[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3651] Fix faulty RollingSink Restore

2016-03-23 Thread aljoscha
GitHub user aljoscha opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1830

[FLINK-3651] Fix faulty RollingSink Restore

On restore the sink for subtask index i has to cleanup leftover files
for subtask i. The pattern used for checking this was not properly
terminated so the sink for subtask 1 would, for example, delete some
files for sink i=11. This would lead to data loss.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/aljoscha/flink rolling-sink-fix

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1830.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1830


commit a78d88f01a3d0da3bcfaad07c9abf419061a8025
Author: Aljoscha Krettek 
Date:   2016-03-07T16:15:20Z

[FLINK-3651] Fix faulty RollingSink Restore

On restore the sink for subtask index i has to cleanup leftover files
for subtask i. The pattern used for checking this was not properly
terminated so the sink for subtask 1 would, for example, delete some
files for sink i=11. This would lead to data loss.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3651] Fix faulty RollingSink Restore

2016-03-24 Thread uce
Github user uce commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1830#issuecomment-200795802
  
Good catch! The changes look good to me.

I tried running the adjusted `RollingSinkFaultToleranceITCase` and 
`RollingSinkFaultTolerance2ITCase` w/o the fix in `RollingSink` and they still 
succeeded.

If this expected? Is there a way we can test this differently?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3651] Fix faulty RollingSink Restore

2016-03-24 Thread rmetzger
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1830#issuecomment-200796710
  
I think the test fails only sporadically, depending on the speed at which 
tasks are deleting the files.
If you are lucky, everything is correct.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3651] Fix faulty RollingSink Restore

2016-03-24 Thread aljoscha
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1830#issuecomment-200863307
  
Yes, what @rmetzger  said is correct. Without the fix and the increase of 
parallelism it will be a flaky test that still succeeds sometimes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3651] Fix faulty RollingSink Restore

2016-03-29 Thread uce
Github user uce commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1830#issuecomment-202794232
  
OK, depending on whether it is feasible to test this separately, I would go 
ahead and merge it as is or add a test and merge then. :+1:


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3651] Fix faulty RollingSink Restore

2016-03-29 Thread uce
Github user uce commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1830#issuecomment-203004909
  
I'm going to merge this to `master` and `release-1.0`.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3651] Fix faulty RollingSink Restore

2016-03-29 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1830


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---