[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18056) Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline

2017-05-23 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16020868#comment-16020868
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-18056:


FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-HBASE-14614 #244 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-HBASE-14614/244/])
HBASE-18056 Make the default behavior of CompactionPipeline to merge it 
(anastas: rev 1520c8fd4dd70206ab1abdf3eed81d6dc302990b)
* (edit) 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/MemStoreCompactor.java


> Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-18056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
> Attachments: HBASE-18056-V01.patch
>
>
> Under HBASE-16417 it was decided that CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode should 
> merge multiple ImmutableSegments in CompactionPipeline. Basic+Merge actually 
> demonstrated reduction in GC, alongside improvement in other metrics.
> However, the limit on the number of segments in pipeline is still set to 30. 
> Under this JIRA it should be changed to 1, as it was tested under HBASE-16417.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18056) Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline

2017-05-21 Thread Anastasia Braginsky (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16018964#comment-16018964
 ] 

Anastasia Braginsky commented on HBASE-18056:
-

Dear [~anoop.hbase],

I would like to deeply apologize, as it looks like I disregarded your comments, 
while I didn't meant to. I saw no answer from you for about 3 days. I have 
committed this small change, before you raised your last comment. I didn't see 
your comment on time. I will make a comment next time before commit. 

I also just completely didn't see this issue as critical. We already had a long 
discussion and long benchmark and agreed about it on HBASE-16417. So happened 
that our conclusion there did not yet made it from theory to practice. I was 
surprised by myself to find this constant being not 1. I was sure it is already 
1. I saw it completely as a technical issue that doesn't need a discussion 
(because we already did all the discussions), so I didn't wait for 2 +1.

As it looks like you would like reopen this issue, I would suggest to leave the 
limit to be 1 for now, but when you finish your tests and present your results, 
showing any other conclusion than our, we will just change the constant. What 
do you think? Or you think this need to be reverted?

Thanks,
Anastasia

> Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-18056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
> Attachments: HBASE-18056-V01.patch
>
>
> Under HBASE-16417 it was decided that CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode should 
> merge multiple ImmutableSegments in CompactionPipeline. Basic+Merge actually 
> demonstrated reduction in GC, alongside improvement in other metrics.
> However, the limit on the number of segments in pipeline is still set to 30. 
> Under this JIRA it should be changed to 1, as it was tested under HBASE-16417.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18056) Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline

2017-05-21 Thread Edward Bortnikov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16018956#comment-16018956
 ] 

Edward Bortnikov commented on HBASE-18056:
--

Friends, 

I'm having a hard time understanding why this commit became a big deal :) We 
made a mistake. This parameter change should have been committed together with 
BASIC compaction becoming the default configuration. BASIC does not make sense 
without it. We presented a vey extensive perf evaluation exactly with this 
parameter value. It demonstrated improvement in all the operational metrics, GC 
included. The parameter should be not accessible to users; it is not documented 
in the reference manual; its sole purpose is developer flexibility. 

It is perfectly okay to re-open the discussion (and also revert the setting) 
once there is solid proof that something is broken. But we didn't see any such 
proof yet. Delaying without reason jeopardizes the feature, especially in 
anticipation of release.

Just saying it again - we made a technical mistake, and we are fixing it now. 
There is no new data.  

What is it that I get wrong? Thanks. 

> Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-18056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
> Attachments: HBASE-18056-V01.patch
>
>
> Under HBASE-16417 it was decided that CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode should 
> merge multiple ImmutableSegments in CompactionPipeline. Basic+Merge actually 
> demonstrated reduction in GC, alongside improvement in other metrics.
> However, the limit on the number of segments in pipeline is still set to 30. 
> Under this JIRA it should be changed to 1, as it was tested under HBASE-16417.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18056) Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline

2017-05-21 Thread Anoop Sam John (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16018926#comment-16018926
 ] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18056:


Is this committed already?
1. I have raised a concern already (before also) on 1 being the default value 
for the pipeline threshold for the merge
2. It is a practice to write comment abt the commit and close the issue while 
committing
3. For this kind of  critical changes, it would be better to wait for at least 
2 +1s

> Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-18056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
> Attachments: HBASE-18056-V01.patch
>
>
> Under HBASE-16417 it was decided that CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode should 
> merge multiple ImmutableSegments in CompactionPipeline. Basic+Merge actually 
> demonstrated reduction in GC, alongside improvement in other metrics.
> However, the limit on the number of segments in pipeline is still set to 30. 
> Under this JIRA it should be changed to 1, as it was tested under HBASE-16417.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18056) Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline

2017-05-21 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16018881#comment-16018881
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-18056:


SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #3051 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/3051/])
HBASE-18056 Make the default behavior of CompactionPipeline to merge it 
(anastas: rev 1520c8fd4dd70206ab1abdf3eed81d6dc302990b)
* (edit) 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/MemStoreCompactor.java


> Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-18056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
> Attachments: HBASE-18056-V01.patch
>
>
> Under HBASE-16417 it was decided that CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode should 
> merge multiple ImmutableSegments in CompactionPipeline. Basic+Merge actually 
> demonstrated reduction in GC, alongside improvement in other metrics.
> However, the limit on the number of segments in pipeline is still set to 30. 
> Under this JIRA it should be changed to 1, as it was tested under HBASE-16417.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18056) Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline

2017-05-21 Thread Anoop Sam John (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16018807#comment-16018807
 ] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18056:


This patch changes the threshold to 1 (default value) which is too low.  Am not 
in favor of a change to 1 any way.  Will be testing this in coming days.

> Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-18056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
> Attachments: HBASE-18056-V01.patch
>
>
> Under HBASE-16417 it was decided that CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode should 
> merge multiple ImmutableSegments in CompactionPipeline. Basic+Merge actually 
> demonstrated reduction in GC, alongside improvement in other metrics.
> However, the limit on the number of segments in pipeline is still set to 30. 
> Under this JIRA it should be changed to 1, as it was tested under HBASE-16417.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18056) Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline

2017-05-21 Thread Eshcar Hillel (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16018768#comment-16018768
 ] 

Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18056:
---

I think we are missing the point here.
The original need for merge in the pipeline was the degradation in *read* 
performance when we didn't use merge.
The GC is not the issue here, but for sure we demonstrated in the benchmark 
that doing merge is not increasing GC and has no negative effect on write 
performance 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16417?focusedCommentId=15929565&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15929565
 
Using/not using MSLABs is also not the issue here since the merge is only at 
the index level, it doesn't remove duplicates and its affect is the same 
whether data is stored on MSLABs or not.

+1 for this patch, it is only pushing a solution we already agreed on.
Without it we have a problem with the high percentiles of reads, and I didn't 
see any reasonable explanation or evidence that it causes any  issues in any 
other settings.

> Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-18056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
> Attachments: HBASE-18056-V01.patch
>
>
> Under HBASE-16417 it was decided that CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode should 
> merge multiple ImmutableSegments in CompactionPipeline. Basic+Merge actually 
> demonstrated reduction in GC, alongside improvement in other metrics.
> However, the limit on the number of segments in pipeline is still set to 30. 
> Under this JIRA it should be changed to 1, as it was tested under HBASE-16417.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18056) Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline

2017-05-18 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16015672#comment-16015672
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-18056:
---

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 3m 
52s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 37s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
48s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
14s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 
51s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 29s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
44s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 39s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 39s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
48s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
15s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green} 
31m 47s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 
2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 2.6.5 2.7.1 2.7.2 2.7.3 or 3.0.0-alpha2. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m 
23s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 32s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 123m 5s 
{color} | {color:green} hbase-server in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
32s {color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 169m 14s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.12.3 Server=1.12.3 Image:yetus/hbase:757bf37 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12868713/HBASE-18056-V01.patch 
|
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-18056 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  javac  javadoc  unit  findbugs  hadoopcheck  
hbaseanti  checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux b58289cfe46b 3.13.0-106-generic #153-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 6 
15:44:32 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
 |
| git revision | master / 32d2062 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_131 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6828/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hbase-server U: hbase-server |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6828/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.3.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-18056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18056) Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline

2017-05-18 Thread Anastasia Braginsky (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16015485#comment-16015485
 ] 

Anastasia Braginsky commented on HBASE-18056:
-

When 2 segments are merged together only CellArrayMap is rebuilt, all the cells 
remain in place whether on MSLAB or on JVM heap. 
Regarding why GC works better with merge, we have a theory, and this theory is 
supported with performance numbers. Of course we cannot ensure this theory in 
100%.

So this is the theory:
In case of merge, let's say each of old CellArayMaps was of size 1KB and new 
CellArrayMap has size 2KB. So 2KB are released to GC now. Later the same 
happens five times again and we release 5KB (1KB at each point in time). 
Finally, when flushing to disk we release 7KB in one piece. While without merge 
we release 7 pieces of 1KB. So although in total there is more memory to 
collect, we believe that it is easier to GC to grasp the situation when memory 
is released over time and in one piece, in contrast to single release with 
multiple pieces.

I am putting a patch here to see the QA results.

> Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-18056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
> Attachments: HBASE-18056-V01.patch
>
>
> Under HBASE-16417 it was decided that CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode should 
> merge multiple ImmutableSegments in CompactionPipeline. Basic+Merge actually 
> demonstrated reduction in GC, alongside improvement in other metrics.
> However, the limit on the number of segments in pipeline is still set to 30. 
> Under this JIRA it should be changed to 1, as it was tested under HBASE-16417.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18056) Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline

2017-05-17 Thread Anoop Sam John (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16013855#comment-16013855
 ] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18056:


bq. It reduces GC because the segments memory is garbage collected gradually 
and not all together in time of flush. 
Sorry am not getting this point. Here as per the proposed change, say 2 or more 
segments in pipeline getting compacted together into a larger one right?  So 2 
or more segments as such going away but a new bigger one is still there right?  
What is the memory getting GCed here? I may be missing some thing

> Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-18056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
>
> Under HBASE-16417 it was decided that CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode should 
> merge multiple ImmutableSegments in CompactionPipeline. Basic+Merge actually 
> demonstrated reduction in GC, alongside improvement in other metrics.
> However, the limit on the number of segments in pipeline is still set to 30. 
> Under this JIRA it should be changed to 1, as it was tested under HBASE-16417.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18056) Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline

2017-05-17 Thread Anastasia Braginsky (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16013797#comment-16013797
 ] 

Anastasia Braginsky commented on HBASE-18056:
-

[~anoop.hbase], we have already done performance tests and we saw merge makes 
situation better. What is the JIRA number where you explain the problems you 
see? Why do you think the merge will make situation worse there? The merge is 
of CellArrayMaps only and is not related to MSLAB at all.

bq. Reduction in GC when there are duplicated data right? PE kind of work load 
where each of the data is diff key, how come this merge will reduce GC?

No, without duplicates. It reduces GC because the segments memory is garbage 
collected gradually and not all together in time of flush. But the performance 
numbers speak by themselves.

> Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-18056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
>
> Under HBASE-16417 it was decided that CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode should 
> merge multiple ImmutableSegments in CompactionPipeline. Basic+Merge actually 
> demonstrated reduction in GC, alongside improvement in other metrics.
> However, the limit on the number of segments in pipeline is still set to 30. 
> Under this JIRA it should be changed to 1, as it was tested under HBASE-16417.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18056) Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline

2017-05-16 Thread Anoop Sam John (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16012475#comment-16012475
 ] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18056:


Reduction in GC when there are duplicated data right?  PE kind of work load 
where each of the data is diff key, how come this merge will reduce GC?

> Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-18056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
>
> Under HBASE-16417 it was decided that CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode should 
> merge multiple ImmutableSegments in CompactionPipeline. Basic+Merge actually 
> demonstrated reduction in GC, alongside improvement in other metrics.
> However, the limit on the number of segments in pipeline is still set to 30. 
> Under this JIRA it should be changed to 1, as it was tested under HBASE-16417.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18056) Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline

2017-05-16 Thread Anoop Sam John (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16012473#comment-16012473
 ] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18056:


Will need many rounds of perf test before doing this.  With and with out MSLAB 
and pool (All possible options that we give).. Already I have an issue with 
MSLAB pool and high IHOP. (mentioned details and possible cause in another 
jira). The merge will make the situation worse there. Will do more tests around 
this. Already doing some.

> Change CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode to merge multiple segments in pipeline
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-18056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18056
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
>
> Under HBASE-16417 it was decided that CompactingMemStore in BASIC mode should 
> merge multiple ImmutableSegments in CompactionPipeline. Basic+Merge actually 
> demonstrated reduction in GC, alongside improvement in other metrics.
> However, the limit on the number of segments in pipeline is still set to 30. 
> Under this JIRA it should be changed to 1, as it was tested under HBASE-16417.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)