[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-8862) Issuing multiple attach-volume commands simultaneously can be problematic
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15873484#comment-15873484 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-8862: Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1900 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 358 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=105 Failed=0 Skipped=7 _Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0 **Failed tests:** **Skipped tests:** test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3 test_static_role_account_acls test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm test_nested_virtualization_vmware test_3d_gpu_support test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm **Passed test suits:** test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py test_affinity_groups_projects.py test_portable_publicip.py test_over_provisioning.py test_global_settings.py test_scale_vm.py test_service_offerings.py test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py test_loadbalance.py test_routers.py test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py test_network.py test_router_dns.py test_non_contigiousvlan.py test_login.py test_deploy_vm_iso.py test_list_ids_parameter.py test_public_ip_range.py test_multipleips_per_nic.py test_regions.py test_affinity_groups.py test_network_acl.py test_pvlan.py test_volumes.py test_nic.py test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py test_resource_detail.py test_secondary_storage.py test_vm_life_cycle.py test_routers_network_ops.py test_disk_offerings.py > Issuing multiple attach-volume commands simultaneously can be problematic > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-8862 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8862 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.5.0, 4.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6.0 > Environment: N/A >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: Future > > > If a user submits two volumeAttach commands around the same time, the first > one can succeed while the second one can fail and can lead CloudStack to ask > the underlying storage plug-in to remove the volume from a given ACL (but the > volume should be in the ACL because the first attachVolume command succeeded). > A somewhat similar problem can happen if you submit the second attachVolume > command to another VM in the same cluster. > Proposed solution: > A data volume should make use of a new column in the volumes table: > attach_state (or some name like that). > This column can have five possible values: null (for root disks), detached > (default state for data volumes), attaching, attached, and detaching. > When an attachVolume command is submitted, the volume should immediately be > placed into the "attaching" state. If a transition to that state is not > possible, an exception is thrown (for example, if you're already in the > "attached" state, you can't transition to the "attaching" state). > A similar kind of logic already exists for volume snapshots. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9728) query to traffic sentinel requesting for usage stats is too long resulting in traffic sentinel sending HTTP 414 error response
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15873379#comment-15873379 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9728: Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1886 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 357 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=103 Failed=2 Skipped=7 _Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0 **Failed tests:** * test_routers_network_ops.py * test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true Failing since 2 runs * test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false Failing since 3 runs **Skipped tests:** test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3 test_static_role_account_acls test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm test_nested_virtualization_vmware test_3d_gpu_support test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm **Passed test suits:** test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py test_affinity_groups_projects.py test_portable_publicip.py test_over_provisioning.py test_global_settings.py test_scale_vm.py test_service_offerings.py test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py test_loadbalance.py test_routers.py test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py test_network.py test_router_dns.py test_non_contigiousvlan.py test_login.py test_deploy_vm_iso.py test_list_ids_parameter.py test_public_ip_range.py test_multipleips_per_nic.py test_regions.py test_affinity_groups.py test_network_acl.py test_pvlan.py test_volumes.py test_nic.py test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py test_resource_detail.py test_secondary_storage.py test_vm_life_cycle.py test_disk_offerings.py > query to traffic sentinel requesting for usage stats is too long resulting in > traffic sentinel sending HTTP 414 error response > -- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9728 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9728 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Network Devices >Reporter: Jayapal Reddy >Assignee: Jayapal Reddy > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > The query sent to the traffic sentinel to retrieve network usage information > is rejected with a 414 error because the string is too long for it to process -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9794) Unable to attach more than 14 devices to a VM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15873327#comment-15873327 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9794: GitHub user sureshanaparti opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953 CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 14 devices to a VM Updated hardcoded value with max data volumes limit from hypervisor capabilities. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Accelerite/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9794 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1953 commit cdf50c1e0f69297beb335f852ae82663bbc87fb4 Author: Suresh Kumar AnapartiDate: 2017-02-18T20:22:30Z CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 14 devices to a VM Updated hardcoded value with max data volumes limit from hypervisor capabilities. > Unable to attach more than 14 devices to a VM > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9794 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9794 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Volumes >Reporter: Suresh Kumar Anaparti >Assignee: Suresh Kumar Anaparti > Fix For: 4.10 > > > A limit of 13 disks is set in hypervisor_capabilities for VMware hypervisor. > Changed this limit to a higher value in the DB directly for the VMware and > tried attaching more than 14 disks. This was failing with the below exception: > {noformat} > 2016-08-12 18:42:53,694 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher] > (API-Job-Executor-40:ctx-56068c6b job-1015) (logid:b22938fd) Unexpected > exception while executing > org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.volume.AttachVolumeCmdByAdmin > java.util.NoSuchElementException > at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.next(ArrayList.java:794) > at > com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.getDeviceId(VolumeApiServiceImpl.java:2439) > at > com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.attachVolumeToVM(VolumeApiServiceImpl.java:1308) > at > com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.attachVolumeToVM(VolumeApiServiceImpl.java:1173) > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor248.invoke(Unknown Source) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601) > at > org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317) > at > org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183) > at > org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.network.contrail.management.EventUtils$EventInterceptor.invoke(EventUtils.java:106) > {noformat} > There was a hardcoded limit of 15 on the number of devices for a VM. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-9794) Unable to attach more than 14 devices to a VM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Kumar Anaparti updated CLOUDSTACK-9794: -- Summary: Unable to attach more than 14 devices to a VM (was: Cannot attach more than 14 devices to a VM) > Unable to attach more than 14 devices to a VM > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9794 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9794 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Volumes >Reporter: Suresh Kumar Anaparti >Assignee: Suresh Kumar Anaparti > Fix For: 4.10 > > > A limit of 13 disks is set in hypervisor_capabilities for VMware hypervisor. > Changed this limit to a higher value in the DB directly for the VMware and > tried attaching more than 14 disks. This was failing with the below exception: > {noformat} > 2016-08-12 18:42:53,694 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher] > (API-Job-Executor-40:ctx-56068c6b job-1015) (logid:b22938fd) Unexpected > exception while executing > org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.volume.AttachVolumeCmdByAdmin > java.util.NoSuchElementException > at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.next(ArrayList.java:794) > at > com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.getDeviceId(VolumeApiServiceImpl.java:2439) > at > com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.attachVolumeToVM(VolumeApiServiceImpl.java:1308) > at > com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.attachVolumeToVM(VolumeApiServiceImpl.java:1173) > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor248.invoke(Unknown Source) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601) > at > org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317) > at > org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183) > at > org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.network.contrail.management.EventUtils$EventInterceptor.invoke(EventUtils.java:106) > {noformat} > There was a hardcoded limit of 15 on the number of devices for a VM. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9724) VPC tier network restart with cleanup, missing public ip on VR interface
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15873313#comment-15873313 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9724: Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1885 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 356 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=101 Failed=2 Skipped=7 _Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0 **Failed tests:** * test_router_dns.py * test_router_dns_guestipquery Failing since 2 runs * test_routers_network_ops.py * ContextSuite context=TestRedundantIsolateNetworks>:setup Failed **Skipped tests:** test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3 test_static_role_account_acls test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm test_nested_virtualization_vmware test_3d_gpu_support test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm **Passed test suits:** test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py test_affinity_groups_projects.py test_portable_publicip.py test_over_provisioning.py test_global_settings.py test_scale_vm.py test_service_offerings.py test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py test_loadbalance.py test_routers.py test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py test_network.py test_non_contigiousvlan.py test_login.py test_deploy_vm_iso.py test_list_ids_parameter.py test_public_ip_range.py test_multipleips_per_nic.py test_regions.py test_affinity_groups.py test_network_acl.py test_pvlan.py test_volumes.py test_nic.py test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py test_resource_detail.py test_secondary_storage.py test_vm_life_cycle.py test_disk_offerings.py > VPC tier network restart with cleanup, missing public ip on VR interface > > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9724 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9724 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Reporter: Jayapal Reddy >Assignee: Jayapal Reddy > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > On vpc tier network restart with clean up missing secondary ip addresses on > the VR public interface. > 1. Create a vpc and deploy a vm in tier. > 2. Acquire a public ip and configure PF rule > 3. check that the VR interface has two ip addresses. > 4. Restart the tier network with cleanup. > 5. After restart in VR interface ip (PF rule configured) is missed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-9794) Cannot attach more than 14 devices to a VM
Suresh Kumar Anaparti created CLOUDSTACK-9794: - Summary: Cannot attach more than 14 devices to a VM Key: CLOUDSTACK-9794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9794 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Volumes Reporter: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Assignee: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Fix For: 4.10 A limit of 13 disks is set in hypervisor_capabilities for VMware hypervisor. Changed this limit to a higher value in the DB directly for the VMware and tried attaching more than 14 disks. This was failing with the below exception: {noformat} 2016-08-12 18:42:53,694 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher] (API-Job-Executor-40:ctx-56068c6b job-1015) (logid:b22938fd) Unexpected exception while executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.volume.AttachVolumeCmdByAdmin java.util.NoSuchElementException at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.next(ArrayList.java:794) at com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.getDeviceId(VolumeApiServiceImpl.java:2439) at com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.attachVolumeToVM(VolumeApiServiceImpl.java:1308) at com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.attachVolumeToVM(VolumeApiServiceImpl.java:1173) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor248.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601) at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150) at org.apache.cloudstack.network.contrail.management.EventUtils$EventInterceptor.invoke(EventUtils.java:106) {noformat} There was a hardcoded limit of 15 on the number of devices for a VM. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9363) Can't start a Xen HVM vm when more than 2 volumes attached
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15873178#comment-15873178 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9363: Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829 LGTM, code and (regression) tests. > Can't start a Xen HVM vm when more than 2 volumes attached > -- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9363 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9363 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.6.0, 4.7.1 > Environment: XenServer 6.5 > HVM template >Reporter: Simon Godard >Priority: Critical > > Starting a HVM VM fails on XenServer fails when more than 2 volumes are > attached to the vm. Attaching the volumes while the vm is running is fine. > PV vms are not affected by this problem. The bug seems to have been > introduced in this bug fix: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8826 > Mailing list discussion: http://markmail.org/thread/4nmyra6aofxtu3o2 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)