[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Zhen Wu updated FLINK-21364:
---
Description:
For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track the
completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough
ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support
pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own
custom source event type for Iceberg source.
Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`.
{code}
public RequestSplitEvent(
@Nullable String hostName,
@Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds)
{code}
was:
For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track the
completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough
ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support
pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own
custom source event type for Iceberg source.
Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`.
```
public RequestSplitEvent(
@Nullable String hostName,
@Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds)
```
> piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
> ---
>
> Key: FLINK-21364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Connectors / Common
>Affects Versions: 1.12.1
>Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu
>Priority: Major
>
> For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track
> the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough
> ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support
> pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own
> custom source event type for Iceberg source.
> Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`.
> {code}
> public RequestSplitEvent(
> @Nullable String hostName,
> @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated FLINK-21364:
---
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
> ---
>
> Key: FLINK-21364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Connectors / Common
>Affects Versions: 1.12.1
>Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu
>Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track
> the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough
> ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support
> pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own
> custom source event type for Iceberg source.
> Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`.
> {code}
> public RequestSplitEvent(
> @Nullable String hostName,
> @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-21364:
---
Labels: pull-request-available stale-major (was: pull-request-available)
> piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
> ---
>
> Key: FLINK-21364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Connectors / Common
>Affects Versions: 1.12.1
>Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu
>Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available, stale-major
>
> For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track
> the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough
> ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support
> pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own
> custom source event type for Iceberg source.
> Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`.
> {code}
> public RequestSplitEvent(
> @Nullable String hostName,
> @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-21364:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
> ---
>
> Key: FLINK-21364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Connectors / Common
>Affects Versions: 1.12.1
>Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu
>Priority: Minor
> Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, pull-request-available
>
> For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track
> the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough
> ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support
> pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own
> custom source event type for Iceberg source.
> Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`.
> {code}
> public RequestSplitEvent(
> @Nullable String hostName,
> @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-21364:
---
Labels: auto-deprioritized-major pull-request-available (was:
pull-request-available stale-major)
> piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
> ---
>
> Key: FLINK-21364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Connectors / Common
>Affects Versions: 1.12.1
>Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu
>Priority: Major
> Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, pull-request-available
>
> For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track
> the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough
> ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support
> pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own
> custom source event type for Iceberg source.
> Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`.
> {code}
> public RequestSplitEvent(
> @Nullable String hostName,
> @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-21364:
---
Labels: auto-deprioritized-major pull-request-available stale-minor (was:
auto-deprioritized-major pull-request-available)
I am the [Flink Jira Bot|https://github.com/apache/flink-jira-bot/] and I help
the community manage its development. I see this issues has been marked as
Minor but is unassigned and neither itself nor its Sub-Tasks have been updated
for 180 days. I have gone ahead and marked it "stale-minor". If this ticket is
still Minor, please either assign yourself or give an update. Afterwards,
please remove the label or in 7 days the issue will be deprioritized.
> piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
> ---
>
> Key: FLINK-21364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Connectors / Common
>Affects Versions: 1.12.1
>Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu
>Priority: Minor
> Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, pull-request-available,
> stale-minor
>
> For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track
> the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough
> ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support
> pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own
> custom source event type for Iceberg source.
> Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`.
> {code}
> public RequestSplitEvent(
> @Nullable String hostName,
> @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21364) piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-21364:
---
Labels: auto-deprioritized-major auto-deprioritized-minor
pull-request-available (was: auto-deprioritized-major pull-request-available
stale-minor)
Priority: Not a Priority (was: Minor)
This issue was labeled "stale-minor" 7 days ago and has not received any
updates so it is being deprioritized. If this ticket is actually Minor, please
raise the priority and ask a committer to assign you the issue or revive the
public discussion.
> piggyback finishedSplitIds in RequestSplitEvent
> ---
>
> Key: FLINK-21364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21364
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Connectors / Common
>Affects Versions: 1.12.1
>Reporter: Steven Zhen Wu
>Priority: Not a Priority
> Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, auto-deprioritized-minor,
> pull-request-available
>
> For some split assignment strategy, the enumerator/assigner needs to track
> the completed splits to advance watermark for event time alignment or rough
> ordering. Right now, `RequestSplitEvent` for FLIP-27 source doesn't support
> pass-along of the `finishedSplitIds` info and hence we have to create our own
> custom source event type for Iceberg source.
> Here is the proposal of add such optional info to `RequestSplitEvent`.
> {code}
> public RequestSplitEvent(
> @Nullable String hostName,
> @Nullable Collection finishedSplitIds)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
