[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13797773#comment-13797773
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9689:
--
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12608896/HBASE-9689_3.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 3 new
or modified tests.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
2.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:red}-1 site{color}. The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to
fail.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7576//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7576//console
This message is automatically generated.
Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
--
Key: HBASE-9689
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
Fix For: 0.98.0
Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689_2.patch,
HBASE-9689_3.patch, HBASE-9689.patch
Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation
Attributes through shell.
It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a
full fledged support using shell.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13798057#comment-13798057 ] stack commented on HBASE-9689: -- I skimmed the patch. Looks good. Thanks for going back and making it so we don't break BC. Support using OperationAttributes through shell script -- Key: HBASE-9689 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.98.0 Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689_2.patch, HBASE-9689_3.patch, HBASE-9689.patch Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation Attributes through shell. It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a full fledged support using shell. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13798059#comment-13798059 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-9689: --- +1 on latest patch, thanks Ram Support using OperationAttributes through shell script -- Key: HBASE-9689 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.98.0 Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689_2.patch, HBASE-9689_3.patch, HBASE-9689.patch Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation Attributes through shell. It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a full fledged support using shell. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13798096#comment-13798096 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-9689: --- LGTM Support using OperationAttributes through shell script -- Key: HBASE-9689 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.98.0 Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689_2.patch, HBASE-9689_3.patch, HBASE-9689.patch Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation Attributes through shell. It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a full fledged support using shell. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13798457#comment-13798457 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-9689: --- FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #4625 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/4625/]) HBASE-9689-Support using OperationAttributes through shell script (Ram) (ramkrishna: rev 1533174) * /hbase/trunk/hbase-shell/src/main/ruby/hbase.rb * /hbase/trunk/hbase-shell/src/main/ruby/hbase/table.rb * /hbase/trunk/hbase-shell/src/main/ruby/shell/commands/get.rb * /hbase/trunk/hbase-shell/src/main/ruby/shell/commands/put.rb * /hbase/trunk/hbase-shell/src/main/ruby/shell/commands/scan.rb * /hbase/trunk/hbase-shell/src/test/ruby/hbase/table_test.rb Support using OperationAttributes through shell script -- Key: HBASE-9689 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.98.0 Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689_2.patch, HBASE-9689_3.patch, HBASE-9689.patch Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation Attributes through shell. It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a full fledged support using shell. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13798786#comment-13798786 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-9689: --- FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0 #797 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0/797/]) HBASE-9689-Support using OperationAttributes through shell script (Ram) (ramkrishna: rev 1533174) * /hbase/trunk/hbase-shell/src/main/ruby/hbase.rb * /hbase/trunk/hbase-shell/src/main/ruby/hbase/table.rb * /hbase/trunk/hbase-shell/src/main/ruby/shell/commands/get.rb * /hbase/trunk/hbase-shell/src/main/ruby/shell/commands/put.rb * /hbase/trunk/hbase-shell/src/main/ruby/shell/commands/scan.rb * /hbase/trunk/hbase-shell/src/test/ruby/hbase/table_test.rb Support using OperationAttributes through shell script -- Key: HBASE-9689 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.98.0 Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689_2.patch, HBASE-9689_3.patch, HBASE-9689.patch Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation Attributes through shell. It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a full fledged support using shell. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13796656#comment-13796656
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9689:
--
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12608555/HBASE-9689_2.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 3 new
or modified tests.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
2.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:red}-1 site{color}. The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to
fail.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7563//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7563//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7563//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7563//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7563//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7563//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7563//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7563//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7563//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7563//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7563//console
This message is automatically generated.
Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
--
Key: HBASE-9689
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
Fix For: 0.98.0
Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689_2.patch, HBASE-9689.patch
Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation
Attributes through shell.
It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a
full fledged support using shell.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13797129#comment-13797129 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-9689: --- bq. What i meant was Timstamp cannot be specified as per the older way Yes, that was my question exactly. So if anyone wants to use the shell to test puts, including messing with timestamps, and has learned the old way, after this change now what they know will not work. I am wondering if there is a way to keep the old way of specifying timestamps as an alternative. Of course it's fine that if someone wants to set operation attributes, that the old way won't work _for that case_. Support using OperationAttributes through shell script -- Key: HBASE-9689 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.98.0 Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689_2.patch, HBASE-9689.patch Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation Attributes through shell. It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a full fledged support using shell. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13797619#comment-13797619 ] stack commented on HBASE-9689: -- What Andrew asks; aren't there places in our ruby code where we look at the type? If a number, consider it a timestamp and if a map, treat it as attributes? Support using OperationAttributes through shell script -- Key: HBASE-9689 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.98.0 Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689_2.patch, HBASE-9689.patch Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation Attributes through shell. It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a full fledged support using shell. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13797633#comment-13797633 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-9689: --- bq.a number, consider it a timestamp and if a map, treat it as attributes? I did this.. but the attributes became a single string mykeymyvalue rather than a map type. Ok I will check for someother workaround. Thanks a lot for the reviews. Support using OperationAttributes through shell script -- Key: HBASE-9689 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.98.0 Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689_2.patch, HBASE-9689.patch Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation Attributes through shell. It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a full fledged support using shell. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13795535#comment-13795535 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-9689: --- bq. So this change is a new behaviour for specifying puts. There is no way to have a backwards compatible put command that does not take an attributes hash, just a timestamp? It's fine if timestamp has to be specified as part of the attribute hash if one is present. Support using OperationAttributes through shell script -- Key: HBASE-9689 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.98.0 Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689_2.patch, HBASE-9689.patch Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation Attributes through shell. It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a full fledged support using shell. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13796400#comment-13796400
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-9689:
---
[~apurtell]
bq.There is no way to have a backwards compatible put command that does not
take an attributes hash, just a timestamp
You can do that.
{code}
put 't1', 'r1', 'c1', 'value', {TIMESTAMP=100}
{code}
What i meant was Timstamp cannot be specified as per the older way
{code}
put 't1','r1','value',ts
{code}
The problem is put accepts a set of parameters. So if we avoid the ts
parameter and specify the ATTRIBUTE instead the timestamp is taken as
'mykeymyvalue'.
Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
--
Key: HBASE-9689
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
Fix For: 0.98.0
Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689_2.patch, HBASE-9689.patch
Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation
Attributes through shell.
It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a
full fledged support using shell.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13794587#comment-13794587 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-9689: --- +1 patch looks ok, would be good to have coverage in TestShell for this Support using OperationAttributes through shell script -- Key: HBASE-9689 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.98.0 Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689.patch Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation Attributes through shell. It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a full fledged support using shell. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13794867#comment-13794867
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-9689:
---
Looks good
{code}
+ # Apply user metadata to table/column descriptor
+def set_scan_attributes(scan, attributes)
{code}
Correct the comment pls. Seems copy paste :)
set_scan_attributes, set_get_attributes, set_put_attributes seems same code
repeating. We can make this one def?
Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
--
Key: HBASE-9689
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
Fix For: 0.98.0
Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689.patch
Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation
Attributes through shell.
It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a
full fledged support using shell.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13790202#comment-13790202
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9689:
--
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12607534/HBASE-9689_1.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
2.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:red}-1 site{color}. The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to
fail.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestCheckTestClasses
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7499//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7499//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7499//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7499//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7499//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7499//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7499//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7499//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7499//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7499//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7499//console
This message is automatically generated.
Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
--
Key: HBASE-9689
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
Fix For: 0.98.0
Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689.patch
Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation
Attributes through shell.
It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a
full fledged support using shell.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13790210#comment-13790210 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-9689: --- Testcase failure not related to this patch. Support using OperationAttributes through shell script -- Key: HBASE-9689 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.98.0 Attachments: HBASE-9689_1.patch, HBASE-9689.patch Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation Attributes through shell. It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a full fledged support using shell. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13789186#comment-13789186
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9689:
--
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12607350/HBASE-9689.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
2.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:red}-1 site{color}. The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to
fail.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7489//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7489//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7489//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7489//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7489//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7489//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7489//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7489//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7489//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7489//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7489//console
This message is automatically generated.
Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
--
Key: HBASE-9689
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
Fix For: 0.98.0
Attachments: HBASE-9689.patch
Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation
Attributes through shell.
It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a
full fledged support using shell.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9689) Support using OperationAttributes through shell script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13785997#comment-13785997 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-9689: --- Can support specifying attrs while get/scan also. +1 for the requirement Support using OperationAttributes through shell script -- Key: HBASE-9689 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9689 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.98.0 Currently the ruby scripts for Put does not support setting of Operation Attributes through shell. It may be useful in some cases and also for testing. And that would give a full fledged support using shell. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
