[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-9209) Database HA not working on a fresh install on Ubuntu 12.04

2016-02-18 Thread Thomas (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15153854#comment-15153854
 ] 

Thomas edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-9209 at 2/19/16 7:34 AM:
-

Hi Simon,

sorry i don`t have this setup running anymore, i switched to Centos7 MGMT 
Server and Galera Cluster.
Maybe the packaging is broken for ubuntu and has missing dependencies?


was (Author: disappear):
Hi Simon,

sorry i don`t have this setup running anymore, i switches to Centos7 MGMT 
Server and Galera Cluster.
Maybe the packaging is broken for ubuntu and has missing dependencies?

> Database HA not working on a fresh install on Ubuntu 12.04
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9209
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9209
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>  Components: Install and Setup
>Affects Versions: 4.7.0
> Environment: Two Ubuntu 12.04 Management Servers, Mysql Master Master 
> Replication, Official community repository: 
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/precise/4.7/
>Reporter: Thomas
>Priority: Blocker
>
> The cloudstack-management service will not come up because of this error:
> 2016-01-05 16:15:00,899 INFO  [c.c.u.d.T.Transaction] (main:null) (logid:) Is 
> Data Base High Availiability enabled? Ans : true
> 2016-01-05 16:15:00,924 INFO  [c.c.u.d.T.Transaction] (main:null) (logid:) 
> The slaves configured for Cloud Data base is/are : 192.168.0.90
> 2016-01-05 16:15:00,974 ERROR [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (main:null) (logid:) 
> Unable to get a new db connection
> java.sql.SQLException: Invalid load balancing strategy 
> 'com.cloud.utils.db.StaticStrategy'.
> at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.createSQLException(SQLError.java:934)
> at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.createSQLException(SQLError.java:931)
> at com.mysql.jdbc.Util.loadExtensions(Util.java:588)
> at 
> com.mysql.jdbc.LoadBalancingConnectionProxy.(LoadBalancingConnectionProxy.java:279)
> at 
> com.mysql.jdbc.FailoverConnectionProxy.(FailoverConnectionProxy.java:66)
> at 
> com.mysql.jdbc.NonRegisteringDriver.connectFailover(NonRegisteringDriver.java:382)
> at 
> com.mysql.jdbc.NonRegisteringDriver.connect(NonRegisteringDriver.java:301)
> at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:571)
> at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:215)
> at 
> org.apache.commons.dbcp.DriverManagerConnectionFactory.createConnection(DriverManagerConnectionFactory.java:75)
> at 
> org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolableConnectionFactory.makeObject(PoolableConnectionFactory.java:582)
> at 
> org.apache.commons.pool.impl.GenericObjectPool.borrowObject(GenericObjectPool.java:1188)
> at 
> org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolingDataSource.getConnection(PoolingDataSource.java:106)
> at 
> com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.getStandaloneConnectionWithException(TransactionLegacy.java:202)
> at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.(Merovingian2.java:68)
> at 
> com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.createLockMaster(Merovingian2.java:88)
> at 
> com.cloud.server.LockMasterListener.(LockMasterListener.java:33)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native 
> Method)
> at 
> sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:526)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.BeanUtils.instantiateClass(BeanUtils.java:148)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.SimpleInstantiationStrategy.instantiate(SimpleInstantiationStrategy.java:121)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.ConstructorResolver.autowireConstructor(ConstructorResolver.java:277)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.autowireConstructor(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1077)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBeanInstance(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:981)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:487)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:458)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory$1.getObject(AbstractBeanFactory.java:293)
> at 
>

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9209) Database HA not working on a fresh install on Ubuntu 12.04

2016-02-18 Thread Thomas (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15153854#comment-15153854
 ] 

Thomas commented on CLOUDSTACK-9209:


Hi Simon,

sorry i don`t have this setup running anymore, i switches to Centos7 MGMT 
Server and Galera Cluster.
Maybe the packaging is broken for ubuntu and has missing dependencies?

> Database HA not working on a fresh install on Ubuntu 12.04
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9209
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9209
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>  Components: Install and Setup
>Affects Versions: 4.7.0
> Environment: Two Ubuntu 12.04 Management Servers, Mysql Master Master 
> Replication, Official community repository: 
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/precise/4.7/
>Reporter: Thomas
>Priority: Blocker
>
> The cloudstack-management service will not come up because of this error:
> 2016-01-05 16:15:00,899 INFO  [c.c.u.d.T.Transaction] (main:null) (logid:) Is 
> Data Base High Availiability enabled? Ans : true
> 2016-01-05 16:15:00,924 INFO  [c.c.u.d.T.Transaction] (main:null) (logid:) 
> The slaves configured for Cloud Data base is/are : 192.168.0.90
> 2016-01-05 16:15:00,974 ERROR [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (main:null) (logid:) 
> Unable to get a new db connection
> java.sql.SQLException: Invalid load balancing strategy 
> 'com.cloud.utils.db.StaticStrategy'.
> at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.createSQLException(SQLError.java:934)
> at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.createSQLException(SQLError.java:931)
> at com.mysql.jdbc.Util.loadExtensions(Util.java:588)
> at 
> com.mysql.jdbc.LoadBalancingConnectionProxy.(LoadBalancingConnectionProxy.java:279)
> at 
> com.mysql.jdbc.FailoverConnectionProxy.(FailoverConnectionProxy.java:66)
> at 
> com.mysql.jdbc.NonRegisteringDriver.connectFailover(NonRegisteringDriver.java:382)
> at 
> com.mysql.jdbc.NonRegisteringDriver.connect(NonRegisteringDriver.java:301)
> at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:571)
> at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:215)
> at 
> org.apache.commons.dbcp.DriverManagerConnectionFactory.createConnection(DriverManagerConnectionFactory.java:75)
> at 
> org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolableConnectionFactory.makeObject(PoolableConnectionFactory.java:582)
> at 
> org.apache.commons.pool.impl.GenericObjectPool.borrowObject(GenericObjectPool.java:1188)
> at 
> org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolingDataSource.getConnection(PoolingDataSource.java:106)
> at 
> com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.getStandaloneConnectionWithException(TransactionLegacy.java:202)
> at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.(Merovingian2.java:68)
> at 
> com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.createLockMaster(Merovingian2.java:88)
> at 
> com.cloud.server.LockMasterListener.(LockMasterListener.java:33)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native 
> Method)
> at 
> sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:526)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.BeanUtils.instantiateClass(BeanUtils.java:148)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.SimpleInstantiationStrategy.instantiate(SimpleInstantiationStrategy.java:121)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.ConstructorResolver.autowireConstructor(ConstructorResolver.java:277)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.autowireConstructor(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1077)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBeanInstance(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:981)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:487)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:458)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory$1.getObject(AbstractBeanFactory.java:293)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:223)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.doGetBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:290)
> at 
>

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9290) Send StatsCollector metrics to optional OpenTSDB

2016-02-18 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152882#comment-15152882
 ] 

Pierre-Luc Dion commented on CLOUDSTACK-9290:
-

update of CLOUDSTACK-7583 to support OpenTSDB backend.

> Send StatsCollector metrics to optional OpenTSDB
> 
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9290
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9290
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>  Components: Management Server
>Reporter: Pierre-Luc Dion
>Assignee: Patrick D.
>Priority: Minor
>
> Send Metrics collected from StatsCollector into OpenTSDB directly from the 
> Management Server. This is an update of CLOUDSTACK-7583 that send metrics 
> into Graphite.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-9290) Send StatsCollector metrics to optional OpenTSDB

2016-02-18 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion (JIRA) 
Pierre-Luc Dion created CLOUDSTACK-9290:
---

 Summary: Send StatsCollector metrics to optional OpenTSDB
 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9290
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9290
 Project: CloudStack
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.)
  Components: Management Server
Reporter: Pierre-Luc Dion
Assignee: Patrick D.
Priority: Minor


Send Metrics collected from StatsCollector into OpenTSDB directly from the 
Management Server. This is an update of CLOUDSTACK-7583 that send metrics into 
Graphite.





--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9209) Database HA not working on a fresh install on Ubuntu 12.04

2016-02-18 Thread Simon Weller (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152490#comment-15152490
 ] 

Simon Weller commented on CLOUDSTACK-9209:
--

Thomas,

Do you have the log4j ubuntu package installed? 

- Si

> Database HA not working on a fresh install on Ubuntu 12.04
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9209
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9209
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>  Components: Install and Setup
>Affects Versions: 4.7.0
> Environment: Two Ubuntu 12.04 Management Servers, Mysql Master Master 
> Replication, Official community repository: 
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/precise/4.7/
>Reporter: Thomas
>Priority: Blocker
>
> The cloudstack-management service will not come up because of this error:
> 2016-01-05 16:15:00,899 INFO  [c.c.u.d.T.Transaction] (main:null) (logid:) Is 
> Data Base High Availiability enabled? Ans : true
> 2016-01-05 16:15:00,924 INFO  [c.c.u.d.T.Transaction] (main:null) (logid:) 
> The slaves configured for Cloud Data base is/are : 192.168.0.90
> 2016-01-05 16:15:00,974 ERROR [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (main:null) (logid:) 
> Unable to get a new db connection
> java.sql.SQLException: Invalid load balancing strategy 
> 'com.cloud.utils.db.StaticStrategy'.
> at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.createSQLException(SQLError.java:934)
> at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.createSQLException(SQLError.java:931)
> at com.mysql.jdbc.Util.loadExtensions(Util.java:588)
> at 
> com.mysql.jdbc.LoadBalancingConnectionProxy.(LoadBalancingConnectionProxy.java:279)
> at 
> com.mysql.jdbc.FailoverConnectionProxy.(FailoverConnectionProxy.java:66)
> at 
> com.mysql.jdbc.NonRegisteringDriver.connectFailover(NonRegisteringDriver.java:382)
> at 
> com.mysql.jdbc.NonRegisteringDriver.connect(NonRegisteringDriver.java:301)
> at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:571)
> at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:215)
> at 
> org.apache.commons.dbcp.DriverManagerConnectionFactory.createConnection(DriverManagerConnectionFactory.java:75)
> at 
> org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolableConnectionFactory.makeObject(PoolableConnectionFactory.java:582)
> at 
> org.apache.commons.pool.impl.GenericObjectPool.borrowObject(GenericObjectPool.java:1188)
> at 
> org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolingDataSource.getConnection(PoolingDataSource.java:106)
> at 
> com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.getStandaloneConnectionWithException(TransactionLegacy.java:202)
> at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.(Merovingian2.java:68)
> at 
> com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.createLockMaster(Merovingian2.java:88)
> at 
> com.cloud.server.LockMasterListener.(LockMasterListener.java:33)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native 
> Method)
> at 
> sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:526)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.BeanUtils.instantiateClass(BeanUtils.java:148)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.SimpleInstantiationStrategy.instantiate(SimpleInstantiationStrategy.java:121)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.ConstructorResolver.autowireConstructor(ConstructorResolver.java:277)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.autowireConstructor(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1077)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBeanInstance(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:981)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:487)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:458)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory$1.getObject(AbstractBeanFactory.java:293)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:223)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.doGetBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:290)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.getBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:191)
> at 
>

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9026) Modifying testpath for adding missing parameter

2016-02-18 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152269#comment-15152269
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9026:


Github user pritisarap12 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1031#discussion_r53309123
  
--- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_storage_migration.py ---
@@ -248,6 +248,11 @@ def setUpClass(cls):
 DomainName=cls.account.domain
 )
 # Create Service offering
+cls.service_offering = ServiceOffering.create(
+cls.apiclient,
+cls.testdata["service_offering"]
+)
+
--- End diff --

Added service_offering in cleanup.


> Modifying testpath for adding missing parameter
> ---
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9026
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9026
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>  Components: Automation
>Reporter: Priti Sarap
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9026) Modifying testpath for adding missing parameter

2016-02-18 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152162#comment-15152162
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9026:


Github user nitt10prashant commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1031#discussion_r53300709
  
--- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_storage_migration.py ---
@@ -248,6 +248,11 @@ def setUpClass(cls):
 DomainName=cls.account.domain
 )
 # Create Service offering
+cls.service_offering = ServiceOffering.create(
+cls.apiclient,
+cls.testdata["service_offering"]
+)
+
--- End diff --

please add cls._cleanup.append(cls.service_offering)  


> Modifying testpath for adding missing parameter
> ---
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9026
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9026
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>  Components: Automation
>Reporter: Priti Sarap
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9026) Modifying testpath for adding missing parameter

2016-02-18 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152157#comment-15152157
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9026:


Github user sanju1010 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1031#issuecomment-185662747
  
LGTM  based on test results!!

Test migrate Volume (root and data disk) ... === TestName: 
test_01_migrate_root_and_data_disk_nonlive | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 1 test in 1778.920s

OK



> Modifying testpath for adding missing parameter
> ---
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9026
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9026
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>  Components: Automation
>Reporter: Priti Sarap
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9287) As an User I want to use Private Gateways with Redundant VPCs

2016-02-18 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152060#comment-15152060
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9287:


Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1413#issuecomment-185635109
  
LGTM, based on the tests below. This runs in prod at SBP.

Test results:
```
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s -a 
tags=advanced,required_hardware=true \
component/test_vpc_redundant.py \
component/test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py \
component/test_routers_network_ops.py \
component/test_vpc_router_nics.py \
smoke/test_loadbalance.py \
smoke/test_internal_lb.py \
smoke/test_ssvm.py \
smoke/test_network.py

```

Result:

```
Check the password file in the Router VM ... === TestName: 
test_isolate_network_password_server | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Create a redundant VPC with two networks with two VMs in each network ... 
=== TestName: test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Create a redundant VPC with two networks with two VMs in each network and 
check default routes ... === TestName: test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Create a redundant VPC with two networks with two VMs in each network ... 
=== TestName: 
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Create a redundant VPC with 1 Tier, 1 VM, 1 ACL, 1 PF and test Network GC 
Nics ... === TestName: test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Create a redundant VPC with 1 Tier, 1 VM, 1 ACL, 1 PF and test Network GC 
Nics ... === TestName: test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test iptables default INPUT/FORWARD policy on RouterVM ... === TestName: 
test_02_routervm_iptables_policies | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test iptables default INPUT/FORWARD policies on VPC router ... === 
TestName: test_01_single_VPC_iptables_policies | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: 
test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_true | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: 
test_02_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_false | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: 
test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: 
test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: 
test_03_RVR_Network_check_router_state | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Create a VPC with two networks with one VM in each network and test nics 
after destroy ... === TestName: test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Create a VPC with two networks with one VM in each network and test default 
routes ... === TestName: test_02_VPC_default_routes | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Check that the /etc/dhcphosts.txt doesn't contain duplicate IPs ... === 
TestName: test_router_dhcphosts | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to create Load balancing rule with source NAT ... === TestName: 
test_01_create_lb_rule_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to create Load balancing rule with non source NAT ... === TestName: 
test_02_create_lb_rule_non_nat | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test for assign & removing load balancing rule ... === TestName: 
test_assign_and_removal_lb | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test create, assign, remove of an Internal LB with roundrobin http traffic 
to 3 vm's in a Single VPC ... === TestName: 
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test create, assign, remove of an Internal LB with roundrobin http traffic 
to 3 vm's in a Redundant VPC ... === TestName: 
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to verify access to loadbalancer haproxy admin stats page ... === 
TestName: test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to verify access to loadbalancer haproxy admin stats page ... === 
TestName: test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test SSVM Internals ... === TestName: test_03_ssvm_internals | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test CPVM Internals ... === TestName: test_04_cpvm_internals | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test stop SSVM ... === TestName: test_05_stop_ssvm | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test stop CPVM ... === TestName: test_06_stop_cpvm | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test reboot SSVM ... === TestName: test_07_reboot_ssvm | Status :

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9091) Update testpath for parameter issues

2016-02-18 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152055#comment-15152055
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9091:
-

Commit 79edac0ee6d63d642e4df6f828295ffceed6149f in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from sanjeev
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=79edac0 ]

Merge pull request #1130 from 
pritisarap12/CLOUDSTACK-9091-Update-testpath-for-parameter-issues

CLOUDSTACK-9091: Update testpath for parameter issuesIn 
testpath_volume_snapshot testpath creating volume from snapshot function is 
passing zonid parameter to function in base class but there it doesn't take as 
separate parameter it takes it from "services" so updating it.

* pr/1130:
  CLOUDSTACK-9091: Update testpath for parameter issues

Signed-off-by: sanjeev 


> Update testpath for parameter issues
> 
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9091
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9091
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>Reporter: Priti Sarap
>
> In testpath_volume_snapshot testpath creating volume from snapshot function 
> is passing zonid parameter to function in base class but there it doesn't 
> take as separate parameter it takes it from "services" so updating it. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9091) Update testpath for parameter issues

2016-02-18 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152056#comment-15152056
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9091:
-

Commit 79edac0ee6d63d642e4df6f828295ffceed6149f in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from sanjeev
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=79edac0 ]

Merge pull request #1130 from 
pritisarap12/CLOUDSTACK-9091-Update-testpath-for-parameter-issues

CLOUDSTACK-9091: Update testpath for parameter issuesIn 
testpath_volume_snapshot testpath creating volume from snapshot function is 
passing zonid parameter to function in base class but there it doesn't take as 
separate parameter it takes it from "services" so updating it.

* pr/1130:
  CLOUDSTACK-9091: Update testpath for parameter issues

Signed-off-by: sanjeev 


> Update testpath for parameter issues
> 
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9091
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9091
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>Reporter: Priti Sarap
>
> In testpath_volume_snapshot testpath creating volume from snapshot function 
> is passing zonid parameter to function in base class but there it doesn't 
> take as separate parameter it takes it from "services" so updating it. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9091) Update testpath for parameter issues

2016-02-18 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152054#comment-15152054
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9091:
-

Commit 79edac0ee6d63d642e4df6f828295ffceed6149f in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from sanjeev
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=79edac0 ]

Merge pull request #1130 from 
pritisarap12/CLOUDSTACK-9091-Update-testpath-for-parameter-issues

CLOUDSTACK-9091: Update testpath for parameter issuesIn 
testpath_volume_snapshot testpath creating volume from snapshot function is 
passing zonid parameter to function in base class but there it doesn't take as 
separate parameter it takes it from "services" so updating it.

* pr/1130:
  CLOUDSTACK-9091: Update testpath for parameter issues

Signed-off-by: sanjeev 


> Update testpath for parameter issues
> 
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9091
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9091
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>Reporter: Priti Sarap
>
> In testpath_volume_snapshot testpath creating volume from snapshot function 
> is passing zonid parameter to function in base class but there it doesn't 
> take as separate parameter it takes it from "services" so updating it. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9091) Update testpath for parameter issues

2016-02-18 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152053#comment-15152053
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9091:
-

Commit 358115de151ababd45d31a743f71edadc8cfafae in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~pritisarap12]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=358115d ]

CLOUDSTACK-9091: Update testpath for parameter issues


> Update testpath for parameter issues
> 
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9091
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9091
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>Reporter: Priti Sarap
>
> In testpath_volume_snapshot testpath creating volume from snapshot function 
> is passing zonid parameter to function in base class but there it doesn't 
> take as separate parameter it takes it from "services" so updating it. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9091) Update testpath for parameter issues

2016-02-18 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152059#comment-15152059
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9091:


Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1130


> Update testpath for parameter issues
> 
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9091
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9091
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>Reporter: Priti Sarap
>
> In testpath_volume_snapshot testpath creating volume from snapshot function 
> is passing zonid parameter to function in base class but there it doesn't 
> take as separate parameter it takes it from "services" so updating it. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9128) Testcase to verify if snapshot_store_ref table stores actual size of back snapshot in secondary storage

2016-02-18 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152037#comment-15152037
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9128:
-

Commit bcbdb2caa086b5440491f2f18a58a144bba5d20a in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from sanjeev
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=bcbdb2c ]

Merge pull request #1199 from 
pritisarap12/CLOUDSTACK-9128-Testcase-to-verify-if-snapshot_store_ref-table-stores-actual-size-of-back-snapshot-in-secondary-storage

CLOUDSTACK-9128: Testcase to verify physical_size attribute of 
snapshot_store_ref table Verify if physical_size attribute of 
snapshot_store_ref table stores actual physical size of the snapshot

* pr/1199:
  CLOUDSTACK-9128: Testcase to verify if snapshot_store_ref table stores actual 
size of back snapshot in secondary storage

Signed-off-by: sanjeev 


> Testcase to verify if snapshot_store_ref table stores actual size of back 
> snapshot in secondary storage
> ---
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9128
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9128
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>  Components: Automation
>Affects Versions: 4.5.1
>Reporter: Priti Sarap
> Fix For: 4.5.1
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9128) Testcase to verify if snapshot_store_ref table stores actual size of back snapshot in secondary storage

2016-02-18 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152035#comment-15152035
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9128:
-

Commit bcbdb2caa086b5440491f2f18a58a144bba5d20a in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from sanjeev
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=bcbdb2c ]

Merge pull request #1199 from 
pritisarap12/CLOUDSTACK-9128-Testcase-to-verify-if-snapshot_store_ref-table-stores-actual-size-of-back-snapshot-in-secondary-storage

CLOUDSTACK-9128: Testcase to verify physical_size attribute of 
snapshot_store_ref table Verify if physical_size attribute of 
snapshot_store_ref table stores actual physical size of the snapshot

* pr/1199:
  CLOUDSTACK-9128: Testcase to verify if snapshot_store_ref table stores actual 
size of back snapshot in secondary storage

Signed-off-by: sanjeev 


> Testcase to verify if snapshot_store_ref table stores actual size of back 
> snapshot in secondary storage
> ---
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9128
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9128
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>  Components: Automation
>Affects Versions: 4.5.1
>Reporter: Priti Sarap
> Fix For: 4.5.1
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9128) Testcase to verify if snapshot_store_ref table stores actual size of back snapshot in secondary storage

2016-02-18 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152036#comment-15152036
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9128:
-

Commit bcbdb2caa086b5440491f2f18a58a144bba5d20a in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from sanjeev
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=bcbdb2c ]

Merge pull request #1199 from 
pritisarap12/CLOUDSTACK-9128-Testcase-to-verify-if-snapshot_store_ref-table-stores-actual-size-of-back-snapshot-in-secondary-storage

CLOUDSTACK-9128: Testcase to verify physical_size attribute of 
snapshot_store_ref table Verify if physical_size attribute of 
snapshot_store_ref table stores actual physical size of the snapshot

* pr/1199:
  CLOUDSTACK-9128: Testcase to verify if snapshot_store_ref table stores actual 
size of back snapshot in secondary storage

Signed-off-by: sanjeev 


> Testcase to verify if snapshot_store_ref table stores actual size of back 
> snapshot in secondary storage
> ---
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9128
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9128
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>  Components: Automation
>Affects Versions: 4.5.1
>Reporter: Priti Sarap
> Fix For: 4.5.1
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9128) Testcase to verify if snapshot_store_ref table stores actual size of back snapshot in secondary storage

2016-02-18 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152038#comment-15152038
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9128:


Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1199


> Testcase to verify if snapshot_store_ref table stores actual size of back 
> snapshot in secondary storage
> ---
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9128
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9128
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>  Components: Automation
>Affects Versions: 4.5.1
>Reporter: Priti Sarap
> Fix For: 4.5.1
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9091) Update testpath for parameter issues

2016-02-18 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15151986#comment-15151986
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9091:


Github user pritisarap12 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1130#issuecomment-185610104
  
Testcase result after modifications:

Test Volume (root) Snapshot ... === TestName: test_01_volume_snapshot | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 1 test in 1012.564s

OK



> Update testpath for parameter issues
> 
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9091
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9091
> Project: CloudStack
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>Reporter: Priti Sarap
>
> In testpath_volume_snapshot testpath creating volume from snapshot function 
> is passing zonid parameter to function in base class but there it doesn't 
> take as separate parameter it takes it from "services" so updating it. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)