[jira] [Created] (COLLECTIONS-403) Make AndPredicate, AnyPredicate etc. not final

2012-04-03 Thread david cogen (Created) (JIRA)
Make AndPredicate, AnyPredicate etc. not final
--

 Key: COLLECTIONS-403
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-403
 Project: Commons Collections
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Collection
Affects Versions: 3.2.1
Reporter: david cogen
Priority: Minor


If there is no good reason for these (and similar classes) to not be final, 
they would be much more useful to me if they were not final.

I have a class that I wanted to have an "is a" relation to AnyPredicate, but, 
AnyPredicate being declared final, I cannot and instead have to design it with 
a "has a" relation to AnyPredicate, which for my purpose is much less clear.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Created] (LANG-787) StringUtils.RemoveIgnoreCase desired

2012-02-01 Thread david cogen (Created) (JIRA)
StringUtils.RemoveIgnoreCase desired


 Key: LANG-787
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-787
 Project: Commons Lang
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: lang.*
Affects Versions: 3.1
Reporter: david cogen
Priority: Minor


removeStartIgnoreCase() and removeEndIgnoreCase() exist, so why not 
removeIgnoreCase()

Specifically:
String removeIgnoreCase(String str, String remove)


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Created] (LANG-773) ImmutablePair doc contains nonsense text

2011-11-16 Thread david cogen (Created) (JIRA)
ImmutablePair doc contains nonsense text


 Key: LANG-773
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-773
 Project: Commons Lang
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: lang.tuple.*
Affects Versions: 3.1
Reporter: david cogen
Priority: Minor


Description of this class contains the following nonsense text:

#ThreadSafe# if the objects are threadsafe

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Created] (LANG-772) ClassUtils.PACKAGE_SEPARATOR javadoc contains garbage text

2011-11-15 Thread david cogen (Created) (JIRA)
ClassUtils.PACKAGE_SEPARATOR javadoc contains garbage text
--

 Key: LANG-772
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-772
 Project: Commons Lang
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: lang.*
Affects Versions: 3.0.1
Reporter: david cogen
Priority: Minor


javadoc description of ClassUtils.PACKAGE_SEPARATOR is as follows:

The package separator String: ".".

It should be something like the following:

The package separator String: ".".

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Created] (LANG-769) Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException

2011-11-14 Thread david cogen (Created) (JIRA)
Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException
-

 Key: LANG-769
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769
 Project: Commons Lang
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: david cogen
Priority: Minor


Why were these removed? I found these very useful and used them often. As the 
version 2.6 api javadoc states, "This exception supplements the standard 
exception classes by providing a more semantically rich description of the 
problem."

Just want you to realize that these have found direct use outside the library; 
not just internal use within commons-lang.

I will define these missing classes myself, or maybe include both commons-lang 
and commons-lang3 (but I really don't to do that). It would be very nice to 
have these back.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira