[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-13308) flink-python releases 2 jars

2019-07-17 Thread Chesnay Schepler (JIRA) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16887675#comment-16887675
 ] 

Chesnay Schepler commented on FLINK-13308:
--

Personally I would prefer a different name because it is very much an entirely 
different module.

> flink-python releases 2 jars
> 
>
> Key: FLINK-13308
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13308
> Project: Flink
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: API / Python, Build System
>Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
>Assignee: Dian Fu
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>
> {{flink-python}} uses a classifier to differentiate itseld from the old 
> python API. turns out thsi doesn't work since it still tries to release a 
> normal unshaded flink-python jar.
> We should drop the classifier, and either stick to flink-python or rename it 
> as proposed in FLINK-12776.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-13308) flink-python releases 2 jars

2019-07-17 Thread Aljoscha Krettek (JIRA) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16887550#comment-16887550
 ] 

Aljoscha Krettek commented on FLINK-13308:
--

The older Python API was removed, so we don't have to worry about name clashes 
anymore, right?

> flink-python releases 2 jars
> 
>
> Key: FLINK-13308
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13308
> Project: Flink
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: API / Python, Build System
>Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
>Assignee: Dian Fu
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>
> {{flink-python}} uses a classifier to differentiate itseld from the old 
> python API. turns out thsi doesn't work since it still tries to release a 
> normal unshaded flink-python jar.
> We should drop the classifier, and either stick to flink-python or rename it 
> as proposed in FLINK-12776.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-13308) flink-python releases 2 jars

2019-07-17 Thread Dian Fu (JIRA) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16886978#comment-16886978
 ] 

Dian Fu commented on FLINK-13308:
-

Sounds good. I'll take this issue and provide a PR ASAP.

> flink-python releases 2 jars
> 
>
> Key: FLINK-13308
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13308
> Project: Flink
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: API / Python, Build System
>Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>
> {{flink-python}} uses a classifier to differentiate itseld from the old 
> python API. turns out thsi doesn't work since it still tries to release a 
> normal unshaded flink-python jar.
> We should drop the classifier, and either stick to flink-python or rename it 
> as proposed in FLINK-12776.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-13308) flink-python releases 2 jars

2019-07-17 Thread Chesnay Schepler (JIRA) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16886975#comment-16886975
 ] 

Chesnay Schepler commented on FLINK-13308:
--

We should drop the classifier in any case, making it a reasonable first step.

> flink-python releases 2 jars
> 
>
> Key: FLINK-13308
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13308
> Project: Flink
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: API / Python, Build System
>Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>
> {{flink-python}} uses a classifier to differentiate itseld from the old 
> python API. turns out thsi doesn't work since it still tries to release a 
> normal unshaded flink-python jar.
> We should drop the classifier, and either stick to flink-python or rename it 
> as proposed in FLINK-12776.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-13308) flink-python releases 2 jars

2019-07-17 Thread Dian Fu (JIRA) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16886965#comment-16886965
 ] 

Dian Fu commented on FLINK-13308:
-

Hi [~Zentol] Thanks a lot for opening this ticket. Either way makes sense to me 
and personally I'm in favor of dropping the classifier. Do you think it makes 
sense to you?

> flink-python releases 2 jars
> 
>
> Key: FLINK-13308
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13308
> Project: Flink
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: API / Python, Build System
>Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>
> {{flink-python}} uses a classifier to differentiate itseld from the old 
> python API. turns out thsi doesn't work since it still tries to release a 
> normal unshaded flink-python jar.
> We should drop the classifier, and either stick to flink-python or rename it 
> as proposed in FLINK-12776.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)