[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steven Zhen Wu updated FLINK-21364: --- Description: For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own custom source event type for Iceberg source. Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`. {code} public RequestSplitEvent( @Nullable String hostName, @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds) {code} was: For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own custom source event type for Iceberg source. Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`. ``` public RequestSplitEvent( @Nullable String hostName, @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds) ``` > piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent > --- > > Key: FLINK-21364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Connectors / Common >Affects Versions: 1.12.1 >Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu >Priority: Major > > For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track > the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough > ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support > pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own > custom source event type for Iceberg source. > Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`. > {code} > public RequestSplitEvent( > @Nullable String hostName, > @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds) > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ASF GitHub Bot updated FLINK-21364: --- Labels: pull-request-available (was: ) > piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent > --- > > Key: FLINK-21364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Connectors / Common >Affects Versions: 1.12.1 >Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > > For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track > the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough > ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support > pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own > custom source event type for Iceberg source. > Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`. > {code} > public RequestSplitEvent( > @Nullable String hostName, > @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds) > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-21364: --- Labels: pull-request-available stale-major (was: pull-request-available) > piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent > --- > > Key: FLINK-21364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Connectors / Common >Affects Versions: 1.12.1 >Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available, stale-major > > For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track > the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough > ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support > pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own > custom source event type for Iceberg source. > Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`. > {code} > public RequestSplitEvent( > @Nullable String hostName, > @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds) > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-21364: --- Priority: Minor (was: Major) > piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent > --- > > Key: FLINK-21364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Connectors / Common >Affects Versions: 1.12.1 >Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu >Priority: Minor > Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, pull-request-available > > For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track > the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough > ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support > pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own > custom source event type for Iceberg source. > Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`. > {code} > public RequestSplitEvent( > @Nullable String hostName, > @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds) > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-21364: --- Labels: auto-deprioritized-major pull-request-available (was: pull-request-available stale-major) > piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent > --- > > Key: FLINK-21364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Connectors / Common >Affects Versions: 1.12.1 >Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu >Priority: Major > Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, pull-request-available > > For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track > the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough > ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support > pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own > custom source event type for Iceberg source. > Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`. > {code} > public RequestSplitEvent( > @Nullable String hostName, > @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds) > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-21364: --- Labels: auto-deprioritized-major pull-request-available stale-minor (was: auto-deprioritized-major pull-request-available) I am the [Flink Jira Bot|https://github.com/apache/flink-jira-bot/] and I help the community manage its development. I see this issues has been marked as Minor but is unassigned and neither itself nor its Sub-Tasks have been updated for 180 days. I have gone ahead and marked it "stale-minor". If this ticket is still Minor, please either assign yourself or give an update. Afterwards, please remove the label or in 7 days the issue will be deprioritized. > piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent > --- > > Key: FLINK-21364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Connectors / Common >Affects Versions: 1.12.1 >Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu >Priority: Minor > Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, pull-request-available, > stale-minor > > For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track > the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough > ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support > pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own > custom source event type for Iceberg source. > Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`. > {code} > public RequestSplitEvent( > @Nullable String hostName, > @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds) > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-21364: --- Labels: auto-deprioritized-major auto-deprioritized-minor pull-request-available (was: auto-deprioritized-major pull-request-available stale-minor) Priority: Not a Priority (was: Minor) This issue was labeled "stale-minor" 7 days ago and has not received any updates so it is being deprioritized. If this ticket is actually Minor, please raise the priority and ask a committer to assign you the issue or revive the public discussion. > piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent > --- > > Key: FLINK-21364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Connectors / Common >Affects Versions: 1.12.1 >Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu >Priority: Not a Priority > Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, auto-deprioritized-minor, > pull-request-available > > For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track > the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough > ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support > pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own > custom source event type for Iceberg source. > Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`. > {code} > public RequestSplitEvent( > @Nullable String hostName, > @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds) > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)