[jira] [Updated] (CONFIGURATION-496) Excessive Synchronization AbstractFileConfiguration

2012-05-08 Thread Tim Canavan (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tim Canavan updated CONFIGURATION-496:
--

Description: 
We are having a problem with commons configuration 1.6 
AbstractFileConfiguration 

During a stress test we are seeing that we have wait locks against this method 
causing this method not to complete for up to one second.

We are using the FileReloadStrategy delegate which makes a check on the file 
system when now + interval is greater than the compare time.

Why can't we make this check before the synchronized block thus increasing 
throughput. I have noticed in 1.8 that the caller to this method is 
synchronized. This seems like excessive synchronization. Any ideas how to solve 
this. 

{code}
public void reload()
{
synchronized (reloadLock)
{
if (noReload == 0)
{
try
{
enterNoReload(); // avoid reentrant calls

if (strategy.reloadingRequired())
{
if (getLogger().isInfoEnabled())
{
getLogger().info("Reloading configuration. URL is " 
+ getURL());
}
fireEvent(EVENT_RELOAD, null, getURL(), true);
setDetailEvents(false);
boolean autoSaveBak = this.isAutoSave(); // save the 
current state
this.setAutoSave(false); // deactivate autoSave to 
prevent information loss
try
{
clear();
load();
}
finally
{
this.setAutoSave(autoSaveBak); // set autoSave to 
previous value
setDetailEvents(true);
}
fireEvent(EVENT_RELOAD, null, getURL(), false);

// notify the strategy
strategy.reloadingPerformed();
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
fireError(EVENT_RELOAD, null, null, e);
// todo rollback the changes if the file can't be reloaded
}
finally
{
exitNoReload();
}
}
}
}

{code}

  was:
We are having a problem with commons configuration 1.6 
AbstractFileConfiguration 

During a stress test we are seeing that we have wait locks against this method 
causing this method not to complete for up to one second.

We are using the FileReloadStrategy delegate which makes a check on the file 
system when now + interval is greater than the compare time.

Why can't we make this check before the synchronized block thus increasing 
throughput. I have noticed in 1.8 that the caller to this method is 
synchronized. This seems like excessive synchronization. Any ideas how to solve 
this. 

public void reload()
{
synchronized (reloadLock)
{
if (noReload == 0)
{
try
{
enterNoReload(); // avoid reentrant calls

if (strategy.reloadingRequired())
{
if (getLogger().isInfoEnabled())
{
getLogger().info("Reloading configuration. URL is " 
+ getURL());
}
fireEvent(EVENT_RELOAD, null, getURL(), true);
setDetailEvents(false);
boolean autoSaveBak = this.isAutoSave(); // save the 
current state
this.setAutoSave(false); // deactivate autoSave to 
prevent information loss
try
{
clear();
load();
}
finally
{
this.setAutoSave(autoSaveBak); // set autoSave to 
previous value
setDetailEvents(true);
}
fireEvent(EVENT_RELOAD, null, getURL(), false);

// notify the strategy
strategy.reloadingPerformed();
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
fireError(EVENT_RELOAD, null, null, e);
// todo rollback the changes if the file can't be reloaded
}
finally
{
exitNoReload();
}
}
}
}


> Excessive Synchronization AbstractFileConfiguration
> 

[jira] [Created] (CONFIGURATION-496) Excessive Synchronization AbstractFileConfiguration

2012-05-08 Thread Tim Canavan (JIRA)
Tim Canavan created CONFIGURATION-496:
-

 Summary: Excessive Synchronization AbstractFileConfiguration
 Key: CONFIGURATION-496
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-496
 Project: Commons Configuration
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: File reloading
Affects Versions: 1.8, 1.7, 1.6
Reporter: Tim Canavan


We are having a problem with commons configuration 1.6 
AbstractFileConfiguration 

During a stress test we are seeing that we have wait locks against this method 
causing this method not to complete for up to one second.

We are using the FileReloadStrategy delegate which makes a check on the file 
system when now + interval is greater than the compare time.

Why can't we make this check before the synchronized block thus increasing 
throughput. I have noticed in 1.8 that the caller to this method is 
synchronized. This seems like excessive synchronization. Any ideas how to solve 
this. 

public void reload()
{
synchronized (reloadLock)
{
if (noReload == 0)
{
try
{
enterNoReload(); // avoid reentrant calls

if (strategy.reloadingRequired())
{
if (getLogger().isInfoEnabled())
{
getLogger().info("Reloading configuration. URL is " 
+ getURL());
}
fireEvent(EVENT_RELOAD, null, getURL(), true);
setDetailEvents(false);
boolean autoSaveBak = this.isAutoSave(); // save the 
current state
this.setAutoSave(false); // deactivate autoSave to 
prevent information loss
try
{
clear();
load();
}
finally
{
this.setAutoSave(autoSaveBak); // set autoSave to 
previous value
setDetailEvents(true);
}
fireEvent(EVENT_RELOAD, null, getURL(), false);

// notify the strategy
strategy.reloadingPerformed();
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
fireError(EVENT_RELOAD, null, null, e);
// todo rollback the changes if the file can't be reloaded
}
finally
{
exitNoReload();
}
}
}
}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira