[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot commented on issue #10840: [FLINK-15444][runtime] Make the component AbstractInvokable in CheckpointBarrierHandler NonNull

2020-01-13 Thread GitBox
flinkbot commented on issue #10840: [FLINK-15444][runtime] Make the component 
AbstractInvokable in CheckpointBarrierHandler NonNull
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/10840#issuecomment-573563119
 
 
   
   ## CI report:
   
   * 61e9e675667e05e44e9c4b5ffd7565f60aec6d62 UNKNOWN
   
   
   Bot commands
 The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
   
- `@flinkbot run travis` re-run the last Travis build
- `@flinkbot run azure` re-run the last Azure build
   


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot commented on issue #10840: [FLINK-15444][runtime] Make the component AbstractInvokable in CheckpointBarrierHandler NonNull

2020-01-13 Thread GitBox
flinkbot commented on issue #10840: [FLINK-15444][runtime] Make the component 
AbstractInvokable in CheckpointBarrierHandler NonNull
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/10840#issuecomment-573561483
 
 
   Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the 
@flinkbot. I help the community
   to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress 
of the review.
   
   
   ## Automated Checks
   Last check on commit 61e9e675667e05e44e9c4b5ffd7565f60aec6d62 (Mon Jan 13 
08:48:18 UTC 2020)
   
   **Warnings:**
* No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up 
to date!
   
   
   Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.
   ## Review Progress
   
   * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
   * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
   * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
   * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
   * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.
   
   Please see the [Pull Request Review 
Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full 
explanation of the review process.
The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied 
according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink 
committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
 The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
   
- `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: 
`description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`)
- `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects
- `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until 
`architecture`
- `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's 
attention
- `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier
   


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services