Hussachai Puripunpinyo created JEXL-366:
-------------------------------------------

             Summary: Fail to evaluate string and number comparison
                 Key: JEXL-366
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-366
             Project: Commons JEXL
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Hussachai Puripunpinyo


The comparison logic doesn't cover the case when one operand is a string and 
another operand is a numerable type (int, short, long,..).

The expected result for '1.0' == 1 should be true but it fails because the 
string comparison check is after the numerable type check. JEXL tries to parse 
'1.0' using toLong function and it fails with this error message `For input 
string: "1.0"`

Moving a string comparison up before other number type checks will not cover 
some corner cases such as
'1.00' == 1.0 // String comparison will yield false but it obviously doesn't 
make sense.

The proposed change is to add the following code to handle the corner case when 
one operand is string and another operand is numerable. To cover this corner 
case, we can apply toBigDecimal to both *lhs* and *rhs* since it should cover 
any arbitrary number in a string form, and it handles other number types well.
{code:java}
if (isNumberable(left) || isNumberable(right)) {
    if (left instanceof String || right instanceof String) {
        final BigDecimal l = toBigDecimal(left);
        final BigDecimal r = toBigDecimal(right);
        return l.compareTo(r);
    } else {
        // this code block remains the same
    }
    return 0;
} {code}

JEXL syntax is very similar to ECMA script except a few small set that are not 
the same. So, I think following the ECMA spec for this comparison check makes 
sense.


The following code is JavaScript and it can be used in the JEXL test to make 
sure that the behavior of comparison are the same. 
Note that '1.0' == 1 yields true
{code:java}
function assert(condition, source) {
    if (!condition) {
        throw `Assertion failed for ${source}`;
    }
}
  // Basic compare
let exprs = [
  "1 == 1", true,
  "1 != 1", false,
  "1 != 2", true,
  "1 > 2", false,
  "1 >= 2", false,
  "1 < 2", true,
  "1 <= 2", true,
  // Int <-> Float Coercion
  "1.0 == 1", true,
  "1 == 1.0", true,
  "1.1 != 1", true,
  "1.1 < 2", true,
  // numbers and strings
  "'1' == 1", true,
  "'' == 0", true, // empty string is coerced to zero (ECMA compliance)
  "1.0 >= '1'", true,
  "1.0 > '1'", false
];for (e = 0; e < exprs.length; e += 2) {
  let stext = exprs[e];
  let expected = exprs[e + 1];
  assert(eval(stext) == expected, stext);
  
} {code}
 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to