d-4745-bdd0-5d81bbf126b6 ]) Seq 10-544932010: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 29066118877352, via: 10, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadCommand:{hvm:true,description:test,checksum:b11099d68763f87ee90eab7af1d4dd1e,maxDownloadSizeInBytes:53687091200,id:209,resourceType:TEMPLATE,installPath:template/tmpl/2/209,_store:{com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO:{_url:nfs://10.223.110.232:/export/home/rayees/SC_QA_AUTO4/secondary3,_role:Image}},url:http://people.apache.org/~tsp/dummy.iso,format:ISO,accountId:2,name:209-2-f327a840-fc0b-3784-b292-b04cf483c01e,secUrl:nfs://10.223.110.232:/export/home/rayees/SC_QA_AUTO4/secondary3,wait:0}}] } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3513) [Automation] Failed to copy iso and template between zones
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709697#comment-13709697 ] Jayapal Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-3513: --- looked at the logs. The copyIsoCmd got executed and ISO copied successfully. Due to some reason the async job not returned result. 2013-07-13 02:52:04,279 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-9:null) Seq 10-544932010: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 29066118877352, via: 10, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, [{com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer:{jobId:cc1f16b9-abb6-4129-ab6b-0f9b816481b5,downloadPct:100,errorString:Install completed successfully at 7/13/13 1:53 PM,downloadStatus:DOWNLOADED,downloadPath:/mnt/SecStorage/b3d8be18-cb6f-3033-bb2c-88e079d0ff31/template/tmpl/2/209/dnld2066499795727855873tmp_,installPath:template/tmpl/2/209/209-2-f327a840-fc0b-3784-b292-b04cf483c01e.iso,templateSize:360448,templatePhySicalSize:360448,checkSum:b11099d68763f87ee90eab7af1d4dd1e,result:true,details:Install completed successfully at 7/13/13 1:53 PM,wait:0}}] } [Automation] Failed to copy iso and template between zones -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3513 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3513 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Automation, ISO, Template Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: 4.2 Automation Reporter: Rayees Namathponnan Assignee: Jayapal Reddy Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: CLOUDSTACK-3513.rar bvt test cases failed 1) integration.smoke.test_templates.TestTemplates.test_06_copy_template 2) integration.smoke.test_iso.TestISO.test_06_copy_iso Steps to reproduce 1) Register ISO 2) copy ISO to another zone 3) iso not getting copied to second zone, i didnt observe any error in ms log, please see the attached log. Job 220 i didnt see any response (job 220) even after 5 minute 2013-07-13 02:52:00,982 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-108:job-220 = [ ccea3738-731d-4745-bdd0-5d81bbf126b6 ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.iso.Cop yIsoCmd for job-220 = [ ccea3738-731d-4745-bdd0-5d81bbf126b6 ] 2013-07-13 02:52:00,985 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-9:null) submit async job-220 = [ ccea3738-731d-4745-bdd0-5d81bbf126b6 ], details: AsyncJobVO {id:220, userId: 2 , accountId: 2, sessionKey: null, instanceType: Template, instanceId: 209, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.iso.CopyIsoCmd, cmdOriginator: null, cmdInfo: {id:b1106f0c-d183-4c75 -99ae-02993d3a91c7,response:json,sessionkey:blwF0jxkh/BXBlAaOW4fzjITizc\u003d,destzoneid:cfd13d3f-38dd-4ccf-baea-dc5d859dbdea,cmdEventType:TEMPLATE.COPY,ctxUserId:2,htt pmethod:GET,_:1373698373159,ctxAccountId:2,sourcezoneid:b76325a6-71dc-486d-98cd-346ea1c3a511,ctxStartEventId:915}, cmdVersion: 0, callbackType: 0, callbackAddress: null, s tatus: 0, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 29066118877352, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null} 2013-07-13 02:52:00,988 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-9:null) ===END=== 10.216.51.171 -- GET command=copyIsoid=b1106f0c-d183-4c75-99ae-02993d3a91c7sourcezoneid=b76325a6-71d c-486d-98cd-346ea1c3a511destzoneid=cfd13d3f-38dd-4ccf-baea-dc5d859dbdearesponse=jsonsessionkey=blwF0jxkh%2FBXBlAaOW4fzjITizc%3D_=1373698373159 2013-07-13 02:52:01,010 DEBUG [storage.image.TemplateDataFactoryImpl] (Job-Executor-108:job-220 = [ ccea3738-731d-4745-bdd0-5d81bbf126b6 ]) template 209 is not in store:2, type:Image 2013-07-13 02:52:01,035 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-108:job-220 = [ ccea3738-731d-4745-bdd0-5d81bbf126b6 ]) Seq 10-544932010: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 29066118877352, via: 10, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadCommand:{hvm:true,description:test,checksum:b11099d68763f87ee90eab7af1d4dd1e,maxDownloadSizeInBytes:53687091200,id:209,resourceType:TEMPLATE,installPath:template/tmpl/2/209,_store:{com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO:{_url:nfs://10.223.110.232:/export/home/rayees/SC_QA_AUTO4/secondary3,_role:Image}},url:http://people.apache.org/~tsp/dummy.iso,format:ISO,accountId:2,name:209-2-f327a840-fc0b-3784-b292-b04cf483c01e,secUrl:nfs://10.223.110.232:/export/home/rayees/SC_QA_AUTO4/secondary3,wait:0}}] } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3554) NPE while attaching VMWARE Tools ISO to the instance
Sailaja Mada created CLOUDSTACK-3554: Summary: NPE while attaching VMWARE Tools ISO to the instance Key: CLOUDSTACK-3554 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3554 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Sailaja Mada Priority: Blocker Steps: 1. Configure Adv Zone with VMWARE 2. Deploy instance with newly added account 3. Tried to attach VMWARE tools iso to this instance Observation: It failed with NPE: 2013-07-16 17:22:43,089 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-18:null) ===START=== 10.144.6.19 -- GET command=attachIsovirtualmachineid=0f7b7a84-2325-4100-817a-e63e216c2b75id=e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993response=jsonsessionkey=5vYbKOzqMAqkmN9vVQ%2F695HcVDs%3D_=1373975773858 2013-07-16 17:22:43,146 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-18:null) submit async job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ], details: AsyncJobVO {id:77, userId: 8, accountId: 8, sessionKey: null, instanceType: None, instanceId: null, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.iso.AttachIsoCmd, cmdOriginator: null, cmdInfo: {id:e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993,response:json,sessionkey:5vYbKOzqMAqkmN9vVQ/695HcVDs\u003d,virtualmachineid:0f7b7a84-2325-4100-817a-e63e216c2b75,cmdEventType:ISO.ATTACH,ctxUserId:8,httpmethod:GET,_:1373975773858,ctxAccountId:8,ctxStartEventId:299}, cmdVersion: 0, callbackType: 0, callbackAddress: null, status: 0, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 187767034175903, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null} 2013-07-16 17:22:43,149 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-18:null) ===END=== 10.144.6.19 -- GET command=attachIsovirtualmachineid=0f7b7a84-2325-4100-817a-e63e216c2b75id=e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993response=jsonsessionkey=5vYbKOzqMAqkmN9vVQ%2F695HcVDs%3D_=1373975773858 2013-07-16 17:22:43,152 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.iso.AttachIsoCmd for job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ] 2013-07-16 17:22:43,186 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Access to Tmpl[200-ISO-vmware-tools.iso granted to Acct[8-dc2user1] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_1028f2c 2013-07-16 17:22:43,188 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Access to VM[User|dc2user1i1] granted to Acct[8-dc2user1] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_1028f2c 2013-07-16 17:22:43,192 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Access to Tmpl[200-ISO-vmware-tools.iso granted to Acct[8-dc2user1] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_1028f2c 2013-07-16 17:22:43,194 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Access to VM[User|dc2user1i1] granted to Acct[8-dc2user1] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_1028f2c 2013-07-16 17:22:43,209 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Seq 4-1669464340: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 187767034175903, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.AttachCommand:{disk:{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{uuid:e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993,id:200,format:ISO,accountId:1,hvm:true,displayText:VMware Tools Installer ISO,name:vmware-tools.iso}},type:ISO},vmName:i-8-13-VM,_storagePort:0,_managed:false,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 17:22:43,210 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Seq 4-1669464340: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 187767034175903, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.AttachCommand:{disk:{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{uuid:e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993,id:200,format:ISO,accountId:1,hvm:true,displayText:VMware Tools Installer ISO,name:vmware-tools.iso}},type:ISO},vmName:i-8-13-VM,_storagePort:0,_managed:false,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 17:22:43,211 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-191:null) Seq 4-1669464340: Executing request 2013-07-16 17:22:43,211 DEBUG [vmware.mo.HostMO] (DirectAgent-191:10.102.192.23) find VM i-8-13-VM on host 2013-07-16 17:22:43,211 DEBUG [vmware.mo.HostMO] (DirectAgent-191:10.102.192.23) load VM cache on host 2013-07-16 17:22:43,221 ERROR [storage.resource.VmwareStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-191:10.102.192.23) AttachIsoCommand(attach) failed due to Exception: java.lang.NullPointerException
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3554) NPE while attaching VMWARE Tools ISO to the instance
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sailaja Mada updated CLOUDSTACK-3554: - Fix Version/s: 4.2.0 NPE while attaching VMWARE Tools ISO to the instance - Key: CLOUDSTACK-3554 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3554 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Sailaja Mada Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 Steps: 1. Configure Adv Zone with VMWARE 2. Deploy instance with newly added account 3. Tried to attach VMWARE tools iso to this instance Observation: It failed with NPE: 2013-07-16 17:22:43,089 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-18:null) ===START=== 10.144.6.19 -- GET command=attachIsovirtualmachineid=0f7b7a84-2325-4100-817a-e63e216c2b75id=e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993response=jsonsessionkey=5vYbKOzqMAqkmN9vVQ%2F695HcVDs%3D_=1373975773858 2013-07-16 17:22:43,146 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-18:null) submit async job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ], details: AsyncJobVO {id:77, userId: 8, accountId: 8, sessionKey: null, instanceType: None, instanceId: null, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.iso.AttachIsoCmd, cmdOriginator: null, cmdInfo: {id:e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993,response:json,sessionkey:5vYbKOzqMAqkmN9vVQ/695HcVDs\u003d,virtualmachineid:0f7b7a84-2325-4100-817a-e63e216c2b75,cmdEventType:ISO.ATTACH,ctxUserId:8,httpmethod:GET,_:1373975773858,ctxAccountId:8,ctxStartEventId:299}, cmdVersion: 0, callbackType: 0, callbackAddress: null, status: 0, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 187767034175903, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null} 2013-07-16 17:22:43,149 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-18:null) ===END=== 10.144.6.19 -- GET command=attachIsovirtualmachineid=0f7b7a84-2325-4100-817a-e63e216c2b75id=e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993response=jsonsessionkey=5vYbKOzqMAqkmN9vVQ%2F695HcVDs%3D_=1373975773858 2013-07-16 17:22:43,152 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.iso.AttachIsoCmd for job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ] 2013-07-16 17:22:43,186 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Access to Tmpl[200-ISO-vmware-tools.iso granted to Acct[8-dc2user1] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_1028f2c 2013-07-16 17:22:43,188 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Access to VM[User|dc2user1i1] granted to Acct[8-dc2user1] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_1028f2c 2013-07-16 17:22:43,192 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Access to Tmpl[200-ISO-vmware-tools.iso granted to Acct[8-dc2user1] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_1028f2c 2013-07-16 17:22:43,194 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Access to VM[User|dc2user1i1] granted to Acct[8-dc2user1] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_1028f2c 2013-07-16 17:22:43,209 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Seq 4-1669464340: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 187767034175903, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.AttachCommand:{disk:{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{uuid:e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993,id:200,format:ISO,accountId:1,hvm:true,displayText:VMware Tools Installer ISO,name:vmware-tools.iso}},type:ISO},vmName:i-8-13-VM,_storagePort:0,_managed:false,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 17:22:43,210 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Seq 4-1669464340: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 187767034175903, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.AttachCommand:{disk:{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{uuid:e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993,id:200,format:ISO,accountId:1,hvm:true,displayText:VMware Tools Installer ISO,name:vmware-tools.iso}},type:ISO},vmName:i-8-13-VM,_storagePort:0,_managed:false,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 17:22:43,211 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-191:null) Seq 4-1669464340: Executing request 2013-07-16 17:22:43,211 DEBUG [vmware.mo.HostMO] (DirectAgent-191:10.102.192.23) find VM i-8-13-VM on host
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3554) NPE while attaching VMWARE Tools ISO to the instance
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sailaja Mada updated CLOUDSTACK-3554: - Attachment: management-server.log apilog.log NPE while attaching VMWARE Tools ISO to the instance - Key: CLOUDSTACK-3554 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3554 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Sailaja Mada Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: apilog.log, management-server.log Steps: 1. Configure Adv Zone with VMWARE 2. Deploy instance with newly added account 3. Tried to attach VMWARE tools iso to this instance Observation: It failed with NPE: 2013-07-16 17:22:43,089 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-18:null) ===START=== 10.144.6.19 -- GET command=attachIsovirtualmachineid=0f7b7a84-2325-4100-817a-e63e216c2b75id=e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993response=jsonsessionkey=5vYbKOzqMAqkmN9vVQ%2F695HcVDs%3D_=1373975773858 2013-07-16 17:22:43,146 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-18:null) submit async job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ], details: AsyncJobVO {id:77, userId: 8, accountId: 8, sessionKey: null, instanceType: None, instanceId: null, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.iso.AttachIsoCmd, cmdOriginator: null, cmdInfo: {id:e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993,response:json,sessionkey:5vYbKOzqMAqkmN9vVQ/695HcVDs\u003d,virtualmachineid:0f7b7a84-2325-4100-817a-e63e216c2b75,cmdEventType:ISO.ATTACH,ctxUserId:8,httpmethod:GET,_:1373975773858,ctxAccountId:8,ctxStartEventId:299}, cmdVersion: 0, callbackType: 0, callbackAddress: null, status: 0, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 187767034175903, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null} 2013-07-16 17:22:43,149 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-18:null) ===END=== 10.144.6.19 -- GET command=attachIsovirtualmachineid=0f7b7a84-2325-4100-817a-e63e216c2b75id=e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993response=jsonsessionkey=5vYbKOzqMAqkmN9vVQ%2F695HcVDs%3D_=1373975773858 2013-07-16 17:22:43,152 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.iso.AttachIsoCmd for job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ] 2013-07-16 17:22:43,186 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Access to Tmpl[200-ISO-vmware-tools.iso granted to Acct[8-dc2user1] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_1028f2c 2013-07-16 17:22:43,188 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Access to VM[User|dc2user1i1] granted to Acct[8-dc2user1] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_1028f2c 2013-07-16 17:22:43,192 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Access to Tmpl[200-ISO-vmware-tools.iso granted to Acct[8-dc2user1] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_1028f2c 2013-07-16 17:22:43,194 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Access to VM[User|dc2user1i1] granted to Acct[8-dc2user1] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_1028f2c 2013-07-16 17:22:43,209 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Seq 4-1669464340: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 187767034175903, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.AttachCommand:{disk:{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{uuid:e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993,id:200,format:ISO,accountId:1,hvm:true,displayText:VMware Tools Installer ISO,name:vmware-tools.iso}},type:ISO},vmName:i-8-13-VM,_storagePort:0,_managed:false,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 17:22:43,210 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-18:job-77 = [ 24362d6b-4eb7-48d0-893a-2ac61fa84d5e ]) Seq 4-1669464340: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 187767034175903, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.AttachCommand:{disk:{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{uuid:e09209bc-4731-4aac-b65e-00aed3540993,id:200,format:ISO,accountId:1,hvm:true,displayText:VMware Tools Installer ISO,name:vmware-tools.iso}},type:ISO},vmName:i-8-13-VM,_storagePort:0,_managed:false,wait:0}}] } 2013-07-16 17:22:43,211 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-191:null) Seq 4-1669464340: Executing request 2013-07-16
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2433) Enable rps and rfs support on virtual router.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709709#comment-13709709 ] Jayapal Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-2433: --- Please find the below test results for the RPS/RFS. Created the VR with 4 cores and 1 MB RAM. netperf command: netperf -H 10.146.0.134 -l 60 -n 4 netserver is running two hosts 10.146.0.134 and 10.147.59.206. From the VR run netperf command to send traffic to two netservers parallel. With the basic tests I could not see big difference in the results. Run the netperf command by changing the various options but in my test setup I did not much difference. With RPS/RFS enable == echo f /sys/class/net/eth0/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus echo 256 /proc/sys/net/core/rps_sock_flow_entries echo 256 /sys/class/net/eth0/queues/rx-0/rps_flow_cnt TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 10.147.59.206 (10.147.59.206) port 0 AF_INET : demo TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 10.146.0.134 (10.146.0.134) port 0 AF_INET : demo Recv SendSend Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size SizeSize Time Throughput bytes bytes bytessecs.10^6bits/sec 87380 16384 1638460.02 423.40 Recv SendSend Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size SizeSize Time Throughput bytes bytes bytessecs.10^6bits/sec 87380 16384 1638460.81 8.20 With RPS/RFS DISABLE: === TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 10.146.0.134 (10.146.0.134) port 0 AF_INET : demo TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 10.147.59.206 (10.147.59.206) port 0 AF_INET : demo root@systemvm:~# Recv SendSend Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size SizeSize Time Throughput #!/bin/sh bytes bytes bytessecs.10^6bits/sec 87380 16384 1638460.03 394.06 Recv SendSend Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size SizeSize Time Throughput bytes bytes bytessecs.10^6bits/sec 87380 16384 1638460.96 8.19 Enable rps and rfs support on virtual router. - Key: CLOUDSTACK-2433 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2433 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Network Devices Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Bharat Kumar Assignee: Jayapal Reddy Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.2.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3489) Failed to start VR due to error in finalizeStart with KVM hypervisor
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjeev N resolved CLOUDSTACK-3489. --- Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Not able to reproduce the issue. Could be setup issue or might have fixed part of the bug fix CLOUDSTACK-3425 Failed to start VR due to error in finalizeStart with KVM hypervisor Key: CLOUDSTACK-3489 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3489 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Latest build from ACS 4.2 branch. Zone: Advanced with KVM cluster Stoarage: S3 and Local storage Reporter: Sanjeev N Assignee: Kishan Kavala Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: management-server.rar Failed to start VR due to error in finalizeStart with KVM hypervisor: KVM routing template being used: systemvmtemplate-2013-06-25-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 Steps to Reproduce: 1.Bring up CS in advanced zone with KVM cluster 2.Use s3 as the secondary storage and Local storage as the primary storage 3.Use default cent os template to deploy guest vm Observations: === VR was started as part of vm deployment process and it remained in starting state for a while. However later it was stopped with following exceptions: com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:4] is unreachable: Host 4: Unable to start instance due to Unable to start VM[DomainRouter|r-13-VM] due to error in finalizeStart, not retrying at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:944) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:557) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.start(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:2727) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.startVirtualRouter(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:1867) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.startRouter(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3124) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.startRouter(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3074) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.router.StartRouterCmd.execute(StartRouterCmd.java:110) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:531) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) Caused by: com.cloud.utils.exception.ExecutionException: Unable to start VM[DomainRouter|r-13-VM] due to error in finalizeStart, not retrying at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:911) ... 19 more 2013-07-12 02:38:24,430 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-8:job-32 = [ c1b6d349-4797-484e-a2e0-dfacce3c6209 ]) Complete async job-32 = [ c1b6d349-4797-484e-a2e0-dfacce3c6209 ], jobStatus: 2, resultCode: 530, result: Error Code: 530 Error text: Resource [Host:4] is unreachable: Host 4: Unable to start instance due to Unable to start VM[DomainRouter|r-13-VM] due to error in finalizeStart, not retrying Few more log snippets from mgmt server log file: 2013-07-12 02:36:21,128 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-4:null) Seq 4-691668978: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 6615759585382, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, [{com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer:{vm:{id:13,name:r-13-VM,type:DomainRouter,cpus:1,minSpeed:500,maxSpeed:500,minRam:134217728,maxRam:134217728,arch:x86_64,os:Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 (32-bit),bootArgs: template=domP name=r-13-VM eth2ip=10.147.48.5 eth2mask=255.255.255.0 gateway=10.147.48.1 eth0ip=10.1.1.1 eth0mask=255.255.255.0 domain=cs2cloud.internal dhcprange=10.1.1.1 eth1ip=169.254.1.161 eth1mask=255.255.0.0 type=router disable_rp_filter=true
[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-3489) Failed to start VR due to error in finalizeStart with KVM hypervisor
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjeev N closed CLOUDSTACK-3489. - Failed to start VR due to error in finalizeStart with KVM hypervisor Key: CLOUDSTACK-3489 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3489 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Latest build from ACS 4.2 branch. Zone: Advanced with KVM cluster Stoarage: S3 and Local storage Reporter: Sanjeev N Assignee: Kishan Kavala Fix For: 4.2.0 Attachments: management-server.rar Failed to start VR due to error in finalizeStart with KVM hypervisor: KVM routing template being used: systemvmtemplate-2013-06-25-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 Steps to Reproduce: 1.Bring up CS in advanced zone with KVM cluster 2.Use s3 as the secondary storage and Local storage as the primary storage 3.Use default cent os template to deploy guest vm Observations: === VR was started as part of vm deployment process and it remained in starting state for a while. However later it was stopped with following exceptions: com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:4] is unreachable: Host 4: Unable to start instance due to Unable to start VM[DomainRouter|r-13-VM] due to error in finalizeStart, not retrying at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:944) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:557) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.start(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:2727) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.startVirtualRouter(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:1867) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.startRouter(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3124) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.startRouter(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3074) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.router.StartRouterCmd.execute(StartRouterCmd.java:110) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:155) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:531) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) Caused by: com.cloud.utils.exception.ExecutionException: Unable to start VM[DomainRouter|r-13-VM] due to error in finalizeStart, not retrying at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:911) ... 19 more 2013-07-12 02:38:24,430 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-8:job-32 = [ c1b6d349-4797-484e-a2e0-dfacce3c6209 ]) Complete async job-32 = [ c1b6d349-4797-484e-a2e0-dfacce3c6209 ], jobStatus: 2, resultCode: 530, result: Error Code: 530 Error text: Resource [Host:4] is unreachable: Host 4: Unable to start instance due to Unable to start VM[DomainRouter|r-13-VM] due to error in finalizeStart, not retrying Few more log snippets from mgmt server log file: 2013-07-12 02:36:21,128 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-4:null) Seq 4-691668978: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 6615759585382, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, [{com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer:{vm:{id:13,name:r-13-VM,type:DomainRouter,cpus:1,minSpeed:500,maxSpeed:500,minRam:134217728,maxRam:134217728,arch:x86_64,os:Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 (32-bit),bootArgs: template=domP name=r-13-VM eth2ip=10.147.48.5 eth2mask=255.255.255.0 gateway=10.147.48.1 eth0ip=10.1.1.1 eth0mask=255.255.255.0 domain=cs2cloud.internal dhcprange=10.1.1.1 eth1ip=169.254.1.161 eth1mask=255.255.0.0 type=router disable_rp_filter=true
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3555) [VMWARE]Newly registered Templates size is set to zero after download is complete
Sailaja Mada created CLOUDSTACK-3555: Summary: [VMWARE]Newly registered Templates size is set to zero after download is complete Key: CLOUDSTACK-3555 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3555 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Sailaja Mada Priority: Critical Steps: 1. Configure Adv Zone with VMWARE 2. Register new Cent OS template 3. Deployed VM using this instance 4. Check the size of the template from template_store_ref table 5. Check the size of the ROOT disk of the instance which is created using this template Observations : 1. Template size is set to 0 for template 2. ROOT disk size is set to 0 which is created using this template. Note: This is not observed with Xenserver mysql select * from template_store_ref\G; *** 1. row *** id: 3 store_id: 1 template_id: 8 created: 2013-07-15 10:24:22 last_updated: 2013-07-16 09:31:11 job_id: NULL download_pct: 100 size: 2097152000 store_role: Image physical_size: 283761664 download_state: DOWNLOADED error_str: NULL local_path: NULL install_path: template/tmpl/1/8/8f42153d-a165-43c2-ad24-7e7328a37e6b.ova url: http://download.cloud.com/templates/burbank/burbank-systemvm-08012012.ova state: Ready destroyed: 0 is_copy: 0 update_count: 0 ref_cnt: 0 updated: NULL *** 2. row *** id: 17 store_id: 1 template_id: 204 created: 2013-07-16 09:31:11 last_updated: 2013-07-16 09:33:35 job_id: b8b85c0c-12fa-46fb-bd43-2e772b7c86fb download_pct: 100 size: 0 store_role: Image physical_size: 0 download_state: DOWNLOADED error_str: Install completed successfully at 7/16/13 9:03 AM local_path: /mnt/SecStorage/756c37ec-129a-3615-a376-c8f1f77fa7aa/template/tmpl/2/204/dnld6479285553744159047tmp_ install_path: template/tmpl/2/204/2b8a6845-d031-3d17-927c-ce1dbcb96426.ova url: NULL state: Ready destroyed: 0 is_copy: 0 update_count: 3 ref_cnt: 0 updated: 2013-07-16 09:33:35 *** 4. row *** id: 19 store_id: 1 template_id: 203 created: 2013-07-16 09:31:12 last_updated: 2013-07-16 09:34:16 job_id: 7e1178cf-e9a8-4c8f-b4ad-381b2561250d download_pct: 100 size: 0 store_role: Image physical_size: 0 download_state: DOWNLOADED error_str: Install completed successfully at 7/16/13 9:04 AM local_path: /mnt/SecStorage/756c37ec-129a-3615-a376-c8f1f77fa7aa/template/tmpl/2/203/dnld3848286103866238688tmp_ install_path: template/tmpl/2/203/9894babd-8cbc-332a-8fc7-609c66834716.ova url: NULL state: Ready destroyed: 0 is_copy: 0 update_count: 3 ref_cnt: 0 updated: 2013-07-16 09:34:16 *** 5. row *** id: 20 store_id: 1 template_id: 205 created: 2013-07-16 11:48:23 last_updated: 2013-07-16 11:55:29 job_id: d49bdb7a-3ea1-4db2-b07b-e35842a23229 download_pct: 100 size: 0 store_role: Image physical_size: 0 download_state: DOWNLOADED error_str: Install completed successfully at 7/16/13 11:25 AM local_path: /mnt/SecStorage/756c37ec-129a-3615-a376-c8f1f77fa7aa/template/tmpl/2/205/dnld599624653636661815tmp_ install_path: template/tmpl/2/205/5573cdd7-94f5-3693-9ec7-7f0f5c341753.ova url: NULL state: Ready destroyed: 0 is_copy: 0 update_count: 3 ref_cnt: 0 updated: 2013-07-16 11:55:29 5 rows in set (0.00 sec) ROOT volume: *** 21. row *** id: 21 account_id: 8 domain_id: 6 pool_id: 7 last_pool_id: NULL instance_id: 13 device_id: 0 name: ROOT-13 uuid: 953256f2-ace0-41d3-a7a5-2c7db77cbeb7 size: 0 folder: NULL path: ROOT-13-21 pod_id: NULL data_center_id: 1 iscsi_name: NULL host_ip: NULL volume_type: ROOT pool_type: NULL disk_offering_id: 1 template_id: 204 first_snapshot_backup_uuid: NULL recreatable: 0 created: 2013-07-16 11:08:42 attached: NULL updated: 2013-07-16 11:10:45
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3555) [VMWARE]Newly registered Templates size is set to zero after download is complete
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sailaja Mada updated CLOUDSTACK-3555: - Attachment: ROOTvolUI.png [VMWARE]Newly registered Templates size is set to zero after download is complete --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3555 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3555 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Sailaja Mada Priority: Critical Attachments: ROOTvolUI.png Steps: 1. Configure Adv Zone with VMWARE 2. Register new Cent OS template 3. Deployed VM using this instance 4. Check the size of the template from template_store_ref table 5. Check the size of the ROOT disk of the instance which is created using this template Observations : 1. Template size is set to 0 for template 2. ROOT disk size is set to 0 which is created using this template. Note: This is not observed with Xenserver mysql select * from template_store_ref\G; *** 1. row *** id: 3 store_id: 1 template_id: 8 created: 2013-07-15 10:24:22 last_updated: 2013-07-16 09:31:11 job_id: NULL download_pct: 100 size: 2097152000 store_role: Image physical_size: 283761664 download_state: DOWNLOADED error_str: NULL local_path: NULL install_path: template/tmpl/1/8/8f42153d-a165-43c2-ad24-7e7328a37e6b.ova url: http://download.cloud.com/templates/burbank/burbank-systemvm-08012012.ova state: Ready destroyed: 0 is_copy: 0 update_count: 0 ref_cnt: 0 updated: NULL *** 2. row *** id: 17 store_id: 1 template_id: 204 created: 2013-07-16 09:31:11 last_updated: 2013-07-16 09:33:35 job_id: b8b85c0c-12fa-46fb-bd43-2e772b7c86fb download_pct: 100 size: 0 store_role: Image physical_size: 0 download_state: DOWNLOADED error_str: Install completed successfully at 7/16/13 9:03 AM local_path: /mnt/SecStorage/756c37ec-129a-3615-a376-c8f1f77fa7aa/template/tmpl/2/204/dnld6479285553744159047tmp_ install_path: template/tmpl/2/204/2b8a6845-d031-3d17-927c-ce1dbcb96426.ova url: NULL state: Ready destroyed: 0 is_copy: 0 update_count: 3 ref_cnt: 0 updated: 2013-07-16 09:33:35 *** 4. row *** id: 19 store_id: 1 template_id: 203 created: 2013-07-16 09:31:12 last_updated: 2013-07-16 09:34:16 job_id: 7e1178cf-e9a8-4c8f-b4ad-381b2561250d download_pct: 100 size: 0 store_role: Image physical_size: 0 download_state: DOWNLOADED error_str: Install completed successfully at 7/16/13 9:04 AM local_path: /mnt/SecStorage/756c37ec-129a-3615-a376-c8f1f77fa7aa/template/tmpl/2/203/dnld3848286103866238688tmp_ install_path: template/tmpl/2/203/9894babd-8cbc-332a-8fc7-609c66834716.ova url: NULL state: Ready destroyed: 0 is_copy: 0 update_count: 3 ref_cnt: 0 updated: 2013-07-16 09:34:16 *** 5. row *** id: 20 store_id: 1 template_id: 205 created: 2013-07-16 11:48:23 last_updated: 2013-07-16 11:55:29 job_id: d49bdb7a-3ea1-4db2-b07b-e35842a23229 download_pct: 100 size: 0 store_role: Image physical_size: 0 download_state: DOWNLOADED error_str: Install completed successfully at 7/16/13 11:25 AM local_path: /mnt/SecStorage/756c37ec-129a-3615-a376-c8f1f77fa7aa/template/tmpl/2/205/dnld599624653636661815tmp_ install_path: template/tmpl/2/205/5573cdd7-94f5-3693-9ec7-7f0f5c341753.ova url: NULL state: Ready destroyed: 0 is_copy: 0 update_count: 3 ref_cnt: 0 updated: 2013-07-16 11:55:29 5 rows in set (0.00 sec) ROOT volume: *** 21. row *** id: 21 account_id: 8 domain_id: 6 pool_id: 7 last_pool_id: NULL instance_id: 13 device_id: 0 name: ROOT-13 uuid: 953256f2-ace0-41d3-a7a5-2c7db77cbeb7 size: 0 folder: NULL path: ROOT-13-21 pod_id: NULL data_center_id: 1
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3543) the cpvm and ssvm' state is still running when the node was crashed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] terryye updated CLOUDSTACK-3543: Summary: the cpvm and ssvm' state is still running when the node was crashed (was: the cpvm and ssvm can not start ,the state is still starting ) the cpvm and ssvm' state is still running when the node was crashed --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3543 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3543 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: KVM, Management Server Affects Versions: 4.1.0 Environment: Ubuntu12.04 Reporter: terryye Original Estimate: 96h Remaining Estimate: 96h When the host node crash the vm'state can not be get right state. the vm state is still running. 2013-07-16 11:18:41,187 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-2:null) HostStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:18:41,791 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (StatsCollector-2:null) Seq 5-1056112658: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52242977168, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } } 2013-07-16 11:18:55,483 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-1:null) VmStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:19:01,137 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-8:null) Ping from 5 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3556) Add NIC icon is not appearing in UI
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raafat Mhamed updated CLOUDSTACK-3556: -- Description: After upgrading from version 4.0.2 to version 4.1 ,I can't see the ADD NIC icon from interface tab. check image |http://postimg.org/image/ekb5olse9/ was: After upgrading from version 4.0.2 to version 4.1 ,I can't see the ADD NIC icon from interface tab. check image [Here |http://postimg.org/image/ekb5olse9/] Add NIC icon is not appearing in UI --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3556 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3556 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: KVM, UI Affects Versions: 4.1.0 Environment: Ubuntu (KVM) Reporter: Raafat Mhamed Priority: Minor After upgrading from version 4.0.2 to version 4.1 ,I can't see the ADD NIC icon from interface tab. check image |http://postimg.org/image/ekb5olse9/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3556) Add NIC icon is not appearing in UI
Raafat Mhamed created CLOUDSTACK-3556: - Summary: Add NIC icon is not appearing in UI Key: CLOUDSTACK-3556 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3556 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: KVM, UI Affects Versions: 4.1.0 Environment: Ubuntu (KVM) Reporter: Raafat Mhamed Priority: Minor After upgrading from version 4.0.2 to version 4.1 ,I can't see the ADD NIC icon from interface tab. check image [Here |http://postimg.org/image/ekb5olse9/] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3555) [VMWARE]Newly registered Templates size is set to zero after download is complete
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sailaja Mada updated CLOUDSTACK-3555: - Attachment: management-server.log cloud-backup.dmp apilog.log templateUI.png [VMWARE]Newly registered Templates size is set to zero after download is complete --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3555 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3555 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Reporter: Sailaja Mada Priority: Critical Attachments: apilog.log, cloud-backup.dmp, management-server.log, ROOTvolUI.png, templateUI.png Steps: 1. Configure Adv Zone with VMWARE 2. Register new Cent OS template 3. Deployed VM using this instance 4. Check the size of the template from template_store_ref table 5. Check the size of the ROOT disk of the instance which is created using this template Observations : 1. Template size is set to 0 for template 2. ROOT disk size is set to 0 which is created using this template. Note: This is not observed with Xenserver mysql select * from template_store_ref\G; *** 1. row *** id: 3 store_id: 1 template_id: 8 created: 2013-07-15 10:24:22 last_updated: 2013-07-16 09:31:11 job_id: NULL download_pct: 100 size: 2097152000 store_role: Image physical_size: 283761664 download_state: DOWNLOADED error_str: NULL local_path: NULL install_path: template/tmpl/1/8/8f42153d-a165-43c2-ad24-7e7328a37e6b.ova url: http://download.cloud.com/templates/burbank/burbank-systemvm-08012012.ova state: Ready destroyed: 0 is_copy: 0 update_count: 0 ref_cnt: 0 updated: NULL *** 2. row *** id: 17 store_id: 1 template_id: 204 created: 2013-07-16 09:31:11 last_updated: 2013-07-16 09:33:35 job_id: b8b85c0c-12fa-46fb-bd43-2e772b7c86fb download_pct: 100 size: 0 store_role: Image physical_size: 0 download_state: DOWNLOADED error_str: Install completed successfully at 7/16/13 9:03 AM local_path: /mnt/SecStorage/756c37ec-129a-3615-a376-c8f1f77fa7aa/template/tmpl/2/204/dnld6479285553744159047tmp_ install_path: template/tmpl/2/204/2b8a6845-d031-3d17-927c-ce1dbcb96426.ova url: NULL state: Ready destroyed: 0 is_copy: 0 update_count: 3 ref_cnt: 0 updated: 2013-07-16 09:33:35 *** 4. row *** id: 19 store_id: 1 template_id: 203 created: 2013-07-16 09:31:12 last_updated: 2013-07-16 09:34:16 job_id: 7e1178cf-e9a8-4c8f-b4ad-381b2561250d download_pct: 100 size: 0 store_role: Image physical_size: 0 download_state: DOWNLOADED error_str: Install completed successfully at 7/16/13 9:04 AM local_path: /mnt/SecStorage/756c37ec-129a-3615-a376-c8f1f77fa7aa/template/tmpl/2/203/dnld3848286103866238688tmp_ install_path: template/tmpl/2/203/9894babd-8cbc-332a-8fc7-609c66834716.ova url: NULL state: Ready destroyed: 0 is_copy: 0 update_count: 3 ref_cnt: 0 updated: 2013-07-16 09:34:16 *** 5. row *** id: 20 store_id: 1 template_id: 205 created: 2013-07-16 11:48:23 last_updated: 2013-07-16 11:55:29 job_id: d49bdb7a-3ea1-4db2-b07b-e35842a23229 download_pct: 100 size: 0 store_role: Image physical_size: 0 download_state: DOWNLOADED error_str: Install completed successfully at 7/16/13 11:25 AM local_path: /mnt/SecStorage/756c37ec-129a-3615-a376-c8f1f77fa7aa/template/tmpl/2/205/dnld599624653636661815tmp_ install_path: template/tmpl/2/205/5573cdd7-94f5-3693-9ec7-7f0f5c341753.ova url: NULL state: Ready destroyed: 0 is_copy: 0 update_count: 3 ref_cnt: 0 updated: 2013-07-16 11:55:29 5 rows in set (0.00 sec) ROOT volume: *** 21. row *** id: 21 account_id: 8 domain_id: 6 pool_id: 7 last_pool_id: NULL instance_id: 13 device_id: 0 name: ROOT-13 uuid: 953256f2-ace0-41d3-a7a5-2c7db77cbeb7
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3543) the cpvm and ssvm' state is still running when the node was crashed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] terryye updated CLOUDSTACK-3543: Description: When the host node crash the vm'state can not be get right state. the vm state is still running. in fact,the vm is down,but the state is type running ,and not worked. so i am edit the database vm state to Stopped. then the ssvm and cpvm can be start. 2013-07-16 11:18:41,187 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-2:null) HostStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:18:41,791 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (StatsCollector-2:null) Seq 5-1056112658: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52242977168, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } } 2013-07-16 11:18:55,483 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-1:null) VmStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:19:01,137 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-8:null) Ping from 5 was: When the host node crash the vm'state can not be get right state. the vm state is still running. in fact,the vm is down,but the state is type running ,and not worked. so i am edit the database vm state to Stipped. then the ssvm and cpvm can be start. 2013-07-16 11:18:41,187 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-2:null) HostStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:18:41,791 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (StatsCollector-2:null) Seq 5-1056112658: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52242977168, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } } 2013-07-16 11:18:55,483 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-1:null) VmStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:19:01,137 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-8:null) Ping from 5 the cpvm and ssvm' state is still running when the node was crashed --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3543 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3543 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: KVM, Management Server Affects Versions: 4.1.0 Environment: Ubuntu12.04 Reporter: terryye Original Estimate: 96h Remaining Estimate: 96h When the host node crash the vm'state can not be get right state. the vm state is still running. in fact,the vm is down,but the state is type running ,and not worked. so i am edit the database vm state to Stopped. then the ssvm and cpvm can be start. 2013-07-16 11:18:41,187 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-2:null) HostStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:18:41,791 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (StatsCollector-2:null) Seq 5-1056112658: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52242977168, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } } 2013-07-16 11:18:55,483 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-1:null) VmStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:19:01,137 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-8:null) Ping from 5 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3543) the cpvm and ssvm' state is still running when the node was crashed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] terryye updated CLOUDSTACK-3543: Description: When the host node crash the vm'state can not be get right state. the vm state is still running. in fact,the vm is down,but the state is type running ,and not worked. so i am edit the database vm state to Stipped. then the ssvm and cpvm can be start. 2013-07-16 11:18:41,187 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-2:null) HostStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:18:41,791 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (StatsCollector-2:null) Seq 5-1056112658: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52242977168, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } } 2013-07-16 11:18:55,483 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-1:null) VmStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:19:01,137 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-8:null) Ping from 5 was: When the host node crash the vm'state can not be get right state. the vm state is still running. 2013-07-16 11:18:41,187 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-2:null) HostStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:18:41,791 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (StatsCollector-2:null) Seq 5-1056112658: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52242977168, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } } 2013-07-16 11:18:55,483 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-1:null) VmStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:19:01,137 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-8:null) Ping from 5 the cpvm and ssvm' state is still running when the node was crashed --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3543 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3543 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: KVM, Management Server Affects Versions: 4.1.0 Environment: Ubuntu12.04 Reporter: terryye Original Estimate: 96h Remaining Estimate: 96h When the host node crash the vm'state can not be get right state. the vm state is still running. in fact,the vm is down,but the state is type running ,and not worked. so i am edit the database vm state to Stipped. then the ssvm and cpvm can be start. 2013-07-16 11:18:41,187 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-2:null) HostStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:18:41,791 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (StatsCollector-2:null) Seq 5-1056112658: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52242977168, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } } 2013-07-16 11:18:55,483 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-1:null) VmStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:19:01,137 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-8:null) Ping from 5 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3556) Add NIC icon is not appearing in UI
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raafat Mhamed updated CLOUDSTACK-3556: -- Description: After upgrading from version 4.0.2 to version 4.1 ,I can't see the ADD NIC icon from interface tab. check image http://postimg.org/image/ekb5olse9/ was: After upgrading from version 4.0.2 to version 4.1 ,I can't see the ADD NIC icon from interface tab. check image |http://postimg.org/image/ekb5olse9/ Add NIC icon is not appearing in UI --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-3556 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3556 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: KVM, UI Affects Versions: 4.1.0 Environment: Ubuntu (KVM) Reporter: Raafat Mhamed Priority: Minor After upgrading from version 4.0.2 to version 4.1 ,I can't see the ADD NIC icon from interface tab. check image http://postimg.org/image/ekb5olse9/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3543) the cpvm and ssvm' state is still running when the computer node was crashed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] terryye updated CLOUDSTACK-3543: Summary: the cpvm and ssvm' state is still running when the computer node was crashed (was: the cpvm and ssvm' state is still running when the node was crashed) the cpvm and ssvm' state is still running when the computer node was crashed Key: CLOUDSTACK-3543 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3543 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: KVM, Management Server Affects Versions: 4.1.0 Environment: Ubuntu12.04 Reporter: terryye Original Estimate: 96h Remaining Estimate: 96h When the host node crash the vm'state can not be get right state. the vm state is still running. in fact,the vm is down,but the state is type running ,and not worked. so i am edit the database vm state to Stopped. then the ssvm and cpvm can be start. this is log ,after the node is crashed. 2013-07-16 11:18:41,187 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-2:null) HostStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:18:41,791 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (StatsCollector-2:null) Seq 5-1056112658: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52242977168, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } } 2013-07-16 11:18:55,483 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-1:null) VmStatsCollector is running... 2013-07-16 11:19:01,137 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-8:null) Ping from 5 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira