[GitHub] TisonKun commented on a change in pull request #6490: [FLINK-10056] [test] Add JobMasterTest#testRequestNextInputSplit

2018-08-05 Thread GitBox
TisonKun commented on a change in pull request #6490: [FLINK-10056] [test] Add 
JobMasterTest#testRequestNextInputSplit
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6490#discussion_r207763974
 
 

 ##
 File path: 
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/executiongraph/ExecutionGraphTestUtils.java
 ##
 @@ -144,7 +146,48 @@ public static void waitUntilExecutionState(Execution 
execution, ExecutionState s
}
 
if (System.nanoTime() >= deadline) {
-   throw new TimeoutException();
+   throw new TimeoutException(
+   "The execution did not reach state " + state + 
" in time. " +
+   "Current status is " + execution.getState() + 
'.');
+   }
+   }
+
+   /**
+* Waits until the Execution vertex has reached a certain state.
+*
+* This method is based on polling and might miss very fast state 
transitions!
+*/
+   public static void waitUntilExecutionVertexState(ExecutionVertex 
executionVertex, ExecutionState state, long maxWaitMillis)
+   throws TimeoutException {
+
 
 Review comment:
   Well I modify the others all remove the empty line 


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] TisonKun commented on a change in pull request #6490: [FLINK-10056] [test] Add JobMasterTest#testRequestNextInputSplit

2018-08-05 Thread GitBox
TisonKun commented on a change in pull request #6490: [FLINK-10056] [test] Add 
JobMasterTest#testRequestNextInputSplit
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6490#discussion_r207727020
 
 

 ##
 File path: 
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/executiongraph/ExecutionGraphTestUtils.java
 ##
 @@ -144,7 +146,48 @@ public static void waitUntilExecutionState(Execution 
execution, ExecutionState s
}
 
if (System.nanoTime() >= deadline) {
-   throw new TimeoutException();
+   throw new TimeoutException(
+   "The execution did not reach state " + state + 
" in time. " +
+   "Current status is " + execution.getState() + 
'.');
+   }
+   }
+
+   /**
+* Waits until the Execution vertex has reached a certain state.
+*
+* This method is based on polling and might miss very fast state 
transitions!
+*/
+   public static void waitUntilExecutionVertexState(ExecutionVertex 
executionVertex, ExecutionState state, long maxWaitMillis)
 
 Review comment:
   insist my opinion. use `waitUntilExecutionVertexStateChanged` or 
`waitUntilExecutionVertexStateReached` does not provide extra accuracy.
   
   maybe a better solution is `[ executionVertex waitUntilExecutionStateReach: 
state WithTimeOut: maxWaitMillis ]`, but we cannot. i think 
`waitUntilExecutionVertexState` is enough. longer name does not provide extra 
accuracy. 


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] TisonKun commented on a change in pull request #6490: [FLINK-10056] [test] Add JobMasterTest#testRequestNextInputSplit

2018-08-05 Thread GitBox
TisonKun commented on a change in pull request #6490: [FLINK-10056] [test] Add 
JobMasterTest#testRequestNextInputSplit
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6490#discussion_r207727020
 
 

 ##
 File path: 
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/executiongraph/ExecutionGraphTestUtils.java
 ##
 @@ -144,7 +146,48 @@ public static void waitUntilExecutionState(Execution 
execution, ExecutionState s
}
 
if (System.nanoTime() >= deadline) {
-   throw new TimeoutException();
+   throw new TimeoutException(
+   "The execution did not reach state " + state + 
" in time. " +
+   "Current status is " + execution.getState() + 
'.');
+   }
+   }
+
+   /**
+* Waits until the Execution vertex has reached a certain state.
+*
+* This method is based on polling and might miss very fast state 
transitions!
+*/
+   public static void waitUntilExecutionVertexState(ExecutionVertex 
executionVertex, ExecutionState state, long maxWaitMillis)
 
 Review comment:
   insist my opinion. use `waitUntilExecutionVertexStateChanged` or 
`waitUntilExecutionVertexStateReached` does not provide extra accuracy.
   
   maybe a better solution is `[ executionVertex waitUntilStateReach: state 
WithTimeOut: maxWaitMillis ]`, but we cannot. i think 
`waitUntilExecutionVertexState` is enough. longer name does not provide extra 
accuracy. 


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] TisonKun commented on a change in pull request #6490: [FLINK-10056] [test] Add JobMasterTest#testRequestNextInputSplit

2018-08-04 Thread GitBox
TisonKun commented on a change in pull request #6490: [FLINK-10056] [test] Add 
JobMasterTest#testRequestNextInputSplit
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6490#discussion_r207708631
 
 

 ##
 File path: 
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/executiongraph/ExecutionGraphTestUtils.java
 ##
 @@ -144,7 +146,48 @@ public static void waitUntilExecutionState(Execution 
execution, ExecutionState s
}
 
if (System.nanoTime() >= deadline) {
-   throw new TimeoutException();
+   throw new TimeoutException(
+   "The execution did not reach state " + state + 
" in time. " +
+   "Current status is " + execution.getState() + 
'.');
+   }
+   }
+
+   /**
+* Waits until the Execution vertex has reached a certain state.
+*
+* This method is based on polling and might miss very fast state 
transitions!
+*/
+   public static void waitUntilExecutionVertexState(ExecutionVertex 
executionVertex, ExecutionState state, long maxWaitMillis)
 
 Review comment:
   `waitUntilExecutionVertexState` means (as its comment/doc) we wait until the 
ExecutionVertex has reached a certain state. otherwise we get a 
`TimeoutException`. It is clear to me. So for me, I would not consider to 
rename it.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] TisonKun commented on a change in pull request #6490: [FLINK-10056] [test] Add JobMasterTest#testRequestNextInputSplit

2018-08-04 Thread GitBox
TisonKun commented on a change in pull request #6490: [FLINK-10056] [test] Add 
JobMasterTest#testRequestNextInputSplit
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6490#discussion_r207708631
 
 

 ##
 File path: 
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/executiongraph/ExecutionGraphTestUtils.java
 ##
 @@ -144,7 +146,48 @@ public static void waitUntilExecutionState(Execution 
execution, ExecutionState s
}
 
if (System.nanoTime() >= deadline) {
-   throw new TimeoutException();
+   throw new TimeoutException(
+   "The execution did not reach state " + state + 
" in time. " +
+   "Current status is " + execution.getState() + 
'.');
+   }
+   }
+
+   /**
+* Waits until the Execution vertex has reached a certain state.
+*
+* This method is based on polling and might miss very fast state 
transitions!
+*/
+   public static void waitUntilExecutionVertexState(ExecutionVertex 
executionVertex, ExecutionState state, long maxWaitMillis)
 
 Review comment:
   `waitUntilExecutionVertexState` means we wait until the ExecutionVertex has 
reached a certain state. otherwise we get a `TimeoutException`. It is clear to 
me. So for me, I would not consider to rename it.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] TisonKun commented on a change in pull request #6490: [FLINK-10056] [test] Add JobMasterTest#testRequestNextInputSplit

2018-08-04 Thread GitBox
TisonKun commented on a change in pull request #6490: [FLINK-10056] [test] Add 
JobMasterTest#testRequestNextInputSplit
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6490#discussion_r207708380
 
 

 ##
 File path: 
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/executiongraph/ExecutionGraphTestUtils.java
 ##
 @@ -144,7 +146,48 @@ public static void waitUntilExecutionState(Execution 
execution, ExecutionState s
}
 
if (System.nanoTime() >= deadline) {
-   throw new TimeoutException();
+   throw new TimeoutException(
+   "The execution did not reach state " + state + 
" in time. " +
+   "Current status is " + execution.getState() + 
'.');
+   }
+   }
+
+   /**
+* Waits until the Execution vertex has reached a certain state.
+*
+* This method is based on polling and might miss very fast state 
transitions!
+*/
+   public static void waitUntilExecutionVertexState(ExecutionVertex 
executionVertex, ExecutionState state, long maxWaitMillis)
+   throws TimeoutException {
+
 
 Review comment:
   This keeps consistent with similar method above.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services