[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17402122#comment-17402122 ]
Cong Luo commented on DRILL-7987: --------------------------------- [~CoolKangaroo2020] Sure. Thanks for your interest in the Apache Drill. there is a link resource about the [Drill : 1.19.0 API|[https://drill.apache.org/apidocs/overview-summary.html|https://drill.apache.org/apidocs/overview-summary.html].]]. Then, Welcome to join our [Slack Channel|https://bit.ly/3t4rozO]. > Missing Javadoc > --------------- > > Key: DRILL-7987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7987 > Project: Apache Drill > Issue Type: Wish > Reporter: CoolGuy > Priority: Minor > > Hello! I find in your [Contribution > Guidelines|http://drill.apache.org/docs/apache-drill-contribution-guidelines/] > that > ??All public classes and methods should have informative Javadoc comments.?? > However, I still witness some public classes without Javadocs, e.g., > * protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/proto/BitData.java > * > exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/MergingReceiverCreator.java > * > exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/common/HashTable.java > ...... > I also find likely missing Javadoc for public methods in the following files: > * drill-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/yarn/core/YarnRMClient.java > * protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/proto/SchemaBitControl.java > ...... > Would you like to add Javadoc for these methods or classes, or they are just > not that important? > If there is anything I can help with? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)