[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-13286) Minimum timeout for a rpc call could be 1 ms instead of 2 seconds
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-13286: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.0) 2.0.0 > Minimum timeout for a rpc call could be 1 ms instead of 2 seconds > - > > Key: HBASE-13286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13286 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Client >Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 0.98.12 >Reporter: Nicolas Liochon >Assignee: Nicolas Liochon >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > Attachments: 13286.patch > > > There is a check in the client to be sure that we don't use a timeout of zero > (i.e. infinite). This includes setting the minimal time out for a rpc timeout > to 2 seconds. However, it makes sense for some calls (typically gets going to > the cache) to have much lower timeouts. So it's better to do the check vs. > zero but with a minimal timeout of 1. > I fixed a typo & a wrong comment in this patch as well. I don't understand > this code: > {code} > // t could be a RemoteException so go around again. > translateException(t); // We don't use the result? > {code} > but may be it's good. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-13286) Minimum timeout for a rpc call could be 1 ms instead of 2 seconds
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicolas Liochon updated HBASE-13286: Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) committed to master, thanks for the reviews! > Minimum timeout for a rpc call could be 1 ms instead of 2 seconds > - > > Key: HBASE-13286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13286 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Client >Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 0.98.12 >Reporter: Nicolas Liochon >Assignee: Nicolas Liochon >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > Attachments: 13286.patch > > > There is a check in the client to be sure that we don't use a timeout of zero > (i.e. infinite). This includes setting the minimal time out for a rpc timeout > to 2 seconds. However, it makes sense for some calls (typically gets going to > the cache) to have much lower timeouts. So it's better to do the check vs. > zero but with a minimal timeout of 1. > I fixed a typo & a wrong comment in this patch as well. I don't understand > this code: > {code} > // t could be a RemoteException so go around again. > translateException(t); // We don't use the result? > {code} > but may be it's good. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-13286) Minimum timeout for a rpc call could be 1 ms instead of 2 seconds
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicolas Liochon updated HBASE-13286: Description: There is a check in the client to be sure that we don't use a timeout of zero (i.e. infinite). This includes setting the minimal time out for a rpc timeout to 2 seconds. However, it makes sense for some calls (typically gets going to the cache) to have much lower timeouts. So it's better to do the check vs. zero but with a minimal timeout of 1. I fixed a typo & a wrong comment in this patch as well. I don't understand this code: {code} // t could be a RemoteException so go around again. translateException(t); // We don't use the result? {code} but may be it's good. was: There is a check in the client to be sure that we don't use a timeout of zero (i.e. infinite). This includes setting the minimal time out for a rpc timeout to 2 seconds. However, it makes sense for some calls (typically gets going to the cache) to have much lower timeouts. So it's better to do the check vs. zero but with a minimal timeout of 0. I fixed a typo & a wrong comment in this patch as well. I don't understand this code: {code} // t could be a RemoteException so go around again. translateException(t); // We don't use the result? {code} but may be it's good. > Minimum timeout for a rpc call could be 1 ms instead of 2 seconds > - > > Key: HBASE-13286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13286 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Client >Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 0.98.12 >Reporter: Nicolas Liochon >Assignee: Nicolas Liochon >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > Attachments: 13286.patch > > > There is a check in the client to be sure that we don't use a timeout of zero > (i.e. infinite). This includes setting the minimal time out for a rpc timeout > to 2 seconds. However, it makes sense for some calls (typically gets going to > the cache) to have much lower timeouts. So it's better to do the check vs. > zero but with a minimal timeout of 1. > I fixed a typo & a wrong comment in this patch as well. I don't understand > this code: > {code} > // t could be a RemoteException so go around again. > translateException(t); // We don't use the result? > {code} > but may be it's good. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-13286) Minimum timeout for a rpc call could be 1 ms instead of 2 seconds
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicolas Liochon updated HBASE-13286: Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Minimum timeout for a rpc call could be 1 ms instead of 2 seconds > - > > Key: HBASE-13286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13286 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Client >Affects Versions: 0.98.12, 1.0.0 >Reporter: Nicolas Liochon >Assignee: Nicolas Liochon >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > Attachments: 13286.patch > > > There is a check in the client to be sure that we don't use a timeout of zero > (i.e. infinite). This includes setting the minimal time out for a rpc timeout > to 2 seconds. However, it makes sense for some calls (typically gets going to > the cache) to have much lower timeouts. So it's better to do the check vs. > zero but with a minimal timeout of 0. > I fixed a typo & a wrong comment in this patch as well. I don't understand > this code: > {code} > // t could be a RemoteException so go around again. > translateException(t); // We don't use the result? > {code} > but may be it's good. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-13286) Minimum timeout for a rpc call could be 1 ms instead of 2 seconds
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicolas Liochon updated HBASE-13286: Attachment: 13286.patch > Minimum timeout for a rpc call could be 1 ms instead of 2 seconds > - > > Key: HBASE-13286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13286 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Client >Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 0.98.12 >Reporter: Nicolas Liochon >Assignee: Nicolas Liochon >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > Attachments: 13286.patch > > > There is a check in the client to be sure that we don't use a timeout of zero > (i.e. infinite). This includes setting the minimal time out for a rpc timeout > to 2 seconds. However, it makes sense for some calls (typically gets going to > the cache) to have much lower timeouts. So it's better to do the check vs. > zero but with a minimal timeout of 0. > I fixed a typo & a wrong comment in this patch as well. I don't understand > this code: > {code} > // t could be a RemoteException so go around again. > translateException(t); // We don't use the result? > {code} > but may be it's good. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)