zoltar9264 opened a new pull request #17443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17443


   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   This pull request support specify a separate savepoint timeout option via 
REST API and CLI, which is decribed in 
[FLINK-9465](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9465).
   
   
   ## Brief change log
   
     - *CheckpointCoordinator.CheckpointTriggerRequest* add savepointTimeout 
field,
     - *CheckpointCoordinator#createPendingCheckpoint()* add a "timeout" 
parameter, and use it as canceller trigger delay if it > 0,
     - *CheckpointCoordinator, RestfulGateway, 
JobMasterGateway,SchedulerNG,ClusterClient* add 
triggerSavepoint/stopWithSavepoint method with parameter "savepointTimeout"
     - *CliFrontend#savepoint(), CliFrontend#stop(), SavepointTriggerHandler, 
StopWithSavepointHandler* migrate to method with "savepointTimeout"
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   *(Please pick either of the following options)*
   
   This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
   
   *(or)*
   
   This change is already covered by existing tests, such as *(please describe 
tests)*.
   
   *(or)*
   
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
   
   *(example:)*
     - *Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads 
(100MB)*
     - *Extended integration test for recovery after master (JobManager) 
failure*
     - *Added test that validates that TaskInfo is transferred only once across 
recoveries*
     - *Manually verified the change by running a 4 node cluser with 2 
JobManagers and 4 TaskManagers, a stateful streaming program, and killing one 
JobManager and two TaskManagers during the execution, verifying that recovery 
happens correctly.*
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: yes
     - The serializers: no
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: yes
     - The S3 file system connector: no
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs 
/ not documented)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to