[jira] [Commented] (CONFIGURATION-604) combining properties which use 3+ part names discards entries as of Commons 1.6+

2015-07-04 Thread Oliver Heger (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14614033#comment-14614033
 ] 

Oliver Heger commented on CONFIGURATION-604:


This seems to be a pretty old change since version 1.6 was released years ago.

To make sure I fully understand the problem, could you please specify exactly 
the expected result and the actual result? (Or even better: could you transform 
your demo code fragment to a unit test?)

 combining properties which use 3+ part names discards entries as of Commons 
 1.6+
 

 Key: CONFIGURATION-604
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-604
 Project: Commons Configuration
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.6
Reporter: N Campbell

 When two property files are combined using commons config 1.5, the aggregate 
 configuration returns an expected result of 6 entries. If Commons 
 configuration 1.6 or higher is used, the resulting set drops to  which is not 
 expected. 
 The property names include 2, 3 or 4 part names X.Y, X.Y.Z etc and it appears 
 that as of 1.6 if the names are arranged in 2 part, then 3 part etc that the 
 combiner returns the expected result.
 There does not appear to be any release notes etc that would suggest  that 
 this isn't a defect versus an intended implementation change.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (CONFIGURATION-604) combining properties which use 3+ part names discards entries as of Commons 1.6+

2015-07-04 Thread N Campbell (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14614045#comment-14614045
 ] 

N Campbell commented on CONFIGURATION-604:
--

Expected answer is 6 as returned when using 1.5

x.y=true
x.y.simpleCase=false
x.y.between=false
x.y.isDistinctFrom=false
x.y.comparison=true
x.y.in=true

Switch to 1.6+ and you get 4

x.y.simpleCase=false
x.y.between=false
x.y.isDistinctFrom=false
x.y=true


Stay with 1.6 and re-order the 2-part entry in A.properties so it appears 
before 3 part names (x.y=true) and you get 6 again

x.y=true
x.y.simpleCase=false
x.y.between=false
x.y.isDistinctFrom=false
x.y.comparison=true
x.y.in=true






 combining properties which use 3+ part names discards entries as of Commons 
 1.6+
 

 Key: CONFIGURATION-604
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-604
 Project: Commons Configuration
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.6
Reporter: N Campbell

 When two property files are combined using commons config 1.5, the aggregate 
 configuration returns an expected result of 6 entries. If Commons 
 configuration 1.6 or higher is used, the resulting set drops to  which is not 
 expected. 
 The property names include 2, 3 or 4 part names X.Y, X.Y.Z etc and it appears 
 that as of 1.6 if the names are arranged in 2 part, then 3 part etc that the 
 combiner returns the expected result.
 There does not appear to be any release notes etc that would suggest  that 
 this isn't a defect versus an intended implementation change.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (CONFIGURATION-604) combining properties which use 3+ part names discards entries as of Commons 1.6+

2015-07-03 Thread N Campbell (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14613397#comment-14613397
 ] 

N Campbell commented on CONFIGURATION-604:
--

Simple source


import java.util.Iterator;

import org.apache.commons.configuration.CombinedConfiguration;
import org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException;
import org.apache.commons.configuration.PropertiesConfiguration;
import org.apache.commons.configuration.tree.NodeCombiner;
import org.apache.commons.configuration.tree.OverrideCombiner;

public class CommonsIssue { 
public static String propFile1 = c:\\temp\\A.properties;
public static String propFile2 = c:\\temp\\B.properties;

public static void main( String[] args ) throws ConfigurationException {
testCombindedConfig();  
}

public static void testCombindedConfig() throws ConfigurationException {
NodeCombiner combiner = new OverrideCombiner();
CombinedConfiguration combinedConfig = new 
CombinedConfiguration(combiner); 

PropertiesConfiguration conf1 = new PropertiesConfiguration();
conf1.setDelimiterParsingDisabled(true);
conf1.setThrowExceptionOnMissing(true); 
conf1.load(propFile1);

combinedConfig.addConfiguration(conf1); 

PropertiesConfiguration conf2 = new PropertiesConfiguration();
conf2.setDelimiterParsingDisabled(true);
conf2.setThrowExceptionOnMissing(true);

conf2.load(propFile2);
combinedConfig.addConfiguration(conf2);

@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
IteratorString keys = combinedConfig.getKeys();

while (keys.hasNext()) {
String key = keys.next();
System.out.println(key + = + 
combinedConfig.getString(key));

}   
}
}

A.properties
x.y.simpleCase=false
x.y.between=false
x.y.isDistinctFrom=false
x.y=true

B.properties
x.y=true
x.y.between=true
x.y.comparison=true
x.y.in=true
x.y.isDistinctFrom=true
x.y.simpleCase=true





 combining properties which use 3+ part names discards entries as of Commons 
 1.6+
 

 Key: CONFIGURATION-604
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-604
 Project: Commons Configuration
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.6
Reporter: N Campbell

 When two property files are combined using commons config 1.5, the aggregate 
 configuration returns an expected result of 6 entries. If Commons 
 configuration 1.6 or higher is used, the resulting set drops to  which is not 
 expected. 
 The property names include 2, 3 or 4 part names X.Y, X.Y.Z etc and it appears 
 that as of 1.6 if the names are arranged in 2 part, then 3 part etc that the 
 combiner returns the expected result.
 There does not appear to be any release notes etc that would suggest  that 
 this isn't a defect versus an intended implementation change.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)