[jira] [Commented] (CXF-8755) Update to Slf4j 2.0
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17626507#comment-17626507 ] Colm O hEigeartaigh commented on CXF-8755: -- Makes sense, thanks [~reta] > Update to Slf4j 2.0 > --- > > Key: CXF-8755 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8755 > Project: CXF > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Andriy Redko >Assignee: Andriy Redko >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.0.0 > > > [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.slf4j/slf4j-api/2.0.0] > https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#changesInVersion200 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (CXF-8755) Update to Slf4j 2.0
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17626239#comment-17626239 ] Andriy Redko commented on CXF-8755: --- [~coheigea] was working on it, so the hard blocker we have is that Spring 5.x / Spring Boot 2.x does not support Slf4j 2.x / Logback 1.4 [1], and indeed it fails with: {noformat} 10:34:53.718 [main] ERROR org.springframework.test.context.TestContextManager - Caught exception while allowing TestExecutionListener [org.springframework.boot.test.autoconfigure.SpringBootDependencyInjectionTestExecutionListener@4218500f] to prepare test instance [org.apache.cxf.systest.jaxrs.spring.boot.SpringClientOnlyJaxrsTest@1755e85b] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder at org.springframework.boot.logging.logback.LogbackLoggingSystem.getLoggerContext(LogbackLoggingSystem.java:293) at org.springframework.boot.logging.logback.LogbackLoggingSystem.beforeInitialize(LogbackLoggingSystem.java:118) {noformat} I think we should keep 3.6.x / 3.5.x on Slf4j 1.7.x, at least for the time being, what do you think? [1] https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/issues/12649 > Update to Slf4j 2.0 > --- > > Key: CXF-8755 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8755 > Project: CXF > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Andriy Redko >Assignee: Andriy Redko >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.0.0 > > > [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.slf4j/slf4j-api/2.0.0] > https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#changesInVersion200 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (CXF-8755) Update to Slf4j 2.0
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17625080#comment-17625080 ] Andriy Redko commented on CXF-8755: --- I think it makes sense, thanks Colm. > Update to Slf4j 2.0 > --- > > Key: CXF-8755 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8755 > Project: CXF > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Andriy Redko >Assignee: Andriy Redko >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.6.0 > > > [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.slf4j/slf4j-api/2.0.0] > https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#changesInVersion200 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (CXF-8755) Update to Slf4j 2.0
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17625044#comment-17625044 ] Colm O hEigeartaigh commented on CXF-8755: -- Maybe we could update as well 3.5.x? SLF4J 1.7.x is EOL afaik. Colm. > Update to Slf4j 2.0 > --- > > Key: CXF-8755 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8755 > Project: CXF > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Andriy Redko >Assignee: Andriy Redko >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.6.0 > > > [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.slf4j/slf4j-api/2.0.0] > https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#changesInVersion200 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)