[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-668) Polygon difference function produces erroneous results with certain polygons

2012-04-20 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-668.


   Resolution: Not A Problem
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
   3.0

I agree with Thomas analyses.

Concerning the difference2 case, the two points are explained by the vertical 
line at x = 5.0 which comes from the outer shape. The internal representation 
is a BSP tree and one of this part of the outer boundary creates an hyperplane 
that splits the inner triangle. When the boundary representation is rebuilt, 
the two segments are glued together and the points appear there. There is no 
post-processing that simplifies the representation afterwards.

Concerning the circle test, I guess you mixed the arrays. What is really in the 
code is that the vertices2 array is build first from outer circle and the 
vertices1 array is built afterwards from inner circle. So you are really 
subtracting a big disk from a smaller one. As Thomas explained, computing set2 
minus set1 give the expected two boundaries. Another possible change is to 
build the circles clockwise instead of counter-clockwise, and in this case the 
two regions are infinite wich a whole at the center, then subtracting set2 from 
set1 returns a disk with a hole.

 Polygon difference function produces erroneous results with certain polygons
 

 Key: MATH-668
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-668
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Curtis Jensen
Assignee: Luc Maisonobe
  Labels: difference, math,, polygon,
 Fix For: 3.0

 Attachments: PolygonsSetCircleTest.java, PolygonsSetTest.java

   Original Estimate: 168h
  Remaining Estimate: 168h

 For some polygons, the difference function produces erroneous results.  This 
 appears to happen when one polygon is completely encompassed in another, and 
 the outer has multiple concave sections.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-742) Please make PolynomialSplineFunction Serializable

2012-02-16 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-742.


Resolution: Won't Fix

After a discussion on the developers list, the consensus reached was to not set 
up Serializable for this kind of objects. See the mailing lists archives for 
the complete thread.

There are several workarounds you can use to solve your problem.

You could use a custom derived class that would implement Serialible. The only 
code you would have to write is the constructors that would call the 
constructors of the base class.

An alternative solution would be to keep the existing non serializable class as 
is but implement Serialization by custom code on the application level. This 
would work of course only if you have access to the serialization framework 
code.



 Please make PolynomialSplineFunction Serializable
 -

 Key: MATH-742
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-742
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Neil Roeth
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: PolynomialSplineFunction.java


 PolynomialSplineFunction is not Serializable, while the very similar 
 PolynomialFunction class in the same package is. All that needs to be done is 
 to add the import:
 {{import java.io.Serializable;}}
 and change this:
 {{public class PolynomialSplineFunction implements 
 DifferentiableUnivariateRealFunction}}
 to this:
 {{public class PolynomialSplineFunction implements 
 DifferentiableUnivariateRealFunction, Serializable}}
 I made exactly that modification to a local copy and it serialized 
 successfully.  Before the change, I got serialization errors.
 Thanks.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-650) FastMath has static code which slows the first access to FastMath

2012-02-15 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-650.


Resolution: Fixed

Soved in subversion repository as of r1244725.

Selected Sebb's patch using literal arrays with a cloning protection.

 FastMath has static code which slows the first access to FastMath
 -

 Key: MATH-650
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-650
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: Nightly Builds
 Environment: Android 2.3 (Dalvik VM with JIT)
Reporter: Alexis Robert
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.0

 Attachments: FastMathLoadCheck.java, LucTestPerformance.java


 Working on an Android application using Orekit, I've discovered that a simple 
 FastMath.floor() takes about 4 to 5 secs on a 1GHz Nexus One phone (only the 
 first time it's called). I've launched the Android profiling tool (traceview) 
 and the problem seems to be linked with the static portion of FastMath code 
 named // Initialize tables
 The timing resulted in :
 - FastMath.slowexp (40.8%)
 - FastMath.expint (39.2%)
  \- FastMath.quadmult() (95.6% of expint)
 - FastMath.slowlog (18.2%)
 Hoping that would help
 Thanks!
 Alexis Robert

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-727) too large first step with embedded Runge-Kutta integrators (Dormand-Prince 8(5,3) ...)

2011-12-17 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-727.


Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1215524.

 too large first step with embedded Runge-Kutta integrators (Dormand-Prince 
 8(5,3) ...)
 --

 Key: MATH-727
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-727
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Luc Maisonobe
Assignee: Luc Maisonobe
 Fix For: 3.0


 Adaptive step size integrators compute the first step size by themselves if 
 it is not provided.
 For embedded Runge-Kutta type, this step size is not checked against the 
 integration range, so if the integration range is extremely short, this step 
 size may evaluate the function out of the range (and in fact it tries 
 afterward to go back, and fails to stop). Gragg-Bulirsch-Stoer integrators do 
 not have this problem, the step size is checked and truncated if needed.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-716) BracketingNthOrderBrentSolver exceeds maxIterationCount while updating always the same boundary

2011-12-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-716.


   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1209307.

Thanks for the report.

 BracketingNthOrderBrentSolver exceeds maxIterationCount while updating always 
 the same boundary
 ---

 Key: MATH-716
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-716
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Pascal Parraud
Assignee: Luc Maisonobe
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.0


 In some cases, the aging feature in BracketingNthOrderBrentSolver fails.
 It attempts to balance the bracketing points by targeting a non-zero value 
 instead of the real root. However, the chosen target is too close too zero, 
 and the inverse polynomial approximation is always on the same side, thus 
 always updates the same bracket.
 In the real used case for a large program, I had a bracket point xA = 
 12500.0, yA = 3.7e-16, agingA = 0, which is the (really good) estimate of the 
 zero on one side of the root and xB = 12500.03, yB = -7.0e-5, agingB = 97. 
 This shows that the bracketing interval is completely unbalanced, and we 
 never succeed to rebalance it as we always updates (xA, yA) and never updates 
 (xB, yB).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-485) Feature Request: Kalman Filter

2011-11-29 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-485.


Resolution: Fixed

Latest patch applied, with new tests and user guide.

Thanks for the patch!

 Feature Request: Kalman Filter
 --

 Key: MATH-485
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-485
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Wish
Reporter: Benjamin McCann
 Fix For: 3.0

 Attachments: KalmanFilterTest.java, MATH-485-cleanup2.patch, 
 MATH-485-update1.patch, MATH-485.patch, filter.xml


 I'd love it if Commons Math could add support for the Kalman filter.  Here 
 are a few implementations that might be able to be used for reference or 
 included if they're using compatible licenses:
 http://code.google.com/p/efficient-java-matrix-library/wiki/KalmanFilterExamples
 http://mathstat.asu.edu/~eubank/
 http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/research/prod/index.php.en?id=53notitle=1
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/jkalman/
 http://www.vni.com/products/imsl/jmsl/v30/api/com/imsl/stat/KalmanFilterEx1.html

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-196) add support to constrained parameter estimation

2011-11-28 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-196.


Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1206821.

Some optimizers (CMA-ES and Bobyqa, still under development) support natively 
simple bounds constrained optimization. For direct optimizers not supporting 
natively simple bounds constrained optimization, two function adapters have 
been set up, using either a penalty function or a mapping to unbounded 
variables.

 add support to constrained parameter estimation
 ---

 Key: MATH-196
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-196
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: 1.2
Reporter: Luc Maisonobe
Assignee: Luc Maisonobe
 Fix For: 3.0


 The current estimation package supports only unconstrained problems. It 
 should at least support simple bounds constrains on parameters.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-714) init methods for event handler and stap handler in ODE

2011-11-28 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-714.


Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1207054.

 init methods for event handler and stap handler in ODE
 --

 Key: MATH-714
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-714
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.1
Reporter: Luc Maisonobe
Assignee: Luc Maisonobe
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.0


 The EventHandler interface does not provide any way to initialize the step 
 handler at integration start.
 The StepHandler interface does have this feature, but it uses a confusing 
 name (reset) which can easily be confused with the resetState method of the 
 EventHandler interface despite it has nothing to do with events based resets.
 Both interfaces being often used together, it would be nice to have an init 
 method in both interfaces, with arguments t0, y0 and t representing the 
 integration boundaries. The init method would simply replace the reset method 
 in the StepHandler interface and it would be a new method in the EventHandler 
 interface.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-710) Add support for fast cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator ISAAC

2011-11-28 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-710.


Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1207554.

Patch applied with minor changes in javadoc (added javadoc for all methods, 
moved author name to pom file as per Apache Commons policy).

Thanks for the report and for the patch.

 Add support for fast cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator 
 ISAAC
 -

 Key: MATH-710
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-710
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Eldar Agalarov
Assignee: Luc Maisonobe
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.0

 Attachments: ISAACRandom.java, ISAACTest.java

   Original Estimate: 1h
  Remaining Estimate: 1h

 Dear developers, please add to Commons Math library support for ISAAC random 
 number generator. This is a free and open-source CSPRNG (see at 
 http://burtleburtle.net/bob/rand/isaacafa.html). 
 Rewrited (with some improvements) Java code from original C version is 
 attached.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-713) Negative value with restrictNonNegative

2011-11-28 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-713.


   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1207566.

Patch applied directly.

Thanks to Michal for the report and thanks to Thomas for the patch.

 Negative value with restrictNonNegative
 ---

 Key: MATH-713
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-713
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.2
 Environment: commons-math-2.2
Reporter: Michał Skrzypczak
  Labels: nonnegative, simplex, solver
 Fix For: 3.0

 Attachments: MATH-713.patch

   Original Estimate: 3h
  Remaining Estimate: 3h

 Problem: commons-math-2.2 SimplexSolver.
 A variable with 0 coefficient may be assigned a negative value nevertheless 
 restrictToNonnegative flag in call:
 SimplexSolver.optimize(function, constraints, GoalType.MINIMIZE, true);
 Function
 1 * x + 1 * y + 0
 Constraints:
 1 * x + 0 * y = 1
 Result:
 x = 1; y = -1;
 Probably variables with 0 coefficients are omitted at some point of 
 computation and because of that the restrictions do not affect their values.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-705) DormandPrince853 integrator leads to revisiting of state events

2011-11-27 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-705.


Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1206723.

Applied same method to all Runge-Kutta based integrators.

Thanks for the report.

 DormandPrince853 integrator leads to revisiting of state events
 ---

 Key: MATH-705
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-705
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.0
 Environment: Commons Math trunk, Java 6, Linux
Reporter: Dennis Hendriks
Assignee: Luc Maisonobe
 Fix For: 3.0

 Attachments: ReappearingEventTest.java, ReappearingEventTest.out


 See the attached ReappearingEventTest.java. It has two unit tests, which use 
 either the DormandPrince853 or the GraggBulirschStoer integrator, on the same 
 ODE problem. It is a problem starting at time 6.0, with 7 variables, and 1 
 state event. The state event was previously detected at time 6.0, which is 
 why I start there now. I provide and end time of 10.0. Since I start at the 
 state event, I expect to integrate all the way to the end (10.0). For the 
 GraggBulirschStoer this is what happens (see attached 
 ReappearingEventTest.out). For the DormandPrince853Integerator, it detects a 
 state event and stops integration at 6.002.
 I think the problem becomes clear by looking at the output in 
 ReappearingEventTest.out, in particular these lines:
 {noformat}
 computeDerivatives: t=6.0  y=[2.0 , 2.0   
   , 2.0 , 4.0 , 2.0 , 
 7.0 , 15.0]
 (...)
 g : t=6.0  y=[1.9996  , 
 1.9996  , 1.9996  , 4.0 , 
 1.9996  , 7.0 , 14.998  ]
 (...)
 final result  : t=6.002y=[2.0013  , 
 2.0013  , 2.0013  , 4.002   , 
 2.0013  , 7.002   , 15.0]
 {noformat}
 The initial value of the last variable in y, the one that the state event 
 refers to, is 15.0. However, the first time it is given to the g function, 
 the value is 14.998. This value is less than 15, and more 
 importantly, it is a value from the past (as all functions are increasing), 
 *before* the state event. This makes that the state event re-appears 
 immediately, and integration stops at 6.002 because of the 
 detected state event.
 I find it puzzling that for the DormandPrince853Integerator the y array that 
 is given to the first evaluation of the g function, has different values than 
 the y array that is the input to the problem. For GraggBulirschStoer is can 
 be seen that the y arrays have identical values.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-709) BigFraction percentageValue does BigInteger divide.

2011-11-17 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-709.


   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1203516.

I have also added the percentage method to Fraction.

Thanks for the report.

 BigFraction percentageValue does BigInteger divide.
 ---

 Key: MATH-709
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-709
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Brent D. Milton
 Fix For: 3.0


 integer divide of 1/2 returns 0

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-706) Bad interaction between step handlers and events detectors that reset state in ODE integrators

2011-11-11 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-706.


Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1201105.

 Bad interaction between step handlers and events detectors that reset state 
 in ODE integrators
 --

 Key: MATH-706
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-706
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Luc Maisonobe
Assignee: Luc Maisonobe
 Fix For: 3.0


 During ODE integration, when en event detector attempts to reset a state, if 
 there are also step handlers
 associated with the integrator, the reset state is not called with the state 
 at event time, but may be called with some other state. The time provided 
 always correspond to the real event time (and hence is inconsistent with the 
 state).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-702) CMA-ES optimizer input sigma should not be normalized by user

2011-11-07 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-702.


Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1198741.

 CMA-ES optimizer input sigma should not be normalized by user
 -

 Key: MATH-702
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-702
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Luc Maisonobe
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.0


 I am trying to use CMA-ES optimizer with simple boundaries.
 It seems the inputSigma parameter should be normalized as it is checked 
 against the [0 - 1] range in the checkParameters private method and as its 
 value defaults to 0.3 if not not set in the initializeCMA private method.
 I would have expected this value to be in the same units as the user 
 parameters and to be normalized as part of an internal processing step 
 instead of relying to the user doing this. I think the method need normalized 
 values internally, as per the encode/decode methods in the inner class 
 FitnessFunction suggest.
 The optimizer should accept values in the same units as the other parameters 
 and use encode (or a similar function) to do the normalization. This way, 
 normalization is considered an internal implementation detail.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-695) Incomplete reinitialization with some events handling

2011-10-26 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-695.


   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1189086.

The fix is different from the proposed patch, it directly updates the events 
when the step truncation occurs, thus preventing even transient inconsistency.

Thanks for the report and for the patch.

 Incomplete reinitialization with some events handling
 -

 Key: MATH-695
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-695
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Pascal Parraud
Assignee: Luc Maisonobe
 Fix For: 3.0

 Attachments: events.patch, test-case-MATH-695.patch


 I get a bug with event handling: I track 2 events that occur in the same 
 step, when the first one is accepted, it resets the state but the 
 reinitialization is not complete and the second one becomes unable to find 
 its way.
 I can't give my context, which is rather large, but I tried a patch that 
 works for me, unfortunately it breaks the unit tests.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-682) Pascal triangle

2011-10-10 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-682.


Resolution: Not A Problem

The existing binomial coefficients methods in MathUtils already provide this 
feature.

 Pascal triangle 
 

 Key: MATH-682
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-682
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: 3.0
 Environment: All
Reporter: DI COSTANZO
Priority: Trivial
 Attachments: PascalTriangle.java, PascalTriangle.java, 
 PascalTriangle.java, PascalTriangleTest.java, PascalTriangleTest.java


 Create a method to get Pascal's triangle coefficient. This method could be 
 implemented in MathUtils, in a static way, with the following signature :
 double[] getTriangleCoefficient(final int order)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-679) Integer overflow in OpenMapRealMatrix

2011-10-10 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-679.


   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1181181.

Thanks for the report and the workaround.

 Integer overflow in OpenMapRealMatrix
 -

 Key: MATH-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-679
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Christopher Berner
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.0

 Attachments: Flaw.java


 computeKey() has an integer overflow. Since it is a sparse matrix, this is 
 quite easily encountered long before heap space is exhausted. The attached 
 code demonstrates the problem, which could potentially be a security 
 vulnerability (for example, if one was to use this matrix to store access 
 control information).
 Workaround: never create an OpenMapRealMatrix with more cells than are 
 addressable with an int.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-687) Add the Jacobi polynomials in the class PolynomialsUtils

2011-10-07 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-687.


   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1180092.

Thanks for the report and the patch.

 Add the Jacobi polynomials in the class PolynomialsUtils
 

 Key: MATH-687
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-687
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: 3.0
 Environment: all
Reporter: DI COSTANZO
Priority: Trivial
 Fix For: 3.0

 Attachments: jacobi.patch


 Jacobi polynomials Pk(vw) are a generalization of the legendre polynomial. 
 Legendre Polynomials are Jacobi polynomials for v = w = 0.
 They are orthogonal polynomials and are defined from a recursion formula, 
 giving the n+1 element of the polynomial from the nth element and the (n-1)'s 
 one
 Therefore, they could be implemented in the PolynomialsUtils and use the 
 generic frame already used in this class to create and store them.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-445) Replace package.html by package-info.java

2011-10-02 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-445.


Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1178168.

The script has been fixed with respect to the missing space and committed in 
commons/script for general use.

The missing spaces have been added directly to the already converted 
package-info.java files.

The checkstyle plugin used by maven has been upgraded so the underlying 
checkstyle is 5.x, so we can use package-info.java.

 Replace package.html by package-info.java
 -

 Key: MATH-445
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-445
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Gilles
Priority: Trivial
 Fix For: 3.0


 The newest (and recommended, I think) way of documenting packages is through 
 package-info.java files.
 CM still uses package.html files.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-380) Need to (re)initialize dYdY0 for multiple integrate with FirstOrderIntegratorWithJacobians

2011-10-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-380.


Resolution: Fixed

fixed in subversion repository as of r1176745.

 Need to (re)initialize dYdY0 for multiple integrate with 
 FirstOrderIntegratorWithJacobians
 --

 Key: MATH-380
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-380
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.1
Reporter: Pascal Parraud
Assignee: Luc Maisonobe
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.0


 There is a lack in the method integrate of FirstOrderIntegratorWithJacobians. 
 The jacobian DYDY0 can't be initialized by the user, unlike DFDP with DF0DP.
 So, for several successive integrations, the matrix is reinitialized to 
 identity and that is not what we might want.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-381) inconsistency for methods names within StepInterpolator and StepInterpolatorWithJacobians

2011-10-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-381.


Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1176745

 inconsistency for methods names within StepInterpolator and 
 StepInterpolatorWithJacobians
 -

 Key: MATH-381
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-381
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.1
Reporter: Pascal Parraud
Priority: Trivial
 Fix For: 3.0


 There is some inconstency in methods naming :
 getInterpolatedY and getInterpolatedYDot in StepInterpolatorWithJacobians do 
 the same as getInterpolatedState and getInterpolatedDerivatives in 
 StepInterpolator, so it will be better if they would have the same name.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-487) Deprecate ConvergenceException in MATH_2_X and remove it in trunk

2011-10-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-487.


   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.2)

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1177986.

The checked exception has been replaced by the unchecked one that lies in the 
exception package.

 Deprecate ConvergenceException in MATH_2_X and remove it in trunk
 ---

 Key: MATH-487
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-487
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Gilles
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.0


 The checked ConvergenceException should be deprecated.
 An example usage is in class {{ContinuedFraction}} (package {{util}}), at 
 line 153:
 {noformat}
   if (scale = 0) {  // Can't scale
 throw new 
 ConvergenceException(LocalizedFormats.CONTINUED_FRACTION_INFINITY_DIVERGENCE, 
 x);
   }
 {noformat}
 I think that it should be replaced by a more specific (and unchecked) 
 exception that reflects the exact low-level problem:
 {noformat}
   if (scale = 0) {  // Can't scale
 throw new NotStrictlypositiveException(scale);
   }
 {noformat}
 A few lines below that, there is:
 {noformat}
   if (infinite) {
 // Scaling failed
 throw new 
 ConvergenceException(LocalizedFormats.CONTINUED_FRACTION_INFINITY_DIVERGENCE, 
 x);
   }
 {noformat}
 So it seems that it is not necessary to throw an exception at the place where 
 the test on scale fails; instead we could have:
 {noformat}
   infinite = true;
   if (scale = 0) {  // Can't scale
 break;
   }
 {noformat}
 and let the check on infinite throw the exception:
 {noformat}
   if (infinite) {
 // Scaling failed
 throw new 
 NotFiniteNumberException(LocalizedFormats.CONTINUED_FRACTION_DIVERGENCE,
  Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY, x);
   }
 {noformat}
 As shown in the above excerpt, we could also replace two {{enum}}:
 * CONTINUED_FRACTION_INFINITY_DIVERGENCE
 * CONTINUED_FRACTION_NAN_DIVERGENCE
 with a single one:
 * CONTINUED_FRACTION_DIVERGENCE
 because the other bit of information (infinity vs NaN) is already given by 
 the first parameter of the message.
 What do you think of these changes?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-569) Add more operators to FieldElementT

2011-10-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-569.


Resolution: Won't Fix

Setting to Won't Fix as per comments above.

 Add more operators to FieldElementT
 -

 Key: MATH-569
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-569
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Arne Plöse
Priority: Minor

 it would be nice to have some additional operators in FieldElement i.e.
 T negate();
 T pow(T x);
 T sqrt();
 maybe the double variant i.e.
 T pow(double x);
 as well.
 This would be affect FieldVector | Matrix, BigReal, ... as well.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-571) make FieldVector generic

2011-10-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-571.


Resolution: Won't Fix

Setting to Won't Fix as per comments above.

 make FieldVector generic
 

 Key: MATH-571
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-571
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Arne Plöse
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.0


 make FieldVector generic, so one can extend i.e. ArrayVieldVectorComplex to 
 ArrayComplexVector an introduce new methoids (getReal())...
 if one has an equation complexvector.copy the original type 
 ArrayComplexVector is lost thus access to getReal() is not possible.
 solution:
 public class InheritationTest {
 public static interface FieldVectorT extends FieldElementT, R extends 
 FieldVector {
 R copy();
 }
 public abstract static class ArrayFieldVectorExtendableT extends 
 FieldElementT, R extends FieldVector implements FieldVectorT, R, 
 Serializable {
 protected T[] data;
 @Override
 public R copy() {
 return createVector(data);
 }
 abstract protected R createVector(T[] data);
 }
 public static class ArrayFieldVectorT extends FieldElementT extends 
 ArrayFieldVectorExtendableT, ArrayFieldVector {
 @Override
 protected ArrayFieldVectorT createVector(T[] data) {
 ArrayFieldVectorT result = new ArrayFieldVectorT();
 result.data = data;
 return result;
 }
 }
 public static class ArrayComplexVector extends 
 ArrayFieldVectorExtendableComplex, ArrayComplexVector {
 @Override
 protected ArrayComplexVector createVector(Complex[] data) {
 ArrayComplexVector result = new ArrayComplexVector();
 result.data = data;
 return result;
 }
 public double[] getReal() {
 return null;
 }
 public double[] getImaginary() {
 return null;
 }
 }
 public void test() {
 ArrayComplexVector v = new ArrayComplexVector();
 ArrayComplexVector v1 = v.copy();  // FiledVector type survives ...
 }
 }

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-457) Remove usage of OptimizationException

2011-10-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-457.


Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1178006.

 Remove usage of OptimizationException
 ---

 Key: MATH-457
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-457
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Gilles
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.0


 {{OptimizationException}} (defined in package {{optimization}}) is still used 
 in classes of packages {{optimization.linear}} and {{optimization.fitting}}.
 Its occurrences must be removed, or replaced by the corresponding exception 
 from the {{exception}} package.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-284) Avoid ArrayStoreException

2011-10-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-284.


Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1178009.

Thanks for the report and the fix suggestion.

 Avoid ArrayStoreException
 -

 Key: MATH-284
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-284
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.0
Reporter: Klaus
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.0

 Attachments: math-284.patch


 Add a new method
 org.apache.commons.math,Field#getRuntimeClass():
 ...
 /**
  * Returns the runtime class of the FieldElement. 
  * 
  * @return The {@code Class} object that represents the runtime
  * class of this object.
  */
 Class? extends FieldElement getRuntimeClass();
 ...
 and replace all occurrences of 
   Array.newInstance(field.getZero().getClass(),)
 with
   Array.newInstance(field.getRuntimeClass(),)
 to avoid the throwing of ArrayStoreException in the case you have a type 
 hierachy of Fields with a common interface
 and the array should have the interface type at runtime.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-445) Replace package.html by package-info.java

2011-10-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-445.


Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in subversion repository as of r1178067.

A shell+sed script has been created for this conversion, it can be found here: 
[http://people.apache.org/~luc/convert-to-package-info.sh]

 Replace package.html by package-info.java
 -

 Key: MATH-445
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-445
 Project: Commons Math
  Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Gilles
Priority: Trivial
 Fix For: 3.0


 The newest (and recommended, I think) way of documenting packages is through 
 package-info.java files.
 CM still uses package.html files.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira