[GitHub] [flink] SteNicholas removed a comment on pull request #14028: [FLINK-20020][client] Make UnsuccessfulExecutionException part of the JobClient.getJobExecutionResult() contract
SteNicholas removed a comment on pull request #14028: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14028#issuecomment-737624582 > example @kl0u , IMO, I really want to follow the remaining comments from @tillrohrmann , and continue to update the commit according to Till's above comments. It's better for me to merge this pull request in the end. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] SteNicholas removed a comment on pull request #14028: [FLINK-20020][client] Make UnsuccessfulExecutionException part of the JobClient.getJobExecutionResult() contract
SteNicholas removed a comment on pull request #14028: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14028#issuecomment-733034701 > 2\. ExecutionGraphBuilder @tillrohrmann , thanks for your detailed review. My answer for above question you mentioned is as follows: 1.`ProgramInvocationException` isn't the part of the public API of a `JobClient`. Even if it is, it is wrapped into `CompletableFuture`. 2.Why the `JobExecutionException` is removed from the runtime components (specifically the `ExecutionGraphBuilder`)? What are the adverse effects of this? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] SteNicholas removed a comment on pull request #14028: [FLINK-20020][client] Make UnsuccessfulExecutionException part of the JobClient.getJobExecutionResult() contract
SteNicholas removed a comment on pull request #14028: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14028#issuecomment-731046963 @tillrohrmann , could you please review this pull request for the application status of `JobExecutionException? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] SteNicholas removed a comment on pull request #14028: [FLINK-20020][client] Make UnsuccessfulExecutionException part of the JobClient.getJobExecutionResult() contract
SteNicholas removed a comment on pull request #14028: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14028#issuecomment-727142827 > I am having a look right now @SteNicholas @kl0u Any other comments by you? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] SteNicholas removed a comment on pull request #14028: [FLINK-20020][client] Make UnsuccessfulExecutionException part of the JobClient.getJobExecutionResult() contract
SteNicholas removed a comment on pull request #14028: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14028#issuecomment-725301089 @kl0u , could you please help to review this commit if you are available? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org