[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-3670) Fix error handling in get(ListGet gets)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13030207#comment-13030207 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-3670: --- Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #1909 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/HBase-TRUNK/1909/]) Fix error handling in get(ListGet gets) - Key: HBASE-3670 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3670 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Components: client Affects Versions: 0.92.0 Reporter: Lars George Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria Fix For: 0.92.0 Attachments: HBASE-3670.r1.diff See HBASE-3634 for details. The get(ListGet gets) call needs to catch (or rather use a try/finally) the exception thrown by batch() and copy the Result instances over and return it. If that is not intended then we need to fix the JavaDoc in HTableInterface to reflect the new behavior. In general it seems to make sense to check the various methods (list based put, get, delete compared to batch) and agree on the correct behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-3670) Fix error handling in get(ListGet gets)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13027478#comment-13027478 ] Harsh J Chouraria commented on HBASE-3670: -- Filed HBASE-3841 for the HTI vs. HT issue. Fix error handling in get(ListGet gets) - Key: HBASE-3670 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3670 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Components: client Affects Versions: 0.92.0 Reporter: Lars George Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria Fix For: 0.92.0 Attachments: HBASE-3670.r1.diff See HBASE-3634 for details. The get(ListGet gets) call needs to catch (or rather use a try/finally) the exception thrown by batch() and copy the Result instances over and return it. If that is not intended then we need to fix the JavaDoc in HTableInterface to reflect the new behavior. In general it seems to make sense to check the various methods (list based put, get, delete compared to batch) and agree on the correct behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-3670) Fix error handling in get(ListGet gets)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13024942#comment-13024942 ] Harsh J Chouraria commented on HBASE-3670: -- Ok, I believe if we mention an exception is thrown it is alright (its always better the dev knows the causes of a failure). Perhaps we can add it as an @throws along with IOExceptions, but am not sure if that's considered as API breakage. I'm now confused on what class of docs to change here, the HTableInterface or the HTable itself? Both have duplicate logs at places, and different in some. Fix error handling in get(ListGet gets) - Key: HBASE-3670 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3670 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Components: client Affects Versions: 0.92.0 Reporter: Lars George Fix For: 0.92.0 See HBASE-3634 for details. The get(ListGet gets) call needs to catch (or rather use a try/finally) the exception thrown by batch() and copy the Result instances over and return it. If that is not intended then we need to fix the JavaDoc in HTableInterface to reflect the new behavior. In general it seems to make sense to check the various methods (list based put, get, delete compared to batch) and agree on the correct behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-3670) Fix error handling in get(ListGet gets)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13024948#comment-13024948 ] stack commented on HBASE-3670: -- It won't break the API if what you add is subclass of IOE. Change HTI I'd say. Maybe file another issue if HTI and HT differ. Doc should be in one only (FYI, HTI came after HT). Fix error handling in get(ListGet gets) - Key: HBASE-3670 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3670 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Components: client Affects Versions: 0.92.0 Reporter: Lars George Fix For: 0.92.0 See HBASE-3634 for details. The get(ListGet gets) call needs to catch (or rather use a try/finally) the exception thrown by batch() and copy the Result instances over and return it. If that is not intended then we need to fix the JavaDoc in HTableInterface to reflect the new behavior. In general it seems to make sense to check the various methods (list based put, get, delete compared to batch) and agree on the correct behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-3670) Fix error handling in get(ListGet gets)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13023539#comment-13023539 ] Harsh J Chouraria commented on HBASE-3670: -- The other batch(...) method states that it would put nulls AND throw an exception. But it doesn't seem to be in use anywhere now. Shall I update the used batch API to reflect the one that's unused-but-correct? Fix error handling in get(ListGet gets) - Key: HBASE-3670 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3670 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Components: client Affects Versions: 0.92.0 Reporter: Lars George Fix For: 0.92.0 See HBASE-3634 for details. The get(ListGet gets) call needs to catch (or rather use a try/finally) the exception thrown by batch() and copy the Result instances over and return it. If that is not intended then we need to fix the JavaDoc in HTableInterface to reflect the new behavior. In general it seems to make sense to check the various methods (list based put, get, delete compared to batch) and agree on the correct behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
